Characterization and Associated Costs of Constipation Relating to Exposure to Strong Opioids in England: An Observational Study.

PURPOSE: Opioid use is associated with gastrointestinal adverse events, including nausea and constipation. We used a real-world dataset to characterize the health care burden associated with opioid-induced constipation (OIC) with particular emphasis on strong opioids. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study was conducted using the Clinical Practice Research Datalink, a large UK primary care dataset linked to hospital data. Patients prescribed opioids during 2016 were selected and episodes of opioid therapy constructed. Episodes with ≥84 days of exposure were classified as chronic, with date of first prescription as the index date. The main analysis focused on patients prescribed strong opioids who were laxative naive. Constipation was defined by ≥2 laxative prescriptions during the opioid episode. Patients for whom initial laxative therapy escalated by switch, augmentation, or dose were defined as OIC unstable, and the first 3 lines of OIC escalation were classified. Health care costs accrued in the first 12 months of the opioid episode were aggregated and compared. FINDINGS: A total of 27,629 opioid episodes were identified; 5916 (21.4%) involved a strong opioid for patients who were previously laxative naive. Of these patients, 2886 (48.8%) were defined as the OIC population; 941 (33.26%) were classified as stable. Of the 1945 (67.4%) episodes classified as unstable, 849 (43.7%), 360 (18.5%), and 736 (37.8%) had 1, 2, and ≥3 changes of laxative prescription, respectively. Patients without OIC had lower costs per patient year (£3822 [US$5160/€4242]) compared with OIC (£4786 [US$6461/€5312]). Costs increased as patients had multiple changes in therapy: £4696 (US$6340/€5213), £4749 (US$6411/€5271), and £4981 (US$6724/€5529) for 1, 2, and ≥3 changes, respectively. The adjusted cost ratio relative to non-OIC was 1.14 (95% CI, 1.09-1.32) for those classified as stable and 1.19 (95% CI, 1.09-1.32) for those with ≥3 laxative changes. Similar patterns were observed for patients taking anyopioid, with costs increased for those classified as having OIC (£3727 [US$5031/€4137] vs £2379 [US$3212 /€2641),and for those patients classified as unstable versus stable (£3931 [US$5307/€4363] vs £3432 [US$4633/€3810). Costs increased with each additional line of therapy from £3701 (US$4996/€4108), £3916 (US$5287/€4347), and £4318 (US$5829/€4793). IMPLICATIONS: OIC was a common adverse event of opioid treatment and was poorly controlled for a large number of patients. Poor control was associated with increased health care costs. The impact of OIC should be considered when prescribing opioids. These results should be interpreted with consideration of the caveats associated with the analysis of routine data.

What is the impact of GOLD 2017 recommendations in primary care? - a descriptive study of patient classifications, treatment burden and costs.

PURPOSE: The changes in grading of disease severity and treatment recommendations for patients with COPD in the 2017 GOLD strategy may present an opportunity for reducing treatment burden for the patients and costs to the health care system. The aim of this study was to assess the implications of the GOLD 2017 grading system in terms of change in distribution across GOLD groups A-D for existing patients in UK primary care and estimate the potential cost savings of implementing GOLD 2017 treatment recommendations in UK primary care. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Using electronic health record data from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD), patients aged ≥35 years with spirometry-confirmed COPD, receiving care during 2016, were included. The cohort was graded according to the GOLD 2017 groups (A-D), and treatment costs were calculated, according to corresponding recommendations, to observe the difference in actual vs predicted costs. RESULTS: When applying GOLD 2013 criteria, less than half of the cohort (46%) was assigned to GOLD A or B, as compared to 86% when applying the GOLD 2017 grading. The actual mean annual maintenance treatment cost was £542 per patient vs a predicted £389 for treatment according to the 2017 GOLD strategy. CONCLUSION: There is a potential to make significant cost savings by implementing the grading and treatment recommendations from the 2017 GOLD strategy.

Evaluation of the cost-effectiveness of rifaximin-α for the management of patients with hepatic encephalopathy in the United Kingdom.

OBJECTIVE: Rifaximin-α 550 mg twice daily plus lactulose has demonstrated efficacy in reducing recurrence of episodes of overt hepatic encephalopathy (OHE) and the risk of hepatic encephalopathy (HE)-related hospitalizations compared with lactulose alone. This analysis estimated the cost effectiveness of rifaximin-α 550 mg twice daily plus lactulose versus lactulose alone in United Kingdom (UK) cirrhotic patients with OHE. METHOD: A Markov model was built to estimate the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). The perspective was that of the UK National Health Service (NHS). Clinical data was sourced from a randomized controlled trial (RCT) and an open-label maintenance study in cirrhotic patients in remission from recurrent episodes of OHE. Health-related utility was estimated indirectly from disease-specific quality of life RCT data. Resource use data describing the impact of rifaximin-α on hospital admissions and length of stay for cirrhotic patients with OHE was from four single-center UK audits. Costs (2012) were derived from published sources; costs and benefits were discounted at 3.5%. The base-case time horizon was 5 years. RESULTS: The average cost per patient was £22,971 in the rifaximin-α plus lactulose arm and £23,545 in the lactulose arm, a saving of £573. The corresponding values for benefit were 2.35 quality adjusted life years (QALYs) and 1.83 QALYs per person, a difference of 0.52 QALYs. This translated into a dominant base-case ICER. Key parameters that impacted the ICER included number of hospital admissions and length of stay. CONCLUSION: Rifaximin-α 550 mg twice daily in patients with recurrent episodes of OHE was estimated to generate cost savings and improved clinical outcomes compared to standard care over 5 years.

An estimate of the economic burden of vitamin D deficiency in pregnant women in the United Kingdom.

Pregnancy is associated with an increased risk of vitamin D deficiency beyond that of the general population. The aim of the current analysis was to synthesize the current evidence on the dose-outcome relationship of vitamin D/serum 25 hydroxyvitamin D (25-OHD) and complications during pregnancy. An additional aim was to estimate the economic burden attributable to inadequate levels of serum 25-OHD. Published literature on the effects of vitamin D supplementation/serum 25-OHD on pregnancy complications, including randomized control trials and non-interventional studies, was searched in bibliographic databases including Pubmed, Google Scholar, Scopus and EMBASE. A positive and significant treatment effect was obtained for pre-eclampsia (OR = 0.75 95% CI 0.662-0.843), but not for preterm birth (OR = 0.783, 95% CI 0.49-1.251) or small for gestational age (OR = 0.76 95% CI 0.38-1.28). Inadequate vitamin D accounted for 14.04% of risk for pre-eclampsia. It is estimated that addressing vitamin D inadequacy in pregnant women in England and Wales would reduce the number of cases of pre-eclampsia by 4126; and would result in a net saving of £18.6 million for the NHS in England and Wales. The current results suggest that based on current evidence a public health policy preventing vitamin D inadequacy in pregnant women is likely to have a positive impact on the NHS budget in England and Wales. This is contingent upon further evidence regarding the vitamin D dose-pregnancy outcome relationship becoming available.

Cost-Effectiveness of Capsaicin 8% Patch Compared with Pregabalin for the Treatment of Patients with Peripheral Neuropathic Pain in Scotland.

We evaluated the cost-effectiveness of capsaicin 8% patch (QUTENZA™) versus pregabalin in patients with PNP from the perspective of the National Health Service (NHS) and Personal and Social Services in Scotland, UK. A decision-tree cost-effectiveness model was developed for non-diabetic patients with peripheral neuropathic pain (PNP) who were pregabalin-naïve and had not achieved adequate pain relief or tolerated conventional first- or second-line treatments. Patients entering the model received either a single application of capsaicin 8% patch or titrated daily dosing with pregabalin; after 8 weeks patients were classified as responders, non-responders, or were assumed to discontinue treatment due to intolerable adverse events. Responders continued to receive baseline treatment at intervals observed in clinical practice. Non-responders and those who discontinued treatment were assumed to receive last-line therapy (duloxetine). The base-case time horizon was 2 years. Model inputs for effectiveness, discontinuations and health-state utilities were taken from a head-to-head non-inferiority study (ELEVATE, NCT01713426). Other inputs were obtained from published sources or clinical expert opinion. Costs were expressed in GBP 2013/14. Results were presented as incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER), i.e. cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained. Model assumptions were tested with scenario analyses. Parameter uncertainty was tested using one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. Compared with dose-optimized pregabalin, capsaicin 8% patch was the dominant treatment strategy (total cost difference, -£11; total QALY gain, 0.049). Capsaicin 8% patch was also the dominant treatment strategy versus pregabalin in 6 out of 7 scenario analyses. The model was most sensitive to variation in time to capsaicin 8% patch retreatment (maximum ICER, £7,951/QALY at lower-bound 95% confidence interval). At a willingness-to-pay threshold of £20,000/QALY, the probability of capsaicin 8% patch being cost-effective versus pregabalin was 97%. Capsaicin 8% patch is a cost-effective treatment option compared with dose-optimized pregabalin in patients with PNP who have failed one or more previous systemic treatments.

The short-term impact of vitamin D-based hip fracture prevention in older adults in the United Kingdom.

PURPOSE: Vitamin D is a relatively inexpensive drug yet an important hormone in terms of calcium and bone homeostasis. Treatment with vitamin D is associated with reduced fracture risk particularly in an elderly population. Therefore, we assessed the budgetary impact of routine prescription of 800 IU daily colecalciferol on hip fracture among older adults in the United Kingdom. METHODS: Using meta-analysis findings for treatment effect and UK-estimates of incidence, we performed a health economic evaluation of treating the UK population aged 65 and over with 800 IU of vitamin D daily, assessing the impact upon hip fracture costs using incremental attributable costs and excess mortality for a range of age- gender-based treatment strategies. RESULTS: Using only a 1-year horizon, considering only reduction in hip fracture, prescribing colecalciferol 800 IU daily to all adults aged 65 and over, could reduce the number of incident hip fractures from 65,400 to 45,700, saving almost 1,700 associated deaths, whilst saving the UK taxpayer £22 million. CONCLUSIONS: As the UK government seeks to reduce public expenditure in all sectors, investment in prescribed prophylactic colecalciferol 800 IU therapy for adults aged 65 and over is likely to yield cost savings through reduction hip fracture alone in the first year.

Estimation of health-related utility (EQ-5D index) in subjects with seasonal allergic rhinoconjunctivitis to evaluate health gain associated with sublingual grass allergen immunotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Grass allergen immunotherapy (AIT) reduces symptom severity in seasonal allergic rhinoconjunctivitis (ARC) but its impact on general health-related utility has not been characterised for the purposes of economic evaluation. The aim of this study was to model the preferred measure of utility, EQ-5D index, from symptom severity and estimate incremental quality adjusted life years (QALYs) associated with SQ-standardised grass immunotherapy tablet (GRAZAX®, 75,000 SQ-T/2,800 BAU, ALK, Denmark). METHODS: Data were analysed from five consecutive pollen seasons in a randomised placebo controlled trial of GRAZAX®. Binomial and Gaussian mixed effects modelling related weekly EQ-5D index score to daily symptom and medication scores (DSS & DMS respectively). In turn, daily EQ-5D index was estimated from ARC symptoms and medication use. RESULTS: DSS and DMS were the principal predictors of 'perfect' health (EQ-5D = 1.000; binomial) and 'imperfect' health (EQ-5D < 1.000; Gaussian). Each unit increase in DSS and DMS reduced the odds of 'perfect' health (EQ-5D = 1.000) by 27% and 16% respectively, and reduced 'imperfect' health by 0.17 and 0.13, respectively. Gender remained the only other significant main fixed effect (Male odds ratio [OR] = 1.82). Incremental estimated EQ-5D index utility for GRAZAX® was observed from day -30 to day +70 of the pooled pollen season; mean daily utility for GRAZAX® = 0.938 units (95%CI 0.932-0.943) vs. 0.914 (0.907-0.921) for placebo, an incremental difference of 0.0238 (p < 0.001). This translates into an incremental 0.0324 Quality Adjusted Life Years over the five year study period. CONCLUSIONS: ARC symptoms and medication use are the main predictors of EQ-5D index. The incremental QALYs observed for GRAZAX® may not fully describe the health benefits of this treatment, suggesting that economic modelling may be conservative.

The prevalence and incidence, resource use and financial costs of treating people with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in the United Kingdom (1998 to 2010).

BACKGROUND: Attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a common disorder that often presents in childhood and is associated with increased healthcare resource use. The aims of this study were to characterise the epidemiology of diagnosed ADHD in the UK and determine the resource use and financial costs of care. METHODS: For this retrospective, observational cohort study, patients newly diagnosed with ADHD between 1998 and 2010 were identified from the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) and matched to a randomly drawn control group without a diagnosis of ADHD. The prevalence and incidence of diagnosed ADHD were calculated. Resource utilisation and corresponding financial costs post-diagnosis were estimated for general practice contacts, investigations, prescriptions, outpatient appointments, and inpatient admissions. RESULTS: Incidence of diagnosed ADHD (and percentage change using 1998 as a reference) increased from 6.9 per 100,000 population in 1998 to 12.2 per 100,000 (78%) in 2007 and then fell to 9.9 per 100,000 (44%) by 2009. The corresponding prevalence figures were 30.5, 88.9 (192%) and 81.5 (167%) per 100,000. Incidence and prevalence were higher in males than females. Mean annual total healthcare costs were higher for ADHD cases than controls (£1,327 versus £328 for year 1, £1,196 vs. £337 for year 2, £1,148 vs. £316 for year 3, £1,126 vs. £325 for year 4, and £1,112 vs. £361 for year 5). CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of diagnosed ADHD in routine practice in the UK was notably lower than in previous reports, and both prevalence and incidence of diagnosed ADHD in primary care have fallen since 2007. Financial costs were more than four times higher in those with ADHD than in those without ADHD.

Deriving health state utilities for the numerical pain rating scale.

BACKGROUND: The use of patient reported outcome measures within cost-effectiveness analysis has become commonplace. However, specific measures are required that produce values, referred to as 'utilities', that are capable of generating quality adjusted life years. One such measure - the EQ-5D - has come under criticism due to the inherent limitations of its three-level response scales. In evaluations of chronic pain, the numerical pain rating scale (NPRS) which has eleven levels is routinely used which has a greater measurement range, but which can not be used in cost-effetiveness analyses. This study derived utility values for a series of EQ-5D health states that replace the pain dimensions with the NPRS, thereby allowing a potentially greater range of pain intensities to be captured and included in economic analyses. METHODS: Interviews were undertaken with 100 member of the general population. Health state valuations were elicited using the time trade-off approach with a ten year time horizon. Additionally, respondents were asked where the EQ-5D response scale descriptors of moderate and extreme pain lay on the 11-point NPRS scale. RESULTS: 625 valuations were undertaken across the study sample with the crude mean health state utilities showing a negative non-linear relationship with respect to increasing pain intensity. Relative to a NPRS of zero (NPRS0), the successive pain levels (NPRS1-10) had mean decrements in utility of 0.034, 0.043, 0.061, 0.121, 0.144, 0.252, 0.404, 0.575, 0.771 and 0.793, respectively. When respondents were asked to mark on the NPRS scale the EQ-5D pain descriptors of moderate and extreme pain, the median responses were '4' and '8', respectively. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate the potential floor effect of the EQ-5D with respect to pain and provide estimates of health reduction associated with pain intensity described by the NPRS. These estimates are in excess of the decrements produced by an application of the EQ-5D scoring tariff for both the United States and the United Kingdom.

Evaluation of the incremental cost to the National Health Service of prescribing analogue insulin.

Introduction Insulin analogues have become increasingly popular despite their greater cost compared with human insulin. The aim of this study was to calculate the incremental cost to the National Health Service (NHS) of prescribing analogue insulin preparations instead of their human insulin alternatives. Methods Open-source data from the four UK prescription pricing agencies from 2000 to 2009 were analysed. Cost was adjusted for inflation and reported in UK pounds at 2010 prices. Results Over the 10-year period, the NHS spent a total of £2732 million on insulin. The total annual cost increased from £156 million to £359 million, an increase of 130%. The annual cost of analogue insulin increased from £18.2 million (12% of total insulin cost) to £305 million (85% of total insulin cost), whereas the cost of human insulin decreased from £131 million (84% of total insulin cost) to £51 million (14% of total insulin cost). If it is assumed that all patients using insulin analogues could have received human insulin instead, the overall incremental cost of analogue insulin was £625 million. Conclusion Given the high marginal cost of analogue insulin, adherence to prescribing guidelines recommending the preferential use of human insulin would have resulted in considerable financial savings over the period.

A comparison of physician-rated disease severity and patient reported outcomes in mild to moderately active ulcerative colitis.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The aim was to derive health state utility scores in ulcerative colitis (UC) by establishing the relationship between the physician-rated ulcerative colitis disease activity index (UCDAI) and a patient reported EQ-5D by statistically mapping the two instruments. METHODS: In a randomised controlled trial comparing oral plus enema mesalazine treatment with oral mesalazine treatment alone (PINCE), UCDAI and EQ-5D scores were collected in parallel from patients with active UC. From these data, multinomial logistic regression was used to estimate response probabilities to each of the five domains of the EQ-5D index from assessment of UC disease severity using original and abbreviated (no endoscopy) versions of the UCDAI. Predicted EQ-5D responses were converted by Monte Carlo simulation to the EQ-5D index for predicting health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The reliability of the algorithm was tested using UCDAI scores from a second mesalazine RCT (PODIUM). RESULTS: The abbreviated-UCDAI showed comparable explanatory performance to the full UCDAI. For patients in remission, mean utility was 0.939, 0.944, and 0.940U for PINCE(estimated), PINCE(observed), and PODIUM, respectively. Mild/moderate and relapsing cases showed mean utilities of 0.801, 0.811, and 0.775, respectively; whilst for those in severe relapse, the mean utilities were 0.630, 0.700 and 0.660 units, respectively. The mean squared error between actual and predicted utilities from observations in PINCE was 0.019. CONCLUSION: Response mapping of UC activity to EQ-5D domains produced reliable estimates of patient-rated health state utility consistent with UCDAI rated severity. Comparing abbreviated-UCDAI and full UCDAI suggests that inclusion of endoscopy scores has limited predictive value in estimating patient HRQoL.

Estimation of health care costs as a function of disease severity in people with psoriatic arthritis in the UK.

OBJECTIVES: The primary aim of this study was to estimate annual health care costs for biologic-naïve patients with PsA in the UK. The relationship between disease severity, defined by physical limitations, and costs was also explored. METHODS: This study utilized data from the British Society of Rheumatology Biologics Register (BSRBR) to develop a multivariate model estimating disease severity from parameters available in routine primary care data. The HAQ Disability Index was used to determine disease severity. This algorithm was then applied to routine data from The Health Improvement Network (THIN). Annual costs were estimated for drugs, contacts with a general practitioner and other health care professionals, tests, hospital outpatient attendances and inpatient admissions from a National Health Service perspective using official tariffs. The relationship between disease severity and health care costs was estimated using a generalized linear model. RESULTS: Three hundred and fifty-six cases with PsA were identified in the BSRBR and 4492 in THIN. Total mean annual health care costs ranged from £11 to £20 782 with a mean of £1446 (s.d. £1756). When costs were sub-grouped by the predicted HAQ score, the mean annual observed costs ranged from £548 per person for the least severely affected (HAQ ≤ 1.2) to £4832 for the most severely affected (HAQ > 2.6). Prescription costs and secondary care episodes accounted for more than a third of total care costs each (38 and 34%, respectively). When the relationship between disease severity and costs was examined, estimated HAQ was found to be a significant predictor of total health care costs. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of people with PsA resulted in considerable financial costs and these costs varied markedly by disease severity.

Effects of ingesting a commercial thermogenic product on hemodynamic function and energy expenditure at rest in males and females.

The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of a commercially available thermogenic product (TP) on resting energy expenditure (REE) and hemodynamic variables in a randomized, double-blind, placebo (PL)-controlled study. Eight male (age: 23.0 +/- 3.70 years, weight: 95.77 +/- 16.44 kg, height: 182.4 +/- 7.87 cm) and 10 female (age: 23.6 +/- 4.81 years, weight: 67.25 +/- 5.74 kg, height: 172.42 +/- 10.31 cm) physically active individuals participated in this study. Participants reported to the laboratory on a 10-h fast and performed baseline testing on REE, heart rate, and blood pressure. Participants were then randomly assigned to ingest 3 capsules of either an experimental TP or a vitamin E PL. Criterion variables were then measured at 1-, 2-, and 3-h post ingestion. Data were analyzed by 2-factor analysis of variance (ANOVA) using SPSS, version 16.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, Ill.). Supplementation of the TP resulted in a significant main effect for time (p = 0.040) and for interaction (p < 0.01) in REE when compared with PL. Post hoc analysis revealed that there was no significant difference (p > 0.05) between groups at baseline, but the TP group was significantly higher (p < 0.01) than the PL group at 1-, 2-, and 3-h post, with peak values being achieved at 2-h post time point. The TP group also experienced an overall increase in REE by 17.3%, 19.6%, and 15.3% at the 1-, 2-, and 3-h time points, respectively, over baseline values. Conversely, the PL group experienced a reduction in REE by 2.5%, 1.8%, and 0.3% at the same time points compared with baseline values. There was no significant change in heart rate, systolic blood pressure, or diastolic blood pressure in either group. Taken on a daily basis, a TP may increase overall energy expenditure. Caloric expenditure significantly increased at all 3 time points in the TP group, whereas the PL group experienced no change in energy expenditure.

An economic evaluation comparing once daily with twice daily mesalazine for maintaining remission based on results from a randomised controlled clinical trial.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Standard practice to maintain remission in ulcerative colitis (UC) consists of daily mesalazine therapy. However, frequent dosing is associated with poor adherence and increased failure rates. The PODIUM (Pentasa™ Once Daily In UC Maintenance) randomised control trial showed 2 g once daily (OD) to be superior to twice daily (BD) dosing for maintaining remission. We sought to determine whether this alternative dosing regimen is cost-effective. METHODS: An economic evaluation was conducted to compare costs and outcomes of OD with twice daily (BD) dosing. The main outcome considered was quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) based on health state utilities derived from the primary outcome measure, remission without relapse at 12 months defined by a UCDAI score ≤1. The economic evaluation consisted of two health states: (1) remission and (2) active UC. RESULTS: Annual average treatment costs for OD and BD dosing were £654 (95% CI: £536-£759) and £747 (£620-£860), respectively with an average per person savings of £93 per year. Average annual costs of ancillary care for relapse for OD and BD dosing were £307 (£241-£383) and £396 (£320-£483), respectively. Treatment with OD 2 g mesalazine resulted in an incremental QALY improvement of 0.004 units, indicating that it was the dominant treatment option (i.e. improved outcomes and cost-saving). Variations in parameter estimates in the sensitivity analysis indicated that mesalazine had >0.95 probability of being cost-effective compared to BD based on accepted willingness to pay thresholds applied by the UK National Health Service. CONCLUSIONS: Once daily 2 g mesalazine for maintaining remission in UC is cost-saving compared with 1 g twice daily. Cost-savings with 2 g once daily were achieved by differences in ancillary care attributed to higher failure rates observed with 1 g twice daily.

An evaluation of the association between systemic inflammation--as measured by C-reactive protein--and hospital resource use.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association between inflammatory status, as measured by C-reactive protein (CRP), during inpatient admission and subsequent inpatient outcome and associated resource use. METHODS: Probabilistic record linkage was used to match hospital episode data, laboratory reports and mortality statistics in a large urban population of 424,000 people in South Wales, UK. Inpatient mortality, length of stay, emergency readmissions and subsequent 1-year hospital bed day occupancy were assessed as a function of CRP status. RESULTS: Between 2001 and 2005, in total there were 432,272 CRP observations from 98,505 people; 69,593 admissions had at least one CRP measurement, affecting 47,100 individual patients. Across all ICD-10 primary diagnoses, CRP was acutely high (> 10 mg/L) in three-quarters of admissions. Acutely high CRP was associated with an eight-fold increase in risk of hospital mortality (p < 0.001) and a doubling of length of stay (p < 0.001) compared to normal CRP levels, after standardising for age and gender. Across the range of observed maximum CRP values measured during admissions (1 mg/L to > 400 mg/L) the likelihood of emergency readmission within 28 days of discharge increased by 50% (p < 0.001), and the predicted number of subsequent bed days occupied in the year following discharge increased by 30-58% across the range of CRP measurement (p = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: CRP has been found to be clearly associated with hospital resource use. Furthermore, CRP also predicted in-hospital mortality. This may imply that better management of systemic inflammation would result in resource savings in inflammatory diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis.

The effects of orlistat in patients with diabetes: improvement in glycaemic control and weight loss.

OBJECTIVE: In addition to direct weight reduction, there may be other benefits of obesity treatment including improved insulin sensitivity. The purpose of this study was to characterise concomitant diabetes drug use and the related costs in patients with diabetes treated with orlistat (Xenical) in the first 6 months of treatment. METHODS: One hundred overweight patients with diabetes and a body mass index (BMI) > or = 28 kg/m2 were enrolled in a structured UK hospital-based weight management clinic and treated with orlistat plus behavioural interventions. Among other measures, weight, glucose control (HbA1c) and drug treatment were recorded. Subjects were followed-up for a maximum of 24 months at intervals of 1-3 months, with a maximum treatment period of 24 months. RESULTS: The majority of subjects (91%) had type 2 diabetes. They had a mean age of 55 years and 55% were women. For patients followed up at 6 months, their mean BMI at baseline was 39.5 kg/m2 with a mean HbA1c of 7.6%. The mean weight loss at 6 months was 7.1 kg (p < 0.001). Despite a significant average absolute HbA1c reduction of 0.62% (p < 0.001), the most notable gains were made by those with the highest baseline HbA1c values (a mean relative reduction of 20% for those above the 75th percentile). There were 50 patients treated with insulin at baseline and 47 at 6 months. Of those treated with insulin, the mean dose was 130 units at baseline and 90 units at 6 months (p < 0.001). Twenty patients (44.4%) initially treated with oral hypoglycaemic agents alone reduced their dose after 6 months (not significant). Despite marked improvement in insulin sensitivity (baseline mean, 1.24 units/kg; 6 month mean, 0.90 units/kg [p < 0.001]) there was no correlation with BMI change. The average cost of diabetes treatment at baseline was pound 1.16 per day and pound 0.83 at 6 months (p < 0.001). Age was the only independent predictor for insulin dose reduction. CONCLUSIONS: Orlistat appears to reduce the need for concomitant diabetes medication irrespective of weight loss, a reduction that is likely to represent a large cost offset for orlistat treatment.