A randomised assessment of the use of a quality of life questionnaire with or without intervention in patients attending a thoracic cancer clinic.

The study examined the impact of using a quality of life (QoL) questionnaire during a clinic to identify QoL issues and to improve QoL. 138 patients were randomised (1:1:1) to either (1) an Intervention group that completed the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer-Core Quality of Life Questionnaire and Lung Cancer Module (EORTC QLQ-C30 and LC13) at baseline and received feedback during a clinic, (2) an Attention group that completed the questionnaire at baseline without feedback and (3) a Control group that did not complete the questionnaire. All patients completed the same questionnaire 6 weeks later and a contact diary during the study period. There was a significant difference between the Intervention and Control groups for the mean number of QoL issues identified at baseline (4.69 vs. 2.81, P = 0.006) and the mean number of actions taken (4.41 vs. 2.46, P = 0.004). At 6 weeks, there was no difference between the groups in global QoL (Intervention vs. Control group, P = 0.596; Attention vs. Control, P = 0.973). The results suggest that the completion of the EORTC QLQ-C30 LC13 with feedback improves communication and increases the number of QoL issues identified and actions taken. However, the intervention does not impact on QoL per se. Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT01213745.

Assessing standardization of molecular testing for non-small-cell lung cancer: results of a worldwide external quality assessment (EQA) scheme for EGFR mutation testing.

BACKGROUND: The external quality assurance (EQA) process aims at establishing laboratory performance levels. Leading European groups in the fields of EQA, Pathology, and Medical and Thoracic Oncology collaborated in a pilot EQA scheme for somatic epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene mutational analysis in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: EQA samples generated from cell lines mimicking clinical samples were provided to participating laboratories, each with a mock clinical case. Participating laboratories performed the analysis using their usual method(s). Anonymous results were assessed and made available to all participants. Two subsequent EQA rounds followed the pilot scheme. RESULTS: One hundred and seventeen labs from 30 countries registered and 91 returned results. Sanger sequencing and a commercial kit were the main methodologies used. The standard of genotyping was suboptimal, with a significant number of genotyping errors made. Only 72 out of 91 (72%) participants passed the EQA. False-negative and -positive results were the main sources of error. The quality of reports submitted was acceptable; most were clear, concise and easy to read. However, some participants reported the genotyping result in the absence of any interpretation and many obscured the interpretation required for clinical care. CONCLUSIONS: Even in clinical laboratories, the technical performance of genotyping in EGFR mutation testing for NSCLC can be improved, evident from a high level of diagnostic errors. Robust EQA can contribute to global optimisation of EGFR testing for NSCLC patients.

Influence of co-morbidity on renal function assessment by Cockcroft-Gault calculation in lung cancer and mesothelioma patients receiving platinum-based chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Creatinine clearance (CrCl) estimation by Cockcroft-Gault calculation (CG) often replaces measurement of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) by [(51)Cr]-ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid clearance (EDTA). Co-morbidity, age, and renal impairment influence the accuracy of CG, whilst the relationship between CG and EDTA has been poorly assessed in lung cancer patients, a population significantly affected by these covariates. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of co-morbidity, nephrotoxic drug use, chemotherapy toxicity, and correlation between paired CG and EDTA, in 388 lung cancer and mesothelioma patients receiving platinum-based chemotherapy. RESULTS: Potentially nephrotoxic co-morbidity or medication use occurred in 47% of patients, and was twice as likely in those aged >70 years (OR=2.07; 95%CI: 1.25-3.44, p=0.003). Patients with co-morbidity or nephrotoxic medication use had a lower EDTA compared to those without these baseline factors (p=0.02), but were not significantly more likely to experience chemotherapy toxicity. CG and EDTA correlation was high (r(2)=0.68), but reduced in patients with ETDA<50 ml/min (r(2)=0.26, p=0.02) or >120 ml/min (r(2)=0.32, p=0.09), and in those with CG>120 ml/min (r(2)=0.20, p=0.01). The correlation between CG and EDTA was not significantly altered in patients with co-morbidity or nephrotoxic medication use. CG bias (mean percentage error) and precision (mean absolute percentage error, MAPE) were 7% and 26%, respectively, and precision was impaired in patients with abnormally raised serum creatinine (MAPE 65%, p<0.0001). CONCLUSION: CG estimation of CrCl is accurate and safe in lung cancer patients with potentially nephrotoxic co-morbidity or concomitant medication, but should not be used when values are outside the range 50-120 ml/min, or with abnormally elevated serum creatinine.