Demographics, treatment patterns, and healthcare utilization and cost of repository corticotropin injection in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus or rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate healthcare resource utilization (HRU) and costs among patients who initiated repository corticotropin injection (RCI; H.P. Acthar Gel) treatment for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) or systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). METHODS: Patients aged ≥18 years with ≥2 diagnoses for either RA or SLE between July 1, 2006 and April 30, 2015 were identified in the HealthCore Integrated Research Database. Index RCI date was the earliest date of a medical or pharmacy claim for RCI after diagnosis. Baseline characteristics, pre- and post-initiation HRU and costs were assessed using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: This study identified 180 RA patients (mean age = 60 years, 56% female) and 29 SLE patients (mean age = 45 years, 90% female) who initiated RCI. First RCI use averaged 7.1 and 22.6 months after the initial RA and SLE diagnosis, respectively. After RCI initiation, RA patients incurred significantly lower per-patient-per-month (PPPM) all-cause medical costs ($1,881 vs $682, p < .01) vs the pre-initiation period, driven by lower PPPM hospitalizations costs ($1,579 vs $503, p < .01). Overall PPPM healthcare costs were higher ($2,751 vs $5,487, p < .01) due to higher PPPM prescription costs ($869 vs $4,805, p < .01). Similarly, SLE patients had decreased PPPM hospitalization costs ($3,192 vs $799, p = .04) and increased PPPM prescription costs ($905 vs $7,443, p < .01) after initiating RCI; the difference in overall PPPM healthcare costs was not statistically significant likely, due to small sample size. CONCLUSION: This study, across a heterogeneous population of variable disease duration, described clinical and healthcare utilization and costs of RA and SLE patients initiating RCI in a real-world setting. We observed that patients receiving RCI had lower utilization and costs for medical services in both disease populations, which partially offset the increased prescription costs by 30% and 37%. Future research is needed to explore factors associated with RCI initiation and its impact on long-term outcomes.

Budget Impact of Enzalutamide for Chemotherapy-Naïve Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Prostate cancer is expected to account for approximately one quarter of all new diagnoses of cancer in American men in 2015. The cost of prostate cancer care is expected to reach $15.1 billion by the year 2020, up from $11.9 billion in 2010. Given the high burden of prostate cancer, health care payers are interested in quantifying the potential budget impact of new therapies. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the budget impact of enzalutamide for the treatment of chemotherapy-naïve metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) from a U.S. payer perspective. METHODS: A model was developed to assess the budget impact of enzalutamide for treatment of chemotherapy-naïve mCRPC patients in a hypothetical 1-million-member U.S. health plan over a 1-year time horizon. Comparators included abiraterone acetate, sipuleucel-T, radium Ra 223 dichloride, and docetaxel. Epidemiologic data, including National Cancer Institute Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) incidence rates, were used to estimate the number of chemotherapy-naïve mCRPC patients. Dosing, administration, duration of therapy, and adverse event rates were based on package inserts and pivotal studies. Drug costs were obtained from RED BOOK and Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) average sales price pricing files, costs of administration and monitoring from the CMS physician fee schedule, and adverse events from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project and published literature. Market shares were estimated for each comparator before and after adoption of enzalutamide. The incremental aggregate budget impact, per patient per year (PPPY), per patient per month (PPPM), and per member per month (PMPM), was calculated. One-way sensitivity analyses were performed. RESULTS: In a population of 115 chemotherapy-naïve mCRPC patients, adopting enzalutamide had an annual incremental budget impact of $510,641 ($4,426 PPPY, $369 PPPM, and $0.04 PMPM). Results were most sensitive to enzalutamide drug cost, size of the chemotherapy-naïve mCRPC patient population, and enzalutamide adoption rate. CONCLUSIONS: Results indicate a modest 1-year budget impact of adopting enzalutamide for chemotherapy-naïve mCRPC patients, partly because of the cost offset of a moderate incidence of adverse events and lack of additional required monitoring.

Healthcare resource utilization and work loss in dermatomyositis and polymyositis patients in a privately-insured US population.

Background Dermatomyositis and polymyositis (DM/PM) are inflammatory myopathies characterized by muscle inflammation/weakness. Patients with DM/PM have a reduced quality-of-life and are at an increased risk for several comorbidities. Studies have assessed the incidence and prevalence of DM/PM; however, no study has estimated the burden of the diseases in terms of both healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and work loss incurred by patients. Objective To provide a comprehensive, current estimate of the annual HCRU and work loss in DM/PM patients in the US. Methods All patients (aged 18-64 years) with a first diagnosis of DM/PM between January 1, 1998 and March 31, 2014 ('index date') were selected from a de-identified privately-insured administrative claims database. DM/PM patients were required to have continuous health-plan enrollment 12 months prior to and following their index date. Propensity-score (1:1) matching of DM/PM patients with non-DM/PM controls was carried out based on a logistic regression of demographic characteristics, comorbidities, costs, and HCRU to control for these confounding factors. Burden of HCRU and work loss (disability days and medically-related absenteeism) were compared between the matched DM/PM and the non-DM/PM cohorts over the 12-month period after the index date ('outcome period'). Results Of the 2617 DM/PM patients that met sample selection criteria, 2587 (98.9%) were matched with a non-DM/PM control. During the outcome period, DM/PM patients had significantly increased HCRU across places of service, including 44% more inpatient admissions (3.6 vs 2.5, p < 0.001), increased visits with specialists such as rheumatologists, neurologists and physical therapists, and filled 4.7 more prescriptions (32.2 vs 27.5, p < 0.001) than matched control patients. The increased HCRU led to significantly more medically-related work loss among DM/PM patients than matched controls (p < 0.001). Conclusions DM/PM imposes a substantial increase in healthcare resource use and is associated with statistically significantly greater work loss in the first year following diagnosis.