Management of Patients with Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis May Need to Be Individualized: A Multidisciplinary Call for Action.

The optimal management of patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis (ACS) is the subject of extensive debate. According to the 2017 European Society for Vascular Surgery guidelines, carotid endarterectomy should (Class IIa; Level of Evidence: B) or carotid artery stenting may be considered (Class IIb; Level of Evidence: B) in the presence of one or more clinical/imaging characteristics that may be associated with an increased risk of late ipsilateral stroke (e.g., silent embolic infarcts on brain computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging, progression in the severity of ACS, a history of contralateral transient ischemic attack/stroke, microemboli detection on transcranial Doppler, etc.), provided documented perioperative stroke/death rates are <3% and the patient's life expectancy is >5 years. Besides these clinical/imaging characteristics, there are additional individual, ethnic/racial or social factors that should probably be evaluated in the decision process regarding the optimal management of these patients, such as individual patient needs/patient choice, patient compliance with best medical treatment, patient sex, culture, race/ethnicity, age and comorbidities, as well as improvements in imaging/operative techniques/outcomes. The present multispecialty position paper will present the rationale why the management of patients with ACS may need to be individualized.

Use of the walking impairment questionnaire as a measure of functional assessment.

Background: A significant consequence of peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is an impaired functional capacity and deteriorated quality of life. Therefore, our study aimed to investigate the usefulness of a symptom questionnaire and walk tests for the determination of the functional capacity of patients with intermittent claudication. Patients and methods: The study included 53 patients (38 males) with stable claudication distance (50-300m). A detailed history and physical examination, ankle-brachial index (ABI), treadmill exercise test, and 6-minute walk test were performed and compared to walking impairment questionnaire (WIQ). Results: Claudication distance reported from patients' history and 6-minute walk test were significantly correlated with ABI (p=0.033, p=0.044). There were no significant correlations between ABI and treadmill walk test or WIQ. Results of WIQ were significantly correlated with the history and the most of performed walk tests: treadmill initial and maximal claudication distance (p=0.004 and 0.012, respectively) and 6-minute walk test (p=0.026). 6-minute walk test was correlated with maximal claudication distance of treadmill (p=0.018), but not with an initial claudication distance. Conclusions: The validity of WIQ is comparable to walk tests and represents the useful technique for the investigation of the functional capacity of patients with PAD. A self-report based on WIQ enables a longer period of observation. It should be routinely used as a basic diagnostic tool for the estimation of the functional capacity of PAD patients with stable intermittent claudication.