RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: This study investigated the risk of an aggressive endometrial cancer (EC) diagnosis by race, ethnicity, and country of origin to further elucidate histologic disparities in non-Hispanic Black (NHB), Hispanic, Asian/Pacific Islander (API), American Indian/Alaskan Native (AIAN) vs. non-Hispanic White (NHW) patients, particularly in Hispanic or API subgroups. METHODS: Patient diagnosed between 2004 and 2020 with low grade (LG)-endometrioid endometrial cancer (ECC) or an aggressive EC including grade 3 EEC, serous carcinoma, clear cell carcinoma, mixed epithelial carcinoma, or carcinosarcoma in the National Cancer Database were studied. The odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for diagnosis of an aggressive EC histology was estimated using logistic modeling. RESULTS: There were 343,868 NHW, 48,897 NHB, 30,013 Hispanic, 15,015 API and 1646 AIAN patients. The OR (95% CI) for an aggressive EC diagnosis was 3.07 (3.01-3.13) for NHB, 1.08 (1.06-1.11) for Hispanic, 1.17 (1.13-1.21) for API and 1.07 (0.96-1.19) for AIAN, relative to NHW patients. Subset analyses by country of origin illustrated the diversity in the OR for an aggressive EC diagnosis among Hispanic (1.18 for Mexican to 1.87 for Dominican), Asian (1.14 Asian Indian-Pakistani to 1.48 Korean) and Pacific Islander (1.00 for Hawaiian to 1.33 for Samoan) descendants. Hispanic, API and AIAN patients were diagnosed 5-years younger that NHW patients, and the risk for an aggressive EC histology were all significantly higher than NHW patients after correcting for age. Insurance status was another independent risk factor for aggressive histology. CONCLUSIONS: Risk of an aggressive EC diagnosis varied by race, ethnicity, and country of origin. NHB patients had the highest risk, followed by Dominican, South/Central American, Cuban, Korean, Thai, Vietnamese, and Filipino descendants.
Assuntos
Neoplasias do Endométrio , Humanos , Feminino , Neoplasias do Endométrio/etnologia , Neoplasias do Endométrio/patologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Adulto , População Branca/estatística & dados numéricos , Hispânico ou Latino/estatística & dados numéricos , Adenocarcinoma de Células Claras/patologia , Adenocarcinoma de Células Claras/etnologia , Adenocarcinoma de Células Claras/epidemiologia , Carcinossarcoma/patologia , Carcinossarcoma/etnologia , Havaiano Nativo ou Outro Ilhéu do Pacífico/estatística & dados numéricos , Carcinoma Endometrioide/patologia , Carcinoma Endometrioide/etnologia , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Etnicidade/estatística & dados numéricos , Disparidades nos Níveis de Saúde , Cistadenocarcinoma Seroso/patologia , Cistadenocarcinoma Seroso/etnologia , Negro ou Afro-Americano/estatística & dados numéricosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To determine the association between scores from a 25-item patient-reported Rockwood Accumulation of Deficits Frailty Index (DAFI) and survival outcomes in gynecologic cancer patients. METHODS: A frailty index was constructed from the SEER-MHOS database. The DAFI was applied to women age ≥ 65 diagnosed with all types of gynecologic cancers between 1998 and 2015. The impact of frailty status at cancer diagnosis on overall survival (OS) was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards regression. RESULTS: In this cohort (n = 1336) the median age at diagnosis was 74 (range 65-97). Nine hundred sixty-two (72%) women were Caucasian and 132 (10%) were African-American. Overall, 651(49%) of patients were considered frail. On multivariate analysis, frail patients had a 48% increased risk for death (aHR 1.48; 95% CI 1.29-1.69; P < 0.0001). Each 10% increase in frailty index was associated with a 16% increased risk of death (aHR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.11 to 1.21; P < 0.0001). In subgroup analyses of the varying cancer types, the association of frailty status with prognosis was fairly consistent (aHR 1.15-2.24). The DAFI was more prognostic in endometrial (aHR 1.76; 95% CI 1.41-2.18, P < 0.0001) and vaginal/vulvar (aHR 1.94; 95% CI 1.34-2.81, P = 0.0005) cancers as well as patients with loco-regional disease (aHR 1.94; 95% CI 1.62-2.33, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Frailty appears to be a significant predictor of mortality in gynecologic cancer patients regardless of chronological age. This measure of functional age may be of particular utility in women with loco-regional disease only who otherwise would have a favorable prognosis.
Assuntos
Idoso Fragilizado , Fragilidade , Neoplasias dos Genitais Femininos/mortalidade , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos de Coortes , Bases de Dados Factuais , Etnicidade , Feminino , Neoplasias dos Genitais Femininos/etnologia , Humanos , Medicare , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Estudos Retrospectivos , Programa de SEER , Análise de Sobrevida , Estados UnidosRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To study associations among employment, insurance status, and distress in gynecologic oncology patients; and to evaluate the impact of being unemployed or having no/Medicaid insurance on different distress problem areas. METHODS: In this single institution, cross-sectional analysis of gynecologic oncology patients, we screened for distress and problem areas using the National Comprehensive Cancer Network distress thermometer and problem list at outpatient appointments between 6/2017-9/2017. Primary outcome was self-reported high distress (score ≥ 5). The distress problem list included 5 categories-practical, family, emotional, physical, and other. Employment status included employed, unemployed, homemaker, and retired. Logistic regression was used to predict high distress from employment and insurance statuses, adjusting for relevant covariates. RESULTS: Of 885 women, 101 (11.4%) were unemployed, and 53 (6.0%) uninsured or had Medicaid coverage. One in five patients (n = 191, 21.6%) indicated high distress. Unemployed patients were more likely than employed to endorse high distress [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 3.5, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.2-5.7, p < 0.001]. Compared to employed patients, a greater proportion of unemployed patients endorsed distress related to practical (p < 0.05), emotional (p < 0.001), physical (p < 0.01), and other (p < 0.05) problems. Uninsured/Medicaid patients were more likely to endorse high distress (aOR = 2.8, 95% CI 1.5-5.1, p < 0.001) and report family (p < 0.001), emotional (p < 0.001), and other (p < 0.01) problems than patients who had Medicare/commercial insurance. CONCLUSIONS: Gynecologic oncology patients who are unemployed or have no/Medicaid insurance face high distress that appears to arise from issues beyond practical problems, including financial and/or insurance insecurities.
Assuntos
Emprego/psicologia , Emprego/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias dos Genitais Femininos/economia , Neoplasias dos Genitais Femininos/psicologia , Cobertura do Seguro/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Seguro Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Modelos Logísticos , Medicaid/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Angústia Psicológica , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Desemprego/psicologia , Desemprego/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados UnidosRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Metastatic involvement of groin nodes can alter radiation therapy planning for pelvic tumors. 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) can identify nodal metastases; however, interpretation of PET/CT-positive nodes can be complicated by non-malignant processes. We evaluated quantitative metrics as methods to identify groin metastases in patients with pelvic tumors by comparison with standard subjective interpretive criteria, with pathology as the reference standard. METHODS: We retrospectively identified patients with vulvar, vaginal, or anal cancers who underwent 18F-FDG PET/CT before pathologic evaluation of groin nodes between 2007 and 2017. Because patho-radiologic correlation was not possible for every node, one index node identified on imaging was selected for each groin. For each index node, standardized uptake value measurements, total lesion glycolysis, metabolic tumor volume, CT-based volume, and short and long axes were measured. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify metrics predictive for pathologically positive groins and generate a probabilistic model. Area under the receiver-operating characteristic curves (AUCs) for the model were compared with clinical interpretation from the diagnostic report via a Wald's χ2 test. RESULTS: Of 55 patients identified for analysis, 75 groins had pathologic evaluation resulting in 75 index groin nodes for analysis with 35 groins pathologically positive for malignancy. Logistic regression identified mean standardized-uptake-value (50% threshold) and short-axis length as the most predictive imaging metrics for metastatic nodal involvement. The probabilistic model performed better at predicting pathologic involvement compared with standard clinical interpretation on analysis (AUC 0.91, 95% CI 0.84 to 0.97 vs 0.80, 95% CI 0.71 to 0.89; p<0.01). DISCUSSION: Accuracy of 18F-FDG PET/CT for detecting groin nodal metastases in patients with pelvic tumors may be improved with the use of quantitative metrics. Improving prediction of nodal metastases can aid with appropriate selection of patients for pathologic node evaluation and guide radiation volumes and doses.
Assuntos
Neoplasias do Ânus/diagnóstico por imagem , Linfonodos/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias Vaginais/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias Vulvares/diagnóstico por imagem , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Neoplasias do Ânus/patologia , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Fluordesoxiglucose F18 , Humanos , Linfonodos/patologia , Metástase Linfática , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Tomografia por Emissão de Pósitrons combinada à Tomografia Computadorizada/métodos , Compostos Radiofarmacêuticos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Vaginais/patologia , Neoplasias Vulvares/patologiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To investigate racial disparities in uterine carcinosarcoma (UCS) and ovarian carcinosarcoma (OCS) in Commission on Cancer®-accredited facilities. METHODS: Non-Hispanic Black (NHB) and non-Hispanic White (NHW) women in the National Cancer Database diagnosed with stage I-IV UCS or OCS between 2004 and 2014 were eligible. Differences by disease site or race were compared using Chi-square test and multivariate Cox analysis. RESULTS: There were 2830 NHBs and 7366 NHWs with UCS, and 280 NHBs and 2586 NHWs with OCS. Diagnosis of UCS was more common in NHBs (11.5%) vs. NHWs (3.7%) and increased with age (P < .0001). OCS diagnosis remained <5% in both races and all ages. NHBs with UCS or OCS were more common in the South and more likely to have a comorbidity score ≥ 1, low neighborhood income and Medicaid or no insurance (P < .0001). Diagnosis at stage II-IV was more common in NHBs than NHWs with UCS but not OCS. NHBs with both UCS and OCS were less likely to undergo surgery and to achieve no gross residual disease with surgery (P = .002). Risk of death in NHB vs. NHW patients with UCS was 1.38 after adjustment for demographic factors and dropped after sequential adjustment for comorbidity score, neighborhood income, insurance status, stage and treatment by 4%, 16%, 7%, 19% and 10%, respectively, leaving 43.5% of the racial disparity in survival unexplained. In contrast, risk of death in NHBs vs. NHWs with OCS was 1.19 after adjustment for demographic factors and became insignificant after adjustment for comorbidity. Race was an independent prognostic factor in UCS but not in OCS. CONCLUSIONS: Racial disparities exist in characteristics, treatment and survival in UCS and OCS with distinctions that merit additional research.
Assuntos
População Negra/estatística & dados numéricos , Carcinossarcoma/etnologia , Disparidades nos Níveis de Saúde , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias Ovarianas/etnologia , Neoplasias Uterinas/etnologia , População Branca/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Carcinossarcoma/mortalidade , Carcinossarcoma/patologia , Comorbidade , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Neoplasias Ovarianas/mortalidade , Neoplasias Ovarianas/patologia , Prognóstico , Neoplasias Uterinas/mortalidade , Neoplasias Uterinas/patologiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Gynecologic oncologists frequently care for patients at the end of life with the aid of palliative care (PC) specialists. Our primary objectives were to identify perceived barriers to integrating specialty PC into gynecologic cancer care. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Members of the Society of Gynecologic Oncology (SGO) were invited to participate in an anonymous online survey. A Likert scale captured perceptions regarding primary and specialty PC, frequent barriers to use of PC, and potential interventions. RESULTS: A total of 174 (16%) gynecologic oncologists completed the survey. The majority (75%) agreed or strongly agreed that PC should be integrated into cancer care at diagnosis of advanced or metastatic cancer. The most frequently perceived PC barriers included patients' unrealistic expectations (54%), limited access to specialty PC (25%), poor reimbursement (25%), time constraints (22%), and concern of reducing hope or trust (21%). The most agreed upon potential intervention was increased access to outpatient PC (80%). CONCLUSIONS: According to this cohort of SGO members, families' or patients' unrealistic expectations are the most frequent barriers to specialty PC. Understanding this communication breakdown is critically important.
Assuntos
Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Neoplasias dos Genitais Femininos/terapia , Oncologia/organização & administração , Cuidados Paliativos , Adulto , Assistência Ambulatorial/organização & administração , Feminino , Neoplasias dos Genitais Femininos/psicologia , Mão de Obra em Saúde , Esperança , Humanos , Reembolso de Seguro de Saúde , Masculino , Oncologia/economia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Cuidados Paliativos/economia , Inquéritos e Questionários , Fatores de Tempo , ConfiançaRESUMO
Health care in the United States is in the midst of a significant transformation from a "fee for service" to a "fee for value" based model. The Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015 has only accelerated this transition. Anticipating these reforms, the Society of Gynecologic Oncology developed the Future of Physician Payment Reform Task Force (PPRTF) in 2015 to develop strategies to ensure fair value based reimbursement policies for gynecologic cancer care. The PPRTF elected as a first task to develop an Alternative Payment Model for thesurgical management of low risk endometrial cancer. The history, rationale, and conceptual framework for the development of an Endometrial Cancer Alternative Payment Model are described in this white paper, as well as directions forfuture efforts.
Assuntos
Neoplasias do Endométrio/economia , Reforma dos Serviços de Saúde/economia , Modelos Econômicos , Mecanismo de Reembolso/economia , Neoplasias do Endométrio/cirurgia , Feminino , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia/economia , Reforma dos Serviços de Saúde/tendências , Humanos , Médicos/economia , Mecanismo de Reembolso/tendências , Sociedades Médicas , Estados UnidosAssuntos
Codificação Clínica , Neoplasias dos Genitais Femininos/terapia , Ginecologia , Política de Saúde , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde , Mecanismo de Reembolso , Oncologia Cirúrgica , Comitês Consultivos , Feminino , Humanos , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Sociedades Médicas , Estados UnidosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Clinical validation of a chemoresponse assay was recently published, demonstrating a significant increase in overall survival in recurrent ovarian cancer patients treated with therapies to which their tumor was sensitive in the assay. The current study investigates the cost effectiveness of using the assay at the time of ovarian cancer recurrence from the payer's perspective. METHODS: Using a Markov state transition model, patient characteristics and survival data from the recent clinical study, the cumulative costs over the study horizon (71 months) for both the baseline (no assay) and intervention (assay consistent, hypothetical) cohorts were evaluated. RESULTS: The assay consistent cohort had an incremental cost effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $6206 per life year saved (LYS), as compared to the baseline cohort. Cost-effectiveness was further demonstrated in platinum-sensitive and platinum-resistant populations treated with assay-sensitive therapies, with ICERs of $2773 per LYS and $2736 per LYS, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The use of a chemoresponse assay to inform treatment decisions in recurrent ovarian cancer patients has the potential to be cost-effective in both platinum-sensitive and platinum-resistant patients.
Assuntos
Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/tratamento farmacológico , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/economia , Neoplasias Epiteliais e Glandulares/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Epiteliais e Glandulares/economia , Neoplasias Ovarianas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Ovarianas/economia , Carcinoma Epitelial do Ovário , Estudos de Coortes , Análise Custo-Benefício , Resistencia a Medicamentos Antineoplásicos , Feminino , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia/economia , Humanos , Cadeias de Markov , Modelos Econômicos , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/cirurgia , Neoplasias Epiteliais e Glandulares/cirurgia , Compostos Organoplatínicos/administração & dosagem , Compostos Organoplatínicos/efeitos adversos , Compostos Organoplatínicos/economia , Neoplasias Ovarianas/cirurgia , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Taxa de Sobrevida , Estados UnidosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The relationship between racial and socioeconomic status (SES) disparities and the quality of epithelial ovarian cancer care and survival outcome are unclear. METHODS: A population-based analysis of National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) records for invasive primary epithelial ovarian cancer diagnosed in the period from 1998 to 2002 was done using data from patients classified as white or black. Adherence to National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guideline care was defined by stage-appropriate surgical procedures and recommended chemotherapy. The main outcome measures were differences in adherence to NCCN guidelines and overall survival according to race and SES and were analyzed using binomial logistic regression and multilevel survival analysis. RESULTS: A total of 47 160 patients (white = 43 995; black = 3165) were identified. Non-NCCN-guideline-adherent care was an independent predictor of inferior overall survival (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.43, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.38 to 1.47). Demographic characteristics independently associated with a higher likelihood of not receiving NCCN guideline-adherent care were black race (odds ratio [OR] = 1.36, 95% CI = 1.25 to 1.48), Medicare payer status (OR = 1.20, 95% CI = 1.12 to 1.28), and not insured payer status (OR = 1.33, 95% CI = 1.19 to 1.49). After controlling for disease and treatment-related variables, independent racial and SES predictors of survival were black race (HR = 1.29, 95% CI = 1.22 to 1.36), Medicaid payer status (HR = 1.29, 95% CI = 1.20 to 1.38), not insured payer status (HR = 1.32, 95% CI = 1.20 to 1.44), and median household income less than $35 000 (HR = 1.06, 95% CI = 1.02 to 1.11). CONCLUSIONS: These data highlight statistically and clinically significant disparities in the quality of ovarian cancer care and overall survival, independent of NCCN guidelines, along racial and SES parameters. Increased efforts are needed to more precisely define the patient, provider, health-care system, and societal factors leading to these observed disparities and guide targeted interventions.
Assuntos
Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Prescrições de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Fidelidade a Diretrizes , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde , Seguro Saúde , Neoplasias Ovarianas/mortalidade , Neoplasias Ovarianas/terapia , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde , Classe Social , Adulto , Negro ou Afro-Americano/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Carcinoma/mortalidade , Carcinoma/terapia , Quimioterapia Adjuvante , Fatores de Confusão Epidemiológicos , Feminino , Fidelidade a Diretrizes/estatística & dados numéricos , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Modelos Logísticos , Medicaid , Medicare , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Neoplasias Ovarianas/economia , Neoplasias Ovarianas/patologia , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde/economia , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos , População Branca/estatística & dados numéricosAssuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/terapia , Técnicas de Apoio para a Decisão , Árvores de Decisões , Antagonistas de Estrogênios/economia , Gosserrelina/economia , Laparoscopia/economia , Neoplasias da Mama/metabolismo , Análise Custo-Benefício , Antagonistas de Estrogênios/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Gosserrelina/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Ovariectomia/economia , Ovariectomia/métodos , Pré-Menopausa , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida , Receptores de Estrogênio/metabolismoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To determine the long-term effects of radical hysterectomy on bladder and bowel function. METHODS: Subjects included women who underwent radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer between 1993 and 2003. Two contemporary controls who underwent extrafascial abdominal hysterectomy for benign disease were identified for each subject. Identified subjects and controls were surveyed. The Urogenital Distress Inventory (UDI) was used to assess symptoms of incontinence, and the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire (IIQ) was used to examine the impact of incontinence on quality of life. The Manchester Health Questionnaire and Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale (FIQL) were used to assess anorectal symptoms. RESULTS: Surveys were returned by 66 of 209 (32%) subjects and 152 of 428 (36%) controls. Overall, 50% of subjects and 42% of controls reported mild incontinence symptoms; 34% of subjects and 35% of controls reported moderate-severe symptoms (p=0.72). Incontinence was associated with moderate-severe impairment in 18% of subjects and 14% of controls (p=0.74). Fecal incontinence symptoms were uncommon, not differing between subjects and controls. CONCLUSION: Urinary incontinence is relatively common after radical hysterectomy, but severe anorectal dysfunction is uncommon. Radical hysterectomy does not appear to be associated with more long-term bladder or anorectal dysfunction than simple hysterectomy.
Assuntos
Histerectomia/efeitos adversos , Enteropatias/etiologia , Doenças da Bexiga Urinária/etiologia , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/cirurgia , Adulto , Emoções , Feminino , Humanos , Histerectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Enteropatias/epidemiologia , Estilo de Vida , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Doenças da Bexiga Urinária/epidemiologia , Incontinência Urinária/epidemiologia , Incontinência Urinária/etiologia , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/patologia , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/psicologiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: End-of-life (EOL) medical care consumes 10-12% of national health care expenditures and 27% of Medicare dollars annually. Studies suggest that hospice services decrease EOL expenditures by 25-40%. The goal of this study was to compare the total cost of hospital-based resources utilized in ovarian cancer patients during their last 60 days of life for those enrolled in hospice versus those not on hospice. METHODS: Study eligibility included patients who expired from ovarian cancer from 1999 to 2003. Medical records were reviewed for demographic data as well as treatment, response and recurrence rates, histologic type, grade and stage. Billing records were analyzed for costs of inpatient and outpatients visits, including radiologic, laboratory and pharmacy charges. Total cost of hospital resources was compared between patients managed on hospice for >10 days (hospice group) versus <10 days (non-hospice group) using the following methods: Mann-Whitney U, Kruskal-Wallis and Student's t tests. Overall survival was compared using Kaplan-Meier statistics. RESULTS: Of the 84 patients analyzed, 67 (79.8%) were in the non-hospice group and 17 (20.2%) were in the hospice group. Demographic, histologic and staging characteristics as well as platinum sensitivity were similar between the two groups before the last 60 days of life. Mean number of chemotherapy cycles before the study period was also similar (20.4 and 21.0, respectively). However, during the study period, the mean total cost per patient in the non-hospice group was dollar 59,319 versus dollar 15,164 in the hospice group (P = 0.0001). A significant difference in cost was noted for mean inpatient days (dollar 6584 vs. dollar 1629, P = 0.0007), radiology (dollar 6063 vs. dollar 2343, P = 0.003), laboratory (dollar 12,281 vs. dollar 2026, P = 0.0004) and pharmacy charges (dollar 13,650 vs. dollar 4465, P = 0.0017) as well as for treating physician per patient (dollar 112,707 vs. dollar 34,677, P = 0.04). Overall survival for the two groups was the same. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings demonstrate that there is a significant cost difference with no appreciable improvement in survival between ovarian cancer patients treated aggressively versus those enrolled in hospice at the EOL. These data suggest that earlier hospice enrollment is beneficial. Furthermore, cost variations between physicians and patients imply that education may be an important variable.