Immigration Emergency in Italy: The Impact of Socioeconomic Status on Blood Pressure Levels and Control.

INTRODUCTION: Nowadays there are more than 5 millions of immigrants (8.3% of general adult population) in Italy. AIM: To evaluate the potential impact of immigration and the possession of a permanent residence on blood pressure (BP) levels and control in a low income population of immigrants from different countries. METHODS: We evaluated clinical characteristics and social status of adult individuals with known diagnosis of hypertension afferent to the Poliambulatorio della Caritas Diocesana in Rome, Italy, between 2010-2016. Subjects were stratified according to their macro-areas of origin (Europe, Asia, Africa, South-America), housing (with or without house), and immigration status (presence or absence of residence permit). BP levels were measured in three consecutive visits according to recommendations from current European Guidelines. RESULTS: From an overall population sample of 9827 adult individuals, we initially identified 994 patients with a diagnosis of hypertension (10.1%), among whom 536 (5.4%) had valid BP data. Among these, 50.6% came from Europe, 21.6% from Africa, 24.1% from Asia, and 3.7% from South-America. They were predominantly male (54.7%), middle aged (42.8 ± 12.1 years at arrival and 51.6 ± 10.6 years at first visit) and untreated (72.8%) individuals with baseline systolic/diastolic BP levels of 156.9 ± 22.2/97.3 ± 12.4 mmHg). BP levels remained higher in homeless than in housed people at both visit 2 (150.0 ± 21.8/92.6 ± 12.9 mmHg vs. 142.9 ± 19.3/89.9 ± 11.6 mmHg; P < 0.001) and visit 3 (147.9 ± 22.2/91.7 ± 12.5 mmHg vs. 141.8 ± 19.4/89.2 ± 12.0 mmHg; P = 0.013). We also observed reductions of both systolic and diastolic BP levels compared to baseline values in immigrants stratified according to residence permit, although without relevant differences among groups. CONCLUSIONS: Beyond conventional risk factors, socio-economic issues, including lack of residence permit or habitation, may affect BP levels and control in frail populations of immigrants, which have been marginally considered before.

Conventional and new electrocardiographic criteria for hypertension-mediated cardiac organ damage: A narrative review.

Hypertension-mediated organ damage (HMOD) is frequently observed in hypertensive patients at different cardiovascular (CV) risk profile. This may have both diagnostic and therapeutic implications for the choice of the most appropriate therapies. Among different markers of HMOD, the most frequent functional and structural adaptations can be observed at cardiac level, including left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH), diastolic dysfunction, aortic root dilatation, and left atrial enlargement. In particular, LVH was shown to be a strong and independent risk factor for major CV events, namely myocardial infarction, stroke, congestive heart failure, CV death. Thus, early identification of LVH is a key element for preventing CV events in hypertension. Although echocardiographic assessment of LVH represents the gold standard technique, this is not cost-effective and cannot be adopted in routine clinical practice of hypertension. On the other hand, electrocardiographic (ECG) assessment of HMOD relative to the heart is a simple, reproducible, widely available and cost-effective method to assess the presence of LVH, and could be preferred in large scale screening tests. Several new indicators have been proposed and tested in observational studies and clinical trials of hypertension, in order to improve the relatively low sensitivity of the conventional ECG criteria for LVH, despite high specificity. This article reviews the differences in the use of the main conventional and the new 12 lead ECG criteria of LVH for early assessment of asymptomatic, subclinical cardiac HMOD in a setting of clinical practice of hypertension.

Adding markers of organ damage to risk score models improves cardiovascular risk assessment: Prospective analysis of a large cohort of adult outpatients.

INTRODUCTION: Global cardiovascular (CV) risk stratification is recommended in all outpatients. Risk score charts, however, do not include markers of organ damage (OD). AIM: To evaluate the potential added value of including different markers of subclinical OD to US Framingham, European SCORE and Italian Cuore risk score calculators. METHODS: We prospectively evaluated adult outpatients, who underwent blood pressure (BP) assessment and global CV risk stratification. The following OD markers were considered: 1) cardiac OD: electrocardiographic) or echocardiographic left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy; 2) vascular OD: carotid atherosclerotic plaque; 3) renal OD: reduced estimated glomerular filtration rate or creatinine clearance. Different risk score calculators were applied for comparisons. RESULTS: We included an overall population sample of 1979 outpatients (44.0% female, age 57.2±13.0years, BMI 26,6±4,4kg/m2, clinic systolic/diastolic BP 145.4±18.3/85.8±10.7mmHg), among whom 117 (5.9%) presented cardiac, 161 (8.1%) vascular, and 117 (5.9%) renal OD. US Framingham, European SCORE and Italian Cuore risk scores were all significantly raised in patients with than in those without OD. A trend toward increase for US Framingham CVD death, European ESC and Italian Cuore scores was observed according to degree of all markers of OD. Among these, reduced ClCr and eGFR showed high sensitivity and specificity to identify high risk individuals. CONCLUSIONS: Presence of cardiac, vascular or renal OD is associated with higher risk scores, independently by the types of calculators, age and gender classes. OD detection should be included in CV risk stratification in order to improve diagnostic, prognostic and therapeutic processes.