Demystifying pharmaceutical patient assistance programs.

Prescription drug costs impose a significant financial burden on the United States healthcare system. Patients with chronic dermatologic diseases often require long-term and expensive prescription drugs. In an effort to expand drug availability, pharmaceutical companies fund patient assistance programs (PAPs) to assist disadvantaged patients in gaining access to high-priced brand name medications with no suitable therapeutic alternative. Patients and clinical staff often face difficulty navigating the various PAPs. Herein, we seek to explore the utility, criteria, and challenges in PAPs and provide a practical discourse for dermatologists caring for medically indigent patients.

Medicare and medicaid spending trends for immunomodulators prescribed for dermatologic conditions.

Immunomodulators are the most expensive prescription medications used in dermatology for chronic skin conditions. Each year, rising costs for immunomodulators pose significant financial burdens on patients and the healthcare system as a whole. Using the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) we collected Medicare Part D (Medicare-D) and Medicaid spending data for immunomodulators with dermatologic indications or off-label use from 2012-2018. The average annual spending and average annual spending per dosage unit (AASPDU) was calculated for each of the thirteen included medications. Combined Medicare-D and Medicaid spending increased 319.9% from $2.5B in 2012 to $10.6B in 2018, with an average of $6.2B spent annually. For both Medicare-D and Medicaid, adalimumab ($1.8B, $968.8 m), etanercept ($1.4B, $467.5 m), and ustekinumab ($258.8 m, $131.0 m) had the highest overall annual spending. Additionally, ustekinumab ($16,825, $15,576), guselkumab ($10,132, $9,543), and ixekizumab ($4,895, $4,673) had the highest AASPDU for both Medicare-D and Medicaid. Medicare-D and Medicaid spending for immunomodulators has grown substantially (319.9%) from 2012-2018 and is likely to continue to rise. Given this increase in federal spending and continued emergence of new immunomodulators, it is important to learn how we can counteract the trends and reduce future expenses for patients and our healthcare system.

Medicaid and Medicare Part B spending on immunomodulators and biosimilars.

INTRODUCTION: Prices for immunomodulators used in dermatological conditions are rising in the United States. While Medicare Part-D solely covers medication costs, Medicare Part-B covers outpatient infusion and injection costs given by medical professionals. We aim to analyze recent trends in Medicare Part-B spending on immunomodulators and their biosimilars used in the treatment of common chronic inflammatory dermatoses. METHODS: The 2012-2018 Medicare Part-B spending data on immunomodulators commonly used for dermatologic conditions were extracted from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services database. Inflation was adjusted to reflect 2012-dollar amounts using the Consumer Price Index. RESULTS: Medicare Part-B spending has increased by 27.5% from 2012 to 2018 ($2.5B, $3.2B). Average annual total spending (AATS) is greatest for rituximab ($1,522,757,520), and average annual spending per maintenance dose (AASPMD) is greatest for ustekinumab-90 mg ($12,976). The percent change in AASPMD increased for all immunomodulators with Etanercept-50 mg having the greatest percent change (+64.6%, +$285.70). Infliximab had a greater AATS and AASPMD than its biosimilars. DISCUSSION: Medicare Part-B spending is often overlooked but plays a big role in federal healthcare spending. Exploring the strategic use of less expensive biosimilars could help mitigate spending.

Pearls for Managing Atopic Dermatitis in Patients With Low Socioeconomic Status.

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic inflammatory dermatosis presenting with inflamed and itchy skin. Recent studies have shown an inverse relationship between socioeconomic status and the severity of AD. Low socioeconomic status (LSES) individuals with AD face specific barriers that may impede management. These include forgoing doctor's appointments due to transportation costs, inability to take time off from work, and lack of affordable childcare services. Unaffordable medications and over-the-counter products for managing AD further present as significant challenges for LSES patients. This article aims to offer practical and affordable recommendations to help mitigate the challenges faced by LSES patients with AD and thereby alleviate disease burden and improve treatment outcomes.