Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 23
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Am J Emerg Med ; 57: 103-106, 2022 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35550927

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Mental health (MH) disorders comprise a high disease burden and have long-lasting impacts. To improve MH, it is important to define public health MH surveillance. METHODS: We compared MH related definitions using ICD-10-CM codes: The Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists' (CSTE) surveillance indicators for all MH, mood or depressive, schizophrenic, and drug/alcohol-induced disorders; and North Carolina's (NC) syndromic surveillance system's definition for anxiety/mood/psychotic disorders, and suicide/self-harm. We compared code definitions and frequent codes in 2019 emergency department (ED) data for those age ≥ 10 years. RESULTS: CSTE's definition resulted in over one million MH-related visits (23% of all ED visits) and NC's definitions in 451,807 MH-related visits (9% of all ED visits). Using CSTE's broadest definition, nicotine use was the most common visit type; using NC's definitions, it was major depressive disorder. CONCLUSIONS: Standardizing population-level MH indicators benefits surveillance efforts. Given its prevalence, efforts should focus on documenting MH to improve treatment and prevention.


Assuntos
Transtorno Depressivo Maior , Saúde Mental , Criança , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Humanos , Classificação Internacional de Doenças , North Carolina/epidemiologia
2.
BMC Psychiatry ; 22(1): 104, 2022 02 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35144585

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: There is a well-established need for population-based screening strategies to identify people at risk of suicide. Because only about half of suicide decedents are ever diagnosed with a behavioral health condition, it may be necessary for providers to consider life circumstances that may also put individuals at risk. This study described the alignment of medical diagnoses with life circumstances by identifying suicide typologies among decedents. Demographics, stressful life events, suicidal behavior, perceived and diagnosed health problems, and suicide method contributed to the typologies. METHODS: This study linked North Carolina Medicaid and North Carolina Violent Death Reporting System (NC-VDRS) data for analysis in 2020. For suicide decedents from 2014 to 2017 aged 25-54 years, we analyzed 12 indicators of life circumstances from NC-VDRS and 6 indicators from Medicaid claims, using a latent class model. Separate models were developed for men and women. RESULTS: Most decedents were White (88.3%), with a median age of 41, and over 70% had a health care visit in the 90 days prior to suicide. Two typologies were identified in both males (n = 175) and females (n = 153). Both typologies had similar profiles of life circumstances, but one had high probabilities of diagnosed behavioral health conditions (45% of men, 71% of women), compared to low probabilities in the other (55% of men, 29% of women). Black beneficiaries and men who died by firearm were over-represented in the less-diagnosed class, though estimates were imprecise (odds ratio for Black men: 3.1, 95% confidence interval: 0.8, 12.4; odds ratio for Black women: 5.0, 95% confidence interval: 0.9, 31.2; odds ratio for male firearm decedents: 1.6, 95% confidence interval: 0.7, 3.4). CONCLUSIONS: Nearly half of suicide decedents have a typology characterized by low probability of diagnosis of behavioral health conditions. Suicide screening could likely be enhanced using improved indicators of lived experience and behavioral health.


Assuntos
Medicaid , Suicídio , Causas de Morte , Feminino , Homicídio , Humanos , Masculino , North Carolina/epidemiologia , Vigilância da População , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
3.
Epidemiology ; 33(2): 237-245, 2022 03 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34799475

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Firearms are used in about half of U.S. suicides. This study investigated how various medical diagnoses are associated with firearm and nonfirearm suicide. METHODS: We used a case-control design including n = 691 North Carolina Medicaid beneficiaries who died from suicide between 1 January 2014 and 31 December 2017 as cases. We selected a total of n = 68,682 controls (~1:100 case-control ratio from North Carolina Medicaid member files using incidence density sampling methods). We linked Medicaid claims to the North Carolina Violent Death Reporting System to ascertain suicide and means (firearm or nonfirearm). We matched cases and controls on number of months covered by Medicaid over the past 36 months. Analyses adjusted for sex, race, age, Supplemental Security Income status, the Charlson Comorbidity Index, and frequency of health care encounters. RESULTS: The case-control odds ratios for any mental health disorder were 4.2 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.3, 5.2) for nonfirearm suicide and 2.2 (95% CI: 1.7, 2.9) for firearm suicide. There was effect measure modification by sex and race. Behavioral health diagnoses were more strongly associated with nonfirearm suicides than firearm suicide in men but did not differ substantially in women. The association of mental health and substance use diagnoses with suicides appeared to be weaker in Blacks (vs. non-Blacks), but the estimates were imprecise. CONCLUSION: Behavioral health diagnoses are important indicators of risk of suicide. However, these associations differ by means of suicide and sex, and associations for firearm-related suicide are weaker in men than women.


Assuntos
Medicaid , Suicídio , Causas de Morte , Feminino , Homicídio , Humanos , Masculino , North Carolina/epidemiologia , Vigilância da População , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
5.
Am J Public Health ; 111(9): 1682-1685, 2021 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34383554

RESUMO

Objectives. To estimate use of medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD) and prescription opioids in pregnancy among mothers of infants with neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome (NOWS). Methods. We used linked 2016-2018 North Carolina birth certificate and newborn and maternal Medicaid claims data to identify infants with an NOWS diagnosis and maternal claims for MOUD and prescription opioids in pregnancy (n = 3395). Results. Among mothers of infants with NOWS, 38.6% had a claim for MOUD only, 14.3% had a claim for prescription opioids only, 8.1% had a claim for both MOUD and prescription opioids, and 39.1% did not have a claim for MOUD or prescription opioids in pregnancy. Non-Hispanic Black women were less likely to have a claim for MOUD than non-Hispanic White women. The percentage of infants born full term and normal birth weight was highest among women with MOUD or both MOUD and prescription opioid claims. Conclusions. In the 2016-2018 NC Medicaid population, 60% of mothers of infants with NOWS had MOUD or prescription opioid claims in pregnancy, underscoring the extent to which cases of NOWS may be a result of medically appropriate opioid use in pregnancy.


Assuntos
Medicaid/estatística & dados numéricos , Síndrome de Abstinência Neonatal/epidemiologia , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides/epidemiologia , Complicações na Gravidez/tratamento farmacológico , Efeitos Tardios da Exposição Pré-Natal/epidemiologia , Adulto , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapêutico , Buprenorfina/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Síndrome de Abstinência Neonatal/prevenção & controle , North Carolina , Gravidez , Complicações na Gravidez/epidemiologia , Efeitos Tardios da Exposição Pré-Natal/prevenção & controle , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos , Adulto Jovem
6.
Traffic Inj Prev ; 21(8): 545-551, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33095063

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to estimate the potential injuries and costs that could be averted by implementing evidence-based road safety policies and interventions not currently utilized in one U.S. state, North Carolina (NC). NC consistently has annual motor vehicle-related death rates above the national average. METHODS: We used the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Motor Vehicle Prioritizing Interventions and Cost Calculator for States (MV PICCS) tool as a foundation for examining the potential injuries and costs that could be averted from underutilized evidence-based policies, assuming a $1.5 million implementation budget and that income generated from policy-related fines and fees would help offset costs. We further examined costs by payer source. RESULTS: Model results indicated that seven interventions should be prioritized for implementation in NC: increased alcohol ignition interlock use, increased seat belt fines, in-person license renewal for ages 70 and older, license plate impoundment, seat belt enforcement campaigns, saturation patrols, and speed cameras. Increasing the seat belt fine had the potential to avert the greatest number of fatal (n = 70) and non-fatal (n = 6,597) injuries annually, along with being the most cost-effective of the recommended interventions. Collectively, the seven recommended evidence-based policies/interventions have the potential to avert 302 fatal injuries, 16,607 non-fatal injuries, and $839 million annually in NC with the greatest costs averted for insurers. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the utility of the MV PICCS tool as a foundation for exploring state-specific impacts that could be realized through increased evidence-based road safety policy and intervention implementation. For NC, we found that increasing the seat belt fine would avert the most injuries, and had the greatest financial benefits for the state, and the lowest implementation costs. Incorporating fines and fees into policy implementation can create important financial feedbacks that allow for implementation of additional evidence-based and cost-effective policies/interventions. Given the recent uptick in U.S. motor vehicle-related deaths, analyses informed by the MV PICCS tool can help researchers and policy makers initiate discussions about successful state-specific strategies for reducing the burden of crashes.


Assuntos
Acidentes de Trânsito/prevenção & controle , Redução de Custos/estatística & dados numéricos , Política Pública , Segurança/legislação & jurisprudência , Ferimentos e Lesões/prevenção & controle , Acidentes de Trânsito/estatística & dados numéricos , Prática Clínica Baseada em Evidências , Humanos , North Carolina/epidemiologia , Ferimentos e Lesões/epidemiologia
7.
Drug Alcohol Depend ; 204: 107536, 2019 11 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31494440

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: In August 2013, a naloxone distribution program was implemented in North Carolina (NC). This study evaluated that program by quantifying the association between the program and county-level opioid overdose death (OOD) rates and conducting a cost-benefit analysis. METHODS: One-group pre-post design. Data included annual county-level counts of naloxone kits distributed from 2013 to 2016 and mortality data from 2000-2016. We used generalized estimating equations to estimate the association between cumulative rates of naloxone kits distributed and annual OOD rates. Costs included naloxone kit purchases and distribution costs; benefits were quantified as OODs avoided and monetized using a conservative value of a life. RESULTS: The rate of OOD in counties with 1-100 cumulative naloxone kits distributed per 100,000 population was 0.90 times (95% CI: 0.78, 1.04) that of counties that had not received kits. In counties that received >100 cumulative kits per 100,000 population, the OOD rate was 0.88 times (95% CI: 0.76, 1.02) that of counties that had not received kits. By December 2016, an estimated 352 NC deaths were avoided by naloxone distribution (95% CI: 189, 580). On average, for every dollar spent on the program, there was $2742 of benefit due to OODs avoided (95% CI: $1,237, $4882). CONCLUSIONS: Our estimates suggest that community-based naloxone distribution is associated with lower OOD rates. The program generated substantial societal benefits due to averted OODs. States and communities should continue to support efforts to increase naloxone access, which may include reducing legal, financial, and normative barriers.


Assuntos
Atenção à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Overdose de Drogas/mortalidade , Naloxona/uso terapêutico , Antagonistas de Entorpecentes/uso terapêutico , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides/mortalidade , Adolescente , Adulto , Análise Custo-Benefício , Atenção à Saúde/economia , Overdose de Drogas/tratamento farmacológico , Overdose de Drogas/economia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Naloxona/economia , Antagonistas de Entorpecentes/economia , North Carolina/epidemiologia , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides/tratamento farmacológico , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides/economia , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde , Adulto Jovem
8.
Am J Ind Med ; 62(7): 568-579, 2019 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31104330

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Use of worker's compensation (WC) as payer underestimates work-related (WR) injuries. We evaluated three methods to identify WR injuries: WC as payer, ICD-9-CM work-status codes E000.0/E000.1, and other ICD-9-CM external cause codes. METHODS: We identified injury-related emergency department visits from North Carolina's syndromic surveillance system (2010-2013). Characteristics were compared by indicator. We manually reviewed 800 admission notes to confirm if the visit was WR or non-WR; WR keywords from the review were applied to all visits. RESULTS: 133 156 injury-related visits (age, 16 years or older) were identified: WC = 69%, work-status codes = 18%, other ICD-9-CM codes = 13%. Among manually reviewed visits: few visits identified by WC (0.3%) or work-status codes (2%) were non-WR, while 12% of other ICD-9-CM code identified visits were non-WR; 53%, 46%, and 31% of visits identified by WC, work-status codes, and other ICD-9-CM codes were WR, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Findings support use of WC and work-status codes to capture WR injuries; other ICD-9-CM codes should be used with caution or in combination with other indicators.


Assuntos
Codificação Clínica/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Classificação Internacional de Doenças , Traumatismos Ocupacionais/diagnóstico , Indenização aos Trabalhadores/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Feminino , Hospitalização , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , North Carolina/epidemiologia , Traumatismos Ocupacionais/economia , Traumatismos Ocupacionais/epidemiologia , Vigilância de Evento Sentinela , Adulto Jovem
9.
N C Med J ; 79(3): 149-155, 2018.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29735615

RESUMO

BACKGROUND Naloxone-an opioid antagonist that reverses the effects of opioids-is increasingly being distributed in non-medical settings. We sought to identify the facilitators of, and barriers to, opioid users using naloxone kits in North Carolina.METHODS In 2015, we administered a 15-item survey to a convenience sample of 100 treatment seekers at 4 methadone/buprenorphine Medication Assisted Therapy (MAT) clinics in North Carolina.RESULTS Seventy-four percent of participants reported having ever gotten a naloxone kit; this percentage was higher for females (81%) than males (63%) (P = .06). The primary reason given for not having a kit was not knowing where to get one. Only 6% had heard of kits from the media and only 5% received one from a medical provider. Among kit recipients, 56% of both females and males reported mostly or sometimes carrying the kit, with additional participants reporting always. Reasons for not carrying a kit were no longer being around drugs, forgetting it, and the kit being too large. Men discussed the difficulties of carrying the naloxone kits, which are currently too large to fit in a pocket. Ninety-four percent of naloxone users reported intending to call emergency services in case of an overdose emergency.LIMITATIONS Study limitations included a small sample, participants limited to MAT clinics, and a predominantly white sample.CONCLUSIONS MAT treatment seekers reported a willingness to carry and use naloxone kits. Education, outreach, media, and medical providers need to promote naloxone kits. A smaller kit may increase the likelihood of men carrying one.


Assuntos
Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapêutico , Overdose de Drogas/tratamento farmacológico , Naloxona/uso terapêutico , Antagonistas de Entorpecentes/uso terapêutico , Tratamento de Substituição de Opiáceos , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides/tratamento farmacológico , Analgésicos Opioides/intoxicação , Buprenorfina/uso terapêutico , Overdose de Drogas/etiologia , Feminino , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Metadona/uso terapêutico , North Carolina , Fatores Sexuais , Inquéritos e Questionários
10.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 67(18): 529-532, 2018 May 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29746453

RESUMO

The Appalachian region of the United States is experiencing a large increase in hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections related to injection drug use (IDU) (1). Syringe services programs (SSPs) providing sufficient access to safe injection equipment can reduce hepatitis C transmission by 56%; combined SSPs and medication-assisted treatment can reduce transmission by 74% (2). However, access to SSPs has been limited in the United States, especially in rural areas and southern and midwestern states (3). This report describes the expansion of SSPs in Kentucky, North Carolina, and West Virginia during 2013-August 1, 2017. State-level data on the number of SSPs, client visits, and services offered were collected by each state through surveys of SSPs and aggregated in a standard format for this report. In 2013, one SSP operated in a free clinic in West Virginia, and SSPs were illegal in Kentucky and North Carolina; by August 2017, SSPs had been legalized in Kentucky and North Carolina, and 53 SSPs operated in the three states. In many cases, SSPs provide integrated services to address hepatitis and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection, overdose, addiction, unintended pregnancy, neonatal abstinence syndrome, and other complications of IDU. Prioritizing development of SSPs with sufficient capacity, particularly in states with counties vulnerable to epidemics of hepatitis and HIV infection related to IDU, can expand access to care for populations at risk.


Assuntos
Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Programas de Troca de Agulhas/legislação & jurisprudência , Infecções por HIV/epidemiologia , Infecções por HIV/prevenção & controle , Hepatite C/epidemiologia , Hepatite C/prevenção & controle , Humanos , Kentucky/epidemiologia , North Carolina/epidemiologia , Abuso de Substâncias por Via Intravenosa/complicações , West Virginia/epidemiologia
11.
Public Health Rep ; 132(4): 488-495, 2017.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28633003

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: In 2012, a consensus document was developed on drug overdose poisoning definitions. We took the opportunity to apply these new definitions to health care administrative data in 4 states. Our objective was to calculate and compare drug (particularly opioid) poisoning rates in these 4 states for 4 selected Injury Surveillance Workgroup 7 (ISW7) drug poisoning indicators, using 2 ISW7 surveillance definitions, Option A and Option B. We also identified factors related to the health care administrative data used by each state that might contribute to poisoning rate variations. METHODS: We used state-level hospital and emergency department (ED) discharge data to calculate age-adjusted rates for 4 drug poisoning indicators (acute drug poisonings, acute opioid poisonings, acute opioid analgesic poisonings, and acute or chronic opioid poisonings) using just the principal diagnosis or first-listed external cause-of-injury fields (Option A) or using all diagnosis or external cause-of-injury fields (Option B). We also calculated the high-to-low poisoning rate ratios to measure rate variations. RESULTS: The average poisoning rates per 100 000 population for the 4 ISW7 poisoning indicators ranged from 11.2 to 216.4 (ED) and from 14.2 to 212.8 (hospital). For each indicator, ED rates were usually higher than were hospital rates. High-to-low rate ratios between states were lowest for the acute drug poisoning indicator (range, 1.5-1.6). Factors potentially contributing to rate variations included administrative data structure, accessibility, and submission regulations. CONCLUSIONS: The ISW7 Option B surveillance definition is needed to fully capture the state burden of opioid poisonings. Efforts to control for factors related to administrative data, standardize data sources on a national level, and improve data source accessibility for state health departments would improve the accuracy of drug poisoning surveillance.


Assuntos
Analgésicos Opioides/intoxicação , Codificação Clínica/estatística & dados numéricos , Overdose de Drogas/epidemiologia , Classificação Internacional de Doenças/estatística & dados numéricos , Vigilância da População/métodos , Codificação Clínica/normas , Bases de Dados como Assunto , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/tendências , Hospitais/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais/tendências , Humanos , Drogas Ilícitas/intoxicação , Classificação Internacional de Doenças/normas , Uso Excessivo dos Serviços de Saúde/tendências , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
12.
N C Med J ; 77(5): 308-13, 2016.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27621337

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Injury and violence-related morbidity and mortality present a major public health problem in North Carolina. However, the extent to which local health departments (LHDs) engage in injury and violence prevention (IVP) has not been well described. OBJECTIVES: One objective of the current study is to provide a baseline assessment of IVP in the state's LHDs, describing capacity, priorities, challenges, and the degree to which programs are data-driven and evidence-based. The study will also describe a replicable, cost-effective method for systematic assessment of regional IVP. DESIGN: This is an observational, cross-sectional study that was conducted through a survey of North Carolina's 85 LHDs. RESULTS: Representatives from 77 LHDs (91%) responded. Nearly one-third (n = 23; 30%) reported that no staff members were familiar with evidence-based interventions in IVP, and over one-third (n = 29; 38%) reported that their LHD did not train staff in IVP. Almost one-half (n = 37; 48%) had no dedicated funding for IVP. On average, respondents said that about half of their programs were evidence-based; however, there was marked variation (mean, 52%; standard deviation = 41). Many collaborated with diverse partners including law enforcement, hospitals, and community-based organizations. There was discordance between injury and violence burden and programming. Overall, 53% of issues listed as top local problems were not targeted in their LHDs' programs. CONCLUSIONS: Despite funding constraints, North Carolina's LHDs engaged in a broad range of IVP activities. However, programming did not uniformly address state injury and violence priorities, nor local injury and violence burden. Staff members need training in evidence-based strategies that target priority areas. Multisector partnerships were common and increased LHDs' capacity. These findings are actionable at the state and local level.


Assuntos
Saúde Pública , Violência , Ferimentos e Lesões , Análise Custo-Benefício , Estudos Transversais , Prática Clínica Baseada em Evidências/métodos , Prática Clínica Baseada em Evidências/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Governo Local , Avaliação das Necessidades , North Carolina/epidemiologia , Avaliação de Processos em Cuidados de Saúde , Saúde Pública/economia , Saúde Pública/métodos , Desenvolvimento de Pessoal/normas , Violência/prevenção & controle , Violência/estatística & dados numéricos , Recursos Humanos , Ferimentos e Lesões/diagnóstico , Ferimentos e Lesões/epidemiologia , Ferimentos e Lesões/etiologia
13.
N C Med J ; 77(1): 30-6, 2016.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26763241

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Health disparities among persons with disabilities have been previously documented. However, there is little research specific to adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) in this population and how ACE exposure affects health outcomes in adulthood. METHODS: Data from the 2012 North Carolina Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) survey were analyzed to compare the prevalence of ACEs between adults with and without disabilities and high ACE exposure (3-8 ACEs). Adjusted risk ratios of health risks and perceived poor health by disability status were calculated using predicted marginals. RESULTS: A higher percentage of persons with disabilities (36.5%) than those without disabilities (19.6%) reported high ACE exposure. Among those with high ACE exposure, persons with disabilities were more likely to report several ACE categories, particularly childhood sexual abuse. In adjusted analyses, persons with disabilities had an increased risk of smoking (relative risk [RR] = 1.29; 95% CI, 1.10-1.51), poor physical health (RR = 4.34; 95% CI, 3.08-6.11), poor mental health (RR = 4.69; 95% CI, 3.19-6.87), and doctor-diagnosed depression (RR = 2.16; 95% CI, 1.82-2.56) compared to persons without disabilities. LIMITATIONS: The definition of disability derived from the BRFSS survey does not allow for those with disabilities to be categorized according to physical disabilities versus mental or emotional disabilities. In addition, we were unable to determine the timing of ACE exposure in relation to disability onset. CONCLUSIONS: A better understanding of the life course associations between ACEs and disability and the impact of exposure to multiple types of childhood adversity on disability and health is needed to inform research and services specific to this vulnerable population.


Assuntos
Maus-Tratos Infantis/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoas com Deficiência/psicologia , Assunção de Riscos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Sistema de Vigilância de Fator de Risco Comportamental , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Criança , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , North Carolina , Adulto Jovem
14.
J Prim Prev ; 36(5): 287-99, 2015 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26143508

RESUMO

The misuse, abuse and diversion of controlled substances have reached epidemic proportion in the United States. Contributing to this problem are providers who over-prescribe these substances. Using one state's prescription drug monitoring program, we describe a series of metrics we developed to identify providers manifesting unusual and uncustomary prescribing practices. We then present the results of a preliminary effort to assess the concurrent validity of these algorithms, using death records from the state's vital records database pertaining to providers who wrote prescriptions to patients who then died of a medication or drug overdose within 30 days. Metrics manifesting the strongest concurrent validity with providers identified from these records related to those who co-prescribed benzodiazepines (e.g., valium) and high levels of opioid analgesics (e.g., oxycodone), as well as those who wrote temporally overlapping prescriptions. We conclude with a discussion of a variety of uses to which these metrics may be put, as well as problems and opportunities related to their use.


Assuntos
Substâncias Controladas , Revisão de Uso de Medicamentos/métodos , Prescrição Inadequada/prevenção & controle , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Algoritmos , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapêutico , Prescrições de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Prescrição Inadequada/estatística & dados numéricos , North Carolina/epidemiologia
15.
J Head Trauma Rehabil ; 30(3): 175-84, 2015.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25955704

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To examine statewide emergency department (ED) visit data for motorcycle crash morbidity and healthcare utilization due to traumatic brain injuries (TBIs) and non-TBIs. SETTING: North Carolina ED data (2010-2012) and hospital discharge data (2009-2011). POPULATION: Statewide ED visits and hospitalizations due to injuries from traffic-related motorcycle crashes stratified by TBI status. DESIGN: Descriptive study. MAIN MEASURES: Descriptive statistics include age, sex, mode of transport, disposition, expected source of payment, hospital length of stay, and hospital charges. RESULTS: Over the study period, there were 18 780 ED visits and 3737 hospitalizations due to motorcycle crashes. Twelve percent of ED visits for motorcycle crashes and 26% of hospitalizations for motorcycle crashes had a diagnosis of TBI. Motorcycle crash-related hospitalizations with a TBI diagnosis had median hospital charges that were nearly $9000 greater than hospitalizations without a TBI diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: Emergency department visits and hospitalizations due to motorcycle crashes with a TBI diagnosis consumed more healthcare resources than motorcycle crash-related ED visits and hospitalizations without a TBI diagnosis. Increased awareness of motorcyclists by other road users and increased use of motorcycle helmets are 2 strategies to mitigate the incidence and severity of motorcycle crash injuries, including TBIs.


Assuntos
Acidentes de Trânsito/estatística & dados numéricos , Lesões Encefálicas/epidemiologia , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Motocicletas , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Lesões Encefálicas/economia , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Preços Hospitalares/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitalização/economia , Humanos , Incidência , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , North Carolina/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem
16.
N C Med J ; 76(2): 70-5, 2015 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25856346

RESUMO

BACKGROUND North Carolina requires motorcyclists of all ages to wear federally approved safety helmets. The purpose of this article is to estimate the impact of this state law in terms of hospital admissions for traumatic brain injury (TBI) and associated hospital charges. METHODS Hospital admissions of North Carolina motorcyclists with TBIs and associated hospital charges in 2011 were extracted from the North Carolina Hospital Discharge Data system. We estimated hospital admissions and charges for the same year under the counterfactual condition of North Carolina without a universal motorcycle helmet law by using various substitutes (Florida, Pennsylvania, and South Carolina residents treated in North Carolina). RESULTS North Carolina's universal helmet law prevented an estimated 190 to 226 hospital admissions of North Carolina motorcyclists with TBI in 2011. Averted hospital charges to taxpayer-funded sources (ie, government and public charges) were estimated to be between $9.5 million and $11.6 million for 2011, and total averted hospital charges for 2011 were estimated to be between $25.3 million and $31.0 million. LIMITATIONS Cost estimates are limited to inpatients during the initial period of hospital care. This study was unable to capture long-term health care costs and productivity losses incurred by North Carolina's TBI patients and their caregivers. CONCLUSIONS North Carolina's universal motorcycle helmet law generates health and economic benefits for the state and its taxpayers.


Assuntos
Lesões Encefálicas/economia , Dispositivos de Proteção da Cabeça , Preços Hospitalares/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitalização/economia , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Motocicletas/legislação & jurisprudência , Condução de Veículo/legislação & jurisprudência , Lesões Encefálicas/epidemiologia , Lesões Encefálicas/terapia , Humanos , North Carolina/epidemiologia
18.
Pain Res Manag ; 19(4): 179-85, 2014.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24809067

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Despite >20 years of studies investigating the characteristics of patients seeking or receiving opioid analgesics, research characterizing factors associated with physicians' opioid prescribing practices has been inconclusive, and the role of practitioner specialty in opioid prescribing practices remains largely unknown. OBJECTIVE: To examine the relationships between physicians' and other providers' primary specialties and their opioid prescribing practices among patients with chronic noncancer pain (CNCP). METHODS: Prescriptions for opioids filled by 81,459 Medicaid patients with CNCP in North Carolina (USA), 18 to 64 years of age, enrolled at any point during a one-year study period were examined. χ2 statistics were used to examine bivariate differences in prescribing practices according to specialty. For multivariable analyses, maximum-likelihood logistic regression models were used to examine the effect of specialty on prescribing practices, controlling for patients' pain diagnoses and demographic characteristics. RESULTS: Of prescriptions filled by patients with CNCP, who constituted 6.4% of the total sample of 1.28 million individuals, 12.0% were for opioids. General practitioner/family medicine specialists and internists were least likely to prescribe opioids, and orthopedists were most likely. Across specialties, men were more likely to receive opioids than women, as were white individuals relative to other races/ethnicities. In multivariate analyses, all specialties except internal medicine had higher odds of prescribing an opioid than general practitioners: orthopedists, OR 7.1 (95% CI 6.7 to 7.5); dentists, OR 3.5 (95% CI 3.3 to 3.6); and emergency medicine physicians, OR 2.7 (95% CI 2.6 to 2.8). CONCLUSIONS: Significant differences in opioid prescribing practices across prescriber specialties may be reflective of differing norms concerning the appropriateness of opioids for the control of chronic pain. If so, sharing these norms across specialties may improve the care of patients with CNCP.


Assuntos
Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapêutico , Dor Crônica/tratamento farmacológico , Medicaid , Padrões de Prática Médica , Medicamentos sob Prescrição , Adolescente , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Feminino , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , North Carolina , Estados Unidos , Adulto Jovem
19.
South Med J ; 105(4): 225-30, 2012 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22475675

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Because household firearms pose a risk to children, this study examined firearms accessibility in North Carolina households with children. METHODS: In 2008, parents completing the North Carolina Child Health Assessment and Monitoring Program survey were asked how many firearms they owned and their firearms storage practices. Weighted analyses provided estimates of ownership and storage practices and examined variation by sociodemographics. RESULTS: A total of 37% of 2885 parents reported owning firearms. Whites (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 3.9 [95% confidence interval {CI} 2.9-5.2]), households with income >200% of the federal poverty level (aOR 1.7 [95% CI 1.2-2.5]) and married parents (aOR 2.4 [95% CI 1.8-3.4]) were more likely to own firearms. Ownership of more than one firearm was greater among whites (aOR 2.2 [95% CI 1.4-3.4]) and married parents (aOR 1.8 [95% CI 1.5-2.8]) than other groups. The number of firearms owned increased with children's age. Although most parents reported keeping firearms locked and unloaded (57%), many reported unsafe storage practices, which varied by race/ethnicity. Whites were more likely (45%) to store firearms unlocked and/or loaded than other groups (35%). CONCLUSIONS: Many North Carolina youth have access to household firearms, with white youth being more likely to have firearms, a greater number of firearms, and less safely stored firearms than other race/ethnicity groups. Further interventions and policies to reduce youth access to household firearms are needed. Future research should examine and address why whites, married couples, and those with socioeconomic advantages are more likely than individuals not belonging to these groups to own household firearms and store them unsafely.


Assuntos
Armas de Fogo , Propriedade , População Negra , Criança , Humanos , Renda , North Carolina , Fatores Socioeconômicos , População Branca
20.
N C Med J ; 70(3): 205-12, 2009.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19653602

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: In 1999, North Carolina first conducted the Youth Tobacco Survey (YTS) among middle and high school students and found current smoking rates higher than the national average. In 2003, school and community grants across the state were funded to prevent and reduce youth tobacco use. METHODS: The North Carolina YTS has been conducted every other year since 1999 with high response rates by schools and students. The YTS is a written survey administered during the school day. It is voluntary and anonymous. RESULTS: In 2007 middle and high school student tobacco use rates reached their lowest point in the last decade. Nineteen percent of high school students reported current cigarette smoking, while 4.5% of middle school students said that they currently smoke. Almost every type of tobacco product use (cigarette, cigar, pipe, and bidi) has decreased since the 1999 YTS, with increasing rates of decline in cigarette use from 2003-2007 compared to 1999-2003. LIMITATIONS: This is a cross-sectional survey conducted every other year where students self-report use, attitudes, and perceptions. CONCLUSIONS: North Carolina's youth tobacco use rates have declined more steeply since 2003 when the tobacco initiatives started by the North Carolina Health and Wellness Trust Fund (HWTF) began to mobilize communities statewide. Continuing to fund and expand evidence-based tobacco prevention strategies is likely necessary in order to sustain steady declines in youth smoking rates.


Assuntos
Comportamentos Relacionados com a Saúde , Assunção de Riscos , Instituições Acadêmicas/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudantes/estatística & dados numéricos , Tabagismo/epidemiologia , Adolescente , Criança , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Promoção da Saúde , Inquéritos Epidemiológicos , Humanos , Masculino , North Carolina/epidemiologia , Prevalência , Fatores de Risco , Marketing Social , Percepção Social , Tabagismo/prevenção & controle
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA