Clinician Needs for Electronic Health Record Pediatric and Adolescent Weight Management Tools: A Mixed-Methods Study.

BACKGROUND: Clinicians play an important role in addressing pediatric and adolescent obesity, but their effectiveness is restricted by time constraints, competing clinical demands, and the lack of effective electronic health record (EHR) tools. EHR tools are rarely developed with provider input. OBJECTIVES: We conducted a mixed method study of clinicians who provide weight management care to children and adolescents to determine current barriers for effective care and explore the role of EHR weight management tools to overcome these barriers. METHODS: In this mixed-methods study, we conducted three 1-hour long virtual focus groups at one medium-sized academic health center in Missouri and analyzed the focus group scripts using thematic analysis. We sequentially conducted a descriptive statistical analysis of a survey emailed to pediatric and family medicine primary care clinicians (n = 52) at two private and two academic health centers in Missouri. RESULTS: Surveyed clinicians reported that they effectively provided health behavior lifestyle counseling at well-child visits (mean of 60 on a scale of 1-100) and child obesity visits (63); however, most felt the current health care system (27) and EHR tools (41) do not adequately support pediatric weight management. Major themes from the clinician focus groups were that EHR weight management tools should display data in a way that (1) improves clinical efficiency, (2) supports patient-centered communication, (3) improves patient continuity between visits, and (4) reduces documentation burdens. An additional theme was (5) clinicians trust patient data entered in real time over patient recalled data. CONCLUSION: Study participants report that the health care system status quo and currently available EHR tools do not sufficiently support clinicians working to manage pediatric or adolescent obesity and provide health behavior counseling. Clinician input in the development and testing of EHR weight management tools provides opportunities to address barriers, inform content, and improve efficiencies of EHR use.

An Algorithm for Activity Recognition and Assessment of Adults Poststroke.

IMPORTANCE: Stroke is the leading cause of long-term disability in the United States. Providers have no robust tools to objectively and accurately measure the activity of people with stroke living at home. OBJECTIVE: To explore the integration of validated upper extremity assessments poststroke within an activity recognition system. DESIGN: Exploratory descriptive study using data previously collected over 3 mo to report on algorithm testing and assessment integration. SETTING: Data were collected in the homes of community-dwelling participants. PARTICIPANTS: Participants were at least 6 mo poststroke, were able to ambulate with or without an assistive device, and self-reported some difficulty using their arm in everyday activities. OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The activity detection algorithm's accuracy was determined by comparing its activity labels with manual labels. The algorithm integrated assessment by describing the quality of upper extremity movement, which was determined by reporting extent of reach, mean and maximum speed during movement, and smoothness of movement. RESULTS: Sixteen participants (9 women, 7 men) took part in this study, with an average age of 63.38 yr (SD = 12.84). The algorithm was highly accurate in correctly identifying activities, with 87% to 95% accuracy depending on the movement. The algorithm was also able to detect the quality of movement for upper extremity movements. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The algorithm was able to accurately identify in-kitchen activities performed by adults poststroke. Information about the quality of these movements was also successfully calculated. This algorithm has the potential to supplement clinical assessments in treatment planning and outcomes reporting. Plain-Language Summary: This study shows that clinical algorithms have the potential to inform occupational therapy practice by providing clinically relevant data about the in-home activities of adults poststroke. The algorithm accurately identified activities that were performed in the kitchen by adults poststroke. The algorithm also identified the quality of upper extremity movements of people poststroke who were living at home.

Novel clinically-relevant assessment of upper extremity movement using depth sensors.

BACKGROUND: For individuals post-stroke, home-based programs are necessary to deliver additional hours of therapy outside of the limited time in the clinic. Virtual reality (VR)-based approaches show modest outcomes in improving client function when delivered in the home. The movement sensors used in these VR-based approaches, such as the Microsoft Kinect® have been validated against gold standards tools but have not been used as an assessment of upper extremity movement quality in the stroke population. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to explore the use of a movement sensor paired with a VR-based intervention to assess upper extremity movement for individuals post-stroke. METHODS: Movement data captured with the Microsoft Kinect® from four separate studies were aggregated for analysis (n = 8 individuals post-stroke, n = 30 individuals without disabilities). For all participants, the skeletal data (x, y, z coordinates for 15 tracked joints) for each game play session were processed in MatLab and movement variables (normalized jerk, movement path ratio, average path sway) were calculated using an OPTICS density-based cluster algorithm. RESULTS: Data from the 30 healthy individuals created a normative baseline for the three kinematic variables. Individuals post-stroke were less efficient and had more jerky movements in both upper extremities as compared to healthy individuals. CONCLUSION: It is feasible to use a movement sensor paired with a VR-based intervention to quantify and qualify upper extremity movement for individuals post-stroke. Further research with a larger cohort is necessary to establish clinical sensitivity and specificity.