RESUMO
Background: Despite high rates of cardiovascular disease in Scotland, the prevalence and outcomes of patients with cardiogenic shock are unknown. Methods: We undertook a prospective observational cohort study of consecutive patients with cardiogenic shock admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) or coronary care unit at 13 hospitals in Scotland for a 6-month period. Denominator data from the Scottish Intensive Care Society Audit Group were used to estimate ICU prevalence; data for coronary care units were unavailable. We undertook multivariable logistic regression to identify factors associated with in-hospital mortality. Results: In total, 247 patients with cardiogenic shock were included. After exclusion of coronary care unit admissions, this comprised 3.0% of all ICU admissions during the study period (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.6%-3.5%). Aetiology was acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in 48%. The commonest vasoactive treatment was noradrenaline (56%) followed by adrenaline (46%) and dobutamine (40%). Mechanical circulatory support was used in 30%. Overall in-hospital mortality was 55%. After multivariable logistic regression, age (odds ratio [OR] 1.04, 95% CI 1.02-1.06), admission lactate (OR 1.10, 95% CI 1.05-1.19), Society for Cardiovascular Angiographic Intervention stage D or E at presentation (OR 2.16, 95% CI 1.10-4.29) and use of adrenaline (OR 2.73, 95% CI 1.40-5.40) were associated with mortality. Conclusions: In Scotland the prevalence of cardiogenic shock was 3% of all ICU admissions; more than half died prior to discharge. There was significant variation in treatment approaches, particularly with respect to vasoactive support strategy.
Assuntos
COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Fortalecimento Institucional/organização & administração , Administração Hospitalar/métodos , Arquitetura Hospitalar/métodos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva/organização & administração , Inovação Organizacional , Capacidade de Resposta ante Emergências/organização & administração , Humanos , Londres , Seleção de Pessoal/normas , Recursos Humanos em Hospital/normas , SARS-CoV-2 , Medicina EstatalAssuntos
Assistência Ambulatorial/normas , Medicina de Emergência/normas , Medicina de Emergência Baseada em Evidências/normas , Garantia da Qualidade dos Cuidados de Saúde/normas , Doença Aguda , Assistência Ambulatorial/organização & administração , Assistência Ambulatorial/tendências , Medicina de Emergência/organização & administração , Medicina de Emergência/tendências , Necessidades e Demandas de Serviços de Saúde/tendências , Humanos , Tempo de Internação/tendências , Garantia da Qualidade dos Cuidados de Saúde/organização & administração , Medicina Estatal/estatística & dados numéricos , Reino UnidoRESUMO
Pulmonary Embolism is a common cardiopulmonary illness with an age and sex adjusted incidence of around 117 cases per 100 000 person years. The clinical presentation is extremely heterogeneous and non specific. Risk factors for venous thromboembolism are well established. When combined with presenting features and investigations. A multimodality algorithm has led to significant changes in the diagnostic approach of suspected PE. While the best combination of tests for any individual patient remains the subject of controversy this article aims to rationalise the acute physician's approach to diagnosis and use of available investigations.