Health care disparity exists among those undergoing emergent hernia repairs in New York State.

INTRODUCTION: Socioeconomic factors predispose certain populations to an increased exposure to emergent operative procedures. The aim of this study is to evaluate the role socioeconomic factors play in emergent repairs of inguinal, ventral and umbilical hernias. METHODS: The SPARCS database was used to identify all patients undergoing emergent ventral hernia repair (EVR), emergent inguinal hernia repair (EIR), and emergent umbilical hernia repair (EUR) between 2008 and 2015. Chi-square test with exact p values from Monte Carlo simulation determined marginal associations between repairs (elective vs. emergent), and patient characteristics and comorbidities. Multivariable logistic regression models were further utilized to examine socioeconomic disparity. RESULTS: 107,887 ventral hernias, 66,947 inguinal hernias, and 63,515 umbilical hernias (total 238,349) were noted. African Americans were most likely to undergo an EVR compared to Caucasians (OR 1.55, 95% CI: 1.48-1.61), Asians (OR 1.31, 95% CI: 1.15-1.5), and Hispanics (OR 1.3, 95% CI: 1.23-1.37). African Americans were most likely to undergo EIR compared to Caucasians (OR 2.2, 95% CI: 2.06-2.36), Asians (OR 1.74, 95% CI: 1.49-2.02), and Hispanics (OR 1.22, 95% CI: 1.12-1.34). African Americans were most likely to undergo EUR compared to whites (OR 1.29, 95% CI: 1.22-1.36), Asians (26.62%, OR 1.21, 95% CI: 1.01-1.46) and Hispanic (28.03%, OR 1.08, 95% CI: 1.01-1.16). Medicaid patients were also more likely to undergo EVR (OR 1.31, OR 1.73), EIR (OR 2.92, OR 4.55) and EUR (OR 1.63, OR 2.31) compared to Medicare and commercial insurance. CONCLUSION: Race is a contributing factor in who undergoes an emergent hernia repair in New York State. A significantly larger proportion of the African American population is undergoing hernia repair in the emergent setting. Socioeconomic status, as indicated by the significant number of Medicaid patients undergoing emergent hernia repairs, also plays a role.

A research agenda for gastrointestinal and endoscopic surgery.

BACKGROUND: Development of a research agenda may help to inform researchers and research-granting agencies about the key research gaps in an area of research and clinical care. The authors sought to develop a list of research questions for which further research was likely to have a major impact on clinical care in the area of gastrointestinal and endoscopic surgery. METHODS: A formal group process was used to conduct an iterative, anonymous Web-based survey of an expert panel including the general membership of the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES). In round 1, research questions were solicited, which were categorized, collapsed, and rewritten in a common format. In round 2, the expert panel rated all the questions using a priority scale ranging from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest). In round 3, the panel re-rated the 40 questions with the highest mean priority score in round 2. RESULTS: A total of 241 respondents to round 1 submitted 382 questions, which were reduced by a review panel to 106 unique questions encompassing 33 topics in gastrointestinal and endoscopic surgery. In the two successive rounds, respectively, 397 and 385 respondents ranked the questions by priority, then re-ranked the 40 questions with the highest mean priority score. High-priority questions related to antireflux surgery, the oncologic and immune effects of minimally invasive surgery, and morbid obesity. The question with the highest mean priority ranking was: "What is the best treatment (antireflux surgery, endoluminal therapy, or medication) for GERD?" The second highest-ranked question was: "Does minimally invasive surgery improve oncologic outcomes as compared with open surgery?" Other questions covered a broad range of research areas including clinical research, basic science research, education and evaluation, outcomes measurement, and health technology assessment. CONCLUSIONS: An iterative, anonymous group survey process was used to develop a research agenda for gastrointestinal and endoscopic surgery consisting of the 40 most important research questions in the field. This research agenda can be used by researchers and research-granting agencies to focus research activity in the areas most likely to have an impact on clinical care, and to appraise the relevance of scientific contributions.