The association of environmental factors with neurocognitive outcomes in survivors of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL).

PURPOSE: To investigate the association of environmental factors, rehabilitation services during therapy and socioeconomic status (SES - insurance type), with neurocognitive outcomes at the end of therapy for survivors of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). METHODS: Survivors (n = 236) treated on the St. Jude Total Therapy Study 16 completed end of therapy testing with performance measures (IQ, attention, processing speed, fine motor skills, academics) and caregiver ratings (attention, executive function, adaptive skills). Environmental factors were abstracted from the medical record. RESULTS: Distribution of sex (47.3% female, p = 0.399), treatment arm (45.5% low risk, 54.5% standard/high risk p = 0.929), insurance type (47.7% private, 52.3% public/none, p = 0.117), and mean age at diagnosis (7.7 vs. 6.8 years, p = 0.143) were similar for groups with (n = 110; 46.6%) and without (n = 126; 53.6%) rehabilitation services during therapy. Compared to those without rehabilitation, the rehabilitation group (n = 110; 46.4%) had more caregiver reported problems with attention (Z = -0.28 vs. 0.43, p = 0.022), executive function (Z = -0.50 vs. -0.08, p = 0.003), and adaptive skills (Z = -0.41 vs.-0.13, p = 0.031). Among the rehabilitation group, there was no difference in outcomes by insurance status. Among those without rehabilitation, those with public insurance had worse neurocognitive outcomes than those with private insurance in IQ (Z = -0.04 vs. -0.45, p = 0.0115), processing speed (Z = -0.10 vs. -0.75, p = 0.0030), reading (Z = 0.18 vs. -0.59, p < 0.0001), and math (Z = -0.04 vs. -0.50, p = 0.0021). CONCLUSION: Participation in rehabilitation services during early intensive therapy is associated with end of therapy caregiver-reported neurocognitive outcomes in daily life.

Human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor after induction chemotherapy in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

BACKGROUND: Recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor PO1 CA-20180ilgrastim) hastens the recovery from neutropenia after P30 CA-21765emotherapy, but its role in the management of childhood leukemia is unclear. METHODS: We randomly assigned 164 patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (age range, 2 months to 17 years) to receive placebo or G-CSF (10 microg per kilogram of body weight per day subcutaneously), beginning one day after the completion of remission-induction therapy and continuing until the neutrophil count was greater than or equal to 1000 per cubic millimeter for two days. The clinical and laboratory effects of this therapy were documented for 21 days. The area under the plasma G-CSF concentration-time curve was measured on days 1 and 7 in both groups. RESULTS: Responses to the growth factor could be assessed in 148 patients (73 in the G-CSF group and 75 in the placebo group). G-CSF treatment did not significantly lower the rate of hospitalization for febrile neutropenia (58 percent in the G-CSF group vs. 68 percent in the placebo group; relative risk, 0.85; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.59 to 1.16), increase the likelihood of event-free survival at three years (83 percent in both groups), or decrease the number of severe infections (five in the G-CSF group vs. six in the placebo group). Patients treated with G-CSF had shorter median hospital stays (6 days vs. 10 days, P=0.011) and fewer documented infections (12 vs. 27, P=0.009). The median total costs of supportive care were similar in the G-CSF and placebo groups ($8,768 and $8,616, respectively). Among patients who did not have febrile neutropenia during the first week of G-CSF or placebo injections, higher systemic exposure to the growth factor on day 7 was significantly related to a lower probability of subsequent hospitalization (P=0.049). CONCLUSIONS: G-CSF treatment had some clinical benefit in children who received induction chemotherapy for acute lymphoblastic leukemia, but it did not reduce the rate of hospitalization for febrile neutropenia, prolong survival, or reduce the cost of supportive care.