Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Obstet Gynaecol Res ; 45(4): 892-896, 2019 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30623533

RESUMO

AIM: The present study compares the effect and accuracy of the superficial mark guided localization (SGL) and hook-wire guided localization (WGL) techniques for non-palpable breast microcalcifications. METHODS: This retrospective study was conducted to compare SGL and WGL techniques. These techniques were performed on 51 patients with non-palpable breast microcalcifications from January 2015 to May 2016. RESULTS: Among these 51 patients, 25 (49.01%) patients were subjected to WGL and 26 patients (50.99%) were subjected to SGL. The SGL technique had a higher rate of malignant cancer detection (WGL = 12.0% and SGL = 23.0%). Furthermore, no significant differences were found with regard to average age, the rate of a second excision and the diameter of the excised tissue. Moreover, no complications were observed in the SGL group, while four (16.0%) patients in the WGL group experienced problems. CONCLUSION: The SGL technique is as accurate as the WGL technique. Furthermore, the procedure has advantages of being less expensive and causing less complications.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias da Mama/cirurgia , Calcinose/diagnóstico por imagem , Calcinose/cirurgia , Mastectomia Segmentar/normas , Avaliação de Processos em Cuidados de Saúde , Radiografia Intervencionista/normas , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Mastectomia Segmentar/efeitos adversos , Mastectomia Segmentar/economia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Radiografia Intervencionista/efeitos adversos , Radiografia Intervencionista/economia , Estudos Retrospectivos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA