The association between insurance coverage for insulin pen needles and healthcare resource utilization among insulin-dependent patients with diabetes in China.

BACKGROUND: Pen needles are an important component of insulin delivery among patients with diabetes, but are not universally covered in China. We compared clinical and economic characteristics of insulin-dependent patients in China who have some level of pen needle (PN) reimbursement to those with no PN reimbursement. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted among 400 insulin users with Type 1 or Type 2 diabetes treated in outpatient endocrinology units of four large tertiary care hospitals in Nanjing, Chongqing, Beijing and Zhengzhou. Demographics, medical history, healthcare resource utilization (RU), out-of-pocket costs, insurance and PN reimbursement status were surveyed. Unit costs were assigned to healthcare RU and compared using descriptive statistics and multivariate regression models. RESULTS: A total of 400 patients were analyzed; 142 (35.5%) with some level of PN coverage/reimbursement and 258 (64.5%) without. Patients without PN reimbursement had a higher prevalence of lipohypertrophy (59.3% vs. 40.7%, p = 0.0007), greater median PN reuse (12 vs. 7 times per needle, p < 0.0001), greater 6-month insulin costs (1591 vs. 1328 Renminbi [RMB], p = 0.0025) and total unadjusted 6-month expenditures (6433 vs. 4432 RMB, p < 0.0001), respectively. After controlling for clinical and demographic characteristics, patients without PN reimbursement had 4.6 times greater odds of high costs compared to those with PN reimbursement. CONCLUSIONS: Insulin users without PN reimbursement may pose a greater economic burden to China compared to those with PN reimbursement. Expansion of insurance coverage for insulin PNs can improve the quality of care and potentially help reduce the economic burden in this population.

Lipohypertrophy in China: Prevalence, Risk Factors, Insulin Consumption, and Clinical Impact.

BACKGROUND: Lipohypertrophy (LH) is a complication of insulin therapy. We assessed LH prevalence, risk factors, insulin usage, and clinical and health economic effects in China. METHODS: In four cities, 401 adult patients injecting insulin ≥1 year were surveyed for diabetes/insulin injection history and practices, pen needle reimbursement (PNR), and health resource utilization, followed by structured examination and HbA1c testing. Differences between those with and without LH were evaluated by Student's t-test or the Wilcoxon rank sum test. Insulin costs were calculated. RESULTS: Patients were 59.6 ± 11.5 years old; 50% male; 93.5% type 2 diabetes. LH prevalence was 53.1%. Compared to those without LH, patients with LH had higher body mass index (BMI; 26 vs. 24.8 kg/m2) and HbA1c (8.2% vs. 7.7% [66 vs. 61 mmol/mol]), took 11 IU (0.13 IU/kg or 31.7%) more insulin costing $1.4 versus $1.0 (RMB 9.5 vs. 6.8) daily, reused PNs more times, and had less PNR (all P ≤ 0.003). LH patients correctly rotated injection sites less often (67.6% vs. 92.3%, P < 0.0001). By stepwise logistic regression, BMI, needle reuse frequency, and PNR remained modestly associated with LH prevalence (odds ratios [OR] <1.9; P ≤ 0.03); weight-adjusted insulin dose and incorrect site rotation showed ORs of nearly 7 and 8.4, respectively (P ≤ 0.001). Extrapolated to 9 million insulin-injecting patients in China and adjusted for therapy adherence, LH-related excess annual insulin consumption cost is estimated at nearly $297 million (RMB 2 billion). CONCLUSIONS: LH is common in China and associated with worse glycemic control, despite nearly one-third greater insulin consumption, with large cost implications. Proper injection technique education may reduce LH prevalence.