Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
J Clin Monit Comput ; 31(4): 685-692, 2017 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27312841

RESUMO

Non-invasive respiratory variations in arterial pulse pressure using infrared-plethysmography (PPVCNAP) are able to predict fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients. However, they cannot be continuously monitored. The present study evaluated a new algorithm allowing continuous measurements of PPVCNAP (PPVCNAPauto) (CNSystem, Graz, Austria). Thirty-five patients undergoing vascular surgery were studied after induction of general anaesthesia. Stroke volume was measured using the VigileoTM/FloTracTM. Invasive pulse pressure variations were manually calculated using an arterial line (PPVART) and PPVCNAPauto was continuously displayed. PPVART and PPVCNAPauto were simultaneously recorded before and after volume expansion (500 ml hydroxyethylstarch). Subjects were defined as responders if stroke volume increased by ≥15 %. Twenty-one patients were responders. Before volume expansion, PPVART and PPVCNAPauto exhibited a bias of 0.1 % and limits of agreement from -7.9 % to 7.9 %. After volume expansion, PPVART and PPVCNAPauto exhibited a bias of -0.4 % and limits of agreement from -5.3 % to 4.5 %. A 14 % baseline PPVART threshold discriminated responders with a sensitivity of 86 % (95 % CI 64-97 %) and a specificity of 100 % (95 % CI 77-100 %). Area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for PPVART was 0.93 (95 % CI 0.79-0.99). A 15 % baseline PPVCNAPauto threshold discriminated responders with a sensitivity of 76% (95 % CI 53-92 %) and a specificity of 93 % (95 % CI 66-99 %). Area under the ROC curves for PPVCNAPauto was 0.91 (95 % CI 0.76-0.98), which was not different from that for PPVART. When compared with PPVART, PPVCNAPauto performs satisfactorily in assessing fluid responsiveness in hemodynamically stable surgical patients.


Assuntos
Pressão Sanguínea , Hidratação , Monitorização Intraoperatória/instrumentação , Monitorização Intraoperatória/métodos , Monitorização Fisiológica/métodos , Pletismografia , Idoso , Algoritmos , Aorta/cirurgia , Área Sob a Curva , Automação , Débito Cardíaco , Endarterectomia das Carótidas , Feminino , Frequência Cardíaca , Hemodinâmica , Humanos , Derivados de Hidroxietil Amido/química , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Curva ROC , Respiração Artificial , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Volume Sistólico
2.
Liver Transpl ; 21(5): 690-5, 2015 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25761371

RESUMO

Fatty liver disease, including liver steatosis, is a major health problem worldwide. In liver transplantation, macrovesicular steatosis in donor livers is a major cause of graft failure and remains difficult to assess. On one hand, several imaging modalities can be used for the assessment of liver fat, but liver biopsy, which is still considered the gold standard, may be difficult to perform in this context. On the other hand, computed tomography (CT) is commonly used by teams managing cadaveric donors to assess donors and to minimize the risk of complications in recipients. The purpose of our study was to validate the use of CT as a semiquantitative method for assessing macrovesicular steatosis in cadaveric donors with liver biopsy as a reference standard. A total of 109 consecutive cadaveric donors were included between October 2009 and May 2011. Brain death was diagnosed according to French legislation. Liver biopsy and then CT were performed on the same day to determine the degree of macrovesicular steatosis. All liver biopsies and CT scans were analyzed in a double-blinded fashion by a senior pathologist and a senior radiologist, respectively. For CT, we used the liver-to-spleen (L/S) attenuation ratio, which is a validated method for determining 30% or greater steatosis in living liver donors. Fourteen of 109 biopsies exhibited macrovesicular steatosis > 30% upon histologic analysis. A receiver operating characteristic curve was generated for the L/S ratio to identify its ability to predict significant steatosis, which was defined as >30%. A cutoff value of 0.9 for the CT L/S ratio provided a sensitivity of 79% and a specificity of 97% to detect significant steatosis.


Assuntos
Fígado Gorduroso/diagnóstico por imagem , Fígado Gorduroso/diagnóstico , Fígado/diagnóstico por imagem , Baço/diagnóstico por imagem , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/métodos , Adulto , Idoso , Biópsia , Morte Encefálica , Cadáver , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Humanos , Transplante de Fígado/métodos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Curva ROC , Risco , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Doadores de Tecidos
3.
Anesth Analg ; 113(3): 523-8, 2011 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21642606

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Respiratory-induced pulse pressure variations obtained with an arterial line (ΔPP(ART)) indicate fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients. The Infinity® CNAP™ SmartPod® (Dräger Medical AG & Co. KG, Lübeck, Germany) provides noninvasive continuous beat-to-beat arterial blood pressure measurements and a near real-time pressure waveform. We hypothesized that respiratory-induced pulse pressure variations obtained with the CNAP system (ΔPP(CNAP)) predict fluid responsiveness as well as ΔPP(ART) predicts fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients during general anesthesia. METHODS: Thirty-five patients undergoing vascular surgery were studied after induction of general anesthesia. Stroke volume (SV) measured with the Vigileo™/FloTrac™ (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA), ΔPP(ART), and ΔPP(CNAP) were recorded before and after intravascular volume expansion (VE) (500 mL of 6% hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4). Subjects were defined as responders if SV increased by ≥15% after VE. RESULTS: Twenty patients responded to VE and 15 did not. The correlation coefficient between ΔPP(ART) and ΔPP(CNAP) before VE was r = 0.90 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.84-0.96; P < 0.0001). Before VE, ΔPP(ART) and ΔPP(CNAP) were significantly higher in responders than in nonresponders (P < 0.0001). The values of ΔPP(ART) and ΔPP(CNAP) before VE were significantly correlated with the percent increase in SV induced by VE (respectively, r(2) = 0.50; P < 0.0001 and r(2) = 0.57; P < 0.0001). Before VE, a ΔPP(ART) >10% discriminated between responders and nonresponders with a sensitivity of 90% (95% CI = 69%-99%) and a specificity of 87% (95% CI = 60%-98%). The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was 0.957 ± 0.035 for ΔPP(ART). Before VE, a ΔPP(CNAP) >11% discriminated between responders and nonresponders with a sensitivity of 85% (95% CI = 62%-97%) and a specificity of 100% (95% CI = 78%-100%). The area under the ROC curve was 0.942 ± 0.040 for ΔPP(CNAP). There was no significant difference between the area under the ROC curve for ΔPP(ART) and ΔPP(CNAP). CONCLUSIONS: A value of ΔPP(CNAP) >11% has a sensitivity of at least 62% in predicting preload-dependent responders to VE in mechanically ventilated patients during general anesthesia.


Assuntos
Determinação da Pressão Arterial/instrumentação , Monitores de Pressão Arterial , Pressão Sanguínea , Dedos/irrigação sanguínea , Hidratação , Derivados de Hidroxietil Amido/administração & dosagem , Monitorização Intraoperatória/instrumentação , Substitutos do Plasma/administração & dosagem , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Vasculares , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Anestesia Geral , Débito Cardíaco , Cateterismo Periférico , Desenho de Equipamento , Feminino , França , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Método de Monte Carlo , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Curva ROC , Respiração , Respiração Artificial , Volume Sistólico , Fatores de Tempo , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Vasculares/efeitos adversos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA