Statin use associated with improved overall and cancer specific survival in patients with head and neck cancer.

OBJECTIVES: Studies have shown the utility of lipid-lowering agents in improving outcomes in various cancers. We aim to explore how statins affect overall survival and cancer specific survival in head and neck cancer patients using population-based datasets. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare linked dataset, we separated HNC patients into three groups: those with no hyperlipidemia (nH), those with hyperlipidemia and not taking a statin (HnS), and those with hyperlipidemia and taking a statin (H + S). Overall survival (OS) and cancer specific survival (CSS) were compared between the three groups based on disease subsite (oral cavity, oropharynx, and other) using Kaplan-Meier and multivariate Cox regression analysis (MVA), controlling for demographic, socioeconomic, staging, treatment, and comorbidity covariates. Using Pearson chi-square analysis, we also compared the incidence of cancer-related toxicity events. RESULTS: There were 495 nH, 567 HnS, and 530 H + S patients. H + S patients had superior OS and CSS (73.0, 81.2%) relative to nH (58.6, 69.1%) and HnS groups (61.7, 69.2%) (p < 0.01). On MVA, H + S patients showed improved OS (p < 0.01) and CSS (p = 0.04) compared to nH (HR = 1.64, 1.56) and HnS (HR = 1.40, 1.37). MVA stratified by subsite yielded similar results for oral cavity and oropharyngeal disease. Toxicity-related events did not differ significantly between the groups. CONCLUSION: HNC patients with hyperlipidemia and taking a statin demonstrated improved outcomes compared to nH and HnS patients, further supporting statins' role as a potential adjuvant anti-neoplastic agent in HNC. Further prospective studies to investigate the impact of statins on HNC outcomes are warranted.

Patterns of Care for Patients With Early-Stage Glottic Cancer Undergoing Definitive Radiation Therapy: A National Cancer Database Analysis.

PURPOSE: To characterize practice patterns, including temporal trends, in fractionation schedules among patients in the United States undergoing definitive radiation therapy for early-stage glottic cancer and to compare overall survival outcomes between fractionation schedules. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We queried the National Cancer Database for patients with TisN0M0, T1N0M0, or T2N0M0 squamous cell carcinoma of the glottic larynx diagnosed between 2004 and 2012 and undergoing definitive radiation therapy. Dose per fraction was calculated to define cohorts undergoing conventional fractionation (CFxn) and hypofractionation (HFxn). Logistic regression was performed to identify predictors of receiving HFxn, and Cox regression was used to determine predictors of death. One-to-one propensity score matching was then used to compare survival between fractionation schedules. RESULTS: The study included 10,539 patients, with 6576 undergoing CFxn and 3963 undergoing HFxn. Patients with T1 disease comprised a majority of each cohort. Use of HFxn increased significantly over the period studied (P<.001), but even in the final year, nearly one-half of patients continued to receive CFxn. Receipt of HFxn was also independently associated with higher income and facility types other than community cancer programs on logistic regression. On multivariate Cox regression, HFxn was associated with improved survival (hazard ratio [HR] for death, 0.90; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.83-0.97; P=.008), a finding redemonstrated on univariate Cox regression among a well-matched cohort after propensity score matching (HR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.80-0.96; P=.003). Subgroup Cox multivariate analysis demonstrated a significant survival advantage with HFxn among patients with T1 disease (HR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.81-0.99; P=.042) but a nonsignificant benefit among those with Tis (HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.57-1.30; P=.472) or T2 (HR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.76-1.02; P=.099) disease. CONCLUSIONS: Use of HFxn is increasing and is associated with improved survival over CFxn. Our findings support the broadened use of HFxn for patients with early-stage glottic cancer undergoing definitive radiation therapy.

Association of human papillomavirus and p16 status with mucositis and dysphagia for head and neck cancer patients treated with radiotherapy with or without cetuximab: Assessment from a phase 3 registration trial.

BACKGROUND: Mucositis and dysphagia are common adverse effects of radiotherapy (RT) treatment of locally advanced squamous cell cancer of the head and neck (LA-SCCHN). Chemotherapy added to RT increases survival rates but causes worse mucositis and dysphagia. The aim of this analysis was to assess the impact of p16 status on mucositis, dysphagia, and feeding tube use in LA-SCCHN among patients treated with RT±cetuximab in the phase 3 IMCL-9815 trial. METHODS: Patients received RT plus weekly cetuximab or RT alone. Subgroup analyses were conducted on patients with p16-positive (n=75) or p16-negative (n=106) oropharyngeal cancer (OPC), as determined by immunohistochemical analysis. The onset and duration of mucositis and dysphagia by treatment arm and p16 status were displayed using Kaplan-Meier curves and the log-rank test. P values for the incidence of mucositis and dysphagia were calculated using the Fisher exact test. Feeding tube use was assessed as the percent of patients reporting use. RESULTS: The baseline characteristics of patients treated with RT±cetuximab were similar in both the p16-positive and p16-negative OPC subgroups. Patients within the p16-positive OPC subgroup had higher Karnofsky scores and were more likely to have stage T1-T3 cancer and be from the United States. Regardless of p16 status, there was no difference in the onset or duration of grade 3/4 mucositis or dysphagia in patients receiving RT plus cetuximab compared with those receiving RT alone. In the overall population, and the p16-positive and p16-negative OPC subpopulations, feeding tube use was not different for patients receiving RT plus cetuximab compared with RT alone. CONCLUSION: Regardless of p16 status, the addition of cetuximab to RT did not alter the incidence, time to onset, severity, or duration of mucositis and dysphagia and did not impact the frequency of feeding tube use.

Association of health insurance with outcomes in adults ages 18 to 64 years with melanoma in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Studies evaluating insurance status and melanoma outcomes are limited. OBJECTIVE: We investigated whether health insurance correlates with more advanced disease, receipt of treatment, and survival in melanoma. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional analysis of 61,650 patients with cutaneous melanoma using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. RESULTS: Under multivariate analysis, patients with either Medicaid insurance (hazard ratio, 1.83; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.65-2.04; P < .001) or uninsured status (hazard ratio, 1.63; 95% CI, 1.44-1.85; P < .001) were more likely to die of any cause, including melanoma. Uninsured compared with non-Medicaid insured cases more often presented with increasing tumor thickness (odds ratio [OR], 2.19; 95% CI, 1.76-2.73; P < .001) and presence of ulceration (OR, 1.64; 95% CI, 1.40-1.92; P < .001), and less often received treatment (OR, 1.87; 95% CI, 1.60-2.19; P < .001). Compared with non-Medicaid insured, Medicaid cases more often had increasing tumor thickness (OR, 2.36; 95% CI, 1.91-2.91; P < .001), advanced stage (OR, 1.59; 95% CI, 1.37-1.85; P < .001), and presence of ulceration (OR, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.19-1.63; P < .001), and less often received treatment (OR, 1.61; 95% CI, 1.37-1.89; P < .001). LIMITATIONS: This was a retrospective study. CONCLUSION: Patients with melanoma and Medicaid or uninsured status were more likely to present with advanced disease and were less likely to receive treatment, likely contributing to an overall and cause-specific survival detriment. Addressing access to care may help improve these outcomes.

Toxicity assessment of pelvic intensity-modulated radiotherapy with hypofractionated simultaneous integrated boost to prostate for intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the toxicity of pelvic intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) with hypofractionated simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) to the prostate for patients with intermediate- to high-risk prostate cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A retrospective toxicity analysis was performed in 30 consecutive patients treated definitively with pelvic SIB-IMRT, all of whom also received androgen suppression. The IMRT plans were designed to deliver 70 Gy in 28 fractions (2.5 Gy/fraction) to the prostate while simultaneously delivering 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions (1.8 Gy/fraction) to the pelvic lymph nodes. The National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 3.0, was used to score toxicity. RESULTS: The most common acute Grade 2 events were cystitis (36.7%) and urinary frequency/urgency (26.7%). At a median follow-up of 24 months, late toxicity exceeding Grade 2 in severity was uncommon, with two Grade 3 events and one Grade 4 event. Grade 2 or greater acute bowel toxicity was associated with signficantly greater bowel volume receiving > or =25 Gy (p = .04); Grade 2 or greater late bowel toxicity was associated with a higher bowel maximal dose (p = .04) and volume receiving > or =50 Gy (p = .02). Acute or late bladder and rectal toxicity did not correlate with any of the dosimetric parameters examined. CONCLUSION: Pelvic IMRT with SIB to the prostate was well tolerated in this series, with low rates of Grade 3 or greater acute and late toxicity. SIB-IMRT combines pelvic radiotherapy and hypofractionation to the primary site and offers an accelerated approach to treating intermediate- to high-risk disease. Additional follow-up is necessary to fully define the long-term toxicity after hypofractionated, whole pelvic treatment combined with androgen suppression.