A clinical and in vitro assessment of outpatient parenteral benzylpenicillin and ceftriaxone combination therapy for enterococcal endovascular infections.

BACKGROUND: Amoxicillin plus ceftriaxone combination therapy is now standard of care for enterococcal endocarditis. Due to amoxicillin instability in infusion devices, benzylpenicillin plus ceftriaxone may be substituted to facilitate outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) delivery, despite lack of guideline endorsement. OBJECTIVES: To assess the clinical efficacy of benzylpenicillin plus ceftriaxone for the management of enterococcal endovascular infections, in addition to assessing this combination's in vitro synergy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective cohort study assessing unplanned readmissions, relapses and mortality for 20 patients with endovascular Enterococcus faecalis infections treated with benzylpenicillin plus ceftriaxone delivered via OPAT. For a subset of isolates, synergism for both amoxicillin and benzylpenicillin in combination with ceftriaxone was calculated using a chequerboard method. RESULTS: Patients had endovascular infections of native cardiac valves (n = 11), mechanical or bioprosthetic cardiac valves (n = 7), pacemaker leads (n = 1) or left ventricular assistant devices (n = 1). The median duration of OPAT was 22 days, and the most frequent antimicrobial regimen was benzylpenicillin 14 g/day via continuous infusion and ceftriaxone 4 g once daily via short infusion. Rates of unplanned readmissions were high (30%), although rates of relapsed bacteraemia (5%) and 1 year mortality (15%) were comparable to the published literature. Benzylpenicillin less frequently displayed a synergistic interaction with ceftriaxone when compared with amoxicillin (3 versus 4 out of 6 isolates). CONCLUSIONS: Lower rates of synergistic antimicrobial interaction and a significant proportion of unplanned readmissions suggest clinicians should exercise caution when treating enterococcal endovascular infection utilizing a combination of benzylpenicillin and ceftriaxone via OPAT.

Spray on skin for diabetic foot ulcers: an open label randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: One Australian loses a limb every 3 h as a result of infected diabetic foot ulcers (DFU). This common condition accounts for substantial morbidity and mortality for affected individuals and heavy economic costs for the health sector and the community. There is an urgent need to test interventions that improve wound healing time, prevent amputations and recurrent ulceration in patients presenting with DFU whilst improving quality of life and reducing health care costs. METHODS: One hundred and fifty eligible participants will be randomised to receive an autologous skin cell suspension, also termed 'spray-on' skin (ReCell®) or standard care interventions for their DFU. The primary outcome is complete wound healing at 6 months, but participants will be followed up for a total of 12 months to enable secondary outcomes including total overall costs, ulcer free days at 12 months and quality of life to be assessed. DISCUSSION: Outpatient costs for dressings, home nursing visits and outpatient appointments are key cost drivers for DFU. If spray-on skin is effective, large cost savings to WA Health will be realised immediately through a shortened time to healing, and through a higher proportion of patients achieving complete healing. Shortened healing times may enable participants to return to work earlier. Any economic benefits are likely to be amplified across Australia and other similar demographic settings where aging populations with increased diabetes rates are considered major future challenges. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12618000511235. Registered on 9 April 2018.