Pediatric Otolaryngology fellowship virtual interview sentiments.

BACKGROUND: Interviews for Pediatric Otolaryngology fellowship rapidly transitioned to virtual interviews mid-cycle in March 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to describe perspectives on virtual versus in-person interviews for both applicants and program directors. METHODS: Cross-sectional study. Surveys were conducted of all Pediatric Otolaryngology fellowship applicants participating in the San Francisco Match and program directors in 2020 and 2021. RESULTS: Out of 32 U.S. trained fellowship applicants, 24 completed the survey in 2020 and 18 in 2021. While 70% of applicants felt they did not get the same experience with virtual interviews, 75% did not feel it changed how they ranked programs. Applicant perception of virtual interviews improved in 2021, with the majority (56%) preferring virtual interviews if provided an option. Twenty out of 36 fellowship directors completed the survey in 2020, and eighteen in 2021. While fellowship directors continued to prefer in-person in 2021, an increased number (10% in 2020, 30% in 2021) felt continuing with virtual interviews may increase the number of applicants in the future. CONCLUSION: Based on the survey, both applicants and fellowship directors had a less favorable perception of virtual interviews compared to in-person interviews initially; however, applicant perception favored virtual interviews in 2021, while Program Directors continued to prefer in-person.

Patient and caregiver experiences at a Multidisciplinary Tracheostomy Clinic.

INTRODUCTION: Children with tracheostomy are a heterogeneous population requiring care from multiple specialties. Multidisciplinary approaches to treating such patients helps to improve the quality of care they receive. Our institution established a Multidisciplinary Tracheostomy Clinics (MDTC) to address outpatient care coordination for tracheostomy patients by providing care from multiple disciplines at a single visit. We report patient/caregivers' experiences of our MDTC. METHODS: Patients with tracheostomy or their caregivers were prospectively recruited between Dec 2017-Oct 2019 to complete surveys assessing their experience at the MDTC. Demographic and satisfaction questionnaires were sent electronically by a REDCap survey distribution tool. Demographic data were collected, such as patient's residence and education level. Medical care variables assessed included history of MDTC attendance, commute time, medical specialties seen, tracheostomy "Go-Bag" use, home-care nursing, and MDTC satisfaction ratings. RESULTS: Twenty-nine patients/caregivers completed the satisfaction survey and 22 completed both the satisfaction survey and demographics questionnaire. Patient ages ranged from 11 months to 36 years. Twenty-three (79%) participants commuted for up to 2 h to the MDTC, and 6 (21%) commuted for more than 2 h. The median number of medical specialties seen at the MDTC was 3. All participants were satisfied that they saw all requested specialties. Tracheostomy supplies were checked for 25 of 28 patients. Twenty-three of 28 subjects rated staff teamwork as "excellent." Twenty-four of 28 patients were "highly likely" to recommend the MDTC. Twenty-three of 28 participants were "highly likely" to return, and 4 were "somewhat likely" to return. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that patients with tracheostomy and caregivers were satisfied with the improved coordination and facilitation of care through a Multidisciplinary Tracheostomy Clinic.

A standardized, closed-loop system for monitoring pediatric tracheostomy-related adverse events.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Advancement in neonatal and pediatric intensive care has increased the need for chronic-care interventions, including tracheostomy. It is well established that children with a tracheostomy are at a high risk for adverse events, many of which are preventable. Despite this, there is no standardized method of monitoring tracheostomy-related adverse events (TRAEs). Our objective was to describe and assess a standardized, closed-loop system for monitoring TRAEs. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective Study. METHODS: A specific tracheostomy-related category was established within the adverse event reporting system in January 2015. Monthly TRAE reports were supplied to the multidisciplinary tracheostomy team (MDT) with descriptions of event type, severity, and preventability. The MDT reviewed events and discussed necessary follow-up. The frequency of events was standardized by inpatient tracheostomy days (ITDs) using an automated monthly list. Adverse events were tracked using a control chart. Aggregated data were divided into biannual reports for analysis. RESULTS: Eighty-five TRAEs were reported between January 2015 and June 2017, averaging 5.75 per 1,000 ITDs. Most common events include unplanned decannulation (50%) and improper use of tracheostomy supplies (21%). The frequency of all preventable events has decreased by 76% since the second half of 2015. During this timeframe, minor events have decreased, moderate events have maintained a frequency of less than one per 1,000 ITDs, and only one severe event occurred. CONCLUSIONS: This standardized, closed-loop reporting method, modeled after other successful intensive care unit reporting systems, accurately tracks TRAEs. We have observed a decrease in preventable TRAEs without a negative impact on rates of severe events. Results suggest improved quality of care for patients with tracheostomy. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4. Laryngoscope, 128:2419-2424, 2018.

A chief of service rotation as an alternative approach to pediatric otolaryngology inpatient care.

IMPORTANCE: Maintaining an outpatient practice and providing high-quality inpatient care pose significant challenges to the traditional call team approach. OBJECTIVE: To introduce a unique rotating hospitalist inpatient program and assess its clinical, educational, and financial impact. The chief of service (COS) program requires 1 attending physician to rotate weekly as chief of the inpatient service with no conflicting elective duties. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This was a retrospective internal billing data review performed at a tertiary pediatric hospital. A total of 1241 patients were evaluated by the COS from October 2012 through October 2013. INTERVENTIONS: All patients were treated by the inpatient service under the supervision of the COS. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: A retrospective analysis of patient encounters and procedures, including International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) and Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes, locations of service, clinicians, service dates, and average weekly relative value units (RVUs). RESULTS: Over the study period, the COS was involved in the care of 1241 patients, generating 2786 billable patient encounters. The COS averaged 11.2 patient encounters per day. The most common reasons for consultation were respiratory distress, dysphagia, and stridor. Of patient encounters, 63.0% resulted in a procedure; 82.8% of those procedures were performed in the operating room with the most common being lower airway endoscopy (340 [19.4%]). The average weekly RVUs for the COS (232) were comparable with those of the average weekly outpatient clinic and procedural RVUs of the other otolaryngology faculty in the group (240). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The COS program was created to meet the clinical, educational, and organizational demands of a high-volume and high-acuity inpatient service. It is a financially sustainable model with unique advantages, particularly for the staff who maintain their outpatient practices without disruption and for the trainees who have the opportunity to work closely with the entire faculty. Patients are provided supervised evaluations and continuity of care. This rotating hospitalist program is a viable alternative to the full-time hospitalist staff model.