Proposed response assessment and endpoints for meningioma clinical trials: report from the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology Working Group.

No standard criteria exist for assessing response and progression in clinical trials involving patients with meningioma, and there is no consensus on the optimal endpoints for trials currently under way. As a result, there is substantial variation in the design and response criteria of meningioma trials, making comparison between trials difficult. In addition, future trials should be designed with accepted standardized endpoints. The Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology Meningioma Working Group is an international effort to develop standardized radiologic criteria for treatment response for meningioma clinical trials. In this proposal, we present the recommendations for response criteria and endpoints for clinical trials involving patients with meningiomas.

Response assessment of meningioma: 1D, 2D, and volumetric criteria for treatment response and tumor progression.

BACKGROUND: Meningiomas are the most common primary brain tumors in adults. Due to their variable growth rates and irregular tumor shapes, response assessment in clinical trials remains challenging and no standard criteria have been defined. We evaluated 1D, 2D, and volume imaging criteria to assess whether a volumetric approach might be a superior surrogate for overall survival (OS). METHODS: In this retrospective multicenter study, we evaluated the clinical and imaging data of 93 patients with recurrent meningiomas treated with pharmacotherapy. One-dimensional (1D), 2D, and volumetric measurements of enhancing tumor on pre- and post-treatment MRI were compared at 6 and 12 months after treatment initiation. Cox proportional hazards models were used to examine the relationship between each imaging criterion and OS. RESULTS: The median age of the patient cohort is 51 years (range 12-88), with 14 World Health Organization (WHO) grade I, 53 WHO grade II, and 26 WHO grade III meningiomas. Volumetric increase of 40% and unidimensional increase by 10 mm at 6 months and 12 months provided the strongest association with overall survival (HR = 2.58 and 3.24 respectively, p<0.01). Setting a volume change threshold above 40% did not correlate with survival. The interobserver agreement of 1D, 2D, and volume criteria is only moderate (kappa = 0.49, 0.46, 0.52, respectively). None of the criteria based on tumor size reduction were associated with OS (P > 0.09). CONCLUSION: Compared with 1D (Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors 1.1) and 2D (Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology) approaches, volumetric criteria for tumor progression has a stronger association with OS, although the differences were only modest. The interobserver variability is moderate for all 3 methods. Further validation of these findings in an independent patient cohort is needed.

Economics of Malignant Gliomas: A Critical Review.

PURPOSE: Approximately 18,500 persons are diagnosed with malignant glioma in the United States annually. Few studies have investigated the comprehensive economic costs. We reviewed the literature to examine costs to patients with malignant glioma and their families, payers, and society. METHODS: A total of 18 fully extracted studies were included. Data were collected on direct and indirect costs, and cost estimates were converted to US dollars using the conversion rate calculated from the study's publication date, and updated to 2011 values after adjustment for inflation. A standardized data abstraction form was used. Data were extracted by one reviewer and checked by another. RESULTS: Before approval of effective chemotherapeutic agents for malignant gliomas, estimated total direct medical costs in the United States for surgery and radiation therapy per patient ranged from $50,600 to $92,700. The addition of temozolomide (TMZ) and bevacizumab to glioblastoma treatment regimens has resulted in increased overall costs for glioma care. Although health care costs are now less front-loaded, they have increased over the course of illness. Analysis using a willingness-to-pay threshold of $50,000 per quality-adjusted life-year suggests that the benefits of TMZ fall on the edge of acceptable therapies. Furthermore, indirect medical costs, such as productivity losses, are not trivial. CONCLUSION: With increased chemotherapy use for malignant glioma, the paradigm for treatment and associated out-of-pocket and total medical costs continue to evolve. Larger out-of-pocket costs may influence the choice of chemotherapeutic agents, the economic implications of which should be evaluated prospectively.

Leptomeningeal metastasis: a Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology critical review of endpoints and response criteria of published randomized clinical trials.

PURPOSE: To date, response criteria and optimal methods for assessment of outcome have not been standardized in patients with leptomeningeal metastasis (LM). METHODS: A Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology working group of experts in LM critically reviewed published literature regarding randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and trial design in patients with LM. RESULTS: A literature review determined that 6 RCTs regarding the treatment of LM have been published, all of which assessed the response to intra-CSF based chemotherapy. Amongst these RCTs, only a single trial attempted to determine whether intra-CSF chemotherapy was of benefit compared with systemic therapy. Otherwise, this pragmatic question has not been formally addressed in patients with solid cancers and LM. The methodology of the 6 RCTs varied widely with respect to pretreatment evaluation, type of treatment, and response to treatment. Additionally there was little uniformity in reporting of treatment-related toxicity. One RCT suggests no advantage of combined versus single-agent intra-CSF chemotherapy in patients with LM. No specific intra-CSF regimen has shown superior efficacy in the treatment of LM, with the exception of liposomal cytarabine in patients with lymphomatous meningitis. Problematic with all RCTs is the lack of standardization with respect to response criteria. There was considerable variation in definitions of response by clinical examination, neuroimaging, and CSF analysis. CONCLUSION: Based upon a review of published RCTs in LM, there exists a significant unmet need for guidelines for evaluating patients with LM in clinical practice as well as for response assessment in clinical trials.

Development of a symptom index for patients with primary brain tumors.

OBJECTIVES: This study's primary goals included identifying the highest priority symptoms of patients with advanced brain tumors on treatment, comparing patient priority ratings with those of oncology experts, and constructing a brief symptom index using combined input to assess these symptoms and concerns. METHODS: Fifty patients with advanced primary brain tumors and 10 physician experts were recruited from the National Comprehensive Cancer Network institutions and community support agencies. By using a 40-item symptom checklist, patients first selected up to 10 of the most important symptoms/concerns to monitor when assessing the value of drug treatment for brain tumors, then nominated up to 5 of the very most important concerns, and finally generated additional symptoms/concerns. By using the same checklist as patients, physicians rated each symptom/concern as disease- or treatment-related. RESULTS: By using the combined input, a 24-item National Comprehensive Cancer Network/Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Brain Symptom Index (NFBrSI-24) was developed. The NFBrSI-24 showed good internal consistency (α = 0.84), significantly differentiated patients with different levels of functional status (F2,47 = 8.21; P < .001), and demonstrated good convergent validity with the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General functional, physical, social, emotional, and brain tumor-specific concerns (ρ = 0.59, 0.57, 0.40, 0.35, and 0.50, respectively; Ps < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The NFBrSI-24, an index of the symptoms in advanced brain tumors perceived as most important by both patients and clinicians, improves upon existing measures of brain tumor symptoms through better satisfaction of regulatory requirements for measure development. The findings suggest good reliability and validity, indicating that the NFBrSI-24 is a promising brief assessment of high-priority advanced brain tumor symptoms for research and clinical settings.

Concordance of patient and caregiver reports in evaluating quality of life in patients with malignant gliomas and an assessment of caregiver burden.

BACKGROUND: Given the neurocognitive impairment experienced by many patients with malignant gliomas, caregiver reports can be critical in assessing the quality of life (QOL) of these patients. In this study, we explored whether assessment of patient QOL by the primary caregiver shows concordance with the patient's self-reported QOL, and we quantified the burden faced by caregivers. METHODS: QOL of 45 patients was evaluated by both the patient and primary caregiver on 3 or more separate occasions using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Brain (FACT-Br) instrument, and concordance between the 2 reports was evaluated. Caregiver burden was measured using the Caregiver Quality of Life Index-Cancer (CQOL-C) instrument. RESULTS: Overall, good concordance was observed between the patient and caregiver FACT-Br reports (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.74). Patient-reported FACT-Br scores were 4.75 (95% CI, 1.44-8.05) points higher than paired caregiver reports on the 200-point scale (P = .008); however, this difference did not achieve clinical significance. Caregiver burden, as measured by the CQOL-C, was significantly greater among caregivers in this study than those previously reported for caregivers of patients with lung, breast, or prostate cancer (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Despite minor discrepancies in caregiver assessments of patient QOL relative to patient self-reports, our results suggest that the caregiver assessments can serve as adequate proxies for patient reports. Our results also illustrate the particularly heavy burden faced by caregivers of patients with malignant glioma. Further research into both of these areas is warranted.

Financial burden experienced by patients undergoing treatment for malignant gliomas.

BACKGROUND: Patients undergoing treatment for malignant gliomas (MGs) can encounter medical costs beyond what their insurance covers. The magnitude and type of costs experienced by patients are unknown. The purpose of this study was to have patients or their families report on the medical costs incurred during the patients MG treatment. METHODS: Patients with MG were eligible if they were within 6 months of diagnosis or tumor recurrence. Patients had to be ≥18 years of age, fluent in English, and not aphasic. Weekly logbooks were issued to patients for recording associated costs for ∼6 months or until tumor progression. "Out-of-pocket" (OOP) costs included medical and nonmedical expenses that were not reimbursed by insurance. Direct medical costs included hospital and physician bills. Direct nonmedical costs included transportation, parking, and other related items. Indirect medical costs included lost wages. Costs were analyzed to provide mean and medians with range of expenses. RESULTS: Forty-three patients provided cost data for a median of 12 weeks. There were 25 men and 18 women with a median age of 57 years (range, 24y-73y); 79% were married, and 49% reported annual income >$75 000. Health insurance coverage was preferred provider organizations for 58% of patients, and median deductible was $1 500. Median monthly OOP cost was $1 342 (mean, $2 451; range, $333.41-$17 267.16). The highest OOP median costs were medication copayments ($710; range, $0-13 611.20), transportation ($327; range, $0-$1 927), and hospital bill copayments ($403; range, $0-$4 000). Median lost wages were $7 500, and median lost days of work were 12.8. CONCLUSIONS: OOP costs for MG patients can be significant and comprise direct and indirect costs across several areas. Informing patients about expected costs could limit additional duress and allow financial support systems to be implemented.