Optical Coherence Tomography in the Assessment and Management of Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Cardiac Allograft vasculopathy (CAV) is a major barrier to improving outcomes after heart transplantation. Coronary angiography has very low sensitivity to detect early CAV and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) only improves it to some extent. In this article, we detail the current evidence surrounding use of Optical Coherence tomography (OCT) in patients with CAV. RECENT FINDINGS: OCT has the ability to recognize CAV at earlier stages with intimal thickness < 150 µm, can characterize CAV in almost pathologic / microscopic detail - plaque characteristics are better visualized and novel early features such as layered fibrotic plaques and microchannels have been identified. Progression of CAV can be monitored also, with promise shown in automated serial measurements also. OCT has significantly advanced our understanding of the pathophysiology-as well as permits precise monitoring and surveillance of the disease. Potential treatment options could also be evaluated using OCT.

Performance of Noninvasive Assessment in the Diagnosis of Right Heart Failure After Left Ventricular Assist Device.

Right heart failure (RHF) after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) is associated with poor outcomes. Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support (Intermacs) defines RHF as elevated right atrial pressure (RAP) plus venous congestion. The purpose of this study was to examine the diagnostic performance of the noninvasive Intermacs criteria using RAP as the gold standard. We analyzed 108 patients with LVAD who underwent 341 right heart catheterizations (RHC) between January 1, 2006, and December 31, 2013. Physical exam, echocardiography, and laboratory data at the time of RHC were collected. Conventional two-by-two tables were used and missing data were excluded. The noninvasive Intermacs definition of RHF is 32% sensitive (95% cardiac index (CI), 0.21-0.44) and 97% specific (95% CI, 0.95-0.99) for identifying elevated RAP. Clinical assessment failed to identify two-thirds of LVAD patients with RAP > 16 mm Hg. More than half of patients with elevated RAP did not have venous congestion, which may represent a physiologic opportunity to mitigate the progression of disease before end-organ damage occurs. One-quarter of patients who met the noninvasive definition of RHF did not actually have elevated RAP, potentially exposing patients to unnecessary therapies. In practice, if any component of the Intermacs definition is present or equivocal, our data suggest RHC is warranted to establish the diagnosis.