Barriers to Office Hysteroscopy in Fellowship Education and Practice.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To identify the top 3 perceived barriers to performing office hysteroscopy (OH) by minimally invasive gynecologic surgery (MIGS) faculty and fellows and identify opportunities for education on this key topic that will be most effective in fellowship training and MIGS practice. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey study targeted at all American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists-accredited Fellowship in Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery fellows, program directors, and associate program directors in February to April 2022. The survey was designed by faculty who have extensive experience in OH procedures. In addition, a literature search was performed to aid with question design. SETTING, PATIENTS, AND INTERVENTIONS: This was a REDCap electronic survey administered through the Fellowship in Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery listserv. No additional follow-up was performed after survey completion. The 15-minute survey was sent to 60 program directors, 92 assistant program directors, and 158 fellows, including the incoming class of 2024 and the 2022 fellowship graduates. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 93 responses were received; 67% of respondents performed OH but 73% of those performed 5 procedures or less per month. Most participants controlled pain with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs +/- paracervical block. The most common perceived barrier to performing OH was concern over pain management. Other commonly cited concerns were equipment costs, sterilization costs, and office staff training; 37% to 44% of respondents also cited lack of departmental support and insufficient clinic time, respectively, as barriers, and 56% indicated they are interested in educational materials on OH. CONCLUSION: Our study suggests general interest in, but a low volume of, OH among MIGS fellows and faculty. The most common perceived barrier was concern regarding pain management. This has been well studied in the literature and likely presents an area for greater education to improve OH utilization. We also uncovered concerns regarding systemic barriers, such as equipment costs, departmental support, and clinic structure. This is an area for further research and advocacy efforts to address barriers to OH on a system level.

Design of a syringe extension device (Chloe SED®) for low-resource settings in sub-Saharan Africa: a circular economy approach.

Underfunded healthcare infrastructures in low-resource settings in sub-Saharan Africa have resulted in a lack of medical devices crucial to provide healthcare for all. A representative example of this scenario is medical devices to administer paracervical blocks during gynaecological procedures. Devices needed for this procedure are usually unavailable or expensive. Without these devices, providing paracervical blocks for women in need is impossible resulting in compromising the quality of care for women requiring gynaecological procedures such as loop electrosurgical excision, treatment of miscarriage, or incomplete abortion. In that perspective, interventions that can be integrated into the healthcare system in low-resource settings to provide women needing paracervical blocks remain urgent. Based on a context-specific approach while leveraging circular economy design principles, this research catalogues the development of a new medical device called Chloe SED® that can be used to support the provision of paracervical blocks. Chloe SED®, priced at US$ 1.5 per device when produced in polypropylene, US$ 10 in polyetheretherketone, and US$ 15 in aluminium, is attached to any 10-cc syringe in low-resource settings to provide paracervical blocks. The device is designed for durability, repairability, maintainability, upgradeability, and recyclability to address environmental sustainability issues in the healthcare domain. Achieving the design of Chloe SED® from a context-specific and circular economy approach revealed correlations between the material choice to manufacture the device, the device's initial cost, product durability and reuse cycle, reprocessing method and cost, and environmental impact. These correlations can be seen as interconnected conflicting or divergent trade-offs that need to be continually assessed to deliver a medical device that provides healthcare for all with limited environmental impact. The study findings are intended to be seen as efforts to make available medical devices to support women's access to reproductive health services.

Development of a Novel, Low-Cost, Low-Fidelity Simulation Model for Pudendal Nerve Block Application.

Background: Pudendal nerve block is an important alternative to neuraxial anesthesia, yet studies demonstrate that 3% to 50% of pudendal nerve blocks are ineffective. Lack of clinician training is the most common cause, and there are no simulation models currently described. Objective: To develop and test a novel, low-cost, low-fidelity simulation model for training residents in the placement of a pudendal nerve block. Methods: A pudendal nerve block model was developed using commonly found supplies, with a cost of $20.57. First-year to fourth-year obstetrics and gynecology (OB/GYN) and family medicine (FM) residents were invited to 1 of 4 pudendal nerve block 1-hour simulation sessions from December 2019 to March 2021 during their required teaching sessions. Expert faculty led a discussion of pudendal nerve blocks, then participants practiced with the described model. A survey about the model was created by the authors and administrated prior to and immediately after the session. Pre- and post-surveys were analyzed by Wilcoxon signed rank tests, and Bonferroni correction was performed. Results: Thirty-four out of a total of 36 eligible residents participated (94%). Residents showed improvement in knowledge (median pre-simulation score 43.99 compared with 70.06 post-simulation, P<.00625) and self-assessed confidence (median pre-simulation score 1.7 compared with 3.2 post-simulation, P<.00625) of a pudendal block placement after simulation training. Conclusions: This new, low-cost, reusable, low-fidelity simulation model for pudendal nerve block placement improved knowledge and confidence in OB/GYN and FM residents after 1 hour of simulation training.

Safety of a condom uterine balloon tamponade (ESM-UBT) device for uncontrolled primary postpartum hemorrhage among facilities in Kenya and Sierra Leone.

BACKGROUND: Postpartum hemorrhage is the leading cause of maternal mortality in low- and middle-income countries. While evidence on uterine balloon tamponade efficacy for severe hemorrhage is encouraging, little is known about safety of this intervention. The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety of an ultra-low-cost uterine balloon tamponade package (named ESM-UBT) for facility-based management of uncontrolled postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) in Kenya and Sierra Leone. METHODS: Data were collected on complications/adverse events in all women who had an ESM-UBT device placed among 92 facilities in Sierra Leone and Kenya, between September 2012 and December 2015, as part of a multi-country study. Three expert maternal health investigator physicians analyzed each complication/adverse event and developed consensus on whether there was a potential causal relationship associated with use of the ESM-UBT device. Adverse events/complications specifically investigated included death, hysterectomy, uterine rupture, perineal or cervical injury, serious or minor infection, and latex allergy/anaphylaxis. RESULTS: Of the 201 women treated with an ESM-UBT device in Kenya and Sierra Leone, 189 (94.0%) survived. Six-week or longer follow-up was recorded in 156 of the 189 (82.5%). A causal relationship between use of an ESM-UBT device and one death, three perineal injuries and one case of mild endometritis could not be completely excluded. Three experts found a potential association between these injuries and an ESM-UBT device highly unlikely. CONCLUSION: The ESM-UBT device appears safe for use in women with uncontrolled PPH. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Trial registration was not completed as data was collected as a quality assurance measure for the ESM-UBT kit.