Enhanced recovery following posterior spinal fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: A medical and economic study in a French private nonprofit pediatric hospital.

INTRODUCTION: Little data exist on the efficacy of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols in patients undergoing posterior spinal fusion (PSF) for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). HYPOTHESIS: ERAS reduces hospital costs (HC) and length of stay (LOS) without increasing pain or complications. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective comparative medical and economic study of 2 cohorts of patients who underwent PSF for AIS: a prospective group who underwent surgery with an ERAS protocol without a specially assigned care coordinator from 2020 to 2021 (n=30) and a retrospective group (control) who received standard care from 2017 to 2018 (n=30). The key amendments to the ERAS protocol were reduced preoperative investigations, opioid-sparing analgesia, ambulation starting on postoperative day (POD) 1, early resumption of oral diet, and early transition to oral analgesics. Moreover, an intensive care unit (ICU) stay, surgical drainage, and the postoperative CT scan were no longer routine. The discharge criteria were the same for both groups: normal bowel function, independent walking, pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS)<3 without strong opioids, and no signs of complications. The endpoints were: decreased HC (calculated by subtracting the costs of hospital days and complementary exams that were not carried out) and LOS, complications, and postoperative pain according to the VAS on POD 1, POD 3, and discharge. All means were reported with the standard deviation. RESULTS: The mean age of patients undergoing surgery (14.5±1.7 years), sex ratio, curve type according to the Lenke classification, mean Cobb angle (54±12°), and the number of instrumented vertebrae (9±2) were similar in both groups (p>0.5). The HC decreased on average by 3029€ per patient. The mean LOS was 5±0.9 days in the ERAS group versus 6.5±0.6 days in the control group (p<0.001). The VAS scores on POD 1 and POD 3 were lower in the ERAS group. One postoperative complication was noted in each group. CONCLUSION: Implementing an ERAS protocol without a specifically assigned care coordinator for patients with AIS undergoing PSF significantly decreased HC, LOS, and early postoperative pain. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III; retrospective comparative study.

The Direct and Indirect Costs of Treating the Victims of the 2016 Nice Terror Attacks in a Single Pediatric Hospital.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the cost of the terror attack in Nice in a single pediatric institution. METHODS: We carried out descriptive analyses of the data coming from the Lenval University Children's Hospital of Nice database after the July 14, 2016 terror attack. The medical cost for each patient was estimated from the invoice that the hospital sent to public insurance. The indirect costs were calculated from the hospital's accounting, as the items that were previously absent or the difference between costs in 2016 versus the previous year. RESULTS: The costs total 1.56 million USD, corresponding to 2% of Lenval Hospital's 2016 annual budget. Direct medical costs represented 9% of the total cost. The indirect costs were related to human resources (overtime, sick leave), revenue shortfall, and security and psychiatric reinforcement. CONCLUSION: Indirect costs had a greater impact than did direct medical costs. Examining the level and variety of direct and indirect costs will lead to a better understanding of the consequences of terror acts and to improved preparation for future attacks.

A simulation model of nail bed suture and nail fixation: description and preliminary evaluation.

BACKGROUND: Wounds of the finger nail bed represent a frequent injury, especially in children. Residents often learn nail bed repair on patients without prior training. We aimed to develop and evaluate a "low-fidelity" simulation model of nail bed repair. METHODS: The model consists of a false nail on a plastic finger and a hydrocolloid dressing, which is pasted on the nail bed site and cut horizontally. This model allows nail bed suture and nail fixation. The cost of each model is about $1. Thirty-three doctors evaluated this model on 10 items, rated out of five, concerning the realism, the difficulty of the procedure, and the educational value. The duration of the procedure was also noted. We evaluated the clinical effectiveness by comparing through Fisher's exact test the ratio of unsuitable events (revision surgeries, surgical site infections, and complaint letters) on two periods-3 y before and 18 mo after the implementation of this model in our institution, respectively. RESULTS: Average mark was 4.16/5. The model was considered reliable, reproducible, and realistic. All the testers recognized a big educational value. The overall duration of the procedure averaged 23 min for residents and 11 min for surgeons. We collected 17 unsuitable events out of 84 patients from the period "before" and 2 out of 54 patients from the period "after" (P = 0.005). Revision surgeries were 10/84 from the period before and 2/54 from the period after (P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: The results of the internal and clinical evaluations are encouraging. We suggest integration of this model into the training program of residents.