Assuntos
Oclusão Coronária , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea , Doença Crônica , Angiografia Coronária , Oclusão Coronária/diagnóstico por imagem , Oclusão Coronária/cirurgia , Humanos , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/efeitos adversos , Sistema de Registros , Fatores de Risco , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: The authors performed a multicenter, randomized-controlled, clinical trial comparing upfront use of the CrossBoss catheter versus antegrade wire escalation for antegrade crossing of coronary chronic total occlusions. BACKGROUND: There is equipoise about the optimal initial strategy for crossing coronary chronic total occlusions. METHODS: The primary endpoints were the time required to cross the chronic total occlusion or abort the procedure and the frequency of procedural major adverse cardiovascular events. The secondary endpoints were technical and procedural success, total procedure time, fluoroscopy time required to cross and total fluoroscopy time, total air kerma radiation dose, total contrast volume, and equipment use. RESULTS: Between 2015 and 2017, 246 patients were randomized to the CrossBoss catheter (n = 122) or wire escalation (n = 124) at 11 U.S. centers. The baseline clinical and angiographic characteristics of the study groups were similar. Technical and procedural success were 87.8% and 84.1%, respectively, and were similar in the 2 groups. Crossing time was similar: 56 min (interquartile range: 33 to 93 min) in the CrossBoss group and 66 min (interquartile range: 36 to 105 min) in the wire escalation group (p = 0.323), as was as the incidence of procedural major adverse cardiovascular events (3.28% vs. 4.03%; p = 1.000). There were no significant differences in the secondary study endpoints. CONCLUSIONS: As compared with wire escalation, upfront use of the CrossBoss catheter for antegrade crossing of coronary chronic total occlusions was associated with similar crossing time, similar success and complication rates, and similar equipment use and cost.
Assuntos
Cateterismo Cardíaco/métodos , Oclusão Coronária/cirurgia , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/métodos , Idoso , Cateterismo Cardíaco/efeitos adversos , Cateterismo Cardíaco/economia , Cateterismo Cardíaco/instrumentação , Cateteres Cardíacos , Doença Crônica , Angiografia Coronária , Oclusão Coronária/diagnóstico por imagem , Oclusão Coronária/economia , Oclusão Coronária/fisiopatologia , Feminino , Custos Hospitalares , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Duração da Cirurgia , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/efeitos adversos , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/economia , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/instrumentação , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados UnidosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Balloon uncrossable lesions can be challenging to treat, requiring specialized techniques and equipment. METHODS: We examined the prevalence, clinical and angiographic characteristics, management and procedural outcomes of balloon uncrossable lesions in a multicenter chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) registry. RESULTS: Between 2012 and 2016, 718 CTO PCIs (in which the occlusion was successfully crossed with a guidewire) were performed in 701 patients at 11 US centers. Mean age was 65.6 ± 10 years and 84% of the patients were men. Balloon uncrossable lesions represented 9% of all CTOs. Balloon uncrossable CTOs had more moderate/severe calcification (82% vs. 52%, P < 0.0001), moderate/severe tortuosity (61% vs. 35% P < 0.0001) and higher J-CTO score (2.95 ± 1.32 vs. 2.43 ± 1.23, P = 0.005) as compared with the remaining lesions. Technical and procedural success was significantly lower for balloon uncrossable lesions (90.5% vs. 98.3%, P < 0.0001 and 88.9% vs. 96.6% P = 0.004), respectively, but the incidence of major adverse events was similar (1.6% vs. 2.2%, P = 0.751). Balloon uncrossable lesions required longer procedure (208 [interquartile range: 135, 258] vs. 135 [94, 194] min, P < 0.0001) and fluoroscopy (77 [52, 100] vs. 45 min [27, 75], P < 0.0001) time. Techniques used to treat balloon uncrossable lesions included balloon-assisted microdissection (23%), excimer laser atherectomy (18%), and rotational atherectomy (16%). Excimer laser atherectomy and balloon-assisted microdissection were associated with the highest technical and procedural success rates. CONCLUSIONS: Balloon uncrossable CTOs are common, are associated with high rates of technical failure, and require specialized techniques for successful treatment. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Assuntos
Angioplastia Coronária com Balão , Aterectomia Coronária , Oclusão Coronária/terapia , Idoso , Angioplastia Coronária com Balão/efeitos adversos , Angioplastia Coronária com Balão/instrumentação , Angioplastia Coronária com Balão/métodos , Aterectomia Coronária/efeitos adversos , Aterectomia Coronária/instrumentação , Aterectomia Coronária/métodos , Doença Crônica , Angiografia Coronária , Oclusão Coronária/diagnóstico por imagem , Oclusão Coronária/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Lasers de Excimer/uso terapêutico , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prevalência , Sistema de Registros , Fatores de Risco , Stents , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos/epidemiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: In the RadiCure study 505 catheterization procedures were 1:1 randomized to use or no use of real-time radiation monitoring. Use of the Bleeper Sv monitor resulted in a significant reduction in operator radiation exposure. METHODS: We examined the association between several baseline and procedural parameters with operator and patient radiation exposure using univariable and multivariable analysis in the 505 patients that were enrolled in RadiCure. All baseline demographic and procedure characteristics recorded were included in the univariable analysis. RESULTS: Median fluoroscopy time was 6.2 (2.5-12.5) minutes, median patient air kerma dose was 0.908 (0.602-1.636) Gray and median first operator exposure was 10 (5-22) µSv. For analysis purposes, the 505 procedures were dichotomized based on the median operator exposure (10 µSv) and median patient radiation dose (0.908 Gray). On multivariable analysis, factors associated with high (above median or >10 µSv) first operator radiation exposure included radial access (odds ratio [OR] 5.44, 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 2.88-10.76), chronic total occlusion (CTO) intervention (OR 12.78, 95% CI 4.42-43.60), real-time radiation monitoring (OR 0.42, 95% CI 0.26-0.66), and use of a radioabsorbent drape (OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.28-0.96). High patient radiation dose (above median or >0.908 Gray) was associated with body mass index>30 kg/m2 (OR 3.22, 95% CI 1.99-5.29), prior MI (OR 2.26, 95% CI 1.29-4.04), prior cerebrovascular disease (OR 0.34, 95% CI 0.15-0.75), hypertension (OR 2.40, 95% CI 1.05-5.82), prior coronary artery bypass graft surgery (OR 2.46, 95% CI 1.40-4.39) and CTO intervention (OR 12.93, 95% CI 3.28-87.31), but was not associated with real-time radiation monitoring and use of a radioabsorbent drape. CONCLUSIONS: Several clinical and procedural factors are associated with higher patient and operator radiation exposure. Real-time radiation monitoring and use of disposable radiation shields were associated with lower operator, but not patient, radiation dose. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Assuntos
Cateterismo Cardíaco/métodos , Alarmes Clínicos , Exposição Ocupacional/prevenção & controle , Doses de Radiação , Exposição à Radiação/prevenção & controle , Monitoramento de Radiação/instrumentação , Proteção Radiológica/instrumentação , Radiografia Intervencionista/métodos , Idoso , Cateterismo Cardíaco/efeitos adversos , Distribuição de Qui-Quadrado , Feminino , Fluoroscopia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Exposição Ocupacional/efeitos adversos , Saúde Ocupacional , Razão de Chances , Segurança do Paciente , Equipamento de Proteção Individual , Exposição à Radiação/efeitos adversos , Radiografia Intervencionista/efeitos adversos , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Texas , Fatores de TempoRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine the contemporary prevalence and management of coronary chronic total occlusions (CTO) in a veteran population. BACKGROUND: The prevalence and management of CTOs in various populations has received limited study. METHODS: We collected clinical and angiographic data in consecutive patients that underwent coronary angiography at our institution between January 2011 and December 2012. Coronary artery disease (CAD) was defined as ≥50% diameter stenosis in ≥1 coronary artery. CTO was defined as total coronary artery occlusion of ≥3 month duration. RESULTS: Among 1,699 patients who underwent angiography during the study period, 20% did not have CAD, 20% had CAD and prior coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG), and 60% had CAD but no prior CABG. The prevalence of CTO among CAD patients with and without prior CABG was 89 and 31%, respectively. Compared to patients without CTO, CTO patients had more co-morbidities, more extensive CAD and were more frequently referred for CABG. Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) to any vessel was performed with similar frequency in patients with and without CTO (50% vs. 53%). CTO PCI was performed in 30% of patients without and 15% of patients with prior CABG with high technical (82 and 75%, respectively) and procedural success rates (80 and 73%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In a contemporary veteran population, coronary CTOs are highly prevalent and are associated with more extensive co-morbidities and higher likelihood for CABG referral. PCI was equally likely to be performed in patients with and without CTO.
Assuntos
Ponte de Artéria Coronária , Oclusão Coronária/epidemiologia , Oclusão Coronária/terapia , Hospitais de Veteranos , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea , Centros de Atenção Terciária , United States Department of Veterans Affairs , Idoso , Doença Crônica , Comorbidade , Angiografia Coronária , Oclusão Coronária/diagnóstico , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Prevalência , Encaminhamento e Consulta , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos/epidemiologiaRESUMO
We aimed to examine whether an association exists between the presence and extent of coronary lipid core plaques (LCPs) detected by near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) performed before percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with postprocedural myocardial infarction (MI). NIRS was performed in the native coronary arteries of 30 patients before PCI. Angular extent of LCP, lesion segment lipid core burden index, and block chemogram were evaluated. Cardiac biomarkers were measured before and 16 to 24 hours after PCI to determine occurrence of postprocedural MI. Mean number of 2-mm yellow blocks within the stented lesion was 1.4 ± 2.1 and mean lesion lipid core burden index was 110.3 ± 99. Using a definition of creatine kinase-MB >1 time upper limit of normal (ULN), >2 times ULN, and >3 times ULN, MI after PCI occurred in 23%, 13%, and 10% of patients, respectively. Compared to patients who did not have MI after PCI, those who did had similar clinical characteristics but received more stents and had more blocks within the stented lesion. Creatine kinase-MB increase >3 times ULN was observed in 27% of patients with ≥1 yellow block versus in none of the patients without a yellow block within the stented lesion (p = 0.02). In conclusion, PCI of LCP-positive lesions as assessed by NIRS is associated with increased risk for MI after PCI. NIRS may allow lesion-specific risk stratification before PCI and optimization of PCI strategies for myocardial injury risk minimization.