Comparison of Wire-Guided Lumpectomy (WGL) Versus Hematoma-Directed Ultrasound-Guided Lumpectomy (HDUGL) in Management of Nonpalpable Breast Lesions in Achieving a Negative Resection Margin: a Randomized Trial with Superiority Hypothesis and Cost-effectiveness Analysis.

The advances in imaging techniques and growing awareness have increased the detection of nonpalpable breast lesions, which may be neoplastic or high-risk lesions. The standard technique of localizing these nonpalpable breast lesions is wire-guided biopsy/lumpectomy. However, wire-guided excision is fraught with the complications of migration, transection, patient discomfort, pneumothorax, vasovagal episodes, and injury to the radiologist, surgeon, and pathologist. We embarked upon a randomized controlled trial to compare the cost-effectiveness and patient-reported outcome (PRO) with hematoma-directed ultrasound-guided lumpectomy (HDUGL) versus conventional wire-guided lumpectomy (WGL) for nonpalpable breast lesions. This study was a parallel design, randomized controlled trial with a superiority hypothesis. Twenty-five patients could be randomized to wire-guided lumpectomy (WGL) group (n = 13) and hematoma-directed ultrasound-guided lumpectomy (HDUGL) group (n = 12). Post-excision specimen sonography and mammography for assessing adequacy of margin were done. A margin shave was performed in cases of close or suspicious margin on ultrasonography or mammogram. Both the groups were comparable in age, tumor size, histological subtypes, and location of lesions. The median resection volume in two groups was 34.5 (26.5) ml for HDUGL vs. 41 (15) ml for WGL. Intraoperative cavity shave was required only in the WGL group (n = 3.23%) and margin positivity was also more in the WGL group (n = 2,15.38%) as compared to the HDUGL group (n = 1,8.33%) but neither differences in cavity shave nor positive margins leading to re-operations were statistically significant. The difference in cost of surgery in two groups (INR 4680 ± 560.00 for HDUGL and INR 7486 ± 616.41 for WGL) was statistically significant (P = 0.00). Resultantly, HDUGL was more cost-effective (INR 5105.45) than WGL (INR 8847.09). Patients in the HDUGL group were more satisfied according to the Likert scale of 5 but this difference in two groups was not statistically significant (P = 0.07). The hematoma-directed ultrasound-guided lumpectomy (HDUGL) is better than wire-guided lumpectomy (WGL) for nonpalpable breast lesions in terms of cost-effectiveness. Trial details: CTRI No. CTRI/2019/05/019347. Registered on 24/05/2019, Registered prospectively.

Assessment of healthcare worker's hand hygiene and infection prevention practices of their personal belongings in a healthcare setting: a survey in pre COVID-19 era and literature review on standard disinfection practices.

BACKGROUND: Healthcare workers' (HCW) hands and personnel belongings are vehicles of transmission of nosocomial infections. Knowledge, attitude, and practice of hand hygiene have been extensively studied suggesting adequate knowledge but poor compliance. Similar data on aprons, mobile phone and stethoscope disinfection practices are lacking. This becomes an extensively important topic of discussion in current COVID-19 pandemic where inadequacy in hygiene practices is devastating. AIM: To study the knowledge, attitude, and infection prevention practices of HCWs aprons, electronic devices, stethoscopes, and hands. METHODS: A cross sectional questionnaire-based survey was conducted among HCWs of Medicine ward and ICU. RESULTS: Sixty-six HCWs responded to the survey. Awareness that hands, aprons, mobile phones, stethoscopes could cause cross transmission and knowledge of correct practices was present in majority of the respondents. Hand hygiene was performed by 65.2% of the respondents before touching a patient and 54.5% after touching the patient surroundings while 13.6% performed only when it was visibly soiled. Mobile phones and stethoscopes were disinfected by 13.6 and 30.3% of the respondents after each patient encounter, respectively. Aprons were washed after using them at a stretch for a median duration of 5 days (1-30 days). Forgetfulness, lack of reinforcement, lack of time, inadequate awareness on standard disinfection practices and fear of damaging electronic devices from disinfectants use were reasons for poor compliance. CONCLUSIONS: There is an urgent need to spread awareness and formulate standard guidelines on disinfection practices especially for mobile phones, stethoscopes, and aprons in addition to reinforcing hand hygiene practices.

Perceived barriers and facilitators for adherence to lifestyle prescription: Perspective of obese patients with non alcoholic fatty liver disease from north India.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: This study aims to identify the barriers and facilitators faced by obese patients with NAFLD from north India, while undergoing lifestyle-modification. METHODS: 30 obese patients with NAFLD were interviewed regarding the barriers and facilitators to lifestyle change and responses were noted. Inductive thematic analysis was used. RESULTS: Eight themes under barriers (lack of family support, difficult intervention, work-related, financial, psychological, social, physical and infrastructure related) and four themes under facilitators (family support, intensive nature of intervention, psychological and physiological) were identified from the reponses. CONCLUSIONS: Personalized and socio-culturally appropriate counseling strategies may promote successful treatment outcomes among these patients.

Development and validation of a questionnaire to assess socio-behavioural impact of COVID-19 on the general population.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: The aim of the study is to develop a valid and reliable tool to assess sociobehavioural changes due to COVID among the general population. METHODS: This mixed method study has two phases. Phase I for questionnaire development (literature review, focus group discussion, expert evaluation and pilot testing). Phase II for establishing construct validity via factor analysis and internal consistency via Cronbach's ɑ by administering the questionnaire on 179 participants. RESULTS: A questionnaire comprising 33 questions and five domains was developed having Cronbach's α of 0·82. CONCLUSION: The developed questionnaire is a concise, easy to administer and valid tool to assess socio-behavioural changes.

Impact of COVID-19 on psychosocial functioning of peripartum women: A qualitative study comprising focus group discussions and in-depth interviews.

OBJECTIVE: Peripartum is a period of profound hormonal changes in the body and COVID-19 seems to have an additional impact on these women's psychosocial functioning. This calls for a need to address the psychosocial and behavioural impact of COVID-19 on peripartum women's lives. METHODS: Three focus group discussions and ten in-depth interviews were conducted. A format to guide discussions and interviews was made to bring uniformity across groups and participants. Participants were recruited through purposive sampling. In verbatim transcription was done, followed by thematic analysis to extract key conceptual themes. RESULTS: Fourteen pregnant and eleven postpartum women were included. The mean age was 28.5 years. Two major domains were identified: 1) the psychological domain including the categories of thoughts, emotions, and behaviour, and 2) the social domain comprising categories of relationships with family members and friends, perceived loss of social support, doctor-patient relationship, and social determinants of health. CONCLUSION: The pandemic has indeed affected the psychosocial functioning of peripartum women. The study results might prove to be helpful for clinicians and mental health specialists who can suggest and develop different coping strategies for peripartum women during this pandemic.

Assessment of Preventive Practices Followed by General Public During COVID-19 Pandemic - A Cross-Sectional Survey From India.

Objectives COVID-19 has infected millions of people across the globe, leading to hundreds of thousands of deaths. Currently, there are no vaccines available for COVID-19, and the most effective way to curb its spread is to follow preventive practices. The present study aimed to assess the extent of adoption of preventive practices among the general population in India. Methods A web-based cross-sectional survey was carried out recruiting 964 participants from all over India through purposive sampling. A pre-validated questionnaire consisting of 37 questions was used to collect data. Items 1A to 18A covered various preventive practices and items 1B to 19B covered reasons for not following those preventive practices. Descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, t-tests and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) were conducted. Results Most participants reported taking precautions such as wearing masks (91.80%), covering both nose and mouth (79.14%) and avoiding hand shaking (83.40%). However, practices like following social distancing in public places (51.76%) and workplace (51.04%), frequent hand washing/sanitising (63.59%) and washing hands for at least 20 seconds (45.44%) were less commonly observed. Participants failed to follow social distancing because of overcrowding and lack of space. They also found it cumbersome to wash hands multiple times. Female participants and people residing in metropolitan and small cities were fairly doing well in following preventive practices. Conclusion The study helped in identifying the glitches in following various preventive practices against COVID-19 during unlock phase and reasons for the failure to perform these practices.

Development of a self-assessment tool for resident doctors' communication skills in India

PURPOSE: Effective communication skills are essential for resident doctors to provide optimum patient care. This study was conducted to develop and validate a questionnaire for the self-assessment of resident doctors' communication skills in India. METHODS: This was a mixed-methods study conducted in 2 phases. The first phase consisted of questionnaire development, including the identification of relevant literature, focus group discussions with residents and experts from clinical specialties, and pre-testing of the questionnaire. The second phase involved administering the questionnaire survey to 95 residents from the Departments of Medicine, Emergency Medicine, Pediatrics, and Surgery at the All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India in April 2019. Internal consistency was tested and the factor structure was analyzed to test construct validity. RESULTS: The questionnaire consisted of 3 sections: (A) 4 items on doctor-patient conflicts and the role of communication skills in avoiding these conflicts, (B) 29 items on self-assessment of communication skills in different settings, and (C) 8 items on barriers to practicing good communication skills. Sections B and C had good internal consistency (Cronbach α: 0.885 and 0.771, respectively). Section C had a 2-factor solution, and the barriers were classified as 'training' and 'infrastructure' factors. CONCLUSION: This appears to be a valid assessment tool of resident doctors' communication skills, with potential utility for identifying gaps in communication skills and developing communication skills modules.