Assessment of Vestigial Auriculomotor Activity to Acoustic Stimuli Using Electrodes In and Around the Ear.

Recently, it has been demonstrated that electromyographic (EMG) activity of auricular muscles in humans, especially the postauricular muscle (PAM), depends on the spatial location of auditory stimuli. This observation has only been shown using wet electrodes placed directly on auricular muscles. To move towards a more applied, out-of-the-laboratory setting, this study aims to investigate if similar results can be obtained using electrodes placed in custom-fitted earpieces. Furthermore, with the exception of the ground electrode, only dry-contact electrodes were used to record EMG signals, which require little to no skin preparation and can therefore be applied extremely fast. In two experiments, auditory stimuli were presented to ten participants from different spatial directions. In experiment 1, stimuli were rapid onset naturalistic stimuli presented in silence, and in experiment 2, the corresponding participant's first name, presented in a "cocktail party" environment. In both experiments, ipsilateral responses were significantly larger than contralateral responses. Furthermore, machine learning models objectively decoded the direction of stimuli significantly above chance level on a single trial basis (PAM: ≈ 80%, in-ear: ≈ 69%). There were no significant differences when participants repeated the experiments after several weeks. This study provides evidence that auricular muscle responses can be recorded reliably using an almost entirely dry-contact in-ear electrode system. The location of the PAM, and the fact that in-ear electrodes can record comparable signals, would make hearing aids interesting devices to record these auricular EMG signals and potentially utilize them as control signals in the future.

Ear-EEG for sleep assessment: a comparison with actigraphy and PSG.

PURPOSE: To assess automatic sleep staging of three ear-EEG setups with different electrode configurations and compare performance with concurrent polysomnography and wrist-worn actigraphy recordings. METHODS: Automatic sleep staging was performed for single-ear, single-ear with ipsilateral mastoid, and cross-ear electrode configurations, and for actigraphy data. The polysomnography data were manually scored and used as the gold standard. The automatic sleep staging was tested on 80 full-night recordings from 20 healthy subjects. The scoring performance and sleep metrics were determined for all ear-EEG setups and the actigraphy device. RESULTS: The single-ear, the single-ear with ipsilateral mastoid setup, and the cross-ear setup performed five class sleep staging with kappa values 0.36, 0.63, and 0.72, respectively. For the single-ear with mastoid electrode and the cross-ear setup, the performance of the sleep metrics, in terms of mean absolute error, was better than the sleep metrics estimated from the actigraphy device in the current study, and also better than current state-of-the-art actigraphy studies. CONCLUSION: A statistically significant improvement in both accuracy and kappa was observed from single-ear to single-ear with ipsilateral mastoid, and from single-ear with ipsilateral mastoid to cross-ear configurations for both two and five-sleep stage classification. In terms of sleep metrics, the results were more heterogeneous, but in general, actigraphy and single-ear with ipsilateral mastoid configuration were better than the single-ear configuration; and the cross-ear configuration was consistently better than both the actigraphy device and the single-ear configuration.