Role of fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG PET)-computed tomography (CT) in the staging of bladder cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether to use (18) F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG PET) scans in the preoperative staging of bladder cancer (BC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: In all, 233 patients with muscle-invasive BC (MIBC) or high-risk non-MIBC being considered for radical cystectomy (RC) between 2005 and 2011 had FDG-PET and computed tomography (CT) of the chest, abdomen and pelvis to assess for pelvic lymph node (LN) involvement or distant metastases. Sensitivity and specificity for detecting pelvic LN involvement was determined by comparing the results of the scans to the histopathology reports in patients undergoing RC. These parameters for distant metastases were determined from biopsy results or follow-up imaging. In patients who did not undergo RC, follow-up imaging was used to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity. Patients were excluded from analysis if they either had neoadjuvant chemotherapy or had <10 LNs removed at lymphadenectomy. RESULTS: The PET scan was able to detect metastatic disease outside of the pelvis with a sensitivity of 54% compared with 41% for the staging CT (N = 207). Both scans had similar specificities of 97% and 98%. There were 13 PET avid lesions not visualised on the corresponding staging CT scans. These proved to be metastatic BC (six patients), a synchronous primary colonic cancer (one), colonic adenomas (one), basal cell tumour of the parotid gland (one) and inflammatory lesions (four). The sensitivity and specificity of the CT scans for pelvic LN involvement was 45% and 98%, respectively (N = 93). Using a combination of the PET and CT scan, the sensitivity for detecting metastatic disease in LNs increased to 69% with a 3% reduction in specificity to 95%. CONCLUSIONS: PET when used in conjunction with a standard CT scan provides a small improvement in preoperative staging of BC. However, this advantage is not significant enough to justify the additional cost. Hence we recommend use of dual imaging only in highly selected patients.

Assessing the feasibility of a one-stop approach to diagnosis for urological patients.

INTRODUCTION: Conventional publicly funded out-patient services in many specialties are characterised by delays, fragmented diagnostic processes, and overloaded clinics. This is bad for patients as it is clinically dangerous; bad for managers who spend hours managing the failure; bad for doctors who respond by overloading clinics; and bad for purchasers who have to fund the multiple out-patient visits needed. Sound clinical and financial reasons exist for introducing more efficient diagnostic processes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 330 consecutive patients referred to the urology department of Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust were invited to attend one of nine one-stop clinics staffed by consultant urologists with specialist registrars, nurses, and clerical staff. Pre-clinic blood and urine tests were ordered based on the referral letter. Clinics had facilities to perform cystoscopy, ultrasound, and urinary flow studies. Correspondence was generated in real time, and a copy given to the patient. RESULTS: Overall, 257 patients attended the clinics. Twenty-three patients cancelled appointments and 50 patients did not attend. Pre-clinic tests were requested in 133 patients and were completed by 86% of the patients who attended. Of patients, 42% were diagnosed and discharged; 28% were listed for surgery, extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL), or referred to another specialty. About 30% of patients needed further out-patient review; in approximately two-thirds to complete a diagnosis and one-third to review the results of therapy initiated. An estimated 350 appointments and 550 patient visits to hospital were saved. CONCLUSIONS: A one-stop method of consultation is efficient across a range of urological presenting complaints, and dramatically reduces the need for follow-up consultations. It has potential to: (i) reduce delays to being seen in out-patients; (ii) lead to more cost-effective care; and (iii) increase safety and patient satisfaction. It should become the standard of care in urology, and is probably applicable in many other disciplines.

Assessment of response to therapy using conventional imaging.

The response of lymphoma to treatment is usually documented using cross-sectional imaging. The definitions of response and the changes seen on CT and MRI in the chest and abdomen are well recognised. However, the appearances of residual masses are more variable and features that may help in diagnosis will be included in this review.