Healthcare professional's choice for surgical management of stress urinary incontinence in a U.K. tertiary hospital.

OBJECTIVE: In July 2018, NHS England, introduced a pause on vaginal mesh, including the mid-urethral sling (MUS) for treatment of stress urinary incontinence (SUI). NICE guidelines recommend MUS as one of the surgical options for SUI. The aim of our study was to investigate healthcare professionals choices for surgical treatment of SUI, if conservative measures failed. STUDY DESIGN: The urogynaecology department at our tertiary level hospital devised a questionnaire using SurveyMonkey. This was distributed via email to 1058 healthcare professionals of different medical backgrounds. The surgical options were based on the NICE guideline and its patient decision making aid. We also used surgical information from the British society of Urogynaecology (BSUG) and British association of urological surgeons (BAUS). RESULTS: We received 214 responses of which 204 were complete. Twenty six percent of replies were from obstetricians and gynaecologists, 36 % had over 20 years experience and 79 % were female. Forty four percent had no previous knowledge of surgical options. Mid-urethral sling was the most popular choice based on description, success and specific complications. Urethral bulking agent was the only option that increased in popularity after describing complications. Twenty two percent would avoid surgery due to the risk of complications. CONCLUSION: This is the first study evaluating healthcare professionals surgical choice for SUI. Despite negative media publicity and NHS pause on MUS, it was still the most popular choice before and after informing of specific complications. The urethral bulking agent was the only surgical treatment, which increased in popularity after considering complications.

Assessment of the impact of urogenital prolapse on sexual dysfunction.

Sexual dysfunction is one of the symptoms that motivates women to seek medical help in the management of urogenital prolapse. Conservative or surgical interventions may be offered to treat the prolapse but the question remains as to whether treatment restores sexual function (SF). This article briefly discusses the assessment of SF in women with a urogenital prolapse and reviews the effect of therapeutic interventions on SF.

Minimum standards for continence care in the UK.

AIM: This paper reports on the publication of a joint statement on minimum standards for continence care in the UK. METHODS: A multidisciplinary working party were tasked with creating standards for both training and education in continence care, as well as explicit standards for a framework of service delivery. This was done through a process of extensive consultation with relevant professional bodies. RESULTS: The standards suggest a modular structure to continence training, including basic, male, female, catheter care etc. Discussions on service provision cover primary care through to expert tertiary centres. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first attempt to standardise continence care and training for all health care professionals nationally. The document is available on the United Kingdom Continence Society website www.ukcs.uk.net.