Differential thrombotic prolapse burden in either bioresorbable vascular scaffolds or metallic stents implanted during acute myocardial infarction: The snowshoe effect: Insights from the maximal footprint analysis.

BACKGROUND: The hypothesized increased thrombus entrapment during bioresorbable vascular scaffold implantation in acute myocardial infarction, the so-called "snowshoe effect" has never been demonstrated. METHODS: Patients enrolled in the BVS STEMI FIRST study matched with STEMI patients implanted with everolimus-eluting metal stents (EES) and undergoing optical coherence tomography (OCT) at the index procedure were compared. Quantitative coronary angiography analysis and optical coherence tomography data for evaluation of thrombotic prolapse were reported. Percentage maximal footprint (%MFP) analysis as an indicator of the snowshoe effect was performed. RESULTS: A total of 302 patients were analyzed (151 with BVS and 151 with EES). Of those patients 30 implanted with BVS and 17 implanted with EES were imaged at the index procedure with OCT. Baseline clinical characteristics, TIMI-flow and thrombus burden were similar between groups. Aspiration thrombectomy was similarly performed in the two groups (BVS 83.3% vs 94.1% EES, p=0.405). At the end of the procedure, final TIMI 3 flow was achieved in 93.3% and 82.4% of BVS and EES patients respectively (p=0.296). The %MFP was significantly higher in the BVS treated patients (36.59±5.65% vs 17.61±4.30, p<0.001). The results of the OCT analysis showed a mean prolapse area (0.61±0.26mm(2) vs 0.90±0.31mm(2), p=0.001) and a percentage prolapse area (7.11±2.98mm(2) vs 9.98±2.90mm(2), p=0.002) significantly higher in the EES group. CONCLUSIONS: Scaffold structural characteristics such as strut width may play a role in terms of thrombus dislodgment patterns and acute prolapsing material.

Vasomotor Function Comparative Assessment at 1 and 2 Years Following Implantation of the Absorb Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold and the Xience V Everolimus-Eluting Metallic Stent in Porcine Coronary Arteries: Insights From In Vivo Angiography, Ex Vivo Assessment, and Gene Analysis at the Stented/Scaffolded Segments and the Proximal and Distal Edges.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to assess and compare in vivo the restoration of vasomotor function following Absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) (Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, California) and metallic Xience V (XV) (Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, California) stent implantations in porcine coronary arteries at 1 and 2 years. BACKGROUND: Drug-eluting metallic coronary stents induce sustained vasomotor dysfunction, and preliminary observations from arteries with bioresorbable scaffolds have indicated partially restored vasoreactivity. METHODS: A total of 15 Absorb BVS (3.0 × 18.0 mm) and 14 XV (3.0 × 18.0 mm or 3.0 × 12.0 mm) stents were randomly implanted in the main coronaries of 12 nonatherosclerotic swine. The effect of implant on vasomotor performance (constrictive and expansive) was measured in the stented/scaffolded segments and the 5-mm proximal and distal adjacent segments in vivo by angiography assessing mean luminal diameter changes following infusion of vasoactive agents at 1 year (n = 6) and 2 years (n = 6) as well as ex vivo at 2 years using a tissue chamber apparatus. Endothelial cell function and smooth muscle cell phenotype gene marker levels were evaluated with quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction. RESULTS: The scaffolded Absorb BVS segments showed fully restored constrictive response compared with XV implanted vessels at 1 year: -24.30 ± 14.31% versus -1.79 ± 6.57% (p < 0.004) and at 2 years: -28.13 ± 14.60% versus -3.90 ± 6.44% (p < 0.004). The early restoration of vasomotor function within the scaffolded segments reached a peak at 1 year and did not significantly change up to 2 years. The vasoactive responses of Absorb BVS-implanted vessels within the scaffolded segments were similar to those observed within the proximal and distal edge segments at both time points. Conversely, the stented XV segments demonstrated significantly impaired constrictive response compared with the distal XV edges at 1 year: -1.79 ± 6.57% versus -21.89 ± 7.17% (p < 0.0002) and at 2 years: -3.90 ± 6.44% versus -21.93 ± 15.60% (p < 0.03). Ex vivo assessment of contraction induced by PGF2α and relaxation induced by substance P of isolated BVS segments compared with XV-treated segments generated greater contraction force of 3.94 ± 0.97 g versus 1.83 ± 1.03 g (p < 0.05), and endothelial-dependent relaxation reached 35.91 ± 24.74% versus 1.20 ± 3.79% (p < 0.01). Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction gene analysis at 2 years demonstrated increased Connexin 43 messenger ribonucleic acid levels of Absorb BVS-treated vessels compared with XV-treated vessels: 1.92 ± 0.23 versus 0.77 ± 12 (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Absorb BVS-implanted coronary arteries demonstrate early functional restoration of the scaffolded and adjacent segments at 1 year, which is preserved up to 2 years.

Incidence and imaging outcomes of acute scaffold disruption and late structural discontinuity after implantation of the absorb Everolimus-Eluting fully bioresorbable vascular scaffold: optical coherence tomography assessment in the ABSORB cohort B Trial (A Clinical Evaluation of the Bioabsorbable Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System in the Treatment of Patients With De Novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions).

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to describe the frequency and clinical impact of acute scaffold disruption and late strut discontinuity of the second-generation Absorb bioresorbable polymeric vascular scaffolds (Absorb BVS, Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, California) in the ABSORB (A Clinical Evaluation of the Bioabsorbable Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System in the Treatment of Patients With De Novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions) cohort B study by optical coherence tomography (OCT) post-procedure and at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months. BACKGROUND: Fully bioresorbable scaffolds are a novel approach to treatment for coronary narrowing that provides transient vessel support with drug delivery capability without the long-term limitations of metallic drug-eluting stents. However, a potential drawback of the bioresorbable scaffold is the potential for disruption of the strut network when overexpanded. Conversely, the structural discontinuity of the polymeric struts at a late stage is a biologically programmed fate of the scaffold during the course of bioresorption. METHODS: The ABSORB cohort B trial is a multicenter single-arm trial assessing the safety and performance of the Absorb BVS in the treatment of 101 patients with de novo native coronary artery lesions. The current analysis included 51 patients with 143 OCT pullbacks who underwent OCT at baseline and follow-up. The presence of acute disruption or late discontinuities was diagnosed by the presence on OCT of stacked, overhung struts or isolated intraluminal struts disconnected from the expected circularity of the device. RESULTS: Of 51 patients with OCT imaging post-procedure, acute scaffold disruption was observed in 2 patients (3.9%), which could be related to overexpansion of the scaffold at the time of implantation. One patient had a target lesion revascularization that was presumably related to the disruption. Of 49 patients without acute disruption, late discontinuities were observed in 21 patients. There were no major adverse cardiac events associated with this finding except for 1 patient who had a non-ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization. CONCLUSIONS: Acute scaffold disruption is a rare iatrogenic phenomenon that has been anecdotally associated with anginal symptoms, whereas late strut discontinuity is observed in approximately 40% of patients and could be viewed as a serendipitous OCT finding of a normal bioresorption process without clinical implications. (ABSORB Clinical Investigation, Cohort B [ABSORB B]; NCT00856856).

The edge vascular response following implantation of the Absorb everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold and the XIENCE V metallic everolimus-eluting stent. First serial follow-up assessment at six months and two years: insights from the first-in-man ABSORB Cohort B and SPIRIT II trials.

AIMS: To assess serially the edge vascular response (EVR) of a bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) compared to a metallic everolimus-eluting stent (EES). METHODS AND RESULTS: Non-serial evaluations of the Absorb BVS at one year have previously demonstrated proximal edge constrictive remodelling and distal edge changes in plaque composition with increase of the percent fibro-fatty (FF) tissue component. The 5 mm proximal and distal segments adjacent to the implanted devices were investigated serially with intravascular ultrasound (IVUS), post procedure, at six months and at two years, from the ABSORB Cohort B1 (n=45) and the SPIRIT II (n=113) trials. Twenty-two proximal and twenty-four distal edge segments were available for analysis in the ABSORB Cohort B1 trial. In the SPIRIT II trial, thirty-three proximal and forty-six distal edge segments were analysed. At the 5-mm proximal edge, the vessels treated with an Absorb BVS from post procedure to two years demonstrated a lumen loss (LL) of 6.68% (-17.33; 2.08) (p=0.027) with a trend toward plaque area increase of 7.55% (-4.68; 27.11) (p=0.06). At the 5-mm distal edge no major changes were evident at either time point. At the 5-mm proximal edge the vessels treated with a XIENCE V EES from post procedure to two years did not show any signs of LL, only plaque area decrease of 6.90% (-17.86; 4.23) (p=0.035). At the distal edge no major changes were evident with regard to either lumen area or vessel remodelling at the same time point. CONCLUSIONS: The IVUS-based serial evaluation of the EVR up to two years following implantation of a bioresorbable everolimus-eluting scaffold shows a statistically significant proximal edge LL; however, this finding did not seem to have any clinical implications in the serial assessment. The upcoming imaging follow-up of the Absorb BVS at three years is anticipated to provide further information regarding the vessel wall behaviour at the edges.

First serial assessment at 6 months and 2 years of the second generation of absorb everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold: a multi-imaging modality study.

BACKGROUND: Nonserial observations have shown this bioresorbable scaffold to have no signs of area reduction at 6 months and recovery of vasomotion at 1 year. Serial observations at 6 months and 2 years have to confirm the absence of late restenosis or unfavorable imaging outcomes. METHODS AND RESULTS: The ABSORB trial is a multicenter single-arm trial assessing the safety and performance of an everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold. Forty-five patients underwent serial invasive imaging, such as quantitative coronary angiography, intravascular ultrasound, and optical coherence tomography at 6 and 24 months of follow-up. From 6 to 24 months, late luminal loss increased from 0.16±0.18 to 0.27±0.20 mm on quantitative coronary angiography, with an increase in neointima of 0.68±0.43 mm(2) on optical coherence tomography and 0.17±0.26 mm(2) on intravascular ultrasound. Struts still recognizable on optical coherence tomography at 2 years showed 99% of neointimal coverage with optical and ultrasonic signs of bioresorption accompanied by increase in mean scaffold area compared with baseline (0.54±1.09 mm(2) on intravascular ultrasound, P=0.003 and 0.77±1.33 m(2) on optical coherence tomography, P=0.016). Two-year major adverse cardiac event rate was 6.8% without any scaffold thrombosis. CONCLUSIONS: This serial analysis of the second generation of the everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold confirmed, at medium term, the safety and efficacy of the new device. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00856856.

Vascular response of the segments adjacent to the proximal and distal edges of the ABSORB everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold: 6-month and 1-year follow-up assessment: a virtual histology intravascular ultrasound study from the first-in-man ABSORB cohort B trial.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to investigate in vivo the vascular response at the proximal and distal edges of the second-generation ABSORB everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS). BACKGROUND: The edge vascular response after implantation of the BVS has not been previously investigated. METHODS: The ABSORB Cohort B trial enrolled 101 patients and was divided into B(1) (n = 45) and B(2) (n = 56) subgroups. The adjacent (5-mm) proximal and distal vessel segments to the implanted ABSORB BVS were investigated at either 6 months (B(1)) or 1 year (B(2)) with virtual histology intravascular ultrasound (VH-IVUS) imaging. RESULTS: At the 5-mm proximal edge, the only significant change was modest constrictive remodeling at 6 months (Δ vessel cross-sectional area: -1.80% [-3.18; 1.30], p < 0.05), with a tendency to regress at 1 year (Δ vessel cross-sectional area: -1.53% [-7.74; 2.48], p = 0.06). The relative change of the fibrotic and fibrofatty (FF) tissue areas at this segment were not statistically significant at either time point. At the 5-mm distal edge, a significant increase in the FF tissue of 43.32% [-19.90; 244.28], (p < 0.05) 1-year post-implantation was evident. The changes in dense calcium need to be interpreted with caution since the polymeric struts are detected as "pseudo" dense calcium structures with the VH-IVUS imaging modality. CONCLUSIONS: The vascular response up to 1 year after implantation of the ABSORB BVS demonstrated some degree of proximal edge constrictive remodeling and distal edge increase in FF tissue resulting in nonsignificant plaque progression with adaptive expansive remodeling. This morphological and tissue composition behavior appears to not significantly differ from the behavior of metallic drug-eluting stents at the same observational time points.

A comparative assessment by optical coherence tomography of the performance of the first and second generation of the everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffolds.

AIMS: The first generation of the everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS 1.0) showed an angiographic late loss higher than the metallic everolimus-eluting stent Xience V due to scaffold shrinkage. The new generation (BVS 1.1) presents a different design and manufacturing process than the BVS 1.0. This study sought to evaluate the differences in late shrinkage, neointimal response, and bioresorption process between these two scaffold generations using optical coherence tomography (OCT). METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 12 lesions treated with the BVS 1.0 and 12 selected lesions treated with the revised BVS 1.1 were imaged at baseline and 6-month follow-up with OCT. Late shrinkage and neointimal area (NIA) were derived from OCT area measurements. Neointimal thickness was measured in each strut. Strut appearance has been classified as previously described. Baseline clinical, angiographic, and OCT characteristics were mainly similar in the two groups. At 6 months, absolute and relative shrinkages were significantly larger for the BVS 1.0 than for the BVS 1.1 (0.98 vs. 0.07 mm² and 13.0 vs. 1.0%, respectively; P = 0.01). Neointimal area was significantly higher in the BVS 1.0 than in the BVS 1.1 (in-scaffold area obstruction of 23.6 vs. 12.3%; P < 0.01). Neointimal thickness was also larger in the BVS 1.0 than in the BVS 1.1 (166.0 vs. 76.4 µm; P < 0.01). Consequently, OCT, intravascular ultrasound, and angiographic luminal losses were higher with the BVS 1.0 than with the BVS 1.1. At 6 months, strut appearance was preserved in only 2.9% of the BVS 1.0 struts, but remained unchanged with the BVS 1.1 indicating different state of strut microstucture and/or their reflectivity. CONCLUSION: The BVS 1.1 has less late shrinkage and less neointimal growth at 6-month follow-up compared with the BVS 1.0. A difference in polymer degradation leading to changes in microstructure and reflectivity is the most plausible explanation for this finding.

Setting acceptance criteria for validation of analytical methods of drug eluting stents: Minimum requirements for analytical variability.

Accuracy and reliability of the analytical results are crucial for ensuring quality, safety and efficacy of drug eluting stents (DESs). Method validation is the process used to confirm that the analytical procedure employed for a specific test is suitable for its intended use. Results from method validation can be used to judge the quality, reliability and consistency of analytical results. Validation of analytical methods includes the identification of the performance parameters relevant for the given procedure, the definition of appropriate acceptance criteria and the appropriate design of the validation studies. Achieving an appropriate consideration of the analytical variability in assay procedures and setting acceptance criteria for analytical validations is however much more difficult than usually described. Criteria which are too wide may lead to unnecessary and incorrect out-of-specification (OOS) cases, resulting in bad reject decision for products. This study concentrates on analysis, through simulation, of the relation of method variability with specification limits for the total loaded dose of the active substance on the DES. The findings of this study point what levels of precision and accuracy are needed, in other words what is the magnitude of the allowable total error from all possible effects (both systematic and random) in an assay method in order to achieve the level of performance required for the methods applied routinely for the evaluation of the total loaded dose of DES as part of lot release/stability testing.