Estimating the indirect economic burden of cancer in Jordan: a retrospective observational study.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to estimate the indirect economic burden of 22 cancer types in Jordan using both the human capital approach (HCA) and the value of a statistical life year (VSLY) approach. Additionally, this study aims to forecast the burden of these cancers for the next 5 years while employing time series analysis. DESIGN: Retrospective observational study with a time series analysis. PARTICIPANTS: Disability adjusted life years records from the IHME Global Burden Disease estimates 2019 data. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE: Indirect economic burden of cancer in Jordan. RESULTS: The mean total economic burden for all cancers is estimated to be $1.82 billion using HCA and $3.13 billion using VSLY approach. The cancers contributing most to the total burden are 'tracheal, bronchus and lung cancer' ($359.5 million HCA, $618.3 million VSLY), followed by 'colon and rectum cancer' ($300.6 million HCA, $517.1 million VSLY) and 'breast cancer' ($292.4 million HCA, $502.9 million VSLY). The indirect economic burden ranged from 1.4% to 2.1% of the gross domestic product (GDP) using the HCA, and from 2.3% to 3.6% of the GDP using the VSLY approach. The indirect economic burden is expected to reach 2.3 and 3.5 billion Intl$ by the year 2025 using the HCA and VSLY approach, respectively. CONCLUSION: The indirect economic burden of cancer in Jordan amounted to 1.4%-3.6% of total GDP, with tracheal, bronchus and lung cancer; colon and rectum cancer; and breast cancer contributing to over 50% of the total burden. This will help set national cancer spending priorities following Jordan's economic modernisation vision with regard to maximising health economic outcomes.

Cost-efficiency analysis and expanded treatment access modeling of conversion to rituximab biosimilars from reference rituximab in Jordan.

AIM: To assess the cost-efficiency and expanded access of three rituximab biosimilars versus the reference rituximab from the perspective of the Jordanian national health payer. METHODS: A 1-year cost-efficiency and expanded access model of conversion from reference rituximab (Mabthera) to the approved biosimilars (Truxima, Rixathon, and Tromax) to assess five metrics: total annual cost to treat a hypothetical patient; head-to-head cost comparison; changes in patients' access to rituximab; number-needed-to-convert (NNC) to provide an additional 10 patients access to a rituximab treatment; and relative amount of Jordanian Dinar (JOD) spent on rituximab options. The model included rituximab doses at 100 mg/10 ml and 500 mg/50 ml and considered both cost-saving and cost-wastage scenarios. Costs of treatments were based on the fiscal year 2022 tender prices received by the Joint Procurement Department (JPD). RESULTS: Rixathon was associated with the lowest average annual cost per patient (JOD2,860) across all six indications among all rituximab comparators, followed by Truxima (JOD4,240), Tromax (JOD4,365) and reference Mabthera (JOD11,431). The highest percentage of patient access to rituximab treatment (321%) was achieved when switching patients from Mabthera to Rixathon in the RA and PV indications. At four patients, Rixathon was associated with the lowest NNC to provide an additional 10 patients access to rituximab treatment. For each JOD1 spent on Rixathon, an additional JOD3.21 must be spent on Mabthera, an additional JOD0.55 on Tromax, and an additional JOD0.53 on Truxima. CONCLUSION: Rituximab biosimilars were associated with cost savings in all approved indications in Jordan compared to reference rituximab. Rixathon was associated with the lowest annual cost, the highest percentage of expanded patient access for all six indications, and the lowest NNC providing 10 additional patients with access.

Economic Evaluation of Three BRAF + MEK Inhibitors for the Treatment of Advanced Unresectable Melanoma With BRAF Mutation From a US Payer Perspective.

BACKGROUND: The combinations of BRAF + MEK inhibitors-encorafenib (ENC) + binimetinib (BIN), cobimetinib (COB) + vemurafenib (VEM), and dabrafenib (DAB) + trametinib (TRA)-are recommended for the treatment of BRAF-mutated advanced melanoma. OBJECTIVE: To assess the cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of ENC + BIN versus COB + VEM versus DAB + TRA from a US payer perspective. METHODS: A Markov model was constructed to simulate a hypothetical cohort over a time horizon of 10 years. The overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) curves were independently digitized from a randomized controlled trial for ENC + BIN and fitted using R software. Published and indirectly estimated hazard ratios were used to fit OS and PFS curves for COB + VEM and DAB + TRA. Costs, life-year gains, and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) associated with the 3 treatment combinations were estimated. A base case analysis and probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA) were conducted to estimate the incremental cost-utility ratio (ICUR). A discount rate of 3.5% was applied on cost and outcomes. RESULTS: The ENC + BIN versus COB + VEM comparison was associated with an ICUR of $656 233 per QALY gained. The ENC + BIN versus DAB + TRA comparison was associated with an ICUR of $3 135 269 per QALY gained. The DAB + TRA combination dominated COB + VEM. The base case analysis estimates were confirmed by the PSA estimates. ENC + BIN was the most cost-effective combination at a high willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of $573 000 per QALY and $1.5 million/QALY when compared to COB + VEM and DAB + TRA, respectively. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: Given current prices and acceptable WTP thresholds, our study suggests that DAB + TRA is the optimum treatment. In this study, ENC + BIN was cost-effective only at a very high WTP per QALY threshold.

Assessment of COVID-19-related meta-analysis reporting quality.

BACKGROUND: Meta-analysis of high-quality primary articles represents the top-quality evidence in medical literature. In this project, our aim was to assess the number and quality of COVID-related meta-analysis published since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: The search included the period from January 1, 2020, when the beginning of primary articles on COVID-19, till October 31, 2020. We screened a total of 793 studies. We excluded non-meta-analytic non-COVID-19-related studies. We obtained different characteristics, and we determined the quality of reporting using the AMSTAR tool, an 11-items tool that assesses the content validity and methodological quality of systematic reviews and meta-analysis. RESULTS: A total of 538 studies were included in our assessment. The first meta-analysis included was published in March, while the last one was on the 31st of October. Upon comparing the mean AMSTAR score for meta-analysis published during each month, we found a significant difference (p < 0.001, F = 4.139), where the mean score almost steadily increased since March. CONCLUSION: The urge to publish during the COVID-19 period or any other surge in publishing should not be at the expense of quality.

Productivity Loss in Patients With Chronic Diseases: A Pooled Economic Analysis of Hungarian Cost-of-Illness Studies.

OBJECTIVES: To assess productivity loss (PL) variations across a set of chronic diseases and analyze significant PL drivers (demographics, health status, healthcare resource use) in Hungary. METHODS: Data from 11 cost-of-illness studies (psoriasis, dementia, systemic sclerosis, multiple sclerosis, benign prostatic hyperplasia, Parkinson's disease, psoriatic arthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, schizophrenia, epilepsy, and diabetes) were pooled, and patient-level data were analyzed. A weighted multiple linear regression analysis was run to identify significant PL indicators. All costs were adjusted to 2018 euro rates and PL was further presented as a proportion of gross domestic product/capita, facilitating results comparability and transferability. RESULTS: The dataset comprised 1888 patients from 11 chronic diseases. The average indirect cost/(gross domestic product/capita) ratio was highest in schizophrenia (72.4%) and rheumatoid arthritis (71.3%) and lowest in benign prostatic hyperplasia (1.6%). Correlation results infer that a higher EuroQol 5-dimension 3-level index score was significantly associated with lower PL. The number of hospital admissions was the main contributor toward increasing PL among resource use indicators. Age and sex showed inconsistent and insignificant correlations with PL. In regression analysis, a better EuroQol 5-dimension 3-level index score and higher education were consistently associated with decreasing PL in all models. CONCLUSIONS: This article will enable health decision makers to understand the importance of adopting a societal perspective for chronic disease reimbursement decisions. The correlation between PL and health status supports that timely started effective treatments may prevent patients from losing their workability.

Health Economic Publications From the Middle East and North Africa Region: A Scoping Review of the Volume and Methods of Research.

Introduction: We reviewed the scope of countries, diseases, technologies, and methods involved in the health economic evaluations published in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region. Methods: PRISMA guidelines were followed. A PubMed search was conducted up to December 15, 2019. English language full-text articles were included if they reported original research on humans; involved the local population from Algeria, Bahrain, Egypt, Iraq, Jordan, Kuwait, Lebanon, Libya, Morocco, Oman, Palestine, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Syria, Tunisia, United Arab Emirates, or Yemen; reported costs; and involved a full or partial health economic analysis comparing alternative health technologies. Data on publication year, country of origin, disease area according to ICD-10, type of health technology, and applied methods were extracted. Results: From 105 eligible articles, 57.1% were published between 2015 and 2019. Egypt (30.5%) and Saudi Arabia (27.6%) were the most frequently involved countries. Infectious diseases were most often studied (27.6%). The assessed technology was a system (eg, infection control, screening, coverage/access, hospital management, or healthcare delivery program) in 41.9% of studies. Cost-utility analysis (CUA) was the most frequent method (29.5%) and was growing rapidly. Health system perspective was adopted in 52.4% of studies, whereas societal perspective was scarce (8.6%). The majority of studies (46.7%) were published in Scimago Q1 journals. Over half of the studies (54.2%) did not report or did not have a funding source. Conclusions: From 2015, health economic analysis became more frequent in the MENA region, providing input to value-based health policy and financing. For further growth, in addition to the development of the institutional background, valid and more standardized local cost and outcome data should be available.