Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res ; 22(5): 845-851, 2022 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34927501

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To assess prescribing care indicators, utilization pattern, cost per prescription, cost ratios, and percent cost variation of antidepressants (ADs). METHOD: A prospective cross-sectional study was carried out at the tertiary care hospital of Peshawar, Pakistan among major depressive disorder (MDD) outpatients from July 2019 to February 2020. The ideal standards for World Health Organization (WHO) prescribing care indicators were used. The ePharma Guide was used to calculate the cost in Pakistani rupees (Rs) and United States dollar (USD) 2021 (exchange rate: 1 USD = 154.43 Rs). RESULTS: A total of 296 MDD patients received 846 drugs (average 2.86; range:1-8), of which 366 were ADs (average number ADs/prescription; 1.23). About 23% (n = 68) of patients received more than one AD. Only 21 (5.7%) generic ADs were prescribed, and 346 (94.5%) ADs were prescribed from the hospital formulary list. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) were the most prescribed ADs (67.5%). The average cost of ADs per prescription per month was 700.95 Rs (4.54 USD). Escitalopram (5.69 Rs; 0.04 USD) showed highest cost ratio and maximum percentage cost variation (468.97%). CONCLUSION: This study observed low generic prescribing, a higher prescribing trend of SSRI, wide differences in cost ratio and percentage cost variation among ADs.


Assuntos
Transtorno Depressivo Maior , Antidepressivos/uso terapêutico , Estudos Transversais , Transtorno Depressivo Maior/tratamento farmacológico , Medicamentos Genéricos/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Pacientes Ambulatoriais , Paquistão , Prescrições , Inibidores Seletivos de Recaptação de Serotonina/uso terapêutico , Centros de Atenção Terciária
3.
J Pak Med Assoc ; 70(Suppl 1)(2): S20-S23, 2020 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31981330

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: External fixation is the most commonly used method for temporary management of open fractures of the Tibial shaft followed by internal fixation. This can also be used as a definitive method of fixation. Ilizarov is more superior and can be the primary and definite option where expertise is available. This study was conducted todetermine the outcome of open tibia shaft fracture treated with either Ilizarov or AO External Fixator. METHODS: Anon-commercial retrospective cohort was conducted at Aga Khan University Hospital Karachi on patients operated for isolated open tibia fractures Gustillo type III (A, B, C) stabilized with external fixation either circular or uniplanar external fixator. These two groups were compared in terms of fracture pattern, healing and complications. For fracture healing, Radiographic union score (RUST) for tibial fractures were used. RESULTS: A total of 93 patients were included in the study. Mean age 36.7 +/- 17.3 years comprising 83 males and 10 females. Circular Fixator was used for 46 whereas 47 were treated with uni-planar fixator. Mean new injury severity score was 21 ± 3.4 for circular fixator group and 26 ± 7 in uniplanar fixator group. Mean time fur fracture healing was 6±1months in circular fixator group and 9 months in Uniplanar Fixator group. Mean RUST score for circular fixator was 9.5±1.2.and of uniplanar it was 7.3±1.0. CONCLUSIONS: Circular fixator works as a single stage procedure with acceptable outcomes for Gustilo grade III open tibial shaft fractures as compared to uniplanar external fixator.


Assuntos
Fixadores Externos , Fixação de Fratura/métodos , Fraturas Expostas/cirurgia , Fraturas da Tíbia/cirurgia , Acidentes por Quedas , Acidentes de Trânsito , Adulto , Traumatismos por Explosões/cirurgia , Feminino , Consolidação da Fratura , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Paquistão , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Tempo , Centros de Traumatologia , Resultado do Tratamento , Suporte de Carga , Ferimentos por Arma de Fogo/cirurgia , Adulto Jovem
4.
Biomed Res Int ; 2013: 698461, 2013.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24455717

RESUMO

We reviewed in this series forty patients of pediatric age who underwent resection for malignant tumors of musculoskeletal system followed by biological reconstruction. Our surgical procedure for reconstruction included (1) wide en bloc resection of the tumor; (2) curettage of tumor from the resected bone; (3) autoclaving for 8 minutes (4) bone grafting from the fibula (both vascularized and nonvascularized fibular grafts used); (5) reimplantation of the autoclaved bone into the host bone defect and fixation with plates. Functional evaluation was done using MSTS scoring system. At final followup of at least 18 months (mean 29.2 months), 31 patients had recovered without any complications. Thirty-eight patients successfully achieved a solid bony union between the graft and recipient bone. Three patients had surgical site infection. They were managed with wound debridement and flap coverage of the defect. Local recurrence and nonunion occurred in two patients each. One patient underwent disarticulation at hip due to extensive local disease and one died of metastasis. For patients with non-union, revision procedure with bone graft and compression plates was successfully used. The use of autoclaved tumor grafts provides a limb salvage option that is inexpensive and independent of external resources and is a viable option for musculoskeletal tumor management in developing countries.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Ósseas/cirurgia , Condrossarcoma/cirurgia , Osteossarcoma/cirurgia , Sarcoma de Ewing/cirurgia , Adolescente , Transplante Ósseo , Criança , Países em Desenvolvimento , Feminino , Fíbula/cirurgia , Humanos , Masculino , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/patologia , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/cirurgia , Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica , Tíbia/fisiopatologia , Tíbia/cirurgia , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA