The assessment of pulmonary vein potentials using the new achieve advance during cryoballoon ablation of atrial fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: The new version of inner lumen mapping catheter (Achieve Advance™; Medtronic, Minnesota, USA) includes a new solid core which provides improved rotational response, as compared to the current Achieve Mapping Catheter. In the present study, we sought to analyze the rate of visualisation of real-time recordings using this new device comparing it with a large cohort of patients having undergone second generation cryoballoon (CB) ablation using the previous Achieve mapping catheter. METHODS: All patients having undergone CB ablation using the Achieve Advance and the last 150 consecutive patients having undergone CB ablation using the previous Achieve were analysed. Exclusion criteria were presence of an intracavitary thrombus, uncontrolled heart failure, moderate or severe valvular disease and contraindications to general anesthesia. RESULTS: A total of 200 consecutive patients (60.1 ±â€¯9.5 years, 75% males) were evaluated (50 Achieve Advance and 150 old Achieve). Real-time recordings were significantly more prevalent in the "new Achieve Advance" population compared with the "old Achieve" group (73.5% vs 56.8%; p = 0.0001). Real-time recordings could be more frequently visualized in the "Achieve Advance" group in all veins except RIPV (LSPV: 86% vs 71.3%, p = 0.04; LIPV: 84% vs 62.7%, p = 0.005; RSPV: 78% vs 52%, p < 0.0001; RIPV: 46% vs 41.3%, p = 0.3). CONCLUSIONS: The rate of visualisation of real-time recordings is significantly higher using the new Achieve Advance if compared to the previous Achieve mapping catheter in the setting of CB ablation. Real-time recordings can be visualized in approximately 73.5% of veins with this new device.

Ten years differences in recently onset atrial fibrillation and flutter incidence and management.

ABSTRACT: Ten years differences in recently onset atrial OBJECTS AND BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) and atrial flutter (AFl) are the most common arrhythmias in day-life clinical practice. Purpose of our study was to verify differences occurred in the last ten years in AF and AFI incidence and treatment in the emergency room (ER). METHODS: from the 17th January to the 15th February 2000 and from the 18th January to the 16th February 2010 all the consecutive patients with AF or AFl referring to the ER of our hospital were included in the study. Epidemiological data were collected along with information about treatment, admission to hospital wards, days of hospital stay and therapy. Data from the year 2000 were compared to these collected ten years later. RESULTS: incidence of AF and AFl has increased in the years (50%), patients are older (73.5 vs. 65.2 years; p 0.029) and refer late to the ER (45.6% in 2010 and 23.7% in 2000 with a delay of > 48 hours from arrhythmias onset; p 0.054). In 2010 only a minority of these patients is directly discharged from the ER (15.8% vs 14.4%) and there is an increased admission rate due to AF or AFl (67.5%; p 0.026), if compared to the whole admissions of the hospital. The median duration of hospital stay decreased from 6 days to 4.5 days in the year 2010 (NS). CONCLUSION: AF and AFl incidence is still increasing and account for a high admission rate from the ER to the hospital wards. Costs are consequently continuously increasing.