Black-focused social prescribing: the importance of an Afrocentric approach. / Prescription sociale à l'intention des personnes noires : l'importance d'une approche afrocentrique.

The Black-Focused Social Prescribing (BFSP) project is a unique initiative by the Alliance for Healthier Communities that intertwines Afrocentric principles with social prescribing. Going beyond conventional social prescribing models, BFSP addresses specific health needs within Black communities. It is rooted in the Alliance Black Health Strategy, advocates for Black health, and is guided by Afrocentric principles. The evaluation framework prioritizes client voices, ensuring cultural safety and, by taking time for trust-building, underscores the importance of an inclusive approach. BFSP holds the potential to foster community trust and engagement, and enhance health outcomes in the Black community.

Social prescribing is a health care approach that connects social and clinical aspects of health. Ensuring access to services without discrimination is crucial for improving the health of Black people in Ontario. Tailored interventions are increasingly recognized as necessary to address challenges faced by diverse ethnic and cultural groups. Black-focused social prescribing, particularly the Afrocentric approach, aims to enhance the health outcomes of Black individuals. Evaluating a Black-focused social prescribing program requires time to create a framework and to consider its nuanced aspects.

La prescription sociale est une approche en matière de soins de santé qui met en relation les aspects sociaux et cliniques de la santé. Il est essentiel d'assurer un accès aux services sans discrimination pour améliorer la santé des personnes noires en Ontario. Les interventions adaptées sont de plus en plus reconnues comme nécessaires pour affronter les difficultés auxquelles font face divers groupes ethniques et culturels. La prescription sociale à l'intention des personnes noires, plus particulièrement l'approche afrocentrique, vise à améliorer les résultats en matière de santé des personnes noires. Pour évaluer un programme de prescription sociale à l'intention des personnes noires, il faut prendre le temps de créer un cadre et de prendre en compte ses aspects nuancés.

Health Care Use and System Costs Among Pediatric Refugees in Canada.

BACKGROUND: Resettled refugees land in Canada through 3 sponsorship models with similar health insurance and financial supports but differences in how resettlement is facilitated. We examined whether health system utilization, costs, and aggregate 1-year morbidity differed by resettlement model. METHODS: Population-based matched cohort study in Ontario, 2008 to 2018, including pediatric (0-17 years) resettled refugees and matched Ontario-born peers and categorized refugees by resettlement model: (1) private sponsorship (PSRs), (2) Blended Visa Office-Referred program (BVORs), and (3) government-assisted refugee (GAR). Primary outcomes were health system utilization and costs in year 1 in Canada. Multivariable logistic regression was used to test the associations between sponsorship model and major illnesses. RESULTS: We included 23 287 resettled refugees (13 360 GARs, 1544 BVORs, 8383 PSRs) and 93 148 matched Ontario-born. Primary care visits were highest among GARs and lowest in PSRs (median visits [interquartile range], GARs 4[2-6]; BVORs 3[2-5]; PSRs 3[2-5]; P <.001). Emergency department visits and hospitalizations were more common among GARs and BVORs versus PSRs (emergency department: GARs 19.2%; BVORs 23.4%; PSRs 13.8%; hospitalizations: GARs 2.5%; BVORs 3.2%; PSRs 1.1%, P <.001). Mean 1-year health system costs were highest among GARs (mean [standard deviation] $1278 [$7475]) and lowest among PSRs ($555 [$2799]; Ontario-born $851 [9226]). Compared with PSRs, GARs (adjusted odds ratio 1.63, 95% confidence interval 1.47-1.81) and BVORs (adjusted odds ratio 1.52, 95% confidence interval 1.26-1.84) were more likely to have major illnesses. CONCLUSIONS: Health care use and morbidity of PSRs suggests they are healthier and less costly than GARs and BVOR model refugees. Despite a greater intensity of health care utilization than Ontario-born, overall excess demand on the health system for all resettled refugee children is low.

Who gets access to an interprofessional team-based primary care programme for patients with complex health and social needs? A cross-sectional analysis.

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether a voluntary referral-based interprofessional team-based primary care programme reached its target population and to assess the representativeness of referring primary care physicians. DESIGN: Cross-sectional analysis of administrative health data. SETTING: Ontario, Canada. INTERVENTION: TeamCare provides access to Community Health Centre services for patients of non-team physicians with complex health and social needs. PARTICIPANTS: All adult patients who participated in TeamCare between 1 April 2015 and 31 March 2017 (n=1148), and as comparators, all non-referred adult patients of the primary care providers who shared patients in TeamCare (n=546 989), and a 1% random sample of the adult Ontario population (n=117 753). RESULTS: TeamCare patients were more likely to live in lower income neighbourhoods with a higher degree of marginalisation relative to comparison groups. TeamCare patients had a higher mean number of diagnoses, higher prevalence of all chronic conditions and had more frequent encounters with the healthcare system in the year prior to participation. CONCLUSIONS: TeamCare reached a target population and fills an important gap in the Ontario primary care landscape, serving a population of patients with complex needs that did not previously have access to interprofessional team-based care. STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS: This study used population-level administrative health data. Data constraints limited the ability to identify patients referred to the programme but did not receive services, and data could not capture all relevant patient characteristics.

Longitudinal costs and health service utilisation associated with primary care reforms in Ontario: a retrospective cohort study protocol.

INTRODUCTION: Over the last 20 years, the Canadian province of Ontario implemented several new models of primary care focusing on changes to physician remuneration, clinics led by nurse practitioners and the introduction of interprofessional primary care teams. Health outcome and cost evaluations of these models thus far have been mostly cross-sectional and in some cases results from these studies were conflicting. The aim of this population-based study is to investigate short, medium and long-term effectiveness of these reforms over the past 15-20 years. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is the protocol for a retrospective cohort study including fee-for-service (FFS) and community health centre cohorts (control cohorts) or patients who switched from either being unattached or from FFS to a new practice model (eg, capitation, enhanced FFS, team, nurse practitioner-led) from 1997 to 2020. The primary outcome is total healthcare costs and secondary outcomes are primary care costs, other (non-primary care) health costs, hospitalisations, length of stay, emergency department visits, accessibility and mortality. A combination of hard and propensity matching will be used where relevant. Outcomes will be adjusted for demographic and health factors and measured annually. Interrupted time series models will be used where data permits and difference-in-differences methods will be used otherwise. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval has been received from Queens University and Memorial University. The dissemination plan includes conference presentations, papers, brief evidence summaries targeted at select audiences and knowledge brokering sessions with key stakeholders.

Using self-determination theory to understand the social prescribing process: a qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: Social prescribing (SP) assists patients to engage in social activities and connect to community supports as part of a holistic approach to primary care. Rx: Community was a SP project, which was implemented within 11 community health centres (CHCs) situated across Ontario, Canada. AIM: To explore how SP as a process facilitates positive outcomes for patients. DESIGN & SETTING: Qualitative methods were used. Eighteen focus groups were conducted at CHCs or by video-conferencing, and involved 88 patients. In addition, eight in-depth telephone interviews were undertaken. METHOD: Interviews and focus groups were transcribed verbatim, and analysed thematically using a theoretical framework based on self-determination theory (SDT). RESULTS: Participants who had received social prescriptions described SP as an empathetic process that respects their needs and interests. SP facilitated the patient's voice in their care, helped patients to develop skills in addressing needs important to them, and fostered trusting relationships with staff and other participants. Patients reported their social support networks were expanded, and they had improved mental health and ability in self-management of chronic conditions. Patients who became involved in SP as voluntary 'health champions' reported this was a positive experience and they gained a sense of purpose by giving back to their communities in ways that felt meaningful for them. CONCLUSION: SP produced positive outcomes for patients, and it fits well within the community health centre model of primary care. Future research should examine the impact on health outcomes and examine the return on investment of developing and implementing SP programmes.

A Rapid Primary Healthcare Response to COVID-19: An Equity-Based and Systems-Thinking Approach to Care Ensuring that No One Is Left Behind.

Recent data from across the globe show that COVID-19 is disproportionately affecting those who are already adversely impacted by social determinants of health. In this paper, we explore how members of the Alliance for Healthier Communities - comprehensive, salary-based primary care organizations in Ontario - anticipated the same and rapidly responded by adapting their services to ensure continued equitable access to primary care services. Lessons from this project could be adapted in other primary care team-based models or partnerships to ensure ongoing support for populations that are most at risk from COVID-19 and the consequences of restricted access to services.

Illustrating the patient journey through the care continuum: Leveraging structured primary care electronic medical record (EMR) data in Ontario, Canada using chronic obstructive pulmonary disease as a case study.

BACKGROUND: Although barriers exist to secondary use of primary care electronic medical record (EMR) data, the Alliance for Healthier Communities (the Alliance) in Ontario, Canada has successfully created one of the largest structured primary care EMR datasets in Canada. In 2018, the Alliance and the Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI), an organization that provides comparable and actionable data to accelerate improvements in health across Canada, entered into a partnership to share EMR data. In this paper, we describe (i) the processes that enabled the collection of structured EMR data by the Alliance; (ii) how CIHI connected with the Alliance to share data and assess its quality; and, (iii) demonstrate the value of linking structured EMR data to administrative acute care data in illustrating the patient journey through the care continuum, using COPD as a case study. METHODS: CIHI and the Alliance entered into a formal data sharing agreement that enabled the sharing of linkable structured EMR data by the Alliance's 75 community health centres (CHCs) with CIHI. By leveraging the Alliance's Business Intelligence Reporting Tool, 3 years of EMR data containing patient-level clinical data were shared with CIHI. CIHI assessed the EMR data quality using its Data Source Assessment Tool to ensure fitness for analytical use. By linking the patient level EMR records with hospital records (CIHI's discharge abstract database (DAD) and the national ambulatory care reporting system (NACRS)), we examined aspects of COPD patient management in primary care and followed their journey through the health care continuum, including follow-up in primary care after hospital discharge. RESULTS: Alliance EMR data representing approximately 570,000 patients and 8.5 million primary care encounters between April 1, 2015 and March 31, 2018 were shared with CIHI. A data quality assessment, centered on completeness and concordance, confirmed that the data was fit for analytical purposes. Overall, 13,023 enrolled primary care patients were identified as having COPD, representing an overall crude prevalence of 8.7%. The average age of COPD patients was 64 years and equally affected males and females. Patients were most likely to have completed high school education or equivalent, speak English, live alone, and have a household income less than $15,000. They most commonly had between 10-19 primary care encounters a year with a range of providers where they most commonly sought services for health advice/ instructions, to discuss their treatment plans and for medication renewals. By linking the EMR data to CIHI's NACRS and DAD, we found that 74.1% of COPD patients had at least one ED visit and that 34.4% of COPD patients had at least one acute care hospitalization during the study period. Further, 16.2% of ED visits resulted in an acute care hospital admission. Of those hospitalized, the majority of COPD patients were discharged home (81.6%) and received timely follow-up in primary care (81.0% within 30 days). CONCLUSION: Structured and linkable EMR data provides opportunities to examine the patient journey through the care continuum in an innovative way. Using structured EMR data from the Alliance, linked with CIHI's NACRS and DAD databases, we were able to generate a cohort of patients with COPD, explore the complexities of their primary care encounters and follow them through the continuum of care, namely emergency department visits and hospitalizations. It is hoped that the partnership between the Alliance and CIHI will help drive future efforts on addressing the gap in comparable EMR data in Canada, and internationally.

Delivering primary health care as envisioned: A model of health and well-being guiding community-governed primary care organizations.

PURPOSE: For over 40 years, Canadian and international bodies have endorsed comprehensive primary health care (PHC), yet very little work has been done to describe how services and programs are delivered within these organizations. Because health equity is now of greater interest to policy makers and the public, it is important to describe an evidence-informed framework for the delivery of integrated and equitable PHC. The purpose of this paper is to describe the development of a "Model of Health and Well-being" (MHWB) that provides a roadmap to the delivery of PHC in a successful network of community-governed PHC organizations in Ontario, Canada. DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: The MHWB was developed through an iterative process that involved members of community-governed PHC organizations in Ontario and key stakeholders. This included literature review and consultation to ensure that the model was evidence informed and reflected actual practice. FINDINGS: The MHWB has three guiding principles: highest quality health and well-being for people and communities; health equity and social justice; and community vitality and belonging. In addition, there are eight attributes that describe how services are provided. There is a reasonable evidence base underpinning the all principles and attributes. ORIGINALITY/VALUE: As comprehensive, equitable PHC organizations become increasingly recognized as critical parts of the health care system, it is important to have a means to describe their approach to care and the values that drive their care. The MHWB provides a blueprint for comprehensive PHC as delivered by over 100 Community Governed Primary Health Care (CGPHC) organizations in Ontario. All CGPHC organizations have endorsed, adopted and operationalized this model as a guide for optimum care delivery.