Specification issues in nonlinear SEM: The moderation that wasn't.

BACKGROUND: Analysis of interaction or moderation effects between latent variables is a common requirement in the social sciences. However, when predictors are correlated, interaction and quadratic effects become more alike, making them difficult to distinguish. As a result, when data are drawn from a quadratic population model and the analysis model specifies interactions only, misleading results may be obtained. METHOD: This article addresses the consequences of different types of specification error in nonlinear structural equation models using a Monte Carlo study. RESULTS: Results show that fitting a model with interactions when quadratic effects are present in the population will almost certainly lead to erroneous detection of moderation effects, and that the same is true in the opposite scenario. Simultaneous estimation of interactions and quadratic effects yields correct results. CONCLUSIONS: Simultaneous estimation of interaction and quadratic effects prevents detection of spurious or misleading nonlinear effects. Results are discussed and recommendations are offered to applied researchers.

Latent variables should remain as such: Evidence from a Monte Carlo study.

Use of subject scores as manifest variables to assess the relationship between latent variables produces attenuated estimates. This has been demonstrated for raw scores from classical test theory (CTT) and factor scores derived from factor analysis. Conclusions on scores have not been sufficiently extended to item response theory (IRT) theta estimates, which are still recommended for estimation of relationships between latent variables. This is because IRT estimates appear to have preferable properties compared to CTT, while structural equation modeling (SEM) is often advised as an alternative to scores for estimation of the relationship between latent variables. The present research evaluates the consequences of using subject scores as manifest variables in regression models to test the relationship between latent variables. Raw scores and three methods for obtaining theta estimates were used and compared to latent variable SEM modeling. A Monte Carlo study was designed by manipulating sample size, number of items, type of test, and magnitude of the correlation between latent variables. Results show that, despite the advantage of IRT models in other areas, estimates of the relationship between latent variables are always more accurate when SEM models are used. Recommendations are offered for applied researchers.

Reexamining Nonlinear Structural Equation Modeling Procedures: The Effect of Parallel and Congeneric Measures.

The current study examines the performance of the extended unconstrained approach (EXUC) and the latent moderated structural equation modeling procedure (LMS) in situations where quadratic and interaction terms are tested simultaneously and investigates their limitations with regard to the employment of parallel and congeneric measures, relatively low indicator reliabilities, and relatively large numbers of indicators. By means of a Monte Carlo study, we found LMS to be the best option for testing multiple nonlinear effects given sufficient sample size (n ≥ 500) and normally distributed exogenous variables. Its advantages became more prominent when indicator reliabilities were heterogeneous and small. The EXUC was a viable option for estimating the model when indicators were parallel and exhibited large indicator reliabilities. An empirical example of the results is provided, and the relevance of measurement model characteristics to assess nonlinear relationships is discussed.