Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
J Gastrointest Surg ; 22(2): 295-302, 2018 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29043580

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The current (seventh edition) American Joint Commission on Cancer (AJCC) Staging System for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) dichotomizes pathologic lymph node (LN) involvement into absence (pN0) or presence (pN1) of disease. The recently announced eighth edition also includes stratification on the number of positive nodes. Furthermore, LNs detected on preoperative imaging (CT, MRI, or endoscopic ultrasound-EUS) are considered to be pathologically involved in other gastrointestinal cancers. However, this is less well defined for PDAC. Therefore, the three aims of this study were to determine (1) whether the new AJCC staging system led to more accurate staging, (2) the number of nodes needed to be examined to detect pathologic involvement, and (3) if pN disease could be reliably detected on preoperative imaging in PDAC. METHODS: A retrospective review of all patients undergoing pancreatectomy at a single US academic center from January 1990 to September 2015. Pathology reports of resected specimens were reviewed to determine the total number of LNs examined and those positive for metastasis. CT, MRI, and/or EUS reports were used to determine the presence or absence of preoperatively detectable LN enlargement. RESULTS: Of the 490 surgical resections for PDAC, pN1 disease was detected in 59.4% (n = 291) and was positively correlated with the number of LNs pathologically examined (P < 0.001). Patients with pN1 disease had a shorter overall survival (OS) than those without nodal involvement (25.1 vs. 44.0 months; P < 0.001); however, OS was not different when stratifying by the number of nodes as on the eighth AJCC system. Pathologic examination of > 20 LNs in treatment naïve patients was optimal to detect pN1 disease and predict longer OS for those without nodal involvement (median survival > 41.1 months, P = 0.03 when compared to < 15 or 15-19 LNs examined). LNs were detected by CT, MRI, or EUS in 30.7% (103/335) of patients. The positive predictive value (PPV) of preoperative LN detection for pathologic involvement was 77.3% for treatment naïve patients and 84.2% for those without biliary obstruction. CONCLUSIONS: Although the LN scoring in the seventh PDAC AJCC Staging System was sufficient to predict OS of our patients, more LNs than previously considered (20 vs. 15) were optimal to detect pathologic involvement. Preoperative LN detection was an accurate predictor of pN1 disease for treatment naïve patients without biliary obstruction.


Assuntos
Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/secundário , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/cirurgia , Linfonodos/diagnóstico por imagem , Linfonodos/patologia , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patologia , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirurgia , Adulto , Idoso , Endossonografia , Feminino , Humanos , Excisão de Linfonodo , Metástase Linfática , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias/métodos , Pancreatectomia , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Período Pré-Operatório , Estudos Retrospectivos , Taxa de Sobrevida , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X
2.
JAMA Surg ; 152(1): e163349, 2017 01 18.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27829085

RESUMO

Importance: According to the 2012 International Consensus Guidelines, the diagnostic criterion of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) involving the main duct (MD IPMNs) or the main and branch ducts (mixed IPMNs) of the pancreatic system is a main pancreatic duct (MPD) diameter of 5.0 mm or greater on computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). However, surgical resection is recommended for patients with an MPD diameter of 10.0 mm or greater, which is characterized as a high-risk stigma. An MPD diameter of 5.0 to 9.0 mm is not an indication for immediate resection. Objectives: To determine an appropriate cutoff (ie, one with high sensitivity and negative predictive value) of the MPD diameter on CT or MRI as a prognostic factor for malignant disease and to propose a new management algorithm for patients with MD or mixed IPMNs. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study included 103 patients who underwent surgical resection for a preoperative diagnosis of MD or mixed IPMN and in whom IPMN was confirmed by surgical pathologic findings at a single institution from July 1, 1996, to December 31, 2015. Main Outcomes and Measures: Malignant disease was defined as high-grade dysplasia or invasive adenocarcinoma on results of surgical pathologic evaluation. An appropriate MPD diameter on preoperative CT or MRI to predict malignant disease was determined using a receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. The prognostic value of the new management algorithm that incorporated the new MPD diameter cutoff was evaluated. Results: Among the 103 patients undergoing resection for an MD or mixed IPMN (59 men [57.3%]; 44 women [42.7%]; median [range] age, 71 [48-86] years), 64 (62.1%) had malignant disease. Diagnostic accuracy for malignant neoplasms was highest at an MPD diameter cutoff of 7.2 mm (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.59-0.81). An MPD diameter of 7.2 mm or greater was also an independent prognostic factor for malignant neoplasms (odds ratio, 12.76; 95% CI, 2.43-66.88; P = .003) on logistic regression analysis after controlling for preoperative variables. The new management algorithm, which included an MPD diameter of 7.2 mm or greater as one of the high-risk stigmata, had a higher sensitivity (100%), negative predictive value (100%), and accuracy (66%) for malignant disease than the 2012 version of the International Consensus Guidelines (95%, 57%, and 63%, respectively). Conclusions and Relevance: In this single-center, retrospective analysis, an MPD diameter of 7.2 mm was identified as an optimal cutoff for a prognostic factor for malignant disease in MD or mixed IPMN. These data support lowering the accepted criteria for MPD diameter when selecting patients for resection vs surveillance so as not to overlook cancer in IPMN.


Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma Mucinoso/diagnóstico por imagem , Adenocarcinoma Mucinoso/patologia , Adenocarcinoma Mucinoso/cirurgia , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/diagnóstico por imagem , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/patologia , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/cirurgia , Carcinoma Papilar/diagnóstico por imagem , Carcinoma Papilar/patologia , Carcinoma Papilar/cirurgia , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patologia , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirurgia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Tomada de Decisões , Feminino , Humanos , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Invasividade Neoplásica , Seleção de Pacientes , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Prognóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X
3.
JAMA Surg ; 150(2): 118-24, 2015 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25494212

RESUMO

IMPORTANCE: Autologous islet transplantation is an elegant and effective method for preserving euglycemia in patients undergoing near-total or total pancreatectomy for severe chronic pancreatitis. However, few centers worldwide perform this complex procedure, which requires interdisciplinary coordination and access to a sophisticated Food and Drug Administration-licensed islet-isolating facility. OBJECTIVE: To investigate outcomes from a single institutional case series of near-total or total pancreatectomy and autologous islet transplantation using remote islet isolation. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Retrospective cohort study between March 1, 2007, and December 31, 2013, at tertiary academic referral centers among 9 patients (age range, 13-47 years) with chronic pancreatitis and reduced quality of life after failed medical management. INTERVENTIONS: Pancreas resection, followed by transport to a remote facility for islet isolation using a modified Ricordi technique, with immediate transplantation via portal vein infusion. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Islet yield, pain assessment, insulin requirement, costs, and transport time. RESULTS: Eight of nine patients had successful islet isolation after near-total or total pancreatectomy. Four of six patients with total pancreatectomy had islet yields exceeding 5000 islet equivalents per kilogram of body weight. At 2 months after surgery, all 9 patients had significantly reduced pain or were pain free. Of these patients, 2 did not require insulin, and 1 required low doses. The mean transport cost was $16,527, and the mean transport time was 3½ hours. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Pancreatic resection with autologous islet transplantation for severe chronic pancreatitis is a safe and effective final alternative to ameliorate debilitating pain and to help prevent the development of surgical diabetes. Because many centers lack access to an islet-isolating facility, we describe our experience using a regional 2-center collaboration as a successful model to remotely isolate cells, with outcomes similar to those of larger case series.


Assuntos
Separação Celular/métodos , Diabetes Mellitus/prevenção & controle , Transplante das Ilhotas Pancreáticas/métodos , Pancreatectomia/efeitos adversos , Pancreatite Crônica/cirurgia , Adolescente , Adulto , Comportamento Cooperativo , Diabetes Mellitus/etiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pancreatite Crônica/etiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Manejo de Espécimes/economia , Transplante Autólogo , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
4.
Curr Opin Gastroenterol ; 29(5): 552-8, 2013 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23892537

RESUMO

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To summarize published research on pancreatic surgery over the past year. RECENT FINDINGS: A number of studies aiming to reduce the costs associated with pancreatic surgery were reported. Retrospective analyses confirmed previous findings that neither the routine use of pancreatic duct stents decreases the rate of fistula formation nor does placement of a drain at the time of surgery change the morbidity in patients who develop one. Minimally invasive approaches, both laparoscopic and robot-assisted, are being performed more frequently to remove pancreatic cancers. A randomized trial confirmed that reinforcement of stapled closure during distal pancreatectomy reduces the rate of fistula formation. Controversy remains over whether small pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors need to be surgically resected or can be treated nonoperatively. Patients with chronic pancreatitis should be screened thoroughly before being offered surgical treatment; two studies reported preoperative factors that can be used to identify those most likely to experience pain relief. SUMMARY: Studies published on pancreatic surgery last year focused on a wide-range of topics. The morbidity and mortality of patients undergoing pancreatic surgery continues to improve, and we anticipate that incorporation of these new findings will lead to even better outcomes.


Assuntos
Pancreatectomia/métodos , Pancreatopatias/cirurgia , Carcinoma Neuroendócrino/cirurgia , Análise Custo-Benefício , Humanos , Laparoscopia/métodos , Pancreatectomia/efeitos adversos , Pancreatectomia/economia , Pancreatectomia/normas , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirurgia , Pancreatite Crônica/cirurgia , Indicadores de Qualidade em Assistência à Saúde , Robótica/métodos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA