The application of a haemorrhage assessment tool in evaluating control of bleeding in a pilot trauma haemorrhage trial.

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether it was feasible to use a haemorrhage assessment tool (HAT) within a trauma trial and whether the data obtained could differentiate patients who had achieved haemostasis. BACKGROUND: Major haemorrhage is one of the leading causes of death worldwide, affecting 40% of trauma patients. Clinical trials evaluating haemostatic interventions often use transfusion outcomes as a primary endpoint. Transfusion is highly dependent on local practice, limiting its reliability as a robust, transferable endpoint. METHODS: A five-point HAT questionnaire was applied to participants enrolled into the EFIT-1 trial. This RCT evaluated the feasibility of administering a 6 g fibrinogen concentrate to patients with severe trauma haemorrhage. RESULTS: Of participants, 98% completed a HAT; 75% participants had 'achieved haemostasis' at the time of tool completion, as determined by clinical acumen alone. HAT scores were able to differentiate which participants required transfusion after 3 h. Of participants, 56% were transfused red blood cells when they scored 0-2, compared to 17% with HAT scores between 3 and 5. CONCLUSION: This study has confirmed the feasibility of using a HAT during the emergency care of patients suffering trauma haemorrhage, and future studies should be conducted to determine its value as an endpoint in haemostasis studies.

Can an airway assessment score predict difficulty at intubation in the emergency department?

AIM: To assess whether an airway assessment score based on the LEMON method is able to predict difficulty at intubation in the emergency department. METHODS: Patients requiring endotracheal intubation in the resuscitation room of a UK teaching hospital between June 2002 and September 2003 were assessed on criteria based on the LEMON method. At laryngoscopy, the Cormack and Lehane grade was recorded. An airway assessment score was devised and assessed. RESULTS: 156 patients were intubated during the study period. There were 114 Cormack and Lehane grade 1 intubations, 29 grade 2 intubations, 11 grade 3 intubations, and 2 grade 4 intubations. Patients with large incisors (p<0.001), a reduced inter-incisor distance (p<0.05), or a reduced thyroid to floor of mouth distance (p<0.05) were all more likely to have a poor laryngoscopic view (grade 2, 3, or 4). Patients with a high airway assessment score were more likely to have a poor laryngoscopic view compared with those patients with a low airway assessment score (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: An airway assessment score based on criteria of the LEMON method is able to successfully stratify the risk of intubation difficulty in the emergency department. Patients with a poor laryngoscopic view (grades 2, 3, or 4) were more likely to have large incisors, a reduced inter-incisor distance, and a reduced thyroid to floor of mouth distance. They were also more likely to have a higher airway assessment score than those patients with a good laryngoscopic view.

Pulmonary infiltrates in the surgical ICU: prospective assessment of predictors of etiology and mortality.

A prospective cohort study of 129 consecutive patients developing pulmonary infiltrates in the surgical ICU was conducted to determine the predictors and outcome of pulmonary infiltrates. Most common etiologies of pulmonary infiltrates were pneumonia (30%), pulmonary edema (29%), acute lung injury (15%), and atelectasis (13%). Enteral nutrition was associated with a significantly lower incidence of acute lung injury as compared with pneumonia (22% vs 58%, p = 0.012). Patients with liver disease were significantly more likely to have pulmonary infiltrates due to acute lung injury as compared with other etiologies (p = 0.02). Clinical pulmonary infection score (Pugin score) > 6 virtually excluded acute lung injury, pulmonary edema, or atelectasis as etiologies of pulmonary infiltrates. Nosocomial Haemophilus/pneumococcal pneumonia occurred significantly earlier in the ICU as compared with Gram-negative (p = 0.05) or methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus pneumonia (p = 0.01). Pneumonia in trauma patients was significantly more likely to be due to Haemophilus/pneumococcus as compared with all other ICU patients (54% vs 0%, p = 0.0004). These data have implications for treatment of patients with nosocomial pneumonia in the ICU.