An assessment of the risks associated with the use of antibiotic resistance genes in genetically modified plants: report of the Working Party of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy.

Development of genetically modified (GM) plants is contentious, in part because bacterial antibiotic resistance (AR) genes are used in their construction and often become part of the plant genome. This arouses concern that cultivation of GM plants might provide a reservoir of AR genes that could power the evolution of new drug-resistant bacteria. We have considered bacterial DNA transfer systems (conjugation, transduction and transformation) and mechanisms of recombination (homologous recombination, transposition, site-specific recombination and DNA repair) that together might productively transfer AR genes from GM plants to bacterial cells, but are unable to identify a credible scenario whereby new drug-resistant bacteria would be created. However, we cannot entirely rule out the possibility of rare transfer events that involve novel mechanisms. Hence, we also considered if occasional transfers of AR genes (bla(TEM), aph(3'), aadA) from GM plants into bacteria would pose a threat to public health. These AR genes are common in many bacteria and each is found on mobile genetic elements that have moved extensively between DNA molecules and bacterial cells. This gene mobility has already severely compromised clinical use of antibiotics to which resistance is conferred. Accordingly, the argument that occasional transfer of these particular resistance genes from GM plants to bacteria would pose an unacceptable risk to human or animal health has little substance. We conclude that the risk of transfer of AR genes from GM plants to bacteria is remote, and that the hazard arising from any such gene transfer is, at worst, slight.

Susceptibility testing of Klebsiella spp.--an international collaborative study in quality assessment.

In order to compare the prevalence of antibiotic resistance in different geographical areas, it is necessary to ensure agreement between laboratories on the assignment of strains to 'susceptible' and 'resistant' categories. An international quality assessment was performed to investigate the performance of susceptibility testing of Klebsiella spp. Ninety-five strains of klebsiellae were selected from clinical isolates at the London Hospital Medical College (LHMC). These included strains with a diversity of susceptibility profiles to amoxycillin/clavulanate, piperacillin, ceftazidime, cefuroxime, ciprofloxacin, gentamicin and trimethoprim. The strains were sent to 13 participating laboratories in Europe and the USA and laboratories were asked to test the susceptibility of these strains to these antibiotics by their usual methods. They were also asked to provide details of the method used to test susceptibility. Several different standard recommended testing methods were used. Reporting of susceptibilities was generally accurate, but a number of anomalies were noted. Discrepancies of reporting between the LHMC and the participating laboratories was more marked for resistant strains, particularly in the detection of resistance to cefuroxime and ciprofloxacin, as well as the assignment of susceptibility and resistance to piperacillin and amoxycillin/clavulanate. Some discrepancies could be attributed to the use of different breakpoints, leading to differing assignment of susceptibility. Methodological variations including disc content, inoculum and failure to measure and interpret zone sizes consistently also led to anomalies. This quality assessment programme has helped to identify problems in susceptibility testing which should be investigated further.

Typing of Listeria monocytogenes by random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) analysis.

The aim of the study was to determine the effectiveness of random amplified polymorphic DNA analysis in typing Listeria monocytogenes from human infections. Twenty-five L. monocytogenes serogroup 1/2 and 70 serogroup 4 including 14 serovar 4b(x) were typed by RAPD-PCR analysis. Six primers were used to type each L. monocytogenes isolate and the DNA amplification performed with supertaq DNA polymerase in a Hybaid Thermal Reactor. Each bacterial strain was analysed separately with all primers and the profiles were judged by eye and designated to a group by comparison to other strains. Bands were classified as major or minor. Based on analysis of major band patterns, the 25 serogroup 1/2 isolates gave rise to 12 different groups. The groups only contained serovar 1/2a or 1/2b with a single exception. Using minor bands all isolates could be distinguished. All the serogroup 4 isolates gave the same major band patterns. The 14 serovar 4b(x) isolates which were epidemiologically related gave identical profiles with the exception of one isolate. Of the remaining strains, 41 produced individual patterns on minor band analysis. RAPD analysis with multiple primers is low cost, discriminatory and is most ideally suited to testing small (< 50) numbers of strains. We have shown that serogroup 1/2 L. monocytogenes strains are a more diverse group than serovar 4b strains and RAPD-PCR will provide a technique of considerable value in typing L. monocytogenes in the future.

A critical assessment of the agar dilution chequerboard technique for studying in-vitro antimicrobial interactions using a representative beta-lactam, aminoglycoside and fluoroquinolone.

The agar dilution chequerboard technique of studying antimicrobial interactions was assessed by testing a representative beta-lactam (piperacillin/tazobactam), aminoglycoside (gentamicin) and fluoroquinolone (ciprofloxacin) against themselves, that is piperacillin/tazobactam plus piperacillin/tazobactam, gentamicin plus gentamicin and ciprofloxacin plus ciprofloxacin. In addition, combinations of piperacillin/tazobactam plus gentamicin or ciprofloxacin were also tested against Enterobacteriaceae and Acinetobacter spp. in triplicate. The agar dilution chequerboard technique did not reliably show addition when agents were combined with themselves, and there was also considerable variation when beta-lactam plus aminoglycoside or fluoroquinolone combinations when tested in triplicate. These observations, and problems with the design of the method, indicate that the chequerboard technique should be used only with adequate controls and replication, and then interpreted with extreme caution; ideally, it should not be used as a method of assessing antimicrobial interactions.

The acetyltransferase enzyme method for the assay of serum gentamicon concentrations and a comparison with other methods.

The adenylytransferase/acetyltransferase methods of gentamicin assay have been evaluated for accuracy, speed, and cost. For a comparable cost of materials the latter method is more accurate than that using the adenylytransferase enzyme. The acetyltransferase method is much quicker than the adenyltransferase due to the shorter time necessary for radioactive counting. Sonication is an easier method of enzyme preparation than the previously used osmotic shock technique. The acetyltransferase method is reproducible and there was a very good correlation between it and a microbiological agar-plate diffusion method.