Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Orthopedics ; 44(2): 98-104, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33561867

RESUMO

Orthopedic residency training overlaps with common childbearing ages. The purpose of this study was to describe factors affecting male and female residents' family-planning decisions and attitudes of program directors (PDs) toward parenthood during residency. In 2018, using an anonymous survey model, residents and PDs in Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-accredited orthopedic surgery programs were asked about their perceptions of parenthood on training, the availability of family-oriented services at their programs, and the effect of residency culture and policies on their decision to have children. This survey occurred in 2018. Three hundred forty-nine (76.2%) of 458 resident respondents were male and 109 (23.8%) were female. Two hundred four (49.9%) of 409 residents were unsure of their program's parental leave policy. Male residents reported taking an average of 0.8 weeks (95% CI, 0.0-4.0 weeks) of parental leave and females an average of 4.6 weeks (95% CI, 2.0-6.5 weeks) (P<.001). Female residents were more likely to report delaying having children during residency (56.73% vs 38.71%, P=.001) and were more likely to cite reputational concerns (57.63% vs 0.76%, P<.001) and effects on career opportunities (42.37% vs 7.57%, P<.001) as reasons for delaying parenthood. The most commonly cited negative effect of parenthood on residency training by PDs was reduction in off-duty educational time (15 of 29, 51.72%). Twenty-four (80%) of 30 PDs believe that training may need to be extended based on amount of maternity/paternity leave time taken off. Although parenthood during orthopedic training is common, both male and female residents reported delaying parenthood because of residency-related factors. Improved clarification of leave policies and establishment of clear guidelines for parenthood in residency may improve resident wellness. [Orthopedics. 2021;44(2):98-104.].


Assuntos
Internato e Residência/estatística & dados numéricos , Procedimentos Ortopédicos/educação , Poder Familiar/psicologia , Acreditação , Criança , Feminino , Humanos , Internato e Residência/organização & administração , Masculino , Gravidez , Inquéritos e Questionários
2.
J Bone Joint Surg Am ; 103(2): 106-114, 2021 Jan 20.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33074953

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The ongoing U.S. opioid epidemic threatens quality of life and poses substantial economic and safety burdens to opioid abusers and their communities, physicians, and health-care systems. Public health experts have argued that prescription opioids are implicated in this epidemic; however, opioid dosing following surgical procedures remains controversial. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between initial opioid prescribing following total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and the risk and quantity of long-term opioid use. METHODS: Patients undergoing THA or TKA from January 1, 2016, to June 30, 2016, were identified. Preoperative 30-day opioid and benzodiazepine exposures were evaluated using the Rhode Island Prescription Drug Monitoring Program. Cumulative morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) in the postoperative inpatient stay, initial outpatient opioid prescription, and prescriptions filled from 31 to 90 days (prolonged use) and 91 to 150 days (chronic use) following the surgical procedure were calculated. Regression analyses evaluated the association between the initial postoperative opioid dosing and prolonged or chronic use, controlling for demographic characteristics, procedure, preoperative opioid and benzodiazepine exposures, anesthesia type, and use of a peripheral nerve block. RESULTS: A total of 507 patients (198 who underwent a THA and 309 who underwent a TKA) were identified. Increased inpatient opioid dosing (odds ratio [OR], 1.49 per 1 standard deviation increase in inpatient opioid MMEs; p = 0.001) and increased dosing in the first outpatient prescription (OR, 1.26 per 1 standard deviation increase in initial outpatient prescription MMEs; p = 0.049) were each independently associated with an increased risk of prolonged opioid use. Additionally, increased inpatient dosing postoperatively was strongly associated with a greater risk of chronic use (OR, 1.77 per 1 standard deviation increase in inpatient MMEs; p < 0.001). Among the 30% (151 of 507) of patients requiring prolonged postoperative opioids, each 1-MME increase in the initial outpatient prescription dose was associated with a 0.997-MME increase in quantity filled during the prolonged period (p < 0.001). Among the 14% (73 of 507) of patients requiring chronic opioids, every 1-MME increase in the initial outpatient dose was associated with a 1.678-MME increase in chronic opioid dosing (p = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: Increased opioid dosing in the early postoperative period following total joint arthroplasty (TJA) is associated with an increased risk of extended opioid use. A dose-dependent relationship between initial outpatient dosing and greater future quantities consumed by those with prolonged usage and those with chronic usage was noted. This study suggests that providers should attempt to minimize inpatient and early outpatient opioid utilization following TJA. Multimodal pain management strategies may be employed to assist in achieving adequate pain control while minimizing opioid utilization. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.


Assuntos
Analgésicos Opioides/administração & dosagem , Artroplastia de Quadril , Artroplastia do Joelho , Prescrição Inadequada , Dor Pós-Operatória/tratamento farmacológico , Idoso , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapêutico , Artroplastia de Quadril/estatística & dados numéricos , Artroplastia do Joelho/estatística & dados numéricos , Benzodiazepinas/administração & dosagem , Benzodiazepinas/uso terapêutico , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Prescrições de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Hospitalização , Humanos , Prescrição Inadequada/efeitos adversos , Prescrição Inadequada/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Dor Pós-Operatória/etiologia , Cuidados Pós-Operatórios/estatística & dados numéricos , Rhode Island/epidemiologia , Fatores de Risco , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/epidemiologia , Fatores de Tempo
3.
World Neurosurg ; 139: e449-e454, 2020 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32305603

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: This case series examined patients undergoing caudal extension of prior fusion without alteration of the prior upper instrumented vertebra (UIV) to assess patient outcomes and rates of proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK)/proximal junctional failure (PJF). METHODS: Patients eligible for 2-year minimum follow-up undergoing caudal extension of prior fusion with unchanged UIVs were identified. These patients were evaluated for PJK/PJF, and patient reported outcomes were recorded. RESULTS: In total, 40 patients were included. Mean follow-up duration was 2.2 ± 0.3 years. Patients in this cohort had poor preoperative sagittal alignment (pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis [PI-LL] 26.7°, T1 pelvic angle [TPA] 29.0°, sagittal vertical axis [SVA] 93.4 mm) and achieved substantial sagittal correction (ΔSVA -62.2 mm, ΔPI-LL -19.8°, ΔTPA -11.1°) after caudal extension surgery. At final follow-up, there was a 0% rate of PJF among patients undergoing caudal extension of previous fusion without creation of a new UIV, but 27.5% of patients experienced PJK. Patients experienced significant improvement in both the Oswestry Disability Index and Scoliosis Research Society-22r total score at 2 years postoperatively (P < 0.05). In total, 7.5% (n = 3) of patients underwent further revision, at an average of 1.1 ± 0.54 years after the surgery with unaltered UIV. All 3 of these patients underwent revision for rod fracture with no revisions for PJK/PJF. CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing caudal extension of previous fusions for sagittal alignment correction have high rates of clinical success, low revision surgery rates, and very low rates of PJF. Minimizing repetitive tissue trauma at the UIV may result in decreased PJF risk because the PJF rate in this cohort of patients with unaltered UIV is below historical PJF rates of patients undergoing sagittal balance correction.


Assuntos
Fusão Vertebral/estatística & dados numéricos , Coluna Vertebral/cirurgia , Adulto , Idoso , Bases de Dados Factuais , Avaliação da Deficiência , Feminino , Seguimentos , Fragilidade , Humanos , Incidência , Fixadores Internos , Cifose/cirurgia , Lordose/cirurgia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Reoperação/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Escoliose/cirurgia , Coluna Vertebral/anormalidades , Falha de Tratamento , Resultado do Tratamento
4.
J Bone Joint Surg Am ; 101(10): e43, 2019 May 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31094987

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Since 2016, over half of the states in the United States have passed mandatory limits on opioid prescriptions, with limited evidence of effectiveness. In this study, we evaluated postoperative opioid prescriptions following orthopaedic surgery before and after the implementation of one of the earliest such laws. METHODS: Following the implementation of state legislation limiting opioid prescriptions for opioid-naïve patients, 2 patient cohorts (pre-law and post-law) were compared. Both opioid-tolerant and opioid-naïve patients undergoing 6 common orthopaedic procedures (total knee arthroplasty, rotator cuff repair, anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, open reduction and internal fixation for a distal radial fracture, open reduction and internal fixation for an ankle fracture, and lumbar discectomy) met inclusion criteria. Patients undergoing >1 primary procedure in the same operative session were excluded. All benzodiazepine and opioid prescriptions from 30 days before to 90 days after the surgical procedure were recorded. Logistic regression was performed to determine risk factors for prolonged postoperative opioid use. RESULTS: In this study, 836 pre-law patients were compared with 940 post-law patients. The 2 groups were similar with regard to demographic variables, baseline opioid tolerance, and recent benzodiazepine use (all p > 0.05). Post-law, for all patients, there were decreases in the initial prescription pill quantity (49.65 pills pre-law and 22.08 pills post-law; p < 0.001) and the total morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) (417.67 MMEs pre-law and 173.86 MMEs post-law; p < 0.001), regardless of patient preoperative opioid exposure (all p < 0.001). Additionally, there were decreases in the mean cumulative 30-day MMEs (790.01 MMEs pre-law and 524.61 MMEs post-law; p < 0.001) and the 30 to 90-day MMEs (243.51 MMEs pre-law and 208.54 MMEs post-law; p = 0.008). Despite being specifically exempted from the legislation, opioid-tolerant patients likewise experienced a significant decrease in cumulative 30-day MMEs (1,304.08 MMEs pre-law and 1,015.19 MMEs post-law; p = 0.0016). Opioid-tolerant patients required more postoperative opioids at all time points and had an increased likelihood of prolonged opioid use compared with those who were opioid-naïve preoperatively (odds ratio, 8.73 [95% confidence interval, 6.21 to 12.29]). CONCLUSIONS: A clinically important and significant reduction in opioid utilization after orthopaedic surgery was observed following the implementation of statewide mandatory opioid prescription limits. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: After implementation of mandatory opioid prescription regulations, a clinically important and significant decline in the volume of opioids dispensed in the short term and intermediate term following orthopaedic surgery was observed. Furthermore, important clinical predictors of prolonged postoperative opioid use, including preoperative opioid use and preoperative benzodiazepine use, were identified. These findings have important implications for public health, as well as the potential to influence policymakers and to change practice among orthopaedic surgeons.


Assuntos
Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapêutico , Prescrições de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Uso de Medicamentos/legislação & jurisprudência , Procedimentos Ortopédicos , Dor Pós-Operatória/tratamento farmacológico , Padrões de Prática Médica/legislação & jurisprudência , Uso de Medicamentos/tendências , Feminino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides/etiologia , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides/prevenção & controle , Padrões de Prática Médica/tendências , Uso Indevido de Medicamentos sob Prescrição/legislação & jurisprudência , Uso Indevido de Medicamentos sob Prescrição/prevenção & controle , Estudos Retrospectivos , Rhode Island , Fatores de Risco
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA