Does quantitative assessment of arterial phase hyperenhancement and washout improve LI-RADS v2018-based classification of liver lesions?

OBJECTIVES: To compare interreader agreement and diagnostic accuracy of LI-RADS v2018 categorization using quantitative versus qualitative MRI assessment of arterial phase hyperenhancement (APHE) and washout (WO) of focal liver lesions. METHODS: Sixty patients (19 female; mean age, 56 years) at risk for HCC with 71 liver lesions (28 HCCs, 43 benign) who underwent contrast-enhanced MRI were included in this retrospective study. Four blinded radiologists independently assigned a qualitative LI-RADS score per lesion. Two other radiologists placed ROIs within the lesion, adjacent liver parenchyma, and paraspinal musculature on pre- and post-contrast MR images. The percentage of arterial enhancement and the liver-to-lesion contrast ratio were calculated for quantification of APHE and WO. Using these quantitative parameters, a quantitative LI-RADS score was assigned. Interreader agreement and AUCs were calculated. RESULTS: Interreader agreement was similar for qualitative and quantitative LI-RADS (κ = 0.38 vs. 0.40-0.47) with a tendency towards improved agreement for quantitatively assessed APHE (κ = 0.65 vs. 0.81) and WO (κ = 0.53 vs. 0.78). Qualitative LI-RADS showed an AUC of 0.86, 0.94, 0.94, and 0.91 for readers 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively. The quantitative LI-RADS score where APHE/WO/or both were replaced showed an AUC of 0.89/0.84/0.89, 0.95/0.92/0.92, 0.93/0.91/0.89, and 0.91/0.86/0.88 for readers 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively. Sensitivity of LR-4/5 slightly increased, while specificity slightly decreased using quantitative APHE. CONCLUSION: Qualitative and quantitative LI-RADS showed similar performance. Quantitatively assessed APHE showed the potential to increase interreader agreement and sensitivity of HCC diagnosis, whereas quantitatively assessed WO had the opposite effect and needs to be redefined. KEY POINTS: • Quantitative assessment of arterial phase hyperenhancement shows the potential to increase interreader agreement and sensitivity to diagnose hepatocellular carcinoma. • Adding quantitative measurements of major LI-RADS features does not improve accuracy over qualitative assessment alone according to the LI-RADS v2018 algorithm.

Histogram Analysis of CT Perfusion of Hepatocellular Carcinoma for Predicting Response to Transarterial Radioembolization: Value of Tumor Heterogeneity Assessment.

PURPOSE: To evaluate in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), whether assessment of tumor heterogeneity by histogram analysis of computed tomography (CT) perfusion helps predicting response to transarterial radioembolization (TARE). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixteen patients (15 male; mean age 65 years; age range 47-80 years) with HCC underwent CT liver perfusion for treatment planning prior to TARE with Yttrium-90 microspheres. Arterial perfusion (AP) derived from CT perfusion was measured in the entire tumor volume, and heterogeneity was analyzed voxel-wise by histogram analysis. Response to TARE was evaluated on follow-up imaging (median follow-up, 129 days) based on modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST). Results of histogram analysis and mean AP values of the tumor were compared between responders and non-responders. Receiver operating characteristics were calculated to determine the parameters' ability to discriminate responders from non-responders. RESULTS: According to mRECIST, 8 patients (50%) were responders and 8 (50%) non-responders. Comparing responders and non-responders, the 50th and 75th percentile of AP derived from histogram analysis was significantly different [AP 43.8/54.3 vs. 27.6/34.3 mL min(-1) 100 mL(-1)); p < 0.05], while the mean AP of HCCs (43.5 vs. 27.9 mL min(-1) 100 mL(-1); p > 0.05) was not. Further heterogeneity parameters from histogram analysis (skewness, coefficient of variation, and 25th percentile) did not differ between responders and non-responders (p > 0.05). If the cut-off for the 75th percentile was set to an AP of 37.5 mL min(-1) 100 mL(-1), therapy response could be predicted with a sensitivity of 88% (7/8) and specificity of 75% (6/8). CONCLUSION: Voxel-wise histogram analysis of pretreatment CT perfusion indicating tumor heterogeneity of HCC improves the pretreatment prediction of response to TARE.

MRI assessment of biliary ductal obstruction: is there added value of T1-weighted gadolinium-ethoxybenzyl-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid-enhanced MR cholangiography?

OBJECTIVE: The goal of the present study was to determine the added value of gadolium-ethoxybenzyl-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid (gadoxetate disodium)-enhanced magnetic resonance cholangiography (MRC) to standard liver MRI including T2-weighted MRCP in assessment of biliary ductal obstruction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-eight patients (mean age, 48.1 ± 16.7 years) (40 total examinations) who underwent liver MRI (including T2-weighted MRCP and gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRC) for suspicion of biliary disease were included in this institutional review board-approved, HIPAA-compliant retrospective study. Three blinded radiologists first evaluated MR images without gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRC for presence and significance of biliary obstruction, underlying cause for obstruction, and confidence in final diagnosis. After inclusion of gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRC, readers again determined presence and significance of biliary obstruction and confidence in final diagnosis. Reference standard was established using MRI along with ERCP, percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography, intraoperative cholangiography, or a combination thereof. RESULTS: Overall sensitivity across all readers in diagnosing significance of obstruction was 60% without gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRC and 91% with gadoxetate disodium- enhanced MRC (p < 0.001). Across all readers, assessment of significance of obstruction was changed when adding gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRC in 40 of 120 cases (33%); significance of obstruction was correctly changed in 35 of 40 cases (87.5%). Biliary obstruction was graded of unknown significance in 27 of 120 cases (22.5%) across all readers when gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRC was not reviewed. Significance of biliary obstruction was classified correctly after adding gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRC in 25 of these 27 cases (93%). Confidence in final diagnosis was significantly higher with addition of gadoxetate di-sodium-enhanced MRC for two of three readers (p < 0.003). CONCLUSION: Addition of gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRC to liver MRI significantly improves sensitivity in assessing significance of biliary obstruction and can improve reader confidence in establishing a final diagnosis. This added information could have a substantial impact in the determination of the most appropriate therapeutic options.

Feasibility of semiquantitative liver perfusion assessment by ferucarbotran bolus injection in double-contrast hepatic MRI.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the feasibility of semiquantitative measurement of liver perfusion from analysis of ferucarbotran induced signal-dynamics in double-contrast liver MR-imaging (DC-MRI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In total 31 patients (21 men; 58 ± 10 years) including 18 patients with biopsy proven liver cirrhosis prospectively underwent clinically indicated DC-MRI at 1.5 Tesla (T) with dynamic T2-weighted gradient-echo imaging after ferucarbotran bolus injection. Breathing artefacts in tissue and input time curves were reduced by Savitzky-Golay-filtering and semiquantitative perfusion maps were calculated using a model free approach. Hepatic blood flow index (HBFI) and splenic blood flow index (SBFI) were determined by normalization of arbitrary perfusion values to the perfusion of the erector spinae muscle resulting in a semiquantitative perfusion measure. RESULTS: In 30 of 31 patients the evaluated protocol could successfully be applied. Mean HBF was 7.7 ± 2.46 (range, 4.6-12.8) and mean SBF was 13.20 ± 2.57 (range, 8.5-17.8). A significantly lower total HBF was seen in patients with cirrhotic livers as compared to patients with noncirrhotic livers (P < 0.05). In contrast, similar SBF was observed in cirrhotic and noncirrhotic patients (P = 0.11). CONCLUSION: Capturing the signal dynamics during bolus injection of ferucarbotran in DC-MRI of the liver allows for semiquantitative assessment of hepatic perfusion that may be helpful for a more precise characterisation of liver cirrhosis and focal liver lesions.