RESUMO
Background and objectives: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is usually comorbid with other chronic diseases. We aimed to assess the multimorbidity medication patterns and explore if the patterns are similar for phase 1 (P1) and 5-year follow-up phase 2 (P2) in the COPDGene cohort. Materials and Methods: A total of 5564 out of 10,198 smokers from the COPDGene cohort who completed 2 visits, P1 and P2 visits, with complete medication use history were included in the study. We conducted latent class analysis (LCA) among the 27 categories of chronic disease medications, excluding COPD treatments and cancer medications at P1 and P2 separately. The best number of LCA classes was determined through both statistical fit and interpretation of the patterns. Results: We found four classes of medication patterns at both phases. LCA showed that both phases shared similar characteristics in their medication patterns: LC0: low medication; LC1: hypertension (HTN) or cardiovascular disease (CVD)+high cholesterol (Hychol) medication predominant; LC2: HTN/CVD+type 2 diabetes (T2D) +Hychol medication predominant; LC3: Hychol medication predominant. Conclusions: We found similar multimorbidity medication patterns among smokers at P1 and P2 in the COPDGene cohort, which provides an understanding of how multimorbidity medication clustered and how different chronic diseases combine in smokers.
Assuntos
Doenças Cardiovasculares , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Hiperlipidemias , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica , Humanos , Multimorbidade , Fumantes , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/tratamento farmacológico , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/epidemiologia , Doença CrônicaRESUMO
The COPD Biomarkers Qualification Consortium (CBQC) is a public-private partnership formed in 2010 with a goal of qualifying biomarkers and clinical assessment tools for use in clinical or nonclinical decision-making and particularly within the regulatory context. The St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) is a measure of health-related quality of life widely used in clinical research. The aim of the CBQC working group on SGRQ was to construct an individual patient level database of clinical trial data that included the SGRQ, to use this to confirm the reliability and validity of the SGRQ as an outcome measure of health status, and investigate its use as a predictor of future events (exacerbations and mortality). This manuscript describes the formulation of the CBQC database and presents the baseline demographic and clinical characteristics of the integrated SGRQ database overall, and by study type (short-term [≤1 year], medium-term [2-4 years] and observational studies). Distribution of baseline SGRQ scores varied little by demographic determinants except for income region in the observational data set (low-middle income countries +10 units compared with high income, p<0.0001) and this observation held across studies. SGRQ scores increased with increasing modified Medical Research Council dyspnea scores (mean differences ranged 6.9-17.9 units) and with increasing airflow limitations (Global initiative for chronic Obstructive Lung Disease grades 1 to 4; differences ranged 4.5-16.1 units), consistent across study types. As a method of cross-sectional comparison, the SGRQ appears to be relatively free of bias from demographic factors although care should be taken when making cross sectional comparisons of scores between patients in countries at different levels of socio-economic development/.
RESUMO
RATIONALE: Ever-smokers without airflow obstruction scores greater than or equal to 10 on the COPD Assessment Test (CAT) still have frequent acute respiratory disease events (exacerbation-like), impaired exercise capacity, and imaging abnormalities. Identification of these subjects could provide new opportunities for targeted interventions. OBJECTIVES: We hypothesized that the four respiratory-related items of the CAT might be useful for identifying such individuals, with discriminative ability similar to CAT, which is an eight-item questionnaire used to assess chronic obstructive pulmonary disease impact, including nonrespiratory questions, with scores ranging from 0 to 40. METHODS: We evaluated ever-smoker participants in the Subpopulations and Intermediate Outcomes in COPD Study without airflow obstruction (FEV1/FVC ≥0.70; FVC above the lower limit of normal). Using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, we compared responses to both CAT and the respiratory symptom-related CAT items (cough, phlegm, chest tightness, and breathlessness) and their associations with longitudinal exacerbations. We tested agreement between the two strategies (κ statistic), and we compared demographics, lung function, and symptoms among subjects identified as having high symptoms by each strategy. RESULTS: Among 880 ever-smokers with normal lung function (mean age, 61 yr; 52% women) and using a CAT cutpoint greater than or equal to 10, we classified 51.8% of individuals as having high symptoms, 15.3% of whom experienced at least one exacerbation during 1-year follow-up. After testing sensitivity and specificity of different scores for the first four questions to predict any 1-year follow-up exacerbation, we selected cutpoints of 0-6 as representing a low burden of symptoms versus scores of 7 or higher as representing a high burden of symptoms for all subsequent comparisons. The four respiratory-related items with cutpoint greater than or equal to 7 selected 45.8% participants, 15.6% of whom experienced at least one exacerbation during follow-up. The two strategies largely identified the same individuals (agreement, 88.5%; κ = 0.77; P < 0.001), and the proportions of high-symptoms subjects who had severe dyspnea were similar between CAT and the first four CAT questions (25.9% and 26.8%, respectively), as were the proportions reporting impaired quality of life (66.9% and 70.5%, respectively) and short walking distance (22.4% and 23.1%, respectively). There was no difference in area under the receiver operating characteristic curve to predict 1-year follow-up exacerbations (CAT score ≥10, 0.66; vs. four respiratory items from CAT ≥7 score, 0.65; P = 0.69). Subjects identified by either method also had more depression/anxiety symptoms, poor sleep quality, and greater fatigue. CONCLUSIONS: Four CAT items on respiratory symptoms identified high-risk symptomatic ever-smokers with preserved spirometry as well as the CAT did. These data suggest that simpler strategies can be developed to identify these high-risk individuals in primary care.
Assuntos
Progressão da Doença , Pulmão/fisiopatologia , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/fisiopatologia , Fumar/fisiopatologia , Idoso , Biomarcadores , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Volume Expiratório Forçado , Humanos , Estudos Longitudinais , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Estudos Prospectivos , Qualidade de Vida , Curva ROC , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Fumar/efeitos adversos , Espirometria , Inquéritos e Questionários , Estados Unidos , Capacidade VitalRESUMO
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is the third leading cause of death worldwide. COPD, however, is a heterogeneous collection of diseases with differing causes, pathogenic mechanisms, and physiological effects. Therefore a comprehensive approach to COPD prevention will need to address the complexity of COPD. Advances in the understanding of the natural history of COPD and the development of strategies to assess COPD in its early stages make prevention a reasonable, if ambitious, goal.
Assuntos
Anti-Inflamatórios/uso terapêutico , Broncodilatadores/uso terapêutico , Intervenção Médica Precoce , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/diagnóstico , Abandono do Hábito de Fumar , Albuterol/análogos & derivados , Albuterol/uso terapêutico , Androstadienos/uso terapêutico , Progressão da Doença , Combinação de Medicamentos , Diagnóstico Precoce , Teste de Esforço , Combinação Fluticasona-Salmeterol , Volume Expiratório Forçado , Humanos , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/prevenção & controle , Testes de Função Respiratória , Índice de Gravidade de DoençaRESUMO
IMPORTANCE: Comorbidities are common in COPD, but quantifying their burden is difficult. Currently there is a COPD-specific comorbidity index to predict mortality and another to predict general quality of life. We sought to develop and validate a COPD-specific comorbidity score that reflects comorbidity burden on patient-centered outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using the COPDGene study (GOLD II-IV COPD), we developed comorbidity scores to describe patient-centered outcomes employing three techniques: 1) simple count, 2) weighted score, and 3) weighted score based upon statistical selection procedure. We tested associations, area under the Curve (AUC) and calibration statistics to validate scores internally with outcomes of respiratory disease-specific quality of life (St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire, SGRQ), six minute walk distance (6MWD), modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) dyspnea score and exacerbation risk, ultimately choosing one score for external validation in SPIROMICS. RESULTS: Associations between comorbidities and all outcomes were comparable across the three scores. All scores added predictive ability to models including age, gender, race, current smoking status, pack-years smoked and FEV1 (p<0.001 for all comparisons). Area under the curve (AUC) was similar between all three scores across outcomes: SGRQ (range 0·7624-0·7676), MMRC (0·7590-0·7644), 6MWD (0·7531-0·7560) and exacerbation risk (0·6831-0·6919). Because of similar performance, the comorbidity count was used for external validation. In the SPIROMICS cohort, the comorbidity count performed well to predict SGRQ (AUC 0·7891), MMRC (AUC 0·7611), 6MWD (AUC 0·7086), and exacerbation risk (AUC 0·7341). CONCLUSIONS: Quantifying comorbidity provides a more thorough understanding of the risk for patient-centered outcomes in COPD. A comorbidity count performs well to quantify comorbidity in a diverse population with COPD.
Assuntos
Comorbidade , Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Indicadores Básicos de Saúde , Avaliação de Resultados da Assistência ao Paciente , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/epidemiologia , Área Sob a Curva , Humanos , Qualidade de Vida , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: The primary purpose of this study was to describe individuals' knowledge and beliefs about genetics and smoking. Secondary purposes were to describe (a) differences in knowledge and beliefs based on smoking status, gender, and education and (b) relationships among perceived genetic predisposition for smoking, background characteristics, and knowledge and beliefs about genetics and smoking. Because genetics influences smoking, genetic information will likely be used to individualize future cessation treatment. DESIGN: Questionnaire data were collected about knowledge and beliefs about genetics and smoking, smoking history, and demographics from visitors and staff at a nursing care facility. Data were analyzed with bivariate statistics and logistic regression. SAMPLE: Participants (N=92), ages 19-82, were classified by smoking status. RESULTS: Participants had little knowledge about genetics and smoking or mechanisms of heredity. Most did not believe that genetics caused smoking or influenced cessation. Predictors of perceived genetic predisposition for smoking were smoking status (current/former smoker), education (Assuntos
Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde
, Promoção da Saúde
, Prevenção do Hábito de Fumar
, Fumar/genética
, Adulto
, Idoso
, Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais
, Feminino
, Predisposição Genética para Doença
, Humanos
, Modelos Logísticos
, Masculino
, Pessoa de Meia-Idade
, Meio-Oeste dos Estados Unidos
, Fatores Socioeconômicos
RESUMO
PURPOSE: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), the fourth leading cause of death in the United States, has received disproportionately little attention from physicians and institutions. National data are lacking on patient and physician perceptions of and patterns of care for COPD. METHODS: Linked surveys were administered to national samples of patients with COPD, primary care physicians, and pulmonologists to evaluate perceptions of COPD severity and quality of life, attitudes about COPD, health insurance barriers to COPD care, sources of information, and knowledge about COPD diagnosis and treatment. RESULTS: Overall, 1023 patients with COPD and 1051 primary care physicians and pulmonologists responded to the surveys. Despite experiencing significant symptoms and high health care use, the majority of patients were satisfied with their care. Eighty-eight percent of physicians agreed with the statement that COPD is a "self-inflicted" disease, and more than one third were nihilistic about the treatment of patients who continued to smoke. Patients and physicians reported that insurance problems impeded access to therapies. Patients were generally uninformed about COPD; 54% of primary care physicians were aware of any COPD guidelines. Both patient and physician surveys demonstrated continued confusion about the diagnosis of COPD and treatment choices. There was frequent use of regular oral steroids despite demonstrated lack of efficacy and under-use of pulmonary rehabilitation despite proven efficacy. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with COPD have a high prevalence of activity limitations. Although most physicians believed that proper treatment can slow progression, inadequate knowledge and poor adherence to practice guidelines, together with insurance impediments, negatively impact COPD care.