App-based assessment of patient-reported outcomes in the Molecular Tumor Board in the Center for Personalized Medicine-(TRACE).

Background: Biomarker-based therapies are increasingly used in cancer patients outside clinical trials. Systematic assessment of patient-reported outcomes (PRO) is warranted to take patients' perspectives during biomarker-based therapies into consideration. We assessed the feasibility of an electronic PRO assessment via a smartphone application. Methods: An interdisciplinary expert panel developed a smartphone application based on symptom burden and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) metrics reported in a retrospective analysis of 292 neuro-oncological patients. The app included validated assessments of health-related quality of life (HRQoL), the burden of symptoms, and psychological stress. Feasibility and usability were tested in a pilot study. Semi-structured interviews with patients and health care professionals (HCP) were conducted, transcribed, and analyzed according to Mayring´s qualitative content analysis. Furthermore, we assessed compliance and descriptive data of ePROs. Results: A total of 14 patients have been enrolled, (9 female, 5 male). A total of 4 HCPs, 9 patients, and 1 caregiver were interviewed regarding usability/feasibility. The main advantages were the possibility to complete questionnaires at home and comfortable implementation in daily life. Compliance was high, for example, 82% of the weekly distributed NCCN distress thermometer questionnaires were answered on time, however, with interindividual variability. We observed a median distress score of 5 (range 0-10, 197 results, n = 12, weekly assessed) and a median Global health score of 58.3 according to the EORTC QLQ-C30 instrument (range 16.7-100, 77 results, n = 12, monthly assessed). Conclusions: This pilot study proved the feasibility and acceptance of the app. We will therefore expand its application during biomarker-guided therapies to enable systematic PRO assessments.

Assessment Practice of Patient-Centered Outcomes in Surgical Neuro-Oncology: Survey-Based Recommendations for Clinical Routine.

The psycho-oncological burden related to the diagnosis of an intracranial tumor is often accompanied by neurocognitive deficits and changes in character, overall affecting health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and activities of daily living. Regular administration of adequate screening tools is crucial to ensure a timely detection of needs for support and/or specific interventions. Although efforts have been made to assure the quality of neuro-oncological care, clinical assessment practice of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) remains overall heterogeneous, calling for a concise recommendation tailored to neuro-oncological patients. Therefore, this survey, promoted by the German Society of Neurosurgery, was conducted to evaluate the status quo of health care resources and PRO/neurocognition assessment practices throughout departments of surgical neuro-oncology in Germany. 72/127 (57%) of registered departments participated in the study, including 83% of all university hospital units. A second aim was to shed light on the impact of quality assurance strategies (i.e., department certification as part of an integrative neuro-oncology cancer center; CNOC) on the assessment practice, controlled for interacting structural factors, i.e., university hospital status (UH) and caseload. Despite an overall good to excellent availability of relevant health care structures (psycho-oncologist: 90%, palliative care unit: 97%, neuropsychology: 75%), a small majority of departments practice patient-centered screenings (psycho-oncological burden: 64%, HRQoL: 76%, neurocognition: 58%), however, much less frequently outside the framework of clinical trials. In this context, CNOC affiliation, representing a specific health care quality assurance process, was associated with significantly stronger PRO assessment practices regarding psycho-oncological burden, independent of UH status (common odds ratio=5.0, p=0.03). Nevertheless, PRO/neurocognitive assessment practice was not consistent even across CNOC. The overall most commonly used PRO/neurocognitive assessment tools were the Distress Thermometer (for psycho-oncological burden; 64%), the EORTC QLQ-C30 combined with the EORTC QLQ-BN20 (for HRQoL; 52%) and the Mini-Mental Status Test (for neurocognition; 67%), followed by the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA; 33%). Accordingly, for routine clinical screening, the authors recommend the Distress Thermometer and the EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-BN20, complemented by the MoCA as a comparatively sensitive yet basic neurocognitive test. This recommendation is intended to encourage more regular, adequate, and standardized routine assessments in neuro-oncological practice.

CNS Invasion in Meningioma-How the Intraoperative Assessment Can Improve the Prognostic Evaluation of Tumor Recurrence.

The detection of the infiltrative growth of meningiomas into CNS tissue has been integrated into the WHO classification as a stand-alone marker for atypical meningioma. However, its prognostic impact has been questioned. Infiltrative growth can also be detected intraoperatively. The prognostic impact of the intraoperative detection of the central nervous system tissue invasion of meningiomas was analyzed and compared to the histopathological assessment. The clinical data of 1517 cases with follow-up data regarding radiographic recurrence was collected. Histopathology and operative reports were reviewed and invasive growth was seen during resection in 23.7% (n = 345) while histopathology detected it in 4.8% (n = 73). The histopathological and intraoperative assessments were compatible in 63%. The prognostic impact of histopathological and intraoperative assessment was significant in the univariate but not in the multivariate analysis. Both methods of assessment combined reached statistical significance in the multivariate analysis (p = 0.0409). A score including all independent prognostic factors divided the cohort into three prognostic subgroups with a risk of recurrence of 33.8, 64.7 and 88.5%, respectively. The intraoperative detection of the infiltrative growth of primary meningiomas into the central nervous system tissue can complement the histopathological assessment of CNS invasion. The combined assessment is an independent prognostic factor regarding tumor recurrence and allows a risk-adapted tumor stratification.

Towards the targeted assessment of relevant problems: Optimization of the distress Thermometer for adult neuro-oncological patients.

OBJECTIVE: Generic psychosocial screening tools may not reflect the unique symptom profile of brain tumour patients (BTPs). The aim was to adapt the problem list of the distress thermometer (DT) for BTPs. METHODS: First, items of low relevance for BTPs were identified on basis of retrospective analyses. Second, relevant yet missing problems were identified via an extensive literature search, qualitative interviews with BTPs and experts, as well as an online expert survey. The resulting raw version of the adapted problem list in BTPs was subsequently pretested. RESULTS: In the first part, data of n = 657 BTPs were analysed. Twelve items (20%) were excluded in this step as they proved to be less relevant for BTPs (i.e., items were endorsed by less than 10% and without significant correlations to patients' DT score). In the second part, qualitative interviews and the online survey with 102 professionals led to the addition of 21 new and the modification and condensation of 17 relevant problems specific for BTPs. This adapted list was than successfully pretested in n = 19 patients, leading to the 'distress thermometer brain tumour problem list' (DT-BT), consisting of 42 relevant problems. CONCLUSION: The adapted problem list for the DT particularly reflects the neurological and psychosocial burden of an intracranial tumour and allows for the targeted assessment of the specific burdens and needs of BTPs. Our revised version of the DTs problem list (DT-BT) should in the next step be widely validated in multinational samples.

Counseling Patients with a Glioblastoma Amenable Only for Subtotal Resection: Results of a Multicenter Retrospective Assessment of Survival and Neurologic Outcome.

BACKGROUND: Patients with a glioblastoma (GB) amenable only for subtotal resection (STR) represent a challenge in patient counseling. Our objective was to assess impact of extent of resection (EoR) on survival and clinical outcome of these patients. METHODS: We performed a retrospective multicenter assessment. Patients receiving an intended STR in 3 centers with unilocular, primary, highly eloquent GB who received the same adjuvant treatment were included. We assessed EoR, neurologic outcome, and rate of complications. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated with Kaplan-Meier estimations. We used 1% EoR and 1-cm3 steps to detect a threshold for a minimal EoR and residual tumor volume (RV) to be beneficial for survival and performed multivariate Cox regression models to assess its influence on PFS and OS. RESULTS: In total, 67 patients were included. EoR and RV were not significantly associated with PFS in multivariate Cox regression. Multivariate Cox regression model for OS revealed that volumetric EoR is a significant predictor for OS (P = 0.002, OR 0.982), same as RV (P = 0.007, OR 1.03), controlling for age, preoperative tumor volume, sex, and recurrent surgery. We found a significant benefit for OS if an EoR >60% or a RV <8 cm3 was reached. In the aforementioned multivariate Cox regression models, an EoR ≤60% and a RV ≥8 cm3 independently showed a significantly negative association with OS (P = 0.044, OR 1.96/P = 0.024, OR 2.07). CONCLUSIONS: In highly eloquent GB, EoR significantly matters for patients' OS. Also, potential RV should be considered when treating these patients. In cases with an expected RV above or an EoR below the aforementioned thresholds, open surgery should be carefully considered.

Patient reported feasibility and acceptance of Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) screening pre- and postoperatively in brain tumour patients.

BACKGROUND: Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) represents a short screening tool for neuropsychological deficits. The study's aim was to test feasibility and acceptance of MoCA in patients with brain tumours perioperatively. METHODS: Patients with supratentorial located brain tumours were assessed preoperatively (t1, day -1) and postoperatively (t2, day 3-5) using EORTC-QLQ-C30 + BN20, Distress Thermometer (DT) and the MoCA test (different versions). Feasibility was evaluated by a feedback form and patients were asked about perceived discomfort, overstraining or complexity of MoCA. Results of MoCA were correlated with clinical factors. RESULTS: 63 patients participated, 19 were male. Mean age was 56 years. Mean completion time of MoCA was 11 min (both t1 and t2). At t1, in 27% "moderate or major difficulties" occurred during MoCA assessment vs. 41% at t2. Most of the patients (t1, 93% vs. t2, 86%) negated to be overstrained by MoCA. Better "physical function" according to EORTC-QLQ-C30 (p = 0.041, Pearson = 0.321) and higher KPS (p = 0.012, Pearson = 0.578) correlated to higher MoCA scores. Higher distress at t2 was found to be correlated with a stronger deterioration of MoCA at t2 vs. t1 (p = 0.03, Spearman-Rho = .695). CONCLUSION: The MoCA test was well accepted by the patients and implementable in clinical routine. Further investigations evaluating the sensitivity and specificity of the test in brain tumour patients are required.

Compliance with patient-reported outcome assessment in glioma patients: predictors for drop out.

BACKGROUND: Patient-reported outcomes are of high importance in clinical neuro-oncology. However, assessment is still suboptimal. We aimed at exploring factors associated with the probability for a) drop out of study and b) death during follow-up. METHODS: Patients were assessed twice during follow-up visits scheduled within 3 to 5 months of each other by using 3 validated patient-reported outcome measures (t1: first assessment, t2: second assessment). As "death" was seen as a competing risk for drop out, univariate competing risk Cox regression models were applied to explore factors associated with dropping out (age, gender, WHO grade, living situation, recurrent surgery, Karnofsky Performance Status, time since diagnosis, and patient-reported outcomes assessed by Distress Thermometer, EORTC-QLQ-C30, EORTC-QLQ-BN20, and SCNS-SF-34G). RESULTS: Two hundred forty-six patients were eligible, 173 (70%) participated. Patients declining participation were diagnosed with glioblastomas more often than with other gliomas (56% vs 39%). At t2, 32 (18%) patients dropped out, n = 14 death-related, n = 18 for other reasons. Motor dysfunction (EORTC-QLQ-BN20) was associated with higher risk for non-death-related drop out (HR: 1.02; 95% CI, 1.00-1.03; P = .03). Death-related drop out was associated with age (HR: 1.09; 95% CI, 1.03-1.14; P = .002), Karnofsky Performance Status (HR: 0.92; 95% CI, 0.88-0.96; P < .001), lower physical functioning (EORTC-QLQ-C30; HR: 0.98; 95% CI, 0.96-1.00; P = .04) and lower motor functioning (EORTC-QLQ-BN20; HR: 1.020; 95% CI, 1.00-1.04; P = .02). CONCLUSION: Patients with motor dysfunction and poorer clinical condition seem to be more likely to drop out of studies applying patient-reported outcome measures. This should be taken into account when planning studies assessing glioma patients and for interpretation of results of patient-reported outcome assessments in clinical routine.

Evaluation of surgical decision making and resulting outcome in patients with highly eloquent glioblastoma: Results of a multicenter assessment.

INTRODUCTION: Treatment of glioblastoma(GB) patients amenable only for a subtotal resection(STR) is controversial. Since outcome of patients is affected by surgical management, our aim was to assess surgical decision making and resulting outcome in patients with highly eloquent GBs. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively assessed GB patients with intended sub-total resection (STR) or stereotactic biopsy (STX) of 3 neurooncological centers operated between 2008 and 2013. A volumetric assessment of overall extent of resection(oEoR), presence of complications, new permanent neurological deficits(nPNDs) was performed. A central reviewer reassessed all cases blinded and gave recommendation on surgical management and on a potential EoR(pEoR) based on imaging data. We compared outcome data using Mann-Whitney-U-test and Sign-Rank-Test. Survival was assessed based on Kaplan-Meier-estimates. RESULTS: 97 patients were included. In 17 patients received STX, 70 patients a STR and 10 patients a near total resection (NTR, EoR>95%). Median OS was significantly different from STX patients only if NTR was reached (16 vs. 7 months, p=0.042). The central reviewer recommended a more aggressive strategy(NTR or STR resp.) in 41 patients and a less aggressive strategy in 13 patients. Overall, management recommendation was significantly different to clinical treatment (p<0.001). Mean pEoR was significantly higher than oEoR (85.7% vs. 71.3%, p=0.001). Regarding the different OR subgroups, no significant differences were found in the NTR group(12/13 ties, p=1) and in STX group (14/17 ties, p=0.125). In STR group, a significant difference was found (p=0.001). In 38/69 patients a NTR and in 13/77 patients a STX was recommended. CONCLUSION: Surgery in GB patients with intended STR requires precise preoperative planning since potential EoR is mainly underestimated. Especially, patients with lesions amenable for a NTR should not be missed.

Factors associated with supportive care needs in glioma patients in the neuro-oncological outpatient setting.

Objective of this study aimed at assessing glioma patients' supportive care needs in a neurosurgical outpatient setting and identifying factors that are associated with needs for support. In three neuro-oncological outpatient departments, glioma patients were assessed for their psychosocial needs using the Supportive Care Needs Survey short-form (SCNS-SF34-G). Associations between clinical, sociodemographic, treatment related factors as well as distress (measured with the distress thermometer) and supportive care needs were explored using multivariable general linear models. One-hundred and seventy three of 244 eligible glioma patients participated, most of them with primary diagnoses of a high-grade glioma (81%). Highest need for support was observed in 'psychological needs' (median 17.5, range 5-45) followed by 'physical and daily living needs' (median 12.5, range 0-25) and 'health system and information needs' (median 11.3, range 0-36). Needs in the psychological area were associated with distress (R2 = 0.36) but not with age, sex, Karnofsky performance status (KPS), extend of resection, currently undergoing chemotherapy and whether guidance during assessment was offered. Regarding 'health system and information needs', we observed associations with distress, age, currently undergoing chemotherapy and guidance (R2 = 0.31). In the domain 'physical and daily living needs' we found associations with KPS, residual tumor, as well as with distress (R2 = 0.37). Glioma patients in neuro-oncological departments report unmet supportive care needs, especially in the psychological domain. Distress is the factor most consistently associated with unmet needs requiring support and could serve as indicator for clinical neuro-oncologists to initiate support.

Evaluating patients for psychosocial distress and supportive care needs based on health-related quality of life in primary brain tumors: a prospective multicenter analysis of patients with gliomas in an outpatient setting.

The association between health-related quality of life (HRQoL), psychosocial distress, and supportive care is in the focus of patient-centered neuro-oncology. We investigated the relationship between the aforementioned in glioma-patients to evaluate the association of these instruments and determine cut-off values for suitable HRQoL scales indicating a potential need for intervention. In an observational multi-center study, outpatients completed the Distress Thermometer (DT), EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ-C30/BN20, HRQoL), and Supportive-Care-Needs-Survey-SF34-G (SCNS). Based on nine EORTC-function and selected -symptom scales items of the questionnaires were matched. Convergent validity of related single items and scores across the instruments was estimated. EORTC cut-off values were calculated. Data of 167 patients were analyzed. The strongest correlation of EORTC-QLQ-C30 and DT was found for cognitive function (cogf), global health status (GHS), emotional (emof), role function (rolef), future uncertainty (FU), fatigue, and between EORTC-QLQ-C30 and SCNS for FU, emof, rolef (r = |0.4-0.7|; p < 0.01). EORTC cut-off values of <54.2 (GHS/QoL) and <62.5 (emof) predicted a DT ≥ 6 (AUC 0.79, 0.85, p < 0.01). EORTC cut-off values of <70.8 (emof) and <52.8 (FU) predicted the need for supportive care (AUC 0.78, 0.85; p < 0.01). Worse EORTC-C30 scores correlate with higher DT and SCNS scores. With this exploratory assessment, cut-off values for EORTC-C30 subscores to predict distress and pathological SCNS-scores could be determined, which could influence patients' referral to further treatment. However, further prospective clinical trials are needed to confirm the clinical relevance of these cut-off values.

MGMT promoter methylation determined by HRM in comparison to MSP and pyrosequencing for predicting high-grade glioma response.

BACKGROUND: The DNA repair protein O(6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) causes resistance of cancer cells to alkylating agents and, therefore, is a well-established predictive marker for high-grade gliomas that are routinely treated with alkylating drugs. Since MGMT is highly epigenetically regulated, the MGMT promoter methylation status is taken as an indicator of MGMT silencing, predicting the outcome of glioma therapy. MGMT promoter methylation is usually determined by methylation specific PCR (MSP), which is a labor intensive and error-prone method often used semi-quantitatively. Searching for alternatives, we used closed-tube high resolution melt (HRM) analysis, which is a quantitative method, and compared it with MSP and pyrosequencing regarding its predictive value. RESULTS: We analyzed glioblastoma cell lines with known MGMT activity and formalin-fixed samples from IDH1 wild-type high-grade glioma patients (WHO grade III/IV) treated with radiation and temozolomide by HRM, MSP, and pyrosequencing. The data were compared as to progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of patients exhibiting the methylated and unmethylated MGMT status. A promoter methylation cut-off level relevant for PFS and OS was determined. In a multivariate Cox regression model, methylation of MGMT promoter of high-grade gliomas analyzed by HRM, but not MSP, was found to be an independent predictive marker for OS. Univariate Kaplan-Meier analyses revealed for PFS and OS a significant and better discrimination between methylated and unmethylated tumors when quantitative HRM was used instead of MSP. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to MSP and pyrosequencing, the HRM method is simple, cost effective, highly accurate and fast. HRM is at least equivalent to pyrosequencing in quantifying the methylation level. It is superior in predicting PFS and OS of high-grade glioma patients compared to MSP and, therefore, can be recommended being used routinely for determination of the MGMT status of gliomas.