Patients' preferences for delaying metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: Combining health state and treatment valuation.

PURPOSE: Men with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) experience disease progression at different rates. The purpose of this study was to quantify the strength of patient preferences for delaying prostate cancer progression utilizing a discrete choice experiment (DCE) and valuing 3 health states in the continuum of CRPC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Men with CRPC, recruited from US patient panels, completed a cross-sectional web-based survey. The survey consisted of vignette-based time trade-off and a DCE designed to quantify patients' willingness to pay to delay metastatic CRPC. Three health states were presented: (1) living with non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) (2) living with metastatic CRPC (mCRPC) before chemotherapy, and (3) living with mCRPC either on or after chemotherapy. The DCE consisted of 15 hypothetical choices with attributes characterizing CRPC (pain, fatigue, out of pocket cost, dosing, and time until cancer metastasizes). Patients' willingness to pay for changes in each attribute were derived. RESULTS: A total of 176 patients with CRPC were surveyed (mean age: 64.2 years; 74% nmCRPC). Patients valued the nmCRPC health state (0.865) significantly higher than mCRPC before chemotherapy (0.743) or mCRPC on or after chemotherapy (0.476), both P < 0.001. In the DCE, patient treatment valuation was most affected by increasing the number of months until cancer metastasized; patients were willing to pay an additional $682 per month to delay time to metastases from 6 to 24 months (95% Confidence Interval: $387-$977) and additional $1,041 per month to delay time to metastasis to 48 months (95% Confidence Interval: $591-$1,490). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study demonstrated men with CRPC place significant value on delaying metastases. This study represents the first time 2 stated preference methods, time trade-off and DCE, were used together to understand patients' preferences and valuation of health states in CRPC.

Economic burden, work, and school productivity in individuals with tuberous sclerosis and their families.

AIMS: Tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) is a multi-organ autosomal-dominant, genetic disorder with incomplete penetrance. The multiple manifestations of TSC and impacts to numerous organ systems represent significant disease, healthcare, and treatment burden. The economic and employment burden of the disease on individuals and their families is poorly understood. This study assessed the cost of illness and work and school productivity burden associated with TSC in a cross-sectional web-survey sample. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eligible TSC individuals and caregivers were invited through the Tuberous Sclerosis Alliance advocacy group to complete a web-based survey about illness characteristics, treatment, disease burden, direct and indirect healthcare costs, work and school impairment. RESULTS: Data from 609 TSC adults or caregiver respondents with no cognitive impairments were analyzed. TSC adults (>18 years of age) had significantly higher direct out-of-pocket costs for ER visits, expenses for medical tests and procedures, alternative treatments, medications and lifetime cost of surgeries compared to TSC pediatric individuals. Both TSC adults and TSC caregivers reported work and school absenteeism and presenteeism; however, adults reported significantly higher absenteeism and presenteeism and overall activity impairment due to TSC, as might be expected, compared to TSC caregivers. TSC adults had significantly higher absenteeism and presenteeism rates compared to adults with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis and muscular sclerosis. CONCLUSIONS: TSC results in considerable direct out-of-pocket medical costs and impairment to work productivity, especially for adults. Future studies should include the comparator group and examine direct cost burden in the US using electronic medical records and insurance databases.

Caring for Children With Tuberous Sclerosis Complex: What Is the Physical and Mental Health Impact on Caregivers?

Disease burden associated with tuberous sclerosis complex, a genetic disorder characterized by benign tumor growth including lesions in multiple organs, puts tremendous demands on families. This analysis examines the physical and mental health burden of tuberous sclerosis complex caregivers in the United States. An institutional review board-approved web-based survey of tuberous sclerosis complex caregivers collected information; descriptive analyses were conducted on age-based subgroups. A total of 275 caregivers of tuberous sclerosis complex patients responded. Mean patient age ≤ 18 years was 6.9 (±4.4) and 42.3 (±18.2) for patients >18 years of age. Caregivers reported multiple tuberous sclerosis complex manifestations and high health care utilization for patients. Caregivers spending more time on doctor visits or researching tuberous sclerosis complex had lower physical and mental health-related quality of life scores and more depressive symptoms. Tuberous sclerosis complex caregivers had significantly lower physical and mental health-related quality of life scores and more depressive symptomatology compared to US healthy adult population norms.

Tuberous sclerosis complex: a survey of health care resource use and health burden.

PURPOSE: Tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) is a multiorgan, autosomal-dominant genetic disorder with incomplete penetrance. METHODS: This analysis of a web-based survey focuses on the clinical presentation, management, and associated burden of patients with TSC in the United States. RESULTS: A total of 676 TSC patients or caregivers responded. Both pediatric and adult patient groups experienced skin lesions (77% and 44%), seizures (77% and 24%), and kidney complications (33% and 25%) as well as other manifestations. Patient groups averaged 22 visits to a physician, nine procedures/tests, two emergency room visits, and two hospital admissions in the past year. Standardized tests were administered for health-related quality of life and TSC patients reported significantly worse mental health scores and better physical health scores compared to a normative sample of cancer patients. CONCLUSION: Results demonstrate that TSC is associated with significant clinical burden, resource utilization, and decreased mental health well-being.

The burden of subependymal giant cell astrocytomas associated with tuberous sclerosis complex: results of a patient and caregiver survey.

Tuberous sclerosis complex is a genetic disorder characterized by benign tumor growth including lesions in the ventricular system of the brain known as subependymal giant cell astrocytomas. This analysis focuses on the clinical presentation, management, and associated burden of subependymal giant cell astrocytomas in patients with tuberous sclerosis complex in the United States. An institutional review board-approved web-based survey of tuberous sclerosis complex patients and caregivers collected information, and descriptive analyses were conducted on age-based subgroups. A total of 116 tuberous sclerosis complex-subependymal giant cell astrocytoma patients or caregivers responded (17% of the total tuberous sclerosis complex sample). Mean and median patient ages were 25.5 and 23.5 years. Besides subependymal giant cell astrocytomas, patients also experienced skin lesions (72%), seizures (65%), and cognitive concerns (60%). Forty-five percent reported having brain surgery (22% for subependymal giant cell astrocytoma). In the past year, 42% of patients were admitted at least once to the hospital whereas 39% went to the emergency department. Results demonstrate that tuberous sclerosis complex-subependymal giant cell astrocytoma is associated with significant clinical burden, resource utilization, and decreased well-being.

Psychometric characteristics of the short form 36 health survey and functional assessment of chronic illness Therapy-Fatigue subscale for patients with ankylosing spondylitis.

BACKGROUND: We evaluated the psychometric characteristics of the Short Form 36 (SF-36) Health Survey and the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)-Fatigue subscale in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS). METHODS: We analyzed clinical and patient-reported outcome (PRO) data collected during 12-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled periods of two randomized controlled trials comparing adalimumab and placebo for the treatment of active AS. The Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index, Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index, and other clinical measures were collected during the clinical trial. We evaluated internal consistency/reliability, construct validity, and responsiveness to change for the SF-36 and FACIT-Fatigue. RESULTS: The SF-36 (Cronbach alpha, 0.74-0.92) and FACIT-Fatigue (Cronbach alpha, 0.82-0.86) both had good internal consistency/reliability. At baseline, SF-36 and FACIT-Fatigue scores correlated significantly with Ankylosing Spondylitis Quality of Life scores (r = -0.36 to -0.66 and r = -0.70, respectively; all p < 0.0001). SF-36 scores varied by indicators of clinical severity, with greater impairment observed for more severe degrees of clinical activity (all p < 0.0001). FACIT-Fatigue scores correlated significantly with SF-36 scores (r = 0.42 to 0.74; all p < 0.0001) and varied by clinical severity (p < 0.05 to p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The SF-36 is a reliable, valid, and responsive measure of health-related quality of life and the FACIT-Fatigue is a brief and psychometrically sound measure of the effects of fatigue on patients with AS. These PROs may be useful in evaluating effectiveness of new treatments for AS.

Economic costs associated with acute attacks and long-term management of hereditary angioedema.

BACKGROUND: Hereditary angioedema (HAE) is a rare autosomal dominant disorder characterized by recurrent acute attacks of swelling of the larynx, abdomen, and periphery. OBJECTIVE: To assess the economic burden associated with acute attacks and long-term management of HAE. METHODS: Burden was assessed via a Web-based survey of HAE patients (> or = 18 years old) that solicited information on attack characterization, short-term treatment, long-term disease management, impact on work, and patient costs. A standardized instrument, the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment questionnaire, was included to assess impact on work productivity. Standard medical costs and US average wage costs were assigned to survey items to assess direct medical and indirect costs, respectively. RESULTS: Total annual per-patient costs are estimated at $42,000 for the average HAE patient, with costs totaling $14,000 for patients with mild attacks, $27,000 for patients with moderate attacks, and $96,000 for patients with severe attacks. Hospital costs account for 67% of direct medical costs. Respondents reported high rates of missed work, lost productivity, and lost income, contributing to indirect costs totaling $16,000 annually for the average patient. Almost all costs increase with disease severity, although the distribution varies with severity: indirect costs account for 75% of costs for patients with mild attacks, whereas emergency department and hospital costs account for 68% of costs for patients with severe attacks. CONCLUSIONS: HAE results in considerable economic burden to patients, payers, and society in terms of direct medical and indirect costs and compounds the substantial humanistic burdens, which will be reported separately.

Assessment of health state utilities for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in children using parent proxy report.

This study used standard gamble (SG) utility interviews to assess parent preferences for health states of childhood attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Health state utilities are needed to calculate quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), a critical outcome measure in cost-effectiveness studies of new treatments. Parents (n = 43) of children diagnosed with ADHD completed SG utility interviews, rating their child's current health and 11 hypothetical health states describing untreated ADHD and ADHD treated with a stimulant or non-stimulant. Parents completed questionnaires on their children's symptoms and health-related quality of life (HRQL). Parents' SG rating of their child's current health state (mean of 0.74 on a utility scale ranging from 0 to 1) was significantly correlated with inattentive, hyperactive, and overall ADHD symptoms (r = 0.37, 0.36, and 0.40 respectively; p < 0.05) and psychosocial HRQL domains. Hypothetical health state utilities ranged from 0.48 (severe untreated ADHD) to 0.88 (effective and tolerable non-stimulant treatment). Comparisons between health states found expected differences between untreated mild, moderate, and severe ADHD health states. When both treatments were effective and tolerable, parents preferred the non-stimulant health state over the stimulant health state (p < 0.03). Results suggest that parent SG interviews are a feasible and useful method for obtaining utility scores that can be used in cost-effectiveness models of ADHD treatment.

Responsiveness and interpretation of a symptom severity index specific to upper gastrointestinal disorders.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Determining clinically meaningful change of patient-reported outcome measures is important for evaluating effectiveness of treatments for gastrointestinal (GI) diseases. This study evaluates responsiveness of the Patient Assessment of Gastrointestinal Disorders-Symptom Severity Index (PAGI-SYM) in gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and dyspepsia. METHODS: The PAGI-SYM was based on a review of the published literature and interviews with patients and clinicians. Items were developed to be linguistically and culturally appropriate for multicountry studies. The PAGI-SYM includes 6 subscales: heartburn/regurgitation, fullness/early satiety, nausea/vomiting, bloating, upper abdominal pain, and lower abdominal pain. Subjects with GERD (n = 810) or dyspepsia (n = 767) participated in this multicountry, observational study. All subjects completed the PAGI-SYM, a global symptom relief questionnaire, and a measure of patient-rated change in GI-related symptoms, the Overall Treatment Effect (OTE) scale. Responsiveness was evaluated at 8 weeks by comparing groups by disease, symptom relief, and OTE (improved, stable, and worsened). RESULTS: Subjects reporting symptom relief reported significantly lower (better) PAGI-SYM scores than those reporting no symptom relief ( P < 0.0001 to P < 0.0005). Subjects with improvements in overall GI symptoms exhibited significant decreases in PAGI-SYM subscale scores compared with those who remained the same or worsened (all P values < 0.0001). Effect sizes ranged from 0.21-1.28, and standard errors of measurement ranged from 0.29-0.63, depending on subscale and disease sample. CONCLUSIONS: The PAGI-SYM is a brief symptom severity instrument that measures common GI symptoms. Results suggest that the PAGI-SYM is responsive and sensitive to change in clinical status in subjects with GERD or dyspepsia.

Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index (GCSI): development and validation of a patient reported assessment of severity of gastroparesis symptoms.

BACKGROUND: Patient-rated symptom assessments are needed for evaluating the effectiveness of medical treatments and for monitoring outcomes in gastroparesis. OBJECTIVE: This paper summarizes the development and psychometric evaluation of a new instrument, the Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index (GCSI), for assessing severity of symptoms associated with gastroparesis. METHODS: The GCSI was based on reviews of the medical literature, patient focus groups, and interviews with clinicians. A sample of 169 patients with a documented diagnosis of gastroparesis participated in the psychometric evaluation study. Patients completed the GCSI, the SF-36 Health Survey, and disability days questions at baseline and after 8 weeks. A randomly selected sub-sample of 30 subjects returned at 2 weeks to assess test retest reliability. Clinicians rated severity of symptoms, and both clinicians and patients rated change in gastroparesis-related symptoms over the 8 week study. RESULTS: The GCSI is based on three subscales: post-prandial fullness/early satiety (4 items); nausea/vomiting (3 items), and bloating (2 items). Internal consistency reliability was 0.84 for the GCSI total score and ranged from 0.83 to 0.85 for the subscale scores. Two week test retest reliability was 0.76 for the total score and ranged from 0.68 to 0.81 for subscale scores. Construct validity was supported, given that we observed significant relationships between clinician assessed symptom severity and GCSI total score, significant differences between gastroparesis and dyspepsia patients (n = 760) on GCSI total (p < 0.0001) and subscale scores (p < 0.03 to p < 0.0001), moderate and significant relationships between GCSI total and SF-36 scores, and significant associations between GCSI total score and reports of restricted activity and bed disability days. Patients with greater symptom severity, as rated by clinicians, reported more symptom severity on GCSI total score. GSCI total scores were responsive to changes in overall gastroparesis symptoms as assessed by clinicians (p < 0.0001) and patients (p = 0.0004). CONCLUSION: The findings of this study indicate that the GCSI is a reliable and valid instrument for measuring symptom severity in patients with gastroparesis.

Cross-cultural development and validation of a patient self-administered questionnaire to assess quality of life in upper gastrointestinal disorders: the PAGI-QOL.

OBJECTIVE: Summarize the Patient Assessment of Upper GastroIntestinal Disorders-Quality of Life (PAGI-QOL) development and provide results on its reliability and validity from the international psychometric validation in dyspepsia, GastroEsophageal Reflux Disease (GERD), and gastroparesis. METHODS: Subjects completed the pilot PAGI-QOL at baseline and 8 weeks; and a subsample also at 2 weeks. Other assessments were: Patient Assessment of Upper Gastrointestinal Disorders-Symptom Severity Index, SF-36, number of disability days. RESULTS: 1736 patients completed the PAGI-QOL at baseline. The questionnaire was reduced, producing a 30-item final version covering five domains: Daily Activities, Clothing, Diet and Food Habits, Relationship (REL), and Psychological Well-Being and Distress. Internal consistency was excellent (Cronbach's alpha range: 0.83-0.96). Test-retest reproducibility was good: intraclass correlations coefficients were over 0.70 except for the REL scale (0.61). Concurrent validity between the PAGI-QOL total score and all SF-36 subscale scores was good with moderate (0.52) to strong (0.72) correlations. PAGI-QOL scores showed excellent discriminant properties: patients who had spent some days in bed, had missed some days at work, and were kept from usual activities had much lower PAGI-QOL scores than those who did not (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: The PAGI-QOL is a valid and reliable instrument assessing quality of life in patients with dyspepsia, GERD, or gastroparesis.