[Association of Health Insurance and Socio-economic Factors with Health Care for Malignant Melanoma]. / Assoziation von Krankenversicherung und soziodemografischen Faktoren mit der Versorgung maligner Melanome.

Objective: To analyze the relationship between socio-demographic and regional factors, health insurance status and clinical features of malignant melanoma (MM). Methods: Primary data from a nationwide dermato-histopathologic laboratory on all consecutive excisions with proven diagnosis of MM over the 5-year period 2009-2013 were analyzed regarding tumor-specific and socioeconomic characteristics. The tumor depth (Breslow index) being a predictor of invasive MM progression and mortality was defined as a major indicator for early detection and intervention, thus reflecting quality of health care. Results: N=4 840 histologically verified MM samples from 4 583 patients were analyzed; of these, 2 537 (52.4%) were invasive MM. The tumor depth, which was 1.09 mm on average, increased with age from 1.00 mm in the lowest to 1.56 mm in the highest age group, p<0.001). Controlled for age and sex, the members of agricultural health insurances (LKK) and of German local public health insurances (AOK) showed significantly increased tumor depths (1.67 resp. 1.20 mm). The lowest average levels were found in members of the substitute health funds (e. g. Barmer GEK 0.93 mm) and in privately insured persons (0.99 mm). Based on a regional 4-step classification, there was a gradient in MM depth from more populated to more rural areas, ranging from 1.05 mm in nucleated cities to 1.22 in small rural communities. Distribution of MM locations varied significantly by health insurance: The highest proportion of MM in the head/neck area was seen in members of the agricultural (52.3%) and of the local public health insurances (30.2%) vs. 18.5% in patients from the substitute health funds. In contrast, MM located on the trunk and lower extremities was more prevalent in private, substitute and company health insurance funds. Conclusion: Age, gender and health insurance status are relevant determinants of MM health care and progression risk in Germany. Prevention and early detection programs by health insurances should take this into account.

Methods of analyzing regional dermatological care as exemplified by the city of Hamburg.

BACKGROUND: The rural-urban divide is often linked to regional inequalities in healthcare. However, studies have also shown regional healthcare disparities within urban areas. To evaluate these studies, further parameters such as accessibility must be added to the standard criteria. The objective of this study was to present methodic tools for evaluating dermatological healthcare provision in Hamburg, primarily focusing on accessibility. METHODS: Analyzing data from 97 districts, the geographical distribution of 101 dermatologists and the physician-patient ratio were determined. In a second step, network analysis regarding accessibility was performed. RESULTS: There are regional inequalities in Hamburg with respect to dermatological care. Depending on the district, the physician-patient ratio ranges from 44.9 % (undersupply) to > 500 % (oversupply). Similar differences exist regarding accessibility. Although 94.5 % of the population of Hamburg is able to reach the nearest dermatologist within ten minutes (by car), it may take more than 30 minutes depending on district and mode of transportation. CONCLUSIONS: Analysis of the physician-patient ratio reveals differences regarding dermatological care in Hamburg. However, results of the network analysis show that these differences do not significantly affect access to dermatological care. Therefore, network analysis should be used as an additional tool to evaluate regional healthcare provision.

Health care characteristics of basal cell carcinoma in Germany: the role of insurance status and socio-demographic factors.

BACKGROUND: In Germany population-based data on health care of basal cell carcinoma (BCC) are rare. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the relationship between socio-demographic and regional factors, health insurance status and clinical features of BCC. METHODS: Data base was from a nationwide dermatopathology laboratory. All consecutive excisions from 2010 were analyzed regarding tumor-specific and socioeconomic characteristics of BCC. RESULTS: 9,467 histologically verified BCC derived from 7,116 patients (54.1 % male, mean age 70 years) were analyzed. 33 % of patients had multiple tumors. The average vertical depth of invasion of BCC was 1.27 mm. It was increased significantly (p ≤ 0.001) in men (1.33 mm vs. 1.19 mm in women) and in persons over 70 years of age (1.36 mm vs. 1.14 mm). Controlled for age and sex, members of agricultural health-insurances (LKK) and of German local public health insurances (AOK) showed the highest tumor depths (1.45 mm resp.1.42 mm). The lowest depths (1.17 mm) were found in insurees of the substitute health funds (Ersatzkassen) (p ≤ 0.001). Vertical depth of invasion was significantly increased for patients living in rural counties (1.34 mm) compared to patients from urban areas (1.21 mm). Furthermore, the distribution of BCC locations varied by type of health insurance. CONCLUSIONS: Area of residence, health insurance status, age and gender are relevant determinants of BCC health care in Germany. Prevention programs and activities to improve early detection by health insurances should take this into account.

Routine skin cancer screening in Germany: First data on the impact on health care in dermatology.

BACKGROUND: On July 1st 2008, community skin cancer screening (cSCS) was established in routine care of the German statutory health insurances (SHI). This study aimed at gathering preliminary data on the impact of community SCS on health care provision in German dermatology practices. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Standardized questionnaires were sent to about 2,000 German dermatology practices. Data were analyzed descriptively and with bivariate tests. RESULTS: In total, 693 (34.7%) questionnaires were returned. Each practice performed an average of 354 SCS per quarter, the mean payment being euro 21.50. About 78% named an increase in SCS with an average increase of 36.7%. About 54% of practices performed SCS under SHI payment combined with individual health services paid by the patients ("IGeL"), 38% only as SHI and 8% exclusively as "IGeL". In 85% of practices, the number of surgical procedures had increased since the start of community SCS. 40% had an increase in drug prescriptions related to SCS. 32% were satisfied with SCS, while 40% were unsatisfied. 29 % would prefer SCS only as covered by SHI, 29% only as IGeL, and 42% in a combined fashion. 70% regarded the quality of health care of patients with skin cancer in Germany better since the introduction of cSCS. CONCLUSIONS: Dermatologists in Germany have mainly accepted their role in providing skin cancer as standard care covered by SCS. The regulatory and economic conditions for this need further improvement.