Direct medical cost of COVID-19 in children hospitalized at a tertiary referral healthcare center in Mexico City.

Introduction: Despite the end of the COVID-19 pandemic being declared by the WHO, the economic consequences are far from over. One of these implications was the cost of inpatient care for health institutions. To date, some studies have examined the economic burden of COVID-19 in the adult population but only a few have focused on child populations. Objective: To estimate the direct medical costs of COVID-19, focusing on children in Mexico. Method: Data about resources consumed during hospital stays were extracted from the medical records of patients hospitalized at a Mexican tertiary healthcare institution. Other sources of information were the unit prices of inputs and the salaries of health personnel. A micro-costing methodology was used to obtain cost results by age group over different hospital areas. Data analysis was performed with descriptive statistics and regression models to evaluate the predictors of total cost. Results: One hundred and ten medical records were reviewed of which 57.3% corresponded to male patients and the mean age was 7.2 years old. The estimated average cost per patient was US$5,943 (95% CI: US$4,249-7,637). When the costs of the three clinical areas were summed, only the 5-10 years old group showed a maximum cost of US$14,000. The regression analysis revealed the following factors as significant: sex, age, staying at an emergency room, having a positive bacterial culture, and having comorbidities. Discussion: The cost results were somewhat similar to those reported in children from the USA, but only regarding low severity COVID-19 cases. However, comparability between these types of studies should be done with caution due to the huge differences between the healthcare systems of countries. The study cost results may help public decision-makers in budget planning and as inputs for future cost-effectiveness studies about interventions regarding COVID-19.

Cytomegalovirus infection and disease in pediatric liver transplantation: Burden of disease under a preemptive therapy approach.

BACKGROUND: CMV remains a frequent complication after liver transplantation. Few studies exist in children reporting the epidemiology and outcomes of CMV after LT with current prevention strategies. Our goal is to report the incidence of CMV infection and disease in pediatric LT recipients under preemptive therapy, identify risk factors, complications, and adverse reactions to treatment. METHODS: All pediatric LT recipients from a single center (1998-2018) were included. Antigenemia pp65 (1998-2003) and QNAT or both were used to inform preemptive therapy. Cutoff value for starting treatment was Agpp65 > 10 + cells/200 000 or QNAT >1500 copies/ml or any value in high-risk recipients (D+/R-). RESULTS: One hundred eighteen LT were analyzed. CMV infection was detected in 67% of patients, only 44 (37%) required treatment, and 5 (4%) developed CMV disease. All patients responded well to treatment, and no graft or patients were lost to CMV effects. There were no differences in mortality, CMV indirect effects, or other complications between those who required treatment and those who did not. Thirty-two percent of the patients who received antivirals developed an adverse hematological reaction. Risk factors associated with CMV infection requiring treatment were D+/R- (OR 13.9, p = .01) and fulminant hepatitis (OR 4.8, p = .02). CONCLUSIONS: Preemptive therapy for CMV in children is safe and effective, yields low CMV infection rates that require treatment, and minimal rates of CMV disease, without increasing CMV-related complications. Using this strategy, 63% of our patients did not receive treatment. Therefore, drug exposure, adverse reactions, and resistance risk were minimized.

Costs associated with adverse events from remission induction for children with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL).

BACKGROUND: ALL is the most frequent hematological tumor in children, so during remission induction chemotherapy protocol (RICP) adverse events (AEs) may appear. The public program in Mexico in charge of financial support to oncologic children without social security delivered a fix amount for ALL chemotherapy, but additional money needed to treat any other unexpected condition should be taken from the budget of the oncologic healthcare providers. So the purpose of our study was to estimate and evaluate the direct medical costs associated to EAs during RICP in children with ALL. METHODS: This study was retrospective, longitudinal, and observational based on medical records review of patients in RICP. The CTCAE was used to identify and classify AEs according to a SOC category. We focused on extracting resources data that were consumed both for inpatients and outpatients AEs. A micro-costing approach was adopted which involve quantification of each healthcare resource consumed by the hospital multiplying them by unit cost. The probability distributions of data were evaluated to identify the appropriated statistical tests to be used for comparisons between groups that were performed with Wilcoxon rank sum test. Generalized linear models (GLM) were adjusted to evaluate the effects of patient characteristics on total cost. RESULTS: Forty patients accumulated 204 inpatient and 81 outpatient AEs during RICP. Comparison of total costs between groups showed an incremental cost of $7,460.23 likewise attributable to AEs. The total cost of a pediatric patient undergoing RICP without adverse events was $3,078.36 and the total cost of a patient with AEs exceeds it threefold. CONCLUSIONS: The costs associated with AEs during RICP in Mexican children with ALL representing a high burden for the healthcare provider. Generalized linear models showed that variables such as sex, risk category and alive status are associated with the total costs of AEs. This is the first study aiming to analyze the effect of ALL-related AEs on health care costs in pediatric population, so our results may help not only to local decision making but also it may contribute to the research agenda in this field.

Economic issues of Severe Acute Respiratory Infections for influenza in Mexican children attended in a tertiary public hospital.

BACKGROUND: Influenza cause a clinical and economic burden for health systems and society. It is necessary to know the cost of the disease in order to perform cost-effectiveness assessments of preventive or treatment interventions. OBJECTIVE: Assess the costs of the care of children with influenza in a third level hospital in Mexico. METHODS: Longitudinal retrospective study based on the review of clinical files of children hospitalized with influenza. The use of resources used during their hospitalization in the emergency room, general ward, or PICU was logged, and the amount of supplies were multiplied by their corresponding prices to calculate the direct medical expenses. Descriptive statistics were used, and a GLM was adjusted in order to assess the effect of the clinical characteristics of the patients on the cost. Goodness of fit tests were performed. RESULTS: 132 files were reviewed, out of which 95% were of subjects who had comorbidities. Subjects admitted at the PICU generates the highest cost (mean $29,608.62 USD), when analyzing the total cost summarizing the three clinical areas (Emergency room, general ward and PICU) by age group, the highest cost was for patients over age 10 (mean $49,674.53 USD). Comorbidities increase the cost of hospitalization by $10,000.00 USD. CONCLUSIONS: Influenza causes a significant financial burden on the health system. Children with comorbidities increase the costs and children over 10 years uses a significant amount of resources and they are not a priority in immunization program. It is necessary to perform studies on the use of resources in the first and second attention levels, which represent the highest incidence of the disease.

[Assessment and intervention thresholds to detect cases at risk of osteoporosis and fragility fractures with FRAX® in a mexican population for the first level of healthcare]. / Umbrales de evaluación e intervención para la detección de casos en riesgo de osteoporosis (OP) y fracturas por fragilidad con FRAX® en población mexicana para el primer nivel de salud.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the evaluation and intervention thresholds using FRAX® in Mexican population. METHODS: Probabilities for a mayor fracture using the Mexican FRAX® version to estimate the evaluation and intervention thresholds using clinical scenarios were obtained in both sexes 40 years and over. Projections for 2020 were done to estimate the number of patients at the intervention level taking the osteoporosis prevalence in Mexicans aged 50 years and over. RESULTS: The cutoffs for the intervention thresholds were 2.6%-20.0%. Individuals with thresholds above these probabilities are amenable for intervention. The assessment thresholds range from 1.2-3.2% to 12.5-24.4% for 40 to 90 years. According to projections of our population, approximately three million people are susceptible to intervention by 2020. CONCLUSION: The use of FRAX® thresholds of intervention and evaluation developed in this study will be useful in the primary care level for case detection at high risk of fragility fracture.

Economic Evaluation of the Use of Drug-Eluting Stents versus Bare-Metal Stents in Adults with Ischemic Cardiomyopathy Requiring Angioplasty.

BACKGROUND: The value of drug-eluting stents in preventing cardiovascular events has not been investigated in Mexico. OBJECTIVE: To conduct a cost-effectiveness analysis of early and new-generation drug-eluting stents from the perspective of a healthcare provider. METHODS: We conducted a cost-effectiveness analysis of early and new-generation drug-eluting stents in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy attending a Cardiology Hospital of the Mexican Social Security Institute. The health endpoint used was major acute cardiovascular events prevented. The effectiveness by stent type was obtained from the literature. A retrospective chart review study was conducted to collect cost data on cardiovascular events including seven cost categories. Average and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were estimated. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to test the robustness of estimates. RESULTS: Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios in base-case were 28,910 and US$ 35,590 for early and new-generation stents, respectively. In an optimal scenario, incremental-cost effectiveness ratio was 24,776 and US$ 25,262 for early and new stents, respectively. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis suggested that 90% of cases were cost-effective when willingness-to-pay was 58,000 and US$ 66,000 for early and new-generation stents, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The cost-effectiveness ratios of early and new-generation stents were significantly higher than corresponding bare-metal stents.

Economic evaluation of the use of exogenous pulmonary surfactants in preterm newborns in a Mexican population.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the cost-effectiveness ratio of surfactant rescue treatment of premature infants with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) who are covered by the Medical Insurance for a New Generation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cost-effectiveness evaluation was conducted from the third-payer perspective. Comparisons were made between the use of bovine surfactant (BS) therapy and without BS therapy. A decision tree model with a lifetime horizon was used where the measurements of effectiveness were life years gained (LYG) and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). A 5% discount rate was considered for costs and health outcomes. All costs are expressed in Mexican pesos 2009. RESULTS: Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER) were MXN$136,670 per LYG and MXN$125,250 per QALY. CONCLUSION: Surfactant therapy was confirmed as a cost-effective strategy in accordance with World Health Organization criteria of three per capita gross domestic product (GDP) per QALY in premature infants with RDS in Mexico.

Factores pronósticos de supervivencia en pacientes pediátricos con leucemia linfoblástica aguda afiliados al Seguro Popular / Prognostic factors for survival in pediatric patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia affiliated with the Seguro Popular insurance program

Introducción. La leucemia linfoblástica aguda es la neoplasia más común en menores de 15 años. Se han identificado factores pronósticos como la edad al diagnóstico, el sexo, la traslocación de genes y el estado nutricional, entre otros. El objetivo de este trabajo fue evaluar algunos de estos factores en pacientes pediátricos con leucemia linfoblástica aguda afiliados al Seguro Popular, destacando los factores socioeconómicos. Métodos. Se trata de un estudio retrospectivo basado en la revisión de 391 expedientes clínicos de nueve hospitales con diferentes tasas de supervivencia, acreditados por el Seguro Popular. Se realizaron análisis descriptivos de variables y de supervivencia por el método Kaplan-Meier, utilizando el programa SPSS v 18.0. Resultados. Menos de la mitad de los pacientes (41.7%) fueron atendidos en hospitales de tercer nivel. Estos presentaron una tasa de supervivencia de 82% a cuatro años de seguimiento. Para los pacientes atendidos en hospitales de segundo nivel, la tasa de supervivencia fue de 55%. Los resultados mostraron que las características del hogar y familiares fueron factores pronósticos de supervivencia. Destacaron el mayor grado de educación, las redes sociales de apoyo y el número de proveedores económicos de la familia. Conclusiones. Los factores que intervienen en el pronóstico del paciente con leucemia linfoblástica aguda son diversos. Se mostró que los factores relacionados con la madre mejoran la supervivencia, aunque se requiere profundizar en este tema.

Introduction. Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is the most common malignancy in children <15 years of age. Prognostic factors for survival have been identified such as age at diagnosis, sex, translocation of genes and nutritional status, among others. The aim of this study was to evaluate some of these factors in pediatric patients with ALL affiliated with the Seguro Popular insurance program with an emphasis on socioeconomic factors. Methods. This is a retrospective study based on the review of 391 clinical charts from nine hospitals accredited by the Seguro Popular insurance program with different survival rates. Descriptive and survival Kaplan-Meier analyses were performed with the statistical program SPSS v.18.0. Results. Less than half (41.7%) of the patients were treated at tertiary-care level hospitals with a 4-year survival rate at follow-up of 82%, whereas for secondary-care level hospitals the survival rate was 55%. Results show that household and parental characteristics were predictive of survival, in particular those with higher educational level, support networks and the number of family providers. Conclusions. Several factors are involved in the prognosis of ALL patients. Maternal factors improve survival, but these need to be thoroughly examined.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of the use of palivizumab in the prophylaxis of preterm patients in Mexico / Análisis de costo-efectividad del uso de palivizumab en la profilaxis de pacientes prematuros en México

OBJECTIVE: The study evaluated the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of the prophylaxis of palivizumab, for the reduction of complications associated to the respiratory syncytial virus in preterm patients in Mexico. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A decision tree was developed in preterm groups [<29 and 29-32 weeks of gestational age (wGA)], by using epidemiological and cost local data; the effectiveness was obtained with a systematic review. Patients were evaluated according to their life expectancy. Mexican Health System perspective was used. Effectiveness measures employed were LYG and QALYs. The costs are reported in USD 2009. RESULTS: ICERs per LYG resulted on values of USD $25,029 and USD $29,637 for <29 wGA and 29-32 wGA respectively, whereas ICERs per QALYs obtained in the model accounted for USD $17,532 and USD $20,760. CONCLUSIONS: Palivizumab prophylaxis for preterm newborn patients ≤32 weeks of age resulted in a cost-effective alternative.

OBJETIVO: El estudio evaluó la razón costo-efectividad incremental (RCEI) de profilaxis con palivizumab para reducción de complicaciones asociadas al virus sincicial respiratorio en prematuros en México. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Se empleó un árbol de decisiones en los grupos pretérmino [<29 y 29-32 semanas de edad gestacional (SEG)], empleando datos epidemiológicos y costos locales; la eficacia se obtuvo con una revisión sistemática, evaluando a los pacientes de acuerdo con su esperanza de vida. Se empleó la perspectiva del Sistema Nacional de Salud. Las medidas de eficacia fueron AVG y AVAC. Los costos son reportados en dólares de 2009. RESULTADOS: Las RCEI por AVG resultaron de USD $25 029 y USD $29 637 para <29 y 29-32 SEG, mientras que las RCEI por AVAC fueron de USD $17 532 y USD $20 760. CONCLUSIONES: La profilaxis con palivizumab en pacientes recién nacidos pretérmino ≤32 semanas de edad resultó ser una alternativa costo-efectiva.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of the use of palivizumab in the prophylaxis of preterm patients in Mexico.

OBJECTIVE: The study evaluated the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of the prophylaxis of palivizumab, for the reduction of complications associated to the respiratory syncytial virus in preterm patients in Mexico. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A decision tree was developed in preterm groups [<29 and 29-32 weeks of gestational age (wGA)], by using epidemiological and cost local data; the effectiveness was obtained with a systematic review. Patients were evaluated according to their life expectancy. Mexican Health System perspective was used. Effectiveness measures employed were LYG and QALYs. The costs are reported in USD 2009. RESULTS: ICERs per LYG resulted on values of USD $25,029 and USD $29,637 for <29 wGA and 29-32 wGA respectively, whereas ICERs per QALYs obtained in the model accounted for USD $17,532 and USD $20,760. CONCLUSIONS: Palivizumab prophylaxis for preterm newborn patients ≤32 weeks of age resulted in a cost-effective alternative.

Economic evaluation of the use of exogenous pulmonary surfactants in preterm newborns in a Mexican population / Evaluación económica de la utilización de surfactantes pulmonares exógenos en recién nacidos pretérmino en población mexicana

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the cost-effectiveness ratio of surfactant rescue treatment of premature infants with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) who are covered by the Medical Insurance for a New Generation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cost-effectiveness evaluation was conducted from the third-payer perspective. Comparisons were made between the use of bovine surfactant (BS) therapy and without BS therapy. A decision tree model with a lifetime horizon was used where the measurements of effectiveness were life years gained (LYG) and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). A 5% discount rate was considered for costs and health outcomes. All costs are expressed in Mexican pesos 2009. RESULTS: Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER) were MXN$136670 per LYG and MXN$125250 per QALY. CONCLUSION: Surfactant therapy was confirmed as a cost-effective strategy in accordance with World Health Organization criteria of three per capita gross domestic product (GDP) per QALY in premature infants with RDS in Mexico.

OBJETIVO: Estimar la razón de costo efectividad incremental del tratamiento de surfactante de rescate en pacientes pretérmino con Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria (SDR) cubiertos por el Seguro Médico para una Nueva Generación. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Evaluación de costo-efectividad desde la perspectiva del tercer pagador. Los comparadores fueron la terapia de surfactante bovino y la alternativa de no emplear ésta. Se utilizó un árbol de decisión que consideró la esperanza de vida como horizonte temporal y las medidas de efectividad fueron los años de vida ganados (AVG) y los años de vida ajustados por calidad de vida ( AVAC).Resultados en pesos mexicanos del 2009. RESULTADOS: Las RCEI por AVG y AVAC fueron de MXN$136670 y MXN$125250. CONCLUSIÓN: La razón de costo por AVG y AVAC para la terapia de surfactantes en pacientes prematuros con SDR en México fue menor a tres veces el PIB per cápita, por lo que es una estrategia costo-efectiva según los criterios de la OMS.