Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Pediatr Blood Cancer ; 61(5): 803-9, 2014 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24376115

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Five Asociación de Hemato-Oncología de Centroamérica (AHOPCA) countries have used an adapted BFM-based protocol for childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). PROCEDURE: In the AHOPCA-ALL 2008 protocol, patients were stratified by age, white blood cell count, immunophenotype, central nervous system involvement, day 8 prednisone response, and morphologic bone marrow response to induction therapy. Patients at Standard Risk (SR) received a three-drug induction regimen, a reinduction phase, and maintenance with protracted intrathecal therapy. Those at Intermediate (IR) and High Risk (HR) received, in addition, daunorubicin during induction therapy, a consolidation phase and two or three reinduction phases respectively. RESULTS: From August 2008 through July 2012, 1,313 patients were enrolled: 353 in SR, 548 in IR, 412 in HR. During induction therapy, 3.0% of patients died, 2.7% abandoned treatment, 1.1% had resistant ALL, and 93.2% achieved morphological complete remission (CR). Deaths and abandonment in first CR occurred in 2.7% and in 7.0% of patients, respectively. The relapse rate at a median observation time of 2.1 years was 15.0%. At 3 years, the event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS), with abandonment considered as an event, were 59.4% (SE 1.7) and 68.2% (SE 1.6). Three-year EFS was 68.5% (SE 3.0), 62.1% (SE 2.6), and 47.8% (SE 3.2) for SR, IR, and HR groups. Adolescents had a significantly higher relapse rate (P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This experience shows that common international studies are feasible in lower-middle income countries. Toxic deaths, abandonment of treatment, and relapses remain major obstacles to the successful treatment. Alternative treatment strategies may be beneficial.


Assuntos
Países em Desenvolvimento , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/terapia , Segunda Neoplasia Primária/terapia , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras/terapia , Suspensão de Tratamento/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , América Central , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Terapia Combinada , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Imunofenotipagem , Renda , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/etiologia , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/mortalidade , Segunda Neoplasia Primária/etiologia , Segunda Neoplasia Primária/mortalidade , Pobreza , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras/complicações , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras/mortalidade , Prognóstico , Indução de Remissão , Taxa de Sobrevida , Suspensão de Tratamento/economia
3.
Hematol Oncol Clin North Am ; 15(4): 775-87, x, 2001 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11676283

RESUMO

Health care in some developing countries is now at a level that makes programs for care of children with cancer feasible. Examples of successful international programs in this field include twinning programs, nongovernmental assistance organizations, such as the National Children's Cancer Society, and committees of professional organizations, such as the International Society of Pediatric Oncology (SIOP). The international outreach program at St. Jude Children's Research Hospital includes training programs within the hospital, partner sites in 13 countries, a school for Latin American nurses, a distance learning website, and telecommunications programs, which are described in detail. Future programs should be designed to maximize and evaluate impact, report accomplishments and failures, and avoid duplication.


Assuntos
Países em Desenvolvimento , Hematologia/organização & administração , Cooperação Internacional , Oncologia/organização & administração , Neoplasias/terapia , Pediatria/organização & administração , Adolescente , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Educação em Enfermagem/organização & administração , Fundações/organização & administração , Hospitais Privados , Humanos , Lactente , América Latina , Neoplasias/epidemiologia , Organizações , Sociedades de Enfermagem/organização & administração , Telecomunicações
5.
N Engl J Med ; 336(25): 1781-7, 1997 Jun 19.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9187068

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor PO1 CA-20180ilgrastim) hastens the recovery from neutropenia after P30 CA-21765emotherapy, but its role in the management of childhood leukemia is unclear. METHODS: We randomly assigned 164 patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (age range, 2 months to 17 years) to receive placebo or G-CSF (10 microg per kilogram of body weight per day subcutaneously), beginning one day after the completion of remission-induction therapy and continuing until the neutrophil count was greater than or equal to 1000 per cubic millimeter for two days. The clinical and laboratory effects of this therapy were documented for 21 days. The area under the plasma G-CSF concentration-time curve was measured on days 1 and 7 in both groups. RESULTS: Responses to the growth factor could be assessed in 148 patients (73 in the G-CSF group and 75 in the placebo group). G-CSF treatment did not significantly lower the rate of hospitalization for febrile neutropenia (58 percent in the G-CSF group vs. 68 percent in the placebo group; relative risk, 0.85; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.59 to 1.16), increase the likelihood of event-free survival at three years (83 percent in both groups), or decrease the number of severe infections (five in the G-CSF group vs. six in the placebo group). Patients treated with G-CSF had shorter median hospital stays (6 days vs. 10 days, P=0.011) and fewer documented infections (12 vs. 27, P=0.009). The median total costs of supportive care were similar in the G-CSF and placebo groups ($8,768 and $8,616, respectively). Among patients who did not have febrile neutropenia during the first week of G-CSF or placebo injections, higher systemic exposure to the growth factor on day 7 was significantly related to a lower probability of subsequent hospitalization (P=0.049). CONCLUSIONS: G-CSF treatment had some clinical benefit in children who received induction chemotherapy for acute lymphoblastic leukemia, but it did not reduce the rate of hospitalization for febrile neutropenia, prolong survival, or reduce the cost of supportive care.


Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Fator Estimulador de Colônias de Granulócitos/uso terapêutico , Neutropenia/prevenção & controle , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras/terapia , Adolescente , Área Sob a Curva , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Custos e Análise de Custo , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Febre/induzido quimicamente , Febre/prevenção & controle , Filgrastim , Fator Estimulador de Colônias de Granulócitos/sangue , Fator Estimulador de Colônias de Granulócitos/economia , Hospitalização , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Neutropenia/induzido quimicamente , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras/tratamento farmacológico , Proteínas Recombinantes , Indução de Remissão
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA