Assessment of programmed death-ligand 1 expression in primary tumors and paired lymph node metastases of gastric adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Anti-programmed death-1/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-1/PD-L1) immunotherapy has demonstrated promising results on gastric cancer (GC). However, PD-L1 can express differently between metastatic sites and primary tumors (PT). AIM: To compare PD-L1 status in PT and matched lymph node metastases (LNM) of GC patients and to determine the correlation between the PD-L1 status and clinicopathological characteristics. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 284 GC patients who underwent D2-gastrectomy. PD-L1 was evaluated by immunohistochemistry (clone SP142) using the combined positive score. All PD-L1+ PT staged as pN+ were also tested for PD-L1 expression in their LNM. PD-L1(-) GC with pN+ served as the comparison group. RESULTS: Among 284 GC patients included, 45 had PD-L1+ PT and 24 of them had pN+. For comparison, 44 PD-L1(-) cases with pN+ were included (sample loss of 4 cases). Of the PD-L1+ PT, 54.2% (13/24 cases) were also PD-L1+ in the LNM. Regarding PD-L1(-) PT, 9.1% (4/44) had PD-L1+ in the LNM. The agreement between PT and LNM had a kappa value of 0.483. Larger tumor size and moderate/severe peritumoral inflammatory response were associated with PD-L1 positivity in both sites. There was no statistical difference in overall survival for PT and LNM according to the PD-L1 status (P = 0.166 and P = 0.837, respectively). CONCLUSION: Intra-patient heterogeneity in PD-L1 expression was observed between the PT and matched LNM. This disagreement in PD-L1 status may emphasize the importance of considering different tumor sites for analyses to select patients for immunotherapy.

Effect of age on resting energy expenditure in patients with cancer.

OBJECTIVE: Because older patients with cancer are at high risk for developing malnutrition, it is critical to understand their energy needs and to feed them appropriately. The aim of this study was to determine whether there are differences in resting energy expenditure between younger and older adults with cancer and in various age groups of older patients. METHODS: This retrospective, observational, and descriptive study from a single center included adult (≥18 to <60 y) and older (≥60 y) outpatients with gastrointestinal tract and head and neck cancers. According to the World Health Organization classification for adults and Pan American Health Organization for older individuals, nutritional status was estimated using body mass index. Nutritional risk screening was used to assess the nutritional risk and Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment for those at risk. Resting energy expenditure (REE) was measured by indirect calorimetry coupled to a gas exchange canopy. Bodystat and Quadscan 4000 multifrequency electrical bioimpedance devices were used to assess body composition at four frequencies (5, 50, 100, and 200 kHz). RESULTS: The study included 326 patients of whom 197 were older (60.4%), 244 were men (74.8%), 197 had gastric cancer (60.4%), and 129 had head and neck cancer (39.6%). Most patients had advanced cancer (stages III and IV) and had not undergone cancer treatment in the previous 3 mo. Compared with the younger adults, patients ≥60 y had a higher rate of malnutrition (88.4 versus 54.3%; P < 0.001), a higher percentage of fat-free mass deficit (88.3 versus 74.4%; P < 0.001), and higher percentage of fat mass (91.4 versus 58.9% adult; P < 0.001). The REE of older patients (1263.3 [234.1] kcal/d) was lower than that of patients ≥18 to <60 y (1382.5 [210.5] kcal/d; P < 0.001), for women (1055.2 kcal/d for the older adults versus 1214.3 kcal/d for younger adults), and men (1337.9 versus 1433 kcal/d; P = 0.001). The REE comparison categorized by decades has shown that for patients <60 y, an REE greater than those for individuals 60 to 69 y, 70 to 79 y, and ≥80 y (P < 0.001). REE in patients 60 to 69 y was greater than for those ≥80 y (P < 0.001). When compared with the Harris-Benedict formula, the REE intraclass correlation coefficient for all older patients was 0.514 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.064-0.736); for ages 60 to 69 y it was 0.527 (95% CI, 0.126-0.733), and for ages >70 y, it was 0.466 (95% CI, -0.080 to -0.756). CONCLUSION: Measured REE in patients with cancer decreases with age. This finding is critical for appropriate caloric provision for older patients with cancer.

Laparoscopic vs open colorectal surgery: Economic and clinical outcomes in the Brazilian healthcare.

Laparoscopic surgery has become the preferred surgical approach of several colorectal conditions. However, the economic results of this are quite controversial. The degree of adoption of laparoscopic technology, as well as the aptitude of the surgeons, can have an influence not only in the clinical outcomes but also in the total procedure cost. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical and economic outcomes of laparoscopic colorectal surgeries, compared to open procedures in Brazil.All patients who underwent elective colorectal surgeries between January 2012 and December 2013 were eligible to the retrospective cohort. The considered follow-up period was within 30 days from the index procedure. The outcomes evaluated were the length of stay, blood transfusion, intensive care unit admission, in-hospital mortality, use of antibiotics, the development of anastomotic leakage, readmission, and the total hospital costs including re-admissions.Two hundred eighty patients, who met the eligibility criteria, were included in the analysis. Patients in the laparoscopic group had a shorter length of stay in comparison with the open group (6.02 ±â€Š3.86 vs 9.86 ±â€Š16.27, P < .001). There were no significant differences in other clinical outcomes between the 2 groups. The total costs were similar between the 2 groups, in the multivariate analysis (generalized linear model ratio of means 1.20, P = .074). The cost predictors were the cancer diagnosis and age.Laparoscopic colorectal surgery presents a 17% decrease in the duration of the hospital stay without increasing the total hospitalization costs. The factors associated with increased hospital costs were age and the diagnosis of cancer.

Safety and costs analysis of early hospital discharge after brain tumour surgery: a pilot study.

BACKGROUND: A daily algorithm for hospital discharge (DAHD) is a key point in the concept of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol. We aimed to evaluate the length of stay (LOS), rate of complications, and hospital costs variances after the introduction of the DAHD compared to the traditional postoperative management of brain tumour patients. METHODS: This is a cohort study with partial retrospective data collection. All consecutive patients who underwent brain tumour resection in 2017 were analysed. Demographics and procedure-related variables, as well as clinical outcomes, LOS and healthcare costs within 30 days after surgery were compared in patients before/pre-implementation and after/post-implementation the DAHD, which included: stable neurological examination; oral feeding without aspiration risk; pain control with oral medications; no intravenous medications. The algorithm was applied every morning and discharge was considered from day 1 after surgery if criteria was fulfilled. The primary outcome (LOS after surgery) analysis was adjusted for the preoperative performance status on a multivariable logistic regression model. RESULTS: A total of 61 patients were studied (pre-implementation 32, post-implementation 29). The baseline demographic characteristics were similar between the groups. After the DAHD implementation, LOS decreased significantly (median 5 versus 3 days; p = 0.001) and the proportion of patients who were discharged on day 1 or 2 after surgery increased (44.8% vs 3.1%; p < 0.001). Major and minor complications rates, readmission rate, and unplanned return to hospital in 30-day follow-up were comparable between the groups. There was a significant reduction in the median costs of hospitalization in DAHD group (US$2135 vs US$2765, p = 0.043), mainly due to a reduction in median ward costs (US$922 vs US$1623, p = 0.009). CONCLUSIONS: Early discharge after brain tumour surgery appears to be safe and inexpensive. The LOS and hospitalization costs were reduced without increasing readmission rate or postoperative complications.

The Clinical and Economic Burden of Colorectal Anastomotic Leaks: Middle-Income Country Perspective.

PURPOSE: Anastomotic leaks (AL) present a significant source of clinical and economic burden on patients undergoing colorectal surgeries. This study was aimed at evaluating the clinical and economic consequences of AL and its risk factors. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted between 2012 and 2013 based on the billing information of 337 patients who underwent low anterior resection (LAR). The outcomes evaluated were the development of AL, use of antibiotics, 30-day readmission and mortality, and total hospital costs, including readmissions and length of stay (LOS). The risk factors for AL, as well as the relationship between AL and clinical outcomes, were analyzed using multivariable Poisson regression. Generalized linear models (GLM) were employed to evaluate the association between AL and continuous outcomes (LOS and costs). RESULTS: AL was detected in 6.8% of the patients. Emergency surgery (aRR 2.56; 95% CI: 1.15-5.71, p = 0.021), blood transfusion (aRR 4.44; 95% CI: 1.86-10.64, p = 0.001), and cancer diagnosis (aRR 2.51; 95% CI: 1.27-4.98, p = 0.008) were found to be independent predictors of AL. Patients with AL showed higher antibiotic usage (aRR 1.69; 95% CI: 1.37-2.09, p < 0.001), 30-day readmission (aRR 3.34; 95% CI: 1.53-7.32, p = 0.003) and mortality (aRR 13.49; 95% CI: 4.10-44.35, p < 0.001), and longer LOS (39.6 days, as opposed to 7.5 days for patients without AL, p < 0.001). Total hospital costs amounted to R$210,105 for patients with AL in comparison with R$34,270 for patients without AL (p < 0.001). In multivariable GLM, the total hospital costs for AL patients were 4.66 (95% CI: 3.38-6.23, p < 0.001) times higher than those for patients without AL. CONCLUSIONS: AL leads to worse clinical outcomes and increases hospital costs by 4.66 times. The risk factors for AL were found to be emergency surgery, blood transfusion, and cancer diagnosis.

Propensity score matching comparison of laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer in a middle-income country: short-term outcomes and cost analysis.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer is associated with improved postoperative outcomes compared to open surgery; however, economic studies have yielded contradictory results. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical and economic outcomes of laparoscopic versus open surgery for patients with rectal cancer. METHODS: Propensity score matching analysis was performed in a retrospective cohort of patients who underwent elective low anterior resection for rectal cancer treatment by laparoscopic and open surgery in a single Brazilian cancer center. Matched covariates included age, gender, body mass index, pTNM stage, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, type of anesthesia, neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, and interval between neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and index surgery. The clinical and economic outcomes were evaluated. The follow-up period was within 30 days of the index procedure. The clinical outcomes were reoperation, postoperative complications, operative time, length of stay in the intensive care unit, and postoperative hospital stay. For economic outcomes, a cost analysis was used to compare the costs. RESULTS: Initially, 220 patients were evaluated. After propensity score matching, 100 patients were included in the analysis (50 patients in the open surgery group and 50 patients in the laparoscopic surgery group). There were no differences in patients' baseline characteristics. Operative time was longer for laparoscopic surgery (247 minutes vs 285 minutes, P=0.006). There were no significant differences in other clinical outcomes. The hospital costs were similar between the two groups (Brazilian reais 21,233.15 vs Brazilian reais 21,529.28, P=0.115), although the intraoperative costs were higher for laparoscopic surgery, mainly owing to the surgical devices and the theater-related costs. The postoperative costs were lower for laparoscopic surgery, owing to lower intensive care unit, ward, and reoperation costs. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer is not costlier than open surgery from the health care provider's perspective, since the intraoperative costs were offset by lower postoperative costs. Open surgery tends to have a longer length of stay.

Risk assessment of lymph node metastases in early gastric adenocarcinoma fulfilling expanded endoscopic resection criteria.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Early gastric cancer (EGC) is known to present a low rate of lymph node metastases (LNMs). Gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy is usually curative for EGC. Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a well-accepted treatment modality for lesions that meet the classic criteria: those mucosal differentiated adenocarcinoma measuring 20 mm or less, without ulceration. Expanded criteria for ESD have been proposed based on a null LNM rate from large gastrectomy series from Japan. Patients with LNM have been reported in Western centers, heightening the need for validation of expanded criteria. Our aim was to assess the risk of LNM in gastrectomy specimens of patients with EGC who met the expanded criteria for ESD. METHODS: We conducted an evaluation of gastrectomy specimens including LNM staging of patients submitted to gastrectomy for EGC in a 39-year retrospective cohort. RESULTS: A total of 389 surgical specimens were included. From them, 135 fulfilled criteria for endoscopic resection. None of the 31 patients with classic criteria had LNM. From the 104 patients with expanded criteria, 3 had LNM (n = 104 [2.9%], 95% confidence interval, .7%-8.6%), all of them with undifferentiated tumors without ulceration, measuring less than 20 mm. CONCLUSIONS: There is a small risk of LNM in EGC when expanded criteria for ESD are met. Refinement of the expanded criteria for the risk of LNM may be desirable in a Brazilian cohort. Meanwhile, the decision to complement the endoscopic treatment with gastrectomy will have to take into consideration the individual risk of perioperative morbidity and mortality.

Integrated care pathway for rectal cancer treatment: health care resource utilization, costs, and outcomes.

AIM: Managed Flow C20 (MFC20) is an integrated care pathway (ICP) for rectal cancer implemented at a public teaching hospital. This study aims to quantify resource utilization and estimate direct costs and outcomes associated with the use of this ICP. METHODS: We evaluated consecutive rectal cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) followed by surgery, comparing the period before the ICP implementation (Pre-MFC20 group) and after (MFC20 group). We assessed times between treatment steps and quantified the resources utilized, as well as their costs. RESULTS: There were 112 patients in the Pre-MFC20 group and 218 in the MFC20 group. The mean treatment intervals were significantly shorter in the MFC20 group - from the first medical consultation to nCRT (48.3 vs. 87.5 days; P < 0.001); and from nCRT to surgery (14.8 vs. 23.0 weeks; P < 0.001) - as was the mean total treatment time (192.0 vs. 290.2 days; P < 0.001). Oncology consultations, computed tomography, MRI, and radiotherapy sessions were utilized more frequently in the Pre-MFC20 group (P < 0.001). The median per-patient cost was US$11 180.92 in the Pre-MFC20 group, compared with US$10 412.88 in the MFC20 group (P = 0.125). Daily hospital charges and consultations were the major determinants of the total cost of the treatment. There was no statistical difference in overall survival in the time periods examined. CONCLUSION:: Implementation of a rectal cancer ICP reduced all treatment intervals and promoted rational utilization of oncology consultations and imaging, without increment in per-patient costs or detrimental effects in overall survival.