Ongoing risk of bladder cancer among former workers at the last benzidine manufacturing facility in the USA.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether there is an ongoing risk of developing bladder cancer in a previously studied cohort of workers exposed to both benzidine and dichlorobenzidine or dichlorobenzidine only in the last benzidine manufacturing plant in the USA. METHODS: Workers (n=488) were identified from the quarterly 941 forms the employer was required to submit to the Social Security Administration from 1960 to 1977. Exposures were assigned based on dates worked and known benzidine/dichlorobenzidine production schedules. Incidence, vital status and cause of death were determined through 2014. Analyses were restricted to white men. RESULTS: Bladder cancer incidence and mortality were significantly increased (25 incident cases, standardised incidence ratio (SIR) 2.19, 95% CI 1.42 to 3.23, and 5 deaths, standardised mortality ratio (SMR) 3.79, 95% CI 1.23 to 8.84). There were significant increases in incidence and mortality in those exposed to both benzidine and dichlorobenzidine (SIR 3.11, 95% CI 1.97 to 4.67, SMR 4.10, 95% CI 1.12 to 10.50), but not among workers exposed to dichlorobenzidine only (two incident cases, SIR 0.89, 95% CI 0.11 to 3.23 and one death, SMR 2.90, 95% CI 0.07 to 16.15). Bladder cancer incidence and mortality were increased in individuals with >20 years since last exposure with >5 years worked (six observed, SIR 5.94, 95% CI 2.18 to 12.92 and two deaths, SMR 7.93, 95% CI 0.96 to 28.65). CONCLUSIONS: Incidence and mortality due to bladder cancer increased among workers exposed to benzidine but not among workers exposed only to dichlorobenzidine. The risk of incidence and death from bladder cancer remain elevated more than 20 years after last exposure to benzidine in those who worked >5 years.

Managers' perceptions of the value and impact of HAZWOPER worker health and safety training.

BACKGROUND: Worker training is a core component of the OSHA Hazardous Waste Operations and Emergency Response (HAZWOPER) standard, but few studies have considered what motivates managers to provide HAZWOPER training to employees or what they value in that training. METHODS: In 2012, four university-based programs conducted an exploratory survey of managers who sent employees to HAZWOPER courses. Results from 109 respondents were analyzed. RESULTS: Forty-two percent of respondents cited regulations as the most important reason to provide HAZWOPER training; many indicated they would provide less training if there were no standard in place. Three-quarters (74%) reported training had improved workplace conditions. Fewer than half said they were likely to involve trained employees in aspects of the organization's H&S program. DISCUSSION: Compliance with regulatory requirements is an important factor shaping managers' training delivery decisions. Managers recognize positive impacts of training. These impacts could be enhanced by further leveraging employee H&S knowledge and skills.

Exposure assessment for endocrine disruptors: some considerations in the design of studies.

In studies designed to evaluate exposure-response relationships in children's development from conception through puberty, multiple factors that affect the generation of meaningful exposure metrics must be considered. These factors include multiple routes of exposure; the timing, frequency, and duration of exposure; need for qualitative and quantitative data; sample collection and storage protocols; and the selection and documentation of analytic methods. The methods for exposure data collection and analysis must be sufficiently robust to accommodate the a priori hypotheses to be tested, as well as hypotheses generated from the data. A number of issues that must be considered in study design are summarized here.

Application of a method to evaluate the quality of work histories and document the exposure assessment process.

BACKGROUND: Review of work history records by industrial hygienists is an important component of many occupational epidemiologic studies. A number of factors may influence the hygienist, such as the quality of the data and his or her previous experience. As part of a case-control study of mesothelioma, a system was developed to capture data on several factors that can be considered in a review of work history information. METHODS: The overall quality of the work history record was described by noting the completeness and the consistency of the information; for any potential exposures, the reviewer experience on which the decision was based and the relative quality of the information were categorized. Because of the potential for mesothelioma cases and their next-of-kin to have undergone rigorous questioning about previous asbestos exposure an evaluation of the knowledge of the respondent was included. The frequency and intensity of exposure were also evaluated. RESULTS: Evaluation of 3,444 work records is described. The importance of data completeness in the overall evaluation of quality is shown; follow-up questions regarding specific work tasks provide information not elicited in the standard interview process. The use of the literature was an important resource to the reviewer. Asbestos was reported by the respondent as an exposure on 149 work records; of these, 111 (74%) were judged to represent an unusual level of knowledge for a next-of-kin respondent. CONCLUSIONS: The approach presented allows capture of information about data quality and experience of the reviewer in an epidemiologic analysis. The ratings of frequency and intensity of exposure allow exploration of differences in exposure-response analyses using various exposure metrics.