Decision tree for laparoscopic partial nephrectomy versus laparoscopic renal cryoablation for small renal masses.

PURPOSE: We propose an algorithm to help guide surgeons' decisions between laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) and renal laparoscopic cryoablation (LCA) based on preoperative parameters and outcomes defined in the literature. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From July 2004 to December of 2007, we performed 51 LPNs and 22 LCAs. We formulated an algorithm between LPN and LCA based on outcomes from published series. Candidates for LPN are younger than 70 years; have few comorbidities; masses < or = 7 cm; and solitary, solid, and or cystic masses with an exophytic or mesophytic location. Candidates for LCA are 70 years old or older, with multiple comorbidities, masses < or = 3.5 cm, multiple masses, solid masses only, and include endophytic or hilar tumors. We then applied this decision tree to our series. RESULTS: Our results for LPN are statistically similar to the published series except there was a higher positive margin rate in our series (11.8 v 3.5%). Our LCA series had older patients (71 v 65 y), larger masses (3.2 v 2.5 cm), and a higher rate of bleeding necessitating transfusion (18%). We applied the algorithm to all 73 patients in our series. It estimated that 45 patients should undergo LPN and 28 should undergo LCA. A correlation between the predicted surgery and the surgery performed was seen, but approximately one in five patients would have a change in the surgery performed. CONCLUSIONS: This algorithm validates decisions surgeons are already making between LPN and LCA. While not a perfect model, it can be used to help simplify decisions between these two minimally invasive procedures to achieve optimal outcomes.

Sacral neuromodulation: cost considerations and clinical benefits.

OBJECTIVES: To demonstrate the efficacy of sacral neuromodulation and compare voiding-related health care utilization costs before and after receiving an implant. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients receiving InterStim therapy (Medtronic Neurological, Minneapolis, Minn) was completed. Health care utilization was determined for the year before and the year after implantation, and included hospital and clinic visits, diagnostic and therapeutic procedures, and prescriptions. Utilization costs were derived from Medicare CPT coding and reimbursement data. Drug costs were derived from the actual pharmacy costs. Efficacy was assessed subjectively by patient-reported questionnaire and objectively by voiding diary, pad usage, and number of catheterizations. RESULTS: Sixty-five patients received InterStim therapy. Outpatient visits for urinary symptoms decreased in the 12 months after implantation with a mean decrease of 2.2 visits (P <0.0001). This resulted in a 73% reduction in average yearly office visit expenses from $994 to $265 per patient. After implant, diagnostic and therapeutic procedures performed decreased by 0.97 (P <0.0001). This translated into a decrease in the cost of therapeutic and diagnostic procedures from $733 to $59 per patient (P <0.0001). Drug costs were significantly decreased (P <0.02) from $693 to $483 per patient. These cost savings represent a 92% reduction in outpatient doctor visits and diagnostic and procedure costs along with and a 30% reduction in drug expenditures. CONCLUSION: After InterStim therapy, voiding-related health care costs are reduced. InterStim therapy is an effective treatment option with high patient satisfaction for medically refractory voiding dysfunction.