Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
Int Urol Nephrol ; 49(5): 753-761, 2017 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28197765

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the outcome and the costs of stenting in uncomplicated semirigid ureteroscopic stone removal. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A decision tree model was created to evaluate the economic impact of routine stenting versus non-stenting strategies in uncomplicated ureteroscopy (URS). Probabilities of complications were extracted from twelve randomized controlled trials. Stone removal costs, costs for complication management, and total costs were calculated using Treeage Pro (TreeAge Pro Healthcare version 2015, Software, Inc, Williamstown Massachusetts, USA). RESULTS: Stone removal costs were higher in stented URS (€1512.25 vs. €1681.21, respectively). Complication management costs were higher in non-stented procedures. Both for complications treated conservatively (€189.43 vs. €109.67) and surgically (€49.26 vs. €24.83). When stone removal costs, costs for stent removal, and costs for complication management were considered, uncomplicated URS with stent placement yielded an overall cost per patient of €1889.15 compared to €1750.94 without stent placement. The incremental costs of stented URS were €138.25 per procedure. CONCLUSION: Semirigid URS with stent placement leads to higher direct procedural costs. Costs for managing URS-related complications are higher in non-stented procedures. Overall, a standard strategy of deferring routine stenting uncomplicated ureteroscopic stone removal is more cost efficient.


Assuntos
Custos e Análise de Custo , Litotripsia/economia , Cálculos Ureterais/terapia , Ureteroscopia/economia , Feminino , Humanos , Litotripsia/métodos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Stents/economia , Cálculos Ureterais/diagnóstico , Ureteroscopia/métodos
2.
Minerva Urol Nefrol ; 68(5): 417-23, 2016 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26329755

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to prospectively assess women's pain during rigid and flexible diagnostic cystoscopy and afterwards during a one-week follow-up. METHODS: Prospective, multi-institutional trial analyzing numeric rating scales (NRS) of women undergoing diagnostic cystoscopy. Pain categories: no (0 points), mild (1-3), moderate (4-6) and severe pain (7-10). Assessing of pain before, during cystoscopy, and at day 1, 4 and 7 of follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 150 women undergoing rigid (N.=85) or flexible (N.=65) diagnostic cystoscopy were analyzed. Women undergoing flexible cystoscopy were more frequently pain-free (64.6% vs. 40%, P=0.003) and experienced mild pain less frequently (27.7% vs. 52.9% vs. P=0.002). No significant differences were noted among moderate (6.2% vs. 5.9%, P=0.95) and severe pain (1.5% vs. 1.2%, P=0.85). Patients undergoing their first (P=0.14) and repeat cystoscopy (P=0.08) had similar pain perception. In multivariate logistic regression analyses, women undergoing flexible cystoscopy had a 2.6 increased chance of being pain-free (OR=2.6, CI: 1.28-5.11, P=0.08) and their odds of experiencing mild pain were significantly lower (OR=0.34, CI: 0.17-0.71, P=0.004). The likelihood of experiencing moderate (OR=1.1, CI: 0.28- 4.4, P=0.83) or severe pain (OR=2.42, CI: 0.11-51.79, P=0.57) differed insignificantly. CONCLUSIONS: Rigid and flexible cystoscopies were well-tolerated by most women. However, flexible cystoscopy was associated with a higher likelihood of being pain-free and lower chances of experiencing mild pain. Patients' previous experience with cystoscopy did not influence pain perception.


Assuntos
Cistoscopia/efeitos adversos , Medição da Dor , Dor/etiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Adulto Jovem
3.
Clin Drug Investig ; 33(10): 737-42, 2013 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23921624

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Bladder pain syndrome/interstitial cystitis (BPS/IC) is a chronic disease with a significant impact on quality of life. A broad range of therapies are used to treat this condition, and patients are often excluded from receiving more expensive and more effective therapies because of cost issues. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess the mid- and long-term costs (over 1, 5 and 10 years) of various therapies for BPS/IC. METHODS: Costs in an open-access health system (Austria) for three BPS/IC-specific therapies (intravesical hyaluronan, pentosanpolysulfate and amitriptyline), taken from the American Urological Association guidelines, were evaluated and compared with those of non-specific symptomatic therapies. Response rates for the different therapies were taken from peer-reviewed publications and used to define the need for therapy maintenance with regard to symptom improvement. RESULTS: Despite the highest initial costs, the reduced need for further therapy in patients with long-term symptom remission after hyaluronan therapy resulted in the lowest total treatment costs at all three timepoints. Hyaluronan was cost saving against all alternatives in standard assumptions and in all sensitivity analyses. As a limitation, treatment costs in this study are specific for Austria. However, the template used for calculation of treatment costs can be transferred to all countries by inserting local prices. CONCLUSION: Disease-specific therapies with high remission rates result in significantly lower long-term costs in BPS/IC. Non-specific symptomatic therapies are most expensive. Long-term cost effectiveness is crucial in the treatment of chronic diseases to limit expenses in individual healthcare systems.


Assuntos
Amitriptilina/economia , Cistite Intersticial/tratamento farmacológico , Cistite Intersticial/economia , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Ácido Hialurônico/economia , Poliéster Sulfúrico de Pentosana/economia , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Amitriptilina/uso terapêutico , Áustria/epidemiologia , Cistite Intersticial/epidemiologia , Farmacoeconomia/tendências , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/tendências , Humanos , Ácido Hialurônico/uso terapêutico , Poliéster Sulfúrico de Pentosana/uso terapêutico , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto/normas
4.
Scand J Urol ; 47(2): 101-7, 2013 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22783914

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the psychological distress of men with prostate cancer (PC) throughout the whole process from initial diagnosis to therapy and to evaluate patients' tolerance regarding treatment delay. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This prospective study, performed between July 2007 and March 2010, evaluated the psychological distress of 28 men who underwent prostate biopsy (PB), who were confronted with a cancer diagnosis and were about to undergo radical prostatectomy (RP). Three evaluation points were defined: E1, immediately before PB; E2, after definitive diagnosis and when RP was scheduled; and E3, on the day of admission for RP. RESULTS: Emotional distress was highest before PB, declining significantly until RP (p = 0.02). Symptoms of depression and anxiety were low at all evaluation points, with anxiety rising significantly after cancer diagnosis (p = 0.008). Concerns about postoperative erectile dysfunction and incontinence were registered at all evaluation points. Concerns about the effect on their partnership due to PC were low. The patient's tolerable waiting time for RP differed significantly from daily practice. CONCLUSIONS: Anxiety and depression as well as concerns about a negative effect on their partnership were shown to play a minor role in patients during the interval between PB and RP, while distress and concerns about erectile dysfunction and urinary incontinence were more prevalent. Support from the patient's medical and social environment and a sound partnership may have a protective effect on emotional status. Waiting time for surgery exceeded the patients' tolerated time-frames and may further contribute to the psychological distress of PC.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Próstata/complicações , Qualidade de Vida , Medição de Risco/métodos , Estresse Psicológico/epidemiologia , Idoso , Áustria/epidemiologia , Biópsia , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias da Próstata/diagnóstico , Neoplasias da Próstata/psicologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estresse Psicológico/etiologia , Estresse Psicológico/psicologia , Inquéritos e Questionários
5.
J Urol ; 170(3): 807-9, 2003 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12913704

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Increased urothelial permeability has been proposed as a cause of interstitial cystitis (IC). The potassium sensitivity test assesses bladder discomfort after instillation of 0.4 M KCl for identification of increased urothelial permeability. Since exposure to 0.4 M KCl may be extremely painful for patients with IC we investigated a less traumatic alternative. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study comprised 38 controls and 40 patients with IC. In all subjects cystometry was performed with 0.9% NaCl followed by 0.2 M KCl, and filling volume at first urge and maximum bladder capacity (Cmax) were assessed for both solutions. RESULTS: Controls did not show a significant change in Cmax. KCl decreased Cmax in 37 of 40 (92%) patients with IC with a mean decrease of 30%. The examination was painless in all controls and in 33 of 40 (82%) patients with IC, and was moderately painful in 7. CONCLUSIONS: For demonstration of increased potassium sensitivity and diagnosis of IC, comparative assessment of Cmax is a well tolerated alternative to the 0.4 M potassium sensitivity test. Statistical evaluation of these results suggests that a decrease in Cmax greater than 30% is indicative of IC.


Assuntos
Cistite Intersticial/diagnóstico , Cloreto de Potássio , Cloreto de Sódio , Bexiga Urinária/fisiopatologia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Sensibilidade e Especificidade
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA