Implication of dental insurance status on patterns of pre-radiation dental extraction and risk of osteoradionecrosis of the jaw in head-and-neck cancer patients.

Oral toxicities such as osteoradionecrosis can be minimized by dental screening and prophylactic dental care prior to head and neck (HN) radiation therapy (RT). However, limited information is available about how dental insurance interacts with prophylactic dental care and osteoradionecrosis. To address this gap in knowledge, we conducted a cohort study of 2743 consecutive adult patients treated with curative radiation for HN malignancy who underwent pre-radiation dental assessment and where required, prophylactic dental treatment. Charts were reviewed to determine patient demographics, dental findings, dental treatment and development of osteoradionecrosis following radiation. Three insurance cohorts were identified: private-insured (50.4 %), public-insured (7.3 %), being patients with coverage through government-funded disability and welfare programs, and self-pay (42.4 %). More than half the public-insured patients underwent prophylactic pre-radiation dental extractions, followed by self-pay patients (44 %) and private-insured patients (26.6 %). After a median follow-up time of 4.23 years, 6.5 % of patients developed osteoradionecrosis. The actuarial rate of osteoradionecrosis in the public-insured patients was 14.7 % at 5-years post-RT, compared to 7.5 % in private-insured patients and 6.7 % in self-pay patients. On multivariable analysis, dental insurance status, DMFS160, age at diagnosis, sex, tumor site, nodal involvement, years smoked and gross income were all significant risk factors for tooth removal prior to HN radiation. However, only public-insured status, tumor site and years smoked were significant risk factors for development of osteoradionecrosis. Our findings demonstrate that lack of comprehensive dental coverage (patients who self-pay or who have limited coverage under public-insured programs) associates strongly with having teeth removed prior to HN RT. Nearly 1 in 6 patients covered under public-insurance developed osteoradionecrosis within 5 years of completing their treatment. Well-funded dental insurance programs for HN cancer patients might reduce the number of pre-RT extractions performed in these patients, improving quality of life post-RT.

Individualized risk assessment of distant metastases in oral cavity carcinoma: a validated predictive-score model.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to develop and validate a risk-scoring system for distant metastases (DMs) in oral cavity carcinoma (OCC). METHODS: Patients with OCC who were treated at 4 tertiary cancer institutions with curative surgery with or without postoperative radiation/chemoradiation therapy were randomly assigned to discovery or validation cohorts (3:2 ratio). Cases were staged on the basis of tumor, node, and metastasis staging according to the eighth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer/Union for International Cancer Control guidelines. Predictors of DMs on multivariable analysis in the discovery cohort were used to develop a risk-score model and classify patients into risk groups. The utility of the risk classification was evaluated in the validation cohort. RESULTS: Overall, 2749 patients were analyzed. Predictors (risk score coefficient) of DMs in the discovery cohort were the following: pathological stage (p)T3-4 (0.4), pN+ (N1: 0.8; N2: 1.0; N3: 1.5), histologic grade (G) 3 (G3, 0.7), and lymphovascular invasion (0.4). The DM risk groups were defined by the sum of the following risk score coefficients: high (>1.7), intermediate (0.7-1.7), and standard risk (<0.7). The 5-year DM rates (high/intermediate/standard risk groups) were 30%/15%/4% in the discovery cohort (C-index = 0.79) and 35%/16%/5% in the validation cohort, respectively (C-index = 0.77; both P < .001). In the whole cohort, this predictive model showed excellent discriminative ability in predicting DMs without locoregional failure (29%/11%/1%), later (>2 year) DMs (11%/4%/2%), and DMs in patients treated with surgery (20%/12%/5%), postoperative radiation therapy (34%/17%/4%), and postoperative chemoradiation therapy (39%/18%/7%) (all P < .001). The 5-year overall survival rates in the overall cohort were 25%/51%/67% (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients at higher risk for DMs were identified by use of a predictive-score model for DMs that included pT3-4, pN1/2/3, G3, and lymphovascular invasion. Identified patients may be evaluated for individualized risk-adaptive treatment escalation and/or surveillance strategies.

Employment Outcomes for Canadian Radiation Oncology Graduates: 2020 Assessment and Longitudinal Trends.

Purpose: Canadian radiation oncology (RO) trainees have experienced employment challenges after residency training. The present study was conducted to evaluate current employment trends and perform comparisons to prior reported assessments. Methods and Materials: A survey was administered to all 13 Canadian RO program directors requesting the employment status and location of their graduates during the past 3 years, and their perceptions on graduates' employment challenges. Visa trainees were excluded. Findings were compared with surveys performed in 2014, 2016, and 2018. Results: The response rate from RO program directors was 100%. There were 77 graduates identified who completed their residency training between 2017 and 2020. All had known employment status and location. Two (17%) 2020 graduates, 16 (84%) 2019 graduates, 17 (81%) 2018 graduates, and 24 (100%) 2017 graduates had staff employment. Of the 59 graduates with staff positions, 86% were in Canada. Some graduates (28%) obtained staff or locum employment in a province other than their training program. The proportion of graduates obtaining staff positions 1 year after residency increased to 84% from 46%-48% in prior assessments. Most program directors (62%) did not perceive any difficulties with their graduates finding staff employment or trainees transferring to training programs in other disciplines owing to perceived workforce challenges. Conclusions: Compared with 3 prior employment outcome assessments, this study observed a higher proportion of graduates with staff positions in Canada, fewer total graduates, fewer graduates seeking staff employment or in fellowship positions, and a trend for fewer graduates seeking employment or fellowships abroad. These findings support the view that the Canadian RO job market continues to improve. Although employment challenges for newly certified, Canadian-trained radiation oncologists still exist, national corrective measures to regulate resident intake in 2011 appear to have had a positive effect on the employment outcomes of recent Canadian RO graduates.

Out-of-pocket costs associated with head and neck cancer treatment.

BACKGROUND: Out-of-pocket costs (OOPC) associated with treatment have significant implications on quality of life and survival in cancer patients. Head and neck cancer patients face unique treatment-related challenges, but to date OOPC have been understudied in this population. AIMS: This study aims to identify and measure OOPC for patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) in Ontario. METHODS: HNC patients between 2015 and 2018 at Princess Margaret Cancer Centre in Toronto were recruited. Participants completed OOPC questionnaires and lost income questions during radiation, post-surgery, and 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after completion of treatment. Associations between OOPC and treatment modality and disease site were tested with multivariable hurdle regression. RESULTS: A total of 1545 questionnaires were completed by 657 patients. Median estimated OOPC for the total duration of treatment for participants undergoing chemoradiation was $1452 [$0-14 616], for surgery with adjuvant radiation or chemoradiation (C/RT) was $1626, for radiation therapy alone was $635, and for surgery alone was $360. The major expenses for participants at the mid-treatment time-point was travel (mean $424, standard error of the mean [SEM] $34) and meals, parking, and accommodations (mean $617, SEM $67). In multivariable analysis, chemoradiation, surgery with C/RT, and radiation were associated with significantly higher OOPC than surgery alone during treatment (791% higher, p < .001; 539% higher, p < .001; 370% higher, p < .001 respectively) among patients with non-zero OOPC. Participants with non-zero OOPC in the laryngeal cancer group paid 49% lower OOPC than those with oropharyngeal cancers in adjusted analysis (p = .025). CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing treatment for HNC pay significant OOPC. These costs are highest during treatment and gradually decrease over time. OOPC vary by patient demographics, clinical factors, and, in particular, treatment modality.

Patient and family financial burden associated with cancer treatment in Canada: a national study.

GOAL: To determine patient-reported financial and family burden associated with treatment of cancer in the previous 28 days across Canada. METHODS: A self-administered questionnaire (P-SAFE v7.2.4) was completed by 901 patients with cancer from twenty cancer centres nationally (344 breast, 183 colorectal, 158 lung, 216 prostate) measuring direct and indirect costs related to cancer treatment and foregone care. Monthly self-reported out-of-pocket-costs (OOPCs) included drugs, homecare, homemaking, complementary/ alternative medicines, vitamins/supplements, family care, accommodations, devices, and "other" costs. Travel and parking costs were captured separately. Patients indicated if OOPC, travel, parking, and lost income were a financial burden. RESULTS: Mean 28-day OOPCs were CA$518 (US Purchase Price Parity [PPP] $416), plus CA$179 (US PPP $144) for travel and CA$84 (US PPP $67) for parking. Patients self-reporting high financial burden had total OOPCs (33%), of CA$961 (US PPP $772), while low-burden participants (66%) had OOPCs of CA$300 (US PPP $241). "Worst burden" respondents spent a mean of 50.7% of their monthly income on OOPCs (median 20.8%). Among the 29.4% who took time off work, patients averaged 18.0 days off. Among the 26.0% of patients whose caregivers took time off work, caregivers averaged 11.5 days off. Lastly, 41% of all patients had to reduce spending. Fifty-two per cent of those who reduced spending were families earning < CA$50,000/year. CONCLUSIONS: In our Canadian sample, high levels of financial burden exist for 33% of patients, and the severity of burden is higher for those with lower household incomes.

Needs assessment for a decision support tool in oral cancer requiring major resection and reconstruction: a mixed-methods study protocol.

INTRODUCTION: Advanced oral cancer and its ensuing treatment engenders significant morbidity and mortality. Patients are often elderly with significant comorbidities. Toxicities associated with surgical resection can be devastating and they are often highlighted by patients as impactful. Given the potential for suboptimal oncological and functional outcomes in this vulnerable patient population, promotion and performance of shared decision making (SDM) is crucial.Decision aids (DAs) are useful instruments for facilitating the SDM process by presenting patients with up-to-date evidence regarding risks, benefits and the possible postoperative course. Importantly, DAs also help elicit and clarify patient values and preferences. The use of DAs in cancer treatment has been shown to reduce decisional conflict and increase SDM. No DAs for oral cavity cancer have yet been developed.This study endeavours to answer the question: Is there a patient or surgeon driven need for development and implementation of a DA for adult patients considering major surgery for oral cancer? METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This study is the first step in a multiphase investigation of SDM during major head and neck surgery. It is a multi-institutional convergent parallel mixed-methods needs assessment study. Patients and surgeon dyads will be recruited to complete questionnaires related to their perception of the SDM process (nine-item Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire, SDM-Q-9 and SDM-Q-Doc) and to take part in semistructured interviews. Patients will also complete questionnaires examining decisional self-efficacy (Ottawa Decision Self-Efficacy Scale) and decisional conflict (Decisional Conflict Scale). Questionnaires will be completed at time of recruitment and will be used to assess the current level of SDM, self-efficacy and conflict in this setting. Thematic analysis will be used to analyse transcripts of interviews. Quantitative and qualitative components of the study will be integrated through triangulation, with matrix developed to promote visualisation of the data. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has been approved by the research ethics boards of the Nova Scotia Health Authority (Halifax, Nova Scotia) and the University Health Network (Toronto, Ontario). Dissemination to clinicians will be through traditional approaches and creation of a head and neck cancer SDM website. Dissemination to patients will include a section within the website, patient advocacy groups and postings within clinical environments.

Sexual satisfaction in nasopharyngeal carcinoma survivors: Rates and determinants.

OBJECTIVES: Sexual health problems have been identified as an unmet need in head and neck cancer (HNC) survivors. In particular, little is known about such outcomes in survivors of nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional study of NPC survivors with ≥4y follow-up was undertaken. Sexual satisfaction was assessed using the optional "I am satisfied with my sex life" item of the FACT-H&N. Other patient-reported outcomes measures were also captured including fatigue (FACIT-F), HNC symptom burden (MDASI-HN), emotional distress (HADS) and frontal function (FrSBE). Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine factors influencing sexual satisfaction. RESULTS: The sexual satisfaction item was answered by 85/103 (83%) enrollees. Female (p < 0.001) and non-partnered (p = 0.0045) patients were more likely to abstain from answering. The distribution of responses were: "very much" (26%), "quite a bit" (21%), "somewhat" (20%), "a little bit" (13%) and "not at all" (20%). Sexual satisfaction was associated with multiple patient-reported measures on univariate analysis, including quality of life, fatigue, a priori selected HNC symptoms (pain, taste), emotional distress, frontal lobe function, body image and relationship strength. On multivariate analysis, only relationship strength and emotional distress remained significant. Sociodemographic factors (age, sex, marital status) and other selected orofacial toxicities were not significant. CONCLUSIONS: Nearly half (47%) of our sample reported being in the higher satisfaction range. While reassuring in the context of comparative population level data, a number of factors including toxicity, psychological and social factors were associated with sexual satisfaction responses. Prospective evaluation of this unmet need is required.

Measuring financial toxicity incurred after treatment of head and neck cancer: Development and validation of the Financial Index of Toxicity questionnaire.

BACKGROUND: The treatment of head and neck cancer (HNC) may cause significant financial toxicity to patients. Herein, the authors have presented the development and validation of the Financial Index of Toxicity (FIT) instrument. METHODS: Items were generated using literature review and were based on expert opinion. In item reduction, items with factor loadings of a magnitude <0.3 in exploratory factor analysis and inverse correlations (r < 0) in test-retest analysis were eliminated. Retained items constituted the FIT. Reliability tests included internal consistency (Cronbach α) and test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation). Validity was tested using the Spearman rho by comparing FIT scores with baseline income, posttreatment lost income, and the Financial Concerns subscale of the Social Difficulties Inventory. Responsiveness analysis compared change in income and change in FIT between 12 and 24 months. RESULTS: A total of 14 items were generated and subsequently reduced to 9 items comprising 3 domains identified on exploratory factor analysis: financial stress, financial strain, and lost productivity. The FIT was administered to 430 patients with HNC at 12 to 24 months after treatment. Internal consistency was good (α = .77). Test-retest reliability was satisfactory (intraclass correlation, 0.70). Concurrent validation demonstrated mild to strong correlations between the FIT and Social Difficulties Inventory Money Matters subscale (Spearman rho, 0.26-0.61; P < .05). FIT scores were found to be inversely correlated with baseline household income (Spearman rho, -0.34; P < .001) and positively correlated with lost income (Spearman rho, 0.24; P < .001). Change in income was negatively correlated with change in FIT over time (Spearman rho, -0.25; P = .04). CONCLUSIONS: The 9-item FIT demonstrated internal and test-retest reliability as well as concurrent and construct validity. Prospective testing in patients with HNC who were treated at other facilities is needed to further establish its responsiveness and generalizability.

Patient-Reported Symptoms for Esophageal Cancer Patients Undergoing Curative Intent Treatment.

BACKGROUND: Esophageal cancer (EC) patients experience considerable symptom burden from treatment. This study utilized population-level patient-reported Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) scores collected as part of standard clinical care to describe symptom trajectories and characteristics associated with severe symptoms for patients undergoing curative intent EC treatment. METHODS: EC patients treated with curative intent at regional cancer centers and affiliates between 2009 and 2016 and assessed for symptoms in the 12 months after diagnosis were included. The ESAS measures 9 common patient-reported cancer symptoms. The outcome was report of a severe symptom score (score ≥7 our of 10). Multivariable analyses were used to identify characteristics associated with severe symptom scores. RESULTS: A total of 1751 patients reported a median of 7 (interquartile range, 4-12) ESAS assessments in the year after diagnosis, for a total of 14,953 unique ESAS assessments included in the analysis. The most frequently reported severe symptoms were lack of appetite (n = 918, 52%), tiredness (n = 787, 45%), and poor well-being (n = 713, 41%). The highest symptom burden was within the first 5 months after diagnosis, with moderate improvement in symptom burden in the second half of the first year. Characteristics associated with severe scores for all symptoms included female sex, high comorbidity, lower socioeconomic status, urban residence, and symptom assessment temporally close to diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates a high symptom burden for EC patients undergoing curative intent therapy. Targeted treatment of common severe symptoms and increased support for patients at risk for severe symptoms may enhance patient quality of life.

Head and Neck Cancer Survivorship Care: A Review of the Current Guidelines and Remaining Unmet Needs.

OPINION STATEMENT: A larger proportion of patients with head and neck cancers (HNC) are now surviving, constituting up to 3% of all cancer survivors. This is likely due in part to the increase in HPV-related oropharyngeal cancers affecting younger individuals and with a better prognosis and to the improved outcomes of other HNCs as well over the last two decades. Most studies have previously been focusing on improving risk stratification, treatment and disease-related outcomes. Over the last decade, there has been an evolving interest in the field of survivorship care. Despite the collaborative efforts from a multidisciplinary team in managing cancer and treatment-related side-effects and in improving survivors' overall quality of life (QOL), it has been reported that up to 60-65% of patients have at least one unmet need. The purpose of this article is to review current guidelines for HNC survivorship care and identify areas of unmet need. Over the last 5 years, multiple groups have published guidelines describing survivorship care issues and their possible management. Although a very comprehensive and informative first initiative, multiple issues need to be further evaluated. These include how to best support patients and their partners' fear of cancer recurrence, to provide coordinated care among all physicians, to identify and meet patients' needs in local multidisciplinary teams and to institute measures to ensure every individual's access to high-quality patient-centred care. Furthermore, experts may consider engaging in further dialog with primary care physicians (PCP) to improve sharing of survivorship care. More should be learned about PCPs' comfort levels in providing such care and whether further steps are required to facilitate a seamless. Transition of care and accessibility to specialized care as needed.

Head and Neck Cancer Survivorship: Learning the Needs, Meeting the Needs.

Cancers of the head and neck and the treatments required to control them frequently result in serious and persistent impairments that can affect participation and quality of life. Increased recognition of the needs of cancer survivors and their caregivers has prompted research focused on the unique concerns of this complex group. Unmet needs have been identified among 60-70% of patients and a similar proportion of their partners; impacts can include profound social effects, isolation, and psychiatric conditions. Interprofessional teams, supplementing oncology nursing and physicians with physical rehabilitation, occupational therapy, speech-language pathology, nutrition and psychological disciplines is important to address the spectrum of emotional, cognitive, physical and functional, and pragmatic issues. In addition to investigating modified anti-cancer therapy intended to reduce the frequency of long-term toxicities, supportive care strategies that may be effective include physical activity, nutritional intervention, behavioral and cognitive-behavioral therapy, psycho-education and goal management therapy. This article addresses identified needs across varied domains, the current state of research surrounding them, and their impact on quality of life, while also describing one cancer center's approach to head and neck cancer survivorship.

Informational Needs of Head and Neck Cancer Patients.

The patient journey with head and neck cancer (HNC) is particularly challenging given the physical and functional impact of the cancer and treatment. The ability to perform activities of daily living can be severely compromised and have a profound impact on psychosocial well-being. These complex and long-lasting effects can affect patient quality of life for months to years and the literature shows that information for HNC patients is often insufficient. This observational cross-sectional study utilized survey methodology to investigate the informational needs of HNC patients and the preferred modalities for delivery. This was done to inform the development of resources for HNC patients. Four hundred fifty surveys were analyzed. The median age was 61 years and 58% of the cohort was born in Canada. Most were Caucasian (72%), Chinese being the next largest ethnicity (12%). A third had less than high school education and most had cancer of the oral cavity (28%) and were in long-term follow-up (41%). Comparison of the percentage of items to which a patient responded "very important" across the six domains shows variation of importance by domain (overall mixed effects regression model p < 0.0001). Additionally, each domain was compared to the medical domain and all had significantly lower mean scores (all p < 0.0001) with the medical domain scoring highest (mean score 64.6). The top preferred education modalities were teaching with a healthcare professional and pamphlets. This study highlights the type of information that HNC patients want and the format they wish to receive it in. The design provides a comprehensive way to consult with patients toward building education that responds to their specific needs.

Partner's survivorship care needs: An analysis in head and neck cancer patients.

PURPOSE: To determine the number, type and predictors of unmet needs for head and neck cancer (HNC) survivors' partner's. METHODS: Partners of HNC patients were invited to complete the Cancer Survivors' Partners Unmet Needs Survey (CaSPUN). Analysis determined number, proportion and factors associated with greater unmet needs using linear regression. Agreement between the unmet needs of patients and their partners was determined. RESULTS: Among the 44 partners participated 29 reported ≥1 unmet need and 4 had a very high number of needs (31-35). The most common unmet needs were related to concerns about cancer returning, coping with supporting someone with cancer, and the changes cancer has caused. The highest reported needs were in the Relationships domain. Increasing patient unmet needs was significantly associated with increasing partner unmet needs (p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: A significant proportion of head and neck cancer partners experience unmet needs, which often differ from the patient's needs.

Retrospective assessment of patterns of recurrence relative to radiotherapy volumes for adjuvant conformal chemoradiotherapy in gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: Since the Intergroup 0116 study was published in 2000, adjuvant postoperative chemoradiotherapy using CT-planned and 3D conformal/intensity-modulated radiotherapy has been offered routinely to fit patients with resected gastric cancer at Princess Margaret Hospital .The objective of this study was to analyze patterns of disease recurrence with respect to the radiotherapy volumes. METHODS: For the date and site (local, locoregional, or distant) of the first recurrence, medical records were reviewed for all patients treated at Princess Margaret Hospital with adjuvant chemoradiotherapy for resected gastric adenocarcinoma (January 1, 2000 to November 30, 2009). Patients whose recurrences were limited to local and/or regional sites were selected for further analysis. Available diagnostic imaging of the recurrence site was registered to the original planning radiotherapy dataset for contouring. If necessary to respect changes in anatomy, the contour was translocated on the basis of anatomic descriptors. The center of mass for each recurrence was identified as a point and its location was categorized according to the isodose encompassing it; in field (90 % or more), marginal (50-89 %), or out of field (less than 50 %). RESULTS: Of all 197 patients, 14 (7 %) had isolated locoregional failure, constituting 20 % of all 71 patients with a recurrence. Successful fusions were feasible in five cases. Of these recurrences, four were in field and one was marginal. In a further four cases, visual inspection was used, showing one in-field recurrence, one marginal recurrence, and two out-of-field recurrences. In five patients, either a useable original dataset or diagnostic imaging of the recurrence was not available. CONCLUSIONS: The rates of isolated local/locoregional tumor recurrence in this study were low. Of the small number of recurrences available for analysis, most (five of nine) were in field. Further studies involving a larger cohort of patients might allow a more meaningful analysis of trends in the recurrence site with evolving radiotherapy techniques.

The Added Value of Analyzing Pooled Health-Related Quality of Life Data: A Review of the EORTC PROBE Initiative.

BACKGROUND: The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Patient-Reported Outcomes and Behavioural Evidence (PROBE) initiative was established to investigate critical topics to better understand health-related quality of life (HRQOL) of cancer patients and to educate clinicians, policy makers, and healthcare providers. METHODS: The aim of this paper is to review the major research outcomes of the pooled analysis of HRQOL data along with the clinical data. We identified 30 pooled EORTC randomized controlled trials (RCTs), 18 NCIC-Clinical Trials Group RCTs, and two German Ovarian Cancer Study Group RCTs, all using the EORTC QLQ-C30. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: Evidence was found that HRQOL data can offer prognostic information beyond clinical measures and improve prognostic accuracy in cancer RCTs (by 5.9%-8.3%). Moreover, models that considered both patient- and clinician-reported scores gained more prognostic overall survival accuracy for fatigue (P < .001), vomiting (P = .01), nausea (P < .001), and constipation (P = .01). Greater understanding of the association between symptom and/or functioning scales was developed by identifying physical, psychological, and gastrointestinal clusters. Additionally, minimally important differences in interpreting HRQOL changes for improvement and deterioration were found to vary across different patient populations and disease stages. Finally, HRQOL scores are statistically significantly affected by deviations from the intended time point at which the questionnaire is completed. CONCLUSIONS: The use of existing pooled data shows that it is possible to learn about general aspects of cancer HRQOL and methodology. Our work shows that setting up international pooled datasets holds great promise for understanding patients' unmet psychosocial needs and calls for additional empirical investigation to improve clinical care and understand cancer through retrospective HRQOL analyses.

Survivorship and Quality of Life in Head and Neck Cancer.

Head and neck cancer is becoming more common, and survival rates are improving. Human papillomavirus-associated oropharyngeal cancer, in particular, is increasing in incidence and is associated with an excellent prognosis. However, toxicity from disease and treatment leads to long-term impairment, disability, and handicap. Currently, more than 60% of survivors have unmet needs. As the numbers of survivors increase, current models of care will be increasingly inadequate to meet their needs. Exploration of new strategies and models of care to better address quality-of-life issues and meet the needs of survivors of head and neck cancer is urgently required.

Prospective Longitudinal Assessment of Quality of Life for Liver Cancer Patients Treated With Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy.

PURPOSE: To evaluate quality of life (QoL), an important outcome owing to poor long-term survival, after stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) to the liver. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients (n=222) with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), liver metastases, or intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and Child-Pugh A liver function received 24-60 Gy of 6-fraction image-guided SBRT. Prospective QoL assessment was completed with the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core-30 (QLQ-C30) and/or Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Hepatobiliary (FACT-Hep, version 4) questionnaires at baseline and 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after treatment. Ten HCC patients with Child-Pugh B liver function were also treated. RESULTS: The QLQ-C30 was available for 205 patients, and 196 completed the FACT-Hep. No difference in baseline QoL (P = .17) or overall survival (P = .088) was seen between the HCC, liver metastases, and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma patients. Appetite loss and fatigue measured by the QLQ-C30 clinically and statistically worsened by 1 month after treatment but recovered by 3 months. At 3 and 12 months after treatment, respectively, the FACT-Hep score had improved relative to baseline in 13%/19%, worsened in 36%/27%, and remained stable in 51%/54%. Using the QLQ-C30 Global Health score, QoL improved in 16%/23%, worsened in 34%/39%, and remained stable in 50%/38% at 3 and 12 months, respectively. Median survival was 17.0 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 12.3-19.8 months). Higher baseline scores on both FACT-Hep and QLQ-C30 Global Health were associated with improved survival. Hazard ratios for death, per 10-unit decrease in QoL, were 0.90 (95% CI 0.83-0.98; P = .001) and 0.88 (95% CI 0.82-0.95; P = .001), respectively. Tumor size was inversely correlated with survival. CONCLUSIONS: Liver SBRT temporarily worsens appetite and fatigue, but not overall QoL. Stereotactic body radiation therapy is well tolerated and warrants comparison against other liver-directed therapies.

Assessment of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire for use in patients after neck dissection for head and neck cancer.

BACKGROUND: In this cross-sectional study, the sensibility, test-retest reliability, and validity of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire were assessed in patients who underwent neck dissection. METHODS: Sensibility was assessed with a questionnaire. Test-retest reliability was performed with completion of the DASH questionnaire 2 weeks after initial completion; validity, by evaluating differences in scores between patients undergoing different types of neck dissections and correlating DASH scores with Neck Dissection Impairment Index (NDII) scores. RESULTS: The DASH questionnaire met sensibility criteria. For test-retest reliability analysis, the intraclass coefficient was 0.91. The DASH questionnaire showed differences between patients who underwent accessory nerve-sacrifice and nerve-sparing neck dissection. DASH questionnaire scores strongly correlated with NDII scores (r = -0.86). CONCLUSION: Although this study provides preliminary data on some psychometric properties of the DASH questionnaire in patients who have undergone a neck dissection, further assessment of responsiveness and other properties are required.