Consensus report from the 10th Global Forum for Liver Magnetic Resonance Imaging: developments in HCC management.

The 10th Global Forum for Liver Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) was held as a virtual 2-day meeting in October 2021, attended by delegates from North and South America, Asia, Australia, and Europe. Most delegates were radiologists with experience in liver MRI, with representation also from specialists in liver surgery, oncology, and hepatology. Presentations, discussions, and working groups at the Forum focused on the following themes: • Gadoxetic acid in clinical practice: Eastern and Western perspectives on current uses and challenges in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) screening/surveillance, diagnosis, and management • Economics and outcomes of HCC imaging • Radiomics, artificial intelligence (AI) and deep learning (DL) applications of MRI in HCC. These themes are the subject of the current manuscript. A second manuscript discusses multidisciplinary tumor board perspectives: how to approach early-, mid-, and late-stage HCC management from the perspectives of a liver surgeon, interventional radiologist, and oncologist (Taouli et al, 2023). Delegates voted on consensus statements that were developed by working groups on these meeting themes. A consensus was considered to be reached if at least 80% of the voting delegates agreed on the statements. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: This review highlights the clinical applications of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI for liver cancer screening and diagnosis, as well as its cost-effectiveness and the applications of radiomics and AI in patients with liver cancer. KEY POINTS: • Interpretation of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI differs slightly between Eastern and Western guidelines, reflecting different regional requirements for sensitivity vs specificity. • Emerging data are encouraging for the cost-effectiveness of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI in HCC screening and diagnosis, but more studies are required. • Radiomics and artificial intelligence are likely, in the future, to contribute to the detection, staging, assessment of treatment response and prediction of prognosis of HCC-reducing the burden on radiologists and other specialists and supporting timely and targeted treatment for patients.

Assessment of prognostic value and interreader agreement of ANALI scores in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis.

PURPOSE: ANALI-scores are two prognostic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based scores developed for patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC). Our study aims to assess the interreader agreement between expert radiologists of the two ANALI-scores and of the radiological parameters they utilize, and to test the prognostic performance of the scores in our population. METHOD: Three radiologists evaluated MRIs of 98 PSC-patients from a prospectively collected cohort with median follow-up of 6.7 years. Each parameter of ANALI-scores was assessed, and the scores were calculated. Interreader agreement was assessed with intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). After consensus reading was reached, the prognostic value of ANALI-scores was assessed with Cox regression, and outcome-free survival rates were evaluated with Kaplan-Meier estimates. RESULTS: The ANALI-score without gadolinium had poor to moderate (ICC = 0.56, 95 %CI: 0.42-0.68) and with gadolinium poor (ICC = 0.30, 95 %CI: 0.16-0.44) agreement. Liver deformity (ICC = 0.28, 95 %CI: 0.13-0.44) and parenchymal enhancement heterogeneity (ICC = 0.24, 95 %CI: 0.12-0.38) had poor agreement. Portal hypertension had poor to moderate (ICC = 0.48, 95 %CI: 0.36-0.59) and dilatation of the intrahepatic ducts had moderate (ICC = 0.64, 95 %CI: 0.54-0.73) agreement. Hazard ratios for liver-related death, transplantation or cirrhosis decompensation of the ANALI-scores with and without gadolinium were 3.53 (95 %CI: 1.40-8.93) and 2.25 (95 %CI: 1.56-3.24), respectively. Outcome-free survival was better for patients with low ANALI-scores. CONCLUSIONS: The ANALI-scores show poor to moderate agreement, which challenges their usefulness in clinical practice. They are associated with clinical outcomes, confirming the value of imaging in prognosis of PSC, but need further multicenter evaluation.

Evaluation of neutral oral contrast agents for assessment of the small bowel at abdominal staging CT.

BACKGROUND: Although neutral oral contrast agents are widely in use, a consensus regarding a standardized protocol in abdominal staging CT does not exist. PURPOSE: To test the null hypothesis that there is no quantitative or qualitative difference between water and mannitol for evaluation of the small bowel at abdominal staging CT. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 180 patients prospectively underwent abdominal staging CT with oral administration of either 1 liter mannitol solution (n = 88) or water (n = 92). Intestinal distension was measured in 6 different segments of the small intestine. In addition, two radiologists separately evaluated diagnostic image quality with regards to luminal distension (three-point scale) in each segment and the possibility to rule out a possible underlying pathology. Quantitative and qualitative results were compared (Mann-Whitney test). RESULTS: Quantitatively, intestinal distension was comparable in all segments (p>0.05), except for the horizontal duodenum (p = 0.019). The mean luminal diameter over all intestinal segments was 19.0 mm (18.1-19.9 mm) for the water group and 18.4 mm (17.5-19.2 mm) for the mannitol group, respectively. Qualitatively, ratings were comparable for the first three segments, while distal segments were rated better using mannitol. Side effects were only observed using mannitol (n = 26; 29.5%). CONCLUSIONS: Orally administered water and mannitol solution for evaluation of the small bowel at abdominal staging CT in clinical routine resulted in comparable results for the quantitative, but not for the qualitative analysis. Looking more differentiated at the overall performance, water has advantages in terms of patient comfort, side effects and costs, and can therefore be regarded as noninferior to mannitol in this specific patient group.

Lesion detection and assessment of extrahepatic findings in abdominal MRI using hepatocyte specific contrast agents--comparison of Gd-EOB-DTPA and Gd-BOPTA.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the contrast agent performance of Gd-EOB-DTPA and Gd-BOPTA for detection and assessment of extrahepatic findings, semi-quantitatively and qualitatively. METHODS: 13 patients with 19 extrahepatic lesions underwent liver MRI with Gd-EOB-DTPA and Gd-BOPTA. Quantitative and relative SNR measurements were performed in each dataset in the arterial and portalvenous phase within the extrahepatic lesion, aorta, inferior vena cava, portal vein, spleen, pancreas and renal cortex. Further, relative CNR measurements were performed. Three readers assessed contrast quality using a five-point scale and choosing the preferred image dataset. Statistical analysis consisted of a Student's t-test with p < 0.05 deemed significant, a weighted kappa statistic for assessment of interobserver variability and an ROC analysis. RESULTS: Mean SNR after injection of Gd-BOPTA was significantly higher compared with Gd-EOB-DTPA for all measurements (p < 0.05). Mean relative SNR was also higher for Gd-BOPTA, but without being statistically significant. There was no significant difference in relative CNR. Interobserver agreement for selection of image preference was moderate (mean weighted kappa 0.485). The area under the curve for the ROC-analysis regarding contrast agent performance was 0.464. CONCLUSION: Even though mean SNR is significantly higher after injection of Gd-BOPTA compared with Gd-EOB-DTPA, there is no significant difference in relative CNR with extrahepatic lesions being assessed equally well. Visual impression may differ after injection of Gd-EOB-DTPA, but does not influence image interpretation. Extrahepatic findings can be assessed similarly to MRI after injection of Gd-BOPTA.